User talk:MasterRecs

October 2008

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Del Amitri. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jonobennett (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Iggy Pop, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Knippschild (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw these two notes regarding my posting of links. I do not understand your comments since Wikipedia:

(1) routinely uses information from my website; (2) allows All Music Group, IMDB and other sites to post on as many pages as they wish--clearly they are commeercial sites; (3) the links I am posting are to specific pages with information that is often unique.

I am not attempting to "spam" Wikipedia. My site is about A&M Records artists. There were 2400 of them. I read the Wiki spam page and do not feel that I am in violation of your rules.

See WP:LINKSTOAVOID:

5 Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services, (...)

6 Links to sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content, (...)

If i look for Brenda Russell i see some -copyrighted- pictures of disccovers and i can purchase information about that artist and others. This is not in line with Wikipedia policy. If i see the amount of links you have placed in about 4 hours time, this is spamming. EdBever (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add to this, the guidelines on external links clearly state:

"You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked." -- the links you've post are in direct contravention of this. The links you see to IMDB, etc. weren't posted there by anyone affiliated with those organisations, but by other Wikipedians. Jonobennett (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your claims of Copyvio

I'm sorry to hear you believe your copyright content is being used without your permission in Wikipedia. This is something that's taken very seriously, and will be dealt with if you follow the correct procedure: You can contact [e-mail] with an informal request; please cite the exact URL, and provide enough information to substantiate your claim of copyright ownership. Be aware that correspondence is answered by a small number of volunteers, and an immediate reply may not be possible.

Jonobennett (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]