User talk:Mason7512/Archives/2024/September


April 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, DeRay Mckesson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 01:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cuban-American Bar Association, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Spanish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Placement of inline references

Hi, it's great that you're adding references to articles, but I want to point out that if there's a comma after a statement inline references for this statement should always be placed after said comma (same goes for almost all other kinds of punctuation, see MOS:REFPUNCT, but I noticed the comma issue in particular in your edits). I've corrected this for two of your edits, but it would be great if you could go through your past edits and make sure that that is the case for the references you added, and, of course, please follow this rule in your future edits. Thanks! Felida97 (talk) 23:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC) PS: You also added "Dr." to a subject's lead in one of your edits, which was also not in line with the Manual of Style (see MOS:DOCTOR), which you should keep in mind for future edits (I've reverted this instance already).

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kerry Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uriel Bertran (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mason7512! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asian-Colombians has been accepted

Asian-Colombians, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2013 Zacatecas State Elections (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Yes, primary sources are good but doesn't necessarily slow credible verifiability. You may also need to add WP:SECONDARYSOURCES from newspapers, articles, and magazines to show the significance of the event.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somos Región Colombia has been accepted

Somos Región Colombia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Om Ki Reo Escena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Tiempo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uriel Bertran has been accepted

Uriel Bertran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hernando González Acosta (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Day of Combating Sand and Dust Storms (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Mason7512, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social and Political Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Tiempo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mason7512. Thank you for your work on Embassy of Palestine, Bogotá. Another editor, Wasianpower, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very cool article! It could use expansion on the history of how this embassy and diplomatic mission came to be, that's my biggest question when reading it

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Wasianpower}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Please add reasons to the article's talk page

Hello, you just suggested that the article Robert D. Peloquin might not meet neutrality standards. Please add your reasons to the talk page for that article, so that I can properly address them. Guylaen (talk) 00:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Clearly I don’t know these templates very well

I’m glad you and the others have been suggesting improvements on my redirects I’ve been making. Because I don’t know all the redirect templates, I’m not very good at templates. So thank you. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 19:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 04:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: United Nations Decade for Deserts and the Fight Against Desertification (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
Try finding other sources than just the UN's own website. I'd admit other 'International Decades' articles on Wikipedia are of poor quality, so I do not recommend using them as examples.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 13:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Question about Stub Page

Hello! I have a question, I have recently improved the page of Al-Sāʾib bin ʿUthmān bin Maẓʿūn and there's no much information about him in islamic sources, that's all that you can find and there's not much to add.

- Saludos!

~~~~ Karim Ibn Karim (talk) 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Good improvements on the article! Based on the limited amount of information seemingly available about the subject, I have changed its class from stub to start (as you said, there seems to be little more major details to add) per WP:STUBDEF- There is no set size at which an article stops being a stub.
- Saludos ☆ Mason7512 (talk) 14:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! You also added great improvements!
Ah I see, no issue then!
- Saludos! Karim Ibn Karim (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ʿAbdullāh bin Maẓʿūn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Comments on your edit

Thanks for contributing to my new article. The reasons I reverted parts of your edit are:

  • Wikipedia:No original research
    • "This led Labor MPs to accuse the Coalition" is an interpretation not directly based on a source.
    • Linking the word "racist" to Anti-Palestinianism is interpretive.
  • Curly quotation marks are deprecated in Wikipedia: MOS:APOSTROPHE
  • I changed the lead sentence back to present perfect ("a dispute has existed"), given it is ongoing.

Y. Dongchen (talk) 06:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for making me aware. Mason7512 (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Ajit Kumar Mohanty

Hey, I was considering nominating this article for AfD. I noticed that you marked it as reviewed, and I wanted to ask how this article meets the notability guidelines. GrabUp - Talk 14:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I considered him to meet WP:NPOL as a Secretary to the Government of India, a national office and secondarily WP:NACADEMIC for his awards, positions, and work in nuclear physics. Please correct me if I have misunderstood any criteria or misinterpreted any biographical information. Thank you ☆ Mason7512 (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
@Mason7512: WP:NPOL applies to politicians and judges, and it is not an elected body. However, I now agree, as I can see that the subject has received many awards in the field of science, which can make him notable. Thanks for the reply. GrabUp - Talk 14:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)