User talk:Marko75

Concern about licensing of Image:AmigaOS4b.png

Hiya, I noticed this image when looking up AmigaOS 4, and have a concern about licensing issues. While screenshots of non-free software tend not to be a problem, and are generally counted as "fair use", the image rather prominently displays an image of Crazy Frog as the desktop wallpaper, who (as far as I know) is a copyrighted character... the fair use rationale for AmigaOS obviously cannot apply to Crazy Frog, who is nothing to do with the OS or with the article, so for licensing reasons, it would probably be optimal if you could replace this image with one that was almost identical but with a different wallpaper (something free, or a plain gradient, or something). In fact, for demonstration of the default GUI, the default wallpaper *may* be the most illustrative option. Thanks! Xmoogle (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately, I don't have the option to replace the wallpaper so I manually removed Crazy Frog (most of it) from the image. Marko75 (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That works great! I don't think anyone will care legally about the leftover foot in the background :) Thanks! Xmoogle (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marko75. You have new messages at MSGJ's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Template:AmigaOS4

I disagree with having an AmigaOS4-specific template on just about every Amiga-related article. There is an AmigaOS template, which includes information about the 4.x releases. Since there is a specific article about AmigaOS 4, I guess it can make sense to have a template specific for it and for articles that are strongly tied to AmigaOS 4 only, but there is no pointing in filling all Amiga-related article with over-specific information. --LjL (talk) 21:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you have a point. Here after, I'll put the AmigaOS4 template only on articles that are strongly tied to AmigaOS 4. --Marko75 (talk) 22:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Amiga Walker Motherboard.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Amiga Walker Motherboard.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pais (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raubtier

The article Raubtier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only third-party references are blogs.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Citation is needed for AmigaOne X1000

The article on AmigaOne X1000 lists the specifications for the CPU, but as far as I know, the CPU is still unannounced. While I know that many have investigated the possibility of what it'll be, based on evidence/specs given, the CPU was never directly mentioned and would constitute original research. (unless of course an announcement was made that I happened to miss). Just go ahead and find some citations as soon as ya can. Thanks. —ᚹᚩᛞᛖᚾᚻᛖᛚᛗ (ᚷᛖᛋᛈᚱᛖᚳ) 08:19, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've added a citation now, please see if that is sufficient :) Marko75 (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, looks good to me. Hopefully it wont be too costly when it comes out, I wouldnt mind getting one. —ᚹᚩᛞᛖᚾᚻᛖᛚᛗ (ᚷᛖᛋᛈᚱᛖᚳ) 21:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CommodoreOne

I see you added CommodoreOne to list of Amiga clones. What makes this Amiga clone? I can not find information of such.Xorxos (talk) 05:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where, which article? Marko75 (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Amiga_hardware and C-One. Xorxos (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see... The C-One article mentions it was expanded to include an Amiga core in 2008, and the Natami prototype was based on a C-One mainboard. Marko75 (talk) 16:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so it seems... but article lacks references. I tried to look at C-One homepage but couldnt find it. I found this but it only says up to 128MB multimedia memory for graphics, music and copper data. At the bottom: The Copper processor is designed to make adjustments to the video chip 'on the fly' as the video chip draws the screen the copper can be set to activate at specific pixel locations - upon activation it can modify the video registers with new values. This is how split screen, layered screen and/or mixed video effects are so easy on the Amiga. The Copper command list has three commands 'Wait for Raster Value', 'Skip Function if Event,' and 'Store Value to Register'. but I dont see claim it is compatible to Amiga Copper.Xorxos (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, how compatible C-One is with 68k software I can not say, and where to draw the line if it's a clone or not is debatable, I think. However, I'm neutral to if C-One should still be included in the template. Marko75 (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Raubtier.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Raubtier.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Category:AmigaOS 4 software

How is this programming language related to OS4? -- Polluks <span style="color:ForestGreen">★</span> (talk) 18:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean exactly? Do you mean, how programming languages are related to OS4? -Marko75 (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen no relation between Modula-2 and OS4, there is no strong binding like C and Unix -- Polluks ★ 12:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you objecting against that Modula-2 is listed as an available language in the OS4 template, did I understand you right? In that case, there is a Modula-2 Native PPC compiler to OS4 here: http://os4depot.net/index.php?function=showfile&file=development/language/agletm2ppc.lha -Marko75 (talk) 13:43, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natami for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natami(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. v/r - TP 22:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AmigaOne X1000 case.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmigaOne X1000 case.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Raubtier.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Raubtier.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:AmigaOne Micro-A1.png

Thanks for uploading File:AmigaOne Micro-A1.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sam440ep.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sam440ep.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sam440ep-flex.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sam440ep-flex.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sam440ep-flex rev 1.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sam440ep-flex rev 1.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lech (demo)

The article Lech (demo) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus ^(talk) 09:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lech by Freezers.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lech by Freezers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. czar ⨹ 13:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Amiga

Hi. Is WikiProject Amiga still functional? I see your name listed among the participants but I don't see much action there. H.dryad (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ACube Systems Srl

The article ACube Systems Srl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable company

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. H.dryad (talk) 21:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marko75. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marko75. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User WikiProject Amiga

Template:User WikiProject Amiga has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Legacypac (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User WikiProject Amiga

Template:User WikiProject Amiga, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User WikiProject Amiga and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User WikiProject Amiga during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marko75. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amiga Forever for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amiga Forever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amiga Forever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FreeMediaKid$ 23:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]