en User talk:MarcGarver Archive 39

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MarcGarver. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 35

←

Archive 37

→

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings

In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff

In the media: Many layers of fake news: Fake fiction and fake news vandalism

Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users

Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes

Op-Ed: We couldn't have told you this, but Wikipedia was censored

Opinion: The Curious Case of Croatian Wikipedia

Community view: Chinese Wikipedia and the battle against extradition from Hong Kong

News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year

Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research

On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wittington Investments

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wittington Investments. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Noah Kraft

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noah Kraft. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Declan Arthurs (Irish republican), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 13:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Noah Kraft

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noah Kraft. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Honda Ridgeline

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Honda Ridgeline. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi

You have put a tag on page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Swift_Retort_(film) could you explain why you said article is not notable for wikipedia policy ? it is featured in newspapers and having international and national news coverage. the film is showing the real incidents which i have mentioned and the sources from news saying the same that the real incident shown in this film. kindly remove the tag if possible

Few examples of pakistani animated film: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Glassworker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dajjal:_The_Slayer_and_His_Followers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraaq — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 08:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

I noticed that i added al jazeera article which was my mistake rests are for films. i have added IMDB as well as per wikipedia film notability the film having significant coverage in newspapers / blogs / news websites. can you please let me know how to fix the tag you put ?

i have followed this Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Resources and according to this i have fixed the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 09:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

while the incident may be notable, the film does not inherit its notability. That is, the film itself is just a made-for-YouTube film and has little / no established notability in its own right. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

How you can say that film is not notable ? the film has been featured in "the news" newspaper london edition which can be seen here http://e.thenews.com.pk/london/9-9-2019/page9.asp the film is featured in the news and gulf and many other then why its not notable ? many films here from pakistan even they have one referenced are approved and called as notable , this wikipedia page was checked by two administrator and they have approved / patrolled / fixed the mistakes.

you have removed this news http://globalvillagespace.com/operation-swift-retort-pakistans-befitting-reply-to-indian-aggression/ have you seen that this is clearly showing about the film. please check all the references. according to wikipedia 3 references are enough to show notability

for example this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buz-e-Chini — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 11:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm afraid that's not true. It is not the number of references but their quality, reliability and - very importantly - whether they demonstrate notability. I don't think the film is notable and most of the references are trivial passing mentions or self-published. I'll leave it to the community to decide via the WP:AFD process. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Sure please put the deletion tag on this films as well , awaiting for your response.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dajjal:_The_Slayer_and_His_Followers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Glassworker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraaq https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Evil_Marriage — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 11:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)