User talk:Marah Gh 90

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Marah Gh 90, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 08:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Barıs Ulusoy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ali Barıs Ulusoy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you Marah Gh 90 (talk) 09:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Please do not email me asking me to create articles. Only confidential information should be sent via email. MaxnaCarta (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize @MaxnaCarta, can you give your opinion on the article + sources, thank you Marah Gh 90 (talk) 09:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto from me. You should instead draft the article yourself. You can then submit it for review.--Ipigott (talk) 06:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok @Ipigott, can you help to create it Marah Gh 90 (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You should create the draft yourself, remembering that the subject needs to be covered in some detail in at least three independent sources, for example from newspapers, journals or published books; from reports in relation to recognized awards; or from critical reviews of published work. If you are unable to find such sources, the article is unlikely to be accepted.--Ipigott (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, so it has been disallowed Marah Gh 90 (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott i see this message User:Marah Gh 90|Marah Gh 90]] (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you take a look at the topic @Ipigott and give me your opinion, it has sources in several languages. Marah Gh 90 (talk) 06:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Someone is already preparing a draft - see User:Ali Mahmoud Al Suleiman. If you look for "Ali Al Suleiman (journalist)" you will see an article at Everybodywiki which looks to me as if it was once a Wikipedia article which has been deleted. As you are a new contributor, you will probably find it difficult to have a new article on this person accepted.--Ipigott (talk) 07:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this information @Ipigott - but what do you think of the sources, as you said, there are 3 English sources from newspapers and interviews
+ In Arabic and Turkish, you talk in detail about the subject, what do you think? Marah Gh 90 (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
for example you Can see English Sources - Daily Sabah https://www.dailysabah.com/arts/ali-al-suleiman-the-syrian-translator-behind-turkish-soap-operas-conquering-the-arab-world/news + TRT WORLD + Anadolu Agency Marah Gh 90 (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is indeed one valid source but you cannot use the same article several times just because it has been taken up by other sites. I don't think I can help you further and in any case I am no expert on translators between the languages in question. Several contributors and sock puppets have tried to create or re-create the article. See, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Al Suleiman (journalist). I don't think there's any point in discussing this further.--Ipigott (talk) 08:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok what is your advice for this subject @Ipigott Is it possible, for example, to re-create the article from an experienced editor and review it so it can be acceptable? Thank you for your time Marah Gh 90 (talk) 08:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As I have said, my advice is not to spend any more time on creating this article. As I cannot help you further, please do not continue this discussion.--Ipigott (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much @Ipigott Marah Gh 90 (talk) 08:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genan Wakil

Hello, Marah Gh 90,

For some unknown reason, you tagged an article for CSD speedy deletion when you already tagged it for an AFD discussion. This makes no sense at all which isn't surprising since you have only been active as an editor for a week. CSD G5 doesn't even apply to this article. You are taking on tasks you do not have the experience to do. Please slow down and work on improving articles and stay away from deletion tagging until you understand deletion policies better and have much, much more experience improving articles so you are well aware of when an article doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for notability.

If you have questions about deletion tagging or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse where you can get a second opinion from experienced editors. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear @Liz I'm really sorry no problem I will work on the Guidelines well and understand them , + I think that there are not enough sources, so the page should be deleted. Some links do not work and there are no complete details in 3 independent sources Marah Gh 90 (talk) 07:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The reasons you can't make the edits you want to make is because you are tripping an edit filter that is set up to prevent a LTA sockpuppet from recreating an article that they refuse to stop recreating. If you are a sockpuppet, it means you'll probably be blocked soon. Liz Read! Talk! 07:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:علي أبو عمر per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/علي أبو عمر. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 10:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]