User talk:Mamallarnarashimavarman

Welcome

Hello, Mamallarnarashimavarman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Mamallarnarashimavarman, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Veeran Sundaralingam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pannadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pannadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pannadi

I am putting up reference for it,it will be helpful if u could help me out with page Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devendrakula Velalar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anja divisions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anja divisions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Geolodus (talk) 05:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atha divisions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atha divisions, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ymblanter (talk) 05:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amma divisions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amma divisions, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ymblanter (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amma divisions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Amma divisions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. lovkal (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent speedy deletion nominations

Please stop placing speedy deletion tags on articles, as you do not appear to understand the criteria. If you wish to nominate an article for deletion then the correct forum is WP:Articles for Deletion. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chozhia Vellalar Pages like this have contents without references so what should be done? Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 06:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Chozhia Vellalar already has three tags for needing sources (the little superscript "citation needed" notes), which you can add by typing {{cn}} after the sentence/paragraph that is not properly sourced, like this.[citation needed] You can also add {{refimprove}} at the top of an article, if the article generally needs improved referencing, and {{refimprove-section}} for a single section. If you look at Template:More citations needed#Differences_from_related_templates, you will find lots of other specific examples of ways to tag as needing improved sourcing.
As I wrote above, if you believe a long-standing article needs deleting, it is usually best to take it to WP:Articles for Deletion, so that the community can discuss whether or not it should be deleted. There's an guide for new editors at Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process. Hope this helps, Espresso Addict (talk) 07:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saptur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pillai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 13:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Devendra Kula Vellalar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Largoplazo (talk) 18:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Agna divisions concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Agna divisions, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE: How to protect pages from vandalism

Only WP:Admins can protect pages. If you require their assistance for page protection, you can request it at Wikipedia:Request for page protection. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 18:08, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agna divisions

Hello, Mamallarnarashimavarman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agna divisions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raj sources

We do not use Raj era sources as they are not considered reliable. Please do not reinstate them as you have been doing today. - Sitush (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Kudumbar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I will write using my own words Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 19:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal

Why do this? It is obvious to me that you and the person who added that entry to the list are having a bit of a fight between yourselves across numerous articles but, certainly in this instance, the entry was valid in terms of sourcing and aligned with the linked article. You gave no reason at all for removal, so I have reverted you. - Sitush (talk) 19:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find it in the source if I am not mistaken, that's why I removed it. Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 19:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh this one let me go thru it again, thank you for letting me know Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 19:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sitush (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am very close to asking an admin to block you for edit warring across a multitude of articles. Examples: Mala (caste), Velalar, Devendra kulam, Kudumbar, Devaneya Pavanar, and Thenkalam. In some cases, this seems to have been going on for days now. It has to stop. You already know from the protection applied at Devendra Kulathan by El C that these things should be discussed, not warred over. I am tempted to revert all articles to the state they were in prior to both the edits of yourself and EruTheLord. - Sitush (talk) 14:04, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand, but why aren't the issues being discussed before making the change that is what I don't understand. I was reverting back because all the users are new and they editing on their own way. There is another user which I saw who is also doing something similar. This are the two users EruTheLord & Abjith Iyer. I have no personal conflicts with them, this is what I would like to clarify too. Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 15:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed that there are now several accounts in opposition to you. I have just said this at EruTheLord's talk page. Taking the disputed articles back to prior to your first edit on them might be quite drastic - it depends if unrelated statements etc have been added by others in the intervening time. Nonetheless, it may be the only way forward as I am struggling to see why this has become such a wide problem and where best it might be resolved bearing in mind it does seem to affect a lot of articles now. - Sitush (talk) 15:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, they (your "opponents") are definitely correct in some cases. For example, this is not what the source says. It specifically says the Pallars and you cannot start changing things to DVK just because you prefer that. It looks like I will have to revert a lot of your edits. - Sitush (talk) 17:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As a further example to the above, this edit in February is, like that above, still being edit warred by you today. Why? The thing was not sourced then and seemingly never has been so there is no way you could reach the conclusion you did without using original research. Am I really going to have to check everything you have done since February? It's appalling. - Sitush (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This one, which you have edit warred over, is a straight violation of WP:BLP - we do not state the caste of living people unless we have a reliable source which shows them self-identifying as a member of that caste. - Sitush (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So far, I reckon I have reverted in excess of 50 edits made by you, all of them unsupported by sources etc. This is another egregious example of WP:POV - why on earth did you think it was ok to remove that information without first getting consensus to do so? Of course, you'd tried several times and that should have made it clear to you that your version was contested. - Sitush (talk) 19:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay bro noted, for this one samathuvapuram, the background is unrelated to the article that's why i said it's unrelated to the topic. Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you go through this source and see, this is a latest anthropology report https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/3_APJABSS_v5i2_2019_pp.-21-33.pdf Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 03:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be very blase about these problems that I have found. What am I supposed to be looking for in that paper? It looks suspiciously like a predatory journal to me and, if so, wouldn't be reliable anyway. - Sitush (talk) 04:41, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I've read it. It is near-useless for what you are trying to do. You are trying to impose a claim to Devendra K classification as a fact, eg: it says The seven subcommunities (five groups excluding Devendrakulathan and Pallan) have come together in a social movement for a collective identity, their cause being revivalistic in character with regard to their Identity. The Pallar article already notes this claim and there is nothing wrong with noting similarly in the related articles but what you cannot do is go around tens of articles changing Pallar to read Devendrakula Velalar etc. It simply does not align with the majority of reliable sources and is clearly a politicised movement. - Sitush (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The study was done by madras university after the government ordered them to do soo. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/centre-to-depute-anthropologists-to-tamil-nadu/article8217043.ece/amp/

The report was the outcome of Shobana Sharma & Prof S. Sumathi University of Madras, Chennai. India.

Yes Agreed sometimes it was a political movement, but this one is not. The conclusion of the report is one of the few things I would like to highlight.

1) This was from the article The study validated the above facts through historical, archeological and empirical evidences. The ethnographic documentation of the seven sub-communities has followed the scien- tific approach. Ethnologically the seven sub-communities were analyzed to establish the identity. The identity among the sub communities is Devendakula Velalar. In conclusion, this study recommends that the claim of the sub communities (Kudumban, Pannadi, Kadayan, Kaladi, Vathiriyaan, Pallan and Devendra Kulathan) for a singular identity of Devendrakula Velalar is FACTUAL AND JUSTIFED. There are no significant limitations in the present study as the study covered the required demographic distribution. The study could not factor the population who has migrated to other states.

2) The origin of Kudumbar is also explained that it is associated with the origin of the velalar in Tamil Nadu.

3) Another thing that is often confused is Velalar and Vellalar. Both are different and both means different. I will also provide the references here regarding it. Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 05:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vellalar and velalar are in practice one and the same. They are just spelling differences. If you claim otherwise better provide a source, which I am sure you can't. you will be most probably citing some biased documents or unworthy research. EruTheLord (talk) 06:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We are not using any politicised source as a statement of fact. That report is politicsed and you have said as much yourself - the university was ordered to do it. We can mention things like this but it is wrong to deny decades of other reliable sources etc just because one report says differently, especially when that one report is the outcome of all sorts of revisionist history pressure being applied on politicians. - Sitush (talk) 06:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should be addressing this to mamallanarasimhavarman I suppose. EruTheLord (talk) 06:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to but neither of you seem to have much clue about how to indent on talk pages - this is a problem at pretty much every talk page where the pair of you interact. - Sitush (talk) 07:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sitush, if you find the absence of WP:INDENT occuring regularly, you may summarily remove any such comments from these two editors until they figure it out. If this is how article talk pages look like, then it's disruptive to the stability of those pages. Competence is required. El_C 11:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source query

Hi, I have queried a source here. You've used it quite a lot and in ways that may be contentious, so we really could do with a resolution otherwise I think it will have to be removed from all the articles where you cited it. I can ask other people to check the thing but since you are active it is easiest to ask you as the person who added it in the first place. - Sitush (talk) 09:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What am I supposed to do? Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 10:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Go to the cited page in the source and provide a quote of what it says to support Pannadi is a subcaste of the Pallar and are found in Kongu Nadu, which is located in the western region of Tamil Nadu, India or whatever it says if it does not say that. The quote can be put on the article talk page. There are also two uses of the p 74 of that source at Devendrakula Velalar and they appear to contradict each other, so a quote relating to that would be handy also. If it is easier, scan or photograph the page from the book and email it to me but be aware that if you do that it will disclose your email address to me. - Sitush (talk) 11:49, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay bro understood, will do it as soon as possible Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 15:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have quote what it says in the source for pannadi. For Devendrakula Velalar will do it and let u know. Mamallarnarashimavarman (talk) 04:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have replied at Talk:Pannadi, which is where this should be. - Sitush (talk) 06:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block from Devendra Kulathan

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 12:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been topic banned indefinitely from all caste-related pages, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for long-term disruption of caste-related pages. I'm sorry, but you are a net negative when it comes to these pages, especially in the context of your constant edit warring with your counterpart.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 04:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block

To enforce an arbitration decision and for topic ban violations, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

El_C 16:16, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

  • You recently posted to my talk page, asking me to make an edit to what you called "the Kudumbar article". On checking the relevant editing history I found that there are two serious problems with the edit request you posted to me. Firstly, you were asking me to restore content which you have in the past added to the article more than once; in other words you were asking me to help you to edit-war by proxy, in such a way that the edit-warring would not be attributed to you. Secondly, you were asking me to make an edit on your behalf on a topic from which you are banned; in other words you were asking me to help you evade your topic ban by proxy. I would have simply given you a warning not to do either of those again, were it not for the fact that you have previously been blocked both for edit-warring and for evasion of your topic ban. I have therefore blocked you from editing again, this time for a substantially longer time than either of your previous blocks, in the hope that this may get the message through to you. If I see that you continue to attempt to evade your topic ban, to edit war, to try to get any other editor to make edits on your behalf to avoid sanctions for making those edits again, or to do any other kind of unacceptable editing that you have been warned about, I shall be likely to block you for very much longer than I have done on this occasion. Please simply leave the whole topic from which you are banned. JBW (talk) 21:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mamallarnarashimavarman. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pannadi

Notice

The article Pannadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is enwiki not Tamil wiki. No evidence this word is recognised in English - although there is evidence of a film of this name and also a Dalit people. However, that's not what's presented here and until something valid and sourced is created, this is cruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kudumbar

Notice

The article Kudumbar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is enwiki not Tamil wiki. No evidence this word is recognised in English.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]