|
User talk:Malkinann/Archive 2
Start PR processCan you start the Peer Review process for List of Canaan episodes cause the nominator can't be the reviewer. Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 05:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Cookie time Enjoy this cookie and the fact that you are now an autoreviewer. Don't create article faster than i can pre-check them :p
revertagain, the problem is that i got the last word and yet no one will respond. the problem is that people stop and end up archiving it. for now i'm looking for someone who doesn't even know NGE to decide whether the list of references that people have made multiple assumptions is trvial or not.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC) the problem is that we dont have enough, i'm looking for a nuetral person, actually, i just checked an hour go and noticed someoen actually agreeing with me. i also asked other ones not familiar with this. it was simple discussion whith gwern to see whther the points can work on my favor until folken took it as a full fledge discussion to decide whether they should be removed or added. i was offenced and supported my thoughts.
that is incredibly prejudice. either way, if that was the case then they will just be imature. like i said, i'm loking for arbitration with a mod or some adopter, but everytime i do, folken thinks it's an act against him personally. i really wish you did hear me out that time, e completely harrased me and hopefully it wont happen again.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC) your ideas only affect the article discussions. but what happens when it comes to someones page? i told you about this one, and you ignored me completely. didnt even respond onceBread Ninja (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC) regarding a certain person who was being uncivil, so i asked you to tell him to tone it down considering some tension between us would lead to a fight. you ignored me while the person kept bothering me saying "he was never uncivil". than he accused me of me out to get him and trying to turn other contributors against him. and as much as i tried to explain, he kept bothering.Bread Ninja (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC) i know your not anyones keeper. i was merely tryin to find someone who was in good terms to pass the message without him getting angry. either way his method of thinking is always taking to the personal level when it comes to me or he assumes some personal grudge someone has, and really though i do have some personal grudge, I'm trying not to get in the way of discussion. well anyways............. as vague as that section is, I'll drop it. for now I'm concentrating on summarizing the plot and thinking about removing "Honnêamise sequel" within Origin and production. feel free to discuss it since no one is.Bread Ninja (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC) PingCheck Color (manga) talk page. --KrebMarkt 16:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC) There's a pile of English reviews on the bottom of that page. 211.30.12.191 (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC) as User:Extremepro Summary StyleExactly where are you referring to on that page? Dandy Sephy (talk) 01:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Re: ThanksI'm glad you were able to use the additional information in the oil section of the Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef article. That list of wells was taken from my book on the history of AIMS. I think the article's pretty good - you've covered both the historical and modern issues very well. Peter Bell (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC) ManzaiI'm glad to see that you are working on that article! I'll see what I can do about it... WhisperToMe (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Urusei YatsuraI came across my movie program for Beautiful Dreamer and thought the promotional image from the movie would serve a dual purpose of illustrating the anime style as well as a media type (I have the LP of the ost as well). The common promotional image is [1], let me know what you think. It would be either the album version or dvd/vhs cover as the plain image is already used on the movie article. I'll keep looking in the meantime, but the stuff i own is either LP (varies) or movie program (3rd and 4th.) Dandy Sephy (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
sorry for angelic daysjust letting you know that i wont be able to enter the information in on the production section of angelic days due to my manga archive is in storage. sorry, though frankly, i don't think there was any notable or important information on the manga series.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Courtesy noteYou are receiving this note because you participated in this TFD. Some of these have been re-nominated here, where you may wish to comment. Thanks, –xenotalk 14:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC) A bit busyHi, Sorry to not be much available lately due to the crazy among of unsourced mangaka and Japanese voice actors. Fix one and find two needing to be fixed :( I'm hope, i could spare more time for anything but BLP articles. --KrebMarkt 21:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
If that doesn't make you happySee that one big news. Cheers :) --KrebMarkt 21:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Writing about Moto Hagio......has become a new trend lately enjoy this one (see the last page) from the reliable Japan Foundation. Note: Creating an article for Iguana girl isn't optimum as this short story will be included in the Matt Thorn's collection of short stories scheduled for September. Nevertheless i leave to you the choice to create an article on Iguana girl or not. --KrebMarkt 16:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC) Matt Thorn interviewHe wept reading The Heart of Thomas ;) --KrebMarkt 15:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Old stuffHi, If you remember you dropped me a line not long ago about Alone in My King's Harem. Well the situation is still the same with just a twist. Manga Cast review Mania review both reviews are done the very same Ed Chavez with just a month apart between the two so i can't call a safe for the article, unfortunately. --KrebMarkt 19:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC) hijust wants to says sorry, for being a bit of a jerk. although i changed my views on most things, i still feel a little bit of the same on others. so yeah. anyways, another reason why i came to your talk page was because me and Collectonian confirmed that NGE timeline article does not meet notability guideline and I've been wanting to Afd it or pre-Afd it. but in my last attempt, i dont know how anymore. can you do it for me?Bread Ninja (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC) I started a List of Neon Genesis Evangelion Video Games article on a special page a while back, but i remember you saying you were going to make one, just wondering if you are or discontinued it.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC) Cookie AgainFor taking part of the First Animanga unsourced BLP clean-up drive even it was mostly AfD but someone has to do that part. The clean-up continues now from Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Unreferenced BLPs. Thanks for your contributions. --KrebMarkt 07:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC) HyphenationFor the hyphenation of "magical-girl" when used as an adjective, please see the WP:HYPHEN section of the Wikipedia Manual-of-Style guideline - especially point 3 on compund adjectives. -- HoundsOfSpring (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Moto Hagio 61st birthdayMatt Thorn again ;) The line-up of artists who pay her homage in the book is very very impressive. Leiji Matsumoto, Tetsuya Chiba, Yoshikazu Yasuhiko, Go Nagai, Chica Umino among others. --KrebMarkt 16:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC) ReflinksI've noticed you rarely add full references to the articles you create - only the barelinks (and occasionally with title). Reflink tool can help you with that. Start from your creations from Wikipedia:ANIME/REQUEST? Thanks. 211.30.103.37 (talk) 10:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC) as Extremepro (talk · contribs) Toshiki YuiHi, Malkinann. I see you noticed that I just started to repair the Toshiki Yui entry. It wasn't disastrous, merely very low on the mediocre side. So I've started in on it. If you want to help, that'd be most welcome! Timothy Perper (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Request done Message added Request fulfilled. Also checked Anime Explosion but it had nothing -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. 1. Could you please use up the reviews stashed at the bottom of Ōoku: The Inner Chambers? Thanks.
Id is not a typo, it is part of Freud's theory here: Id, ego, and super-ego. I can't edit her talkpage because its semi-protected.
Change
to
Thanks. 211.30.103.37 (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC) as Extremepro (talk · contribs) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Boys Love round tableHi, just to point you a roundtable around yaoi on the Comics Journal website.
Note that this a very big chunk to digest especially the 4 pages sidebar essay by Dirk Deppey. If you wonder which book he criticized it's this one. --KrebMarkt 20:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC) This article has already been prodded before back in 2008, so it can't be prodded again. But since this is a work by Kouji Seo, I would recommend redirecting it to his article as a viable search term. —Farix (t | c) 12:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Delete article on Boku no Futatsu no Tsubasa?See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boku no Futatsu no Tsubasa and also the discussion page itself for the manga. Timothy Perper (talk) 03:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
I thought about posting the following "comment only" to the deletion page discussion, but suspect that it will only cause irritation and vexation. Which I do not want. What do you think?
I'm sorry, KrebMarkt, but I'm not following your argument. This is not a matter of reliability, but of notability. I believe that Wiki exists to cover and discuss subjects of notable interest to readers, and the existence of scanlations, legal or not, indicates that such interest exists. No one and certainly not me suggests that we use the scanlation site in the article -- I think that's out of the question. But one of the scanlation sites gives 23,000 visits all told to their version of this manga -- I won't give the site. That's a lot. And that is what we mean by "notabiity." This manga is NOT a high school kid's cartoon in a high school newspaper. Timothy Perper (talk) 06:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
@Malkinann Reliability, Notability, and so onThanks for the reference to reliable sources. I think I had seen it -- it seemed familiar. For an encyclopedia that depends on user input, Wiki seems strangely schizy about sources! As far as I can tell, all this stuff comes from the early days of Wikipedia when the founders were trying to prevent a variety of uses they didn't want. One was having people put up long strange articles on "My Theory of the Universe" or "Why God Exists" or "A New View of the Civil War in America" -- which they collectively called "original research" and banned. The "verifiability" criterion was created to prevent loonies from telling us all about the aliens who live on the Moon and they know they're there because they dreamed about them. "Reliability" was designed to prevent other loonies from using crackpot sources like Nostradamus or "The Protocols of Zion" as sources. And "notability" was put in to prevent people from writing wonderful little essays about their pet cat (or parakeet) and all the cute things it does. But all these got changed over the years as various mutually hostile editors discovered they could assault each other using all these terms. It's a shame, because the original idea behind Wikipedia -- that people could create an encyclopedia of reliable knowledge -- sounded like a good idea at the time. But it has proved utopian, a pipe dream, and IMO never came true. That list of "reliable" writers on manga and anime is laughable (and offensive) -- it leaves out so many people. But I'm not going to argue with them about it. Timothy Perper (talk) 11:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
RE:NausicaäOk after 30 mins on it, i think that would do. If you are going to include the rest of the French article Good luck as it's going to be complex. --KrebMarkt 21:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
BRDI am concerned that you have reverted edits at Magog (Andromeda) and Des Blood 2, each with the rather terse "per WP:EP". Both edits insert several kb of completely unsourced material. Do you vouch for the verifiability of that material? Or are you just following my contributions around reverting some of the bolder edits? Please follow the third part of bold, revert, discuss and explain at the talk page of the respective articles just why you think the material you have added is appropriate for Wikipedia. I'm not going to edit-war over the issue but in the absence of any sensible explanation your edits might be seen as disruptive. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 06:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I missed this one. It was deleted as Maiden Rose in June 2009 and then recreated as Hyakujitsu no Bara in December 2009. DMP released it in English in May 2010. I did a review search today and found nothing save for a comicattack review which is a disputed source for reviews. Even if that one counted it won't be enough to pass the GNG or WP:BK. I asking you to see what you can find on your side. At the worst i will take the responsibility to take this one to AfD as pointers suggest that it's a miss in the North America market. Thanks. --KrebMarkt (talk) 09:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Long shotHey, you added this ref to the Media Blasters article in 2008[2] but didn't include any details and the link is now dead. Don't suppose you have any memory of what the article title was that I might try to locate the new URL? -- AnmaFinotera (talk ~ contribs) 06:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
A videoYear 24 Group, explained by Moto Hagio herself A pity that getting the RS stamp for this website would be a headache as this person is conducting a lot of mangaka interviews. Note:I should stop lurking the web for unexpected stuff. --KrebMarkt 22:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC) Don't miss this oneMatt Thorn: What do you want to ask Moto Hagio? Cheers :) --KrebMarkt 19:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Not so far awayAdvance copies are out :) --KrebMarkt (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC) Two imagesone two I hope that made you smile. --KrebMarkt (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC) Your opinion soughtOriginal English-language manga -- I have a note on the talk page about some manga in Arabic. Come over and give your opinions. Timothy Perper (talk) 17:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Native Brazilian mangaWould you like some references to manga done in Brazil? I haven't the time to work them up for inclusion in the Manga outside Japan article, but perhaps you do. If so, let me know and I'll put them here. Timothy Perper (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC) Thanks... no hurry. I gathered these a while ago, hoping I'd be able to use them, but not enough time... http://www.educacional.com.br/reportagens/japao/cultura.asp O mangá invade o Brasil xnnxnxnxnxnxnxnxn Erica Awano http://www.glasshousegraphics.com/creators/pencilers/Erica%20Awano/index.htm Brazilian-born mangaka of Japanese background. She has also done comics for TokyoPop and Dynamic Forces (Alice in Wonderland, 1-4). xnxnxnxnxnxnxnxnxn http://brasil.blogalaxia.com/busca/manga --how to draw manga, in Portuguese; it was up a few days ago. xnxnxnxnxnxnxnxnxn MANGÁ TROPICAL -- which is a magazine. http://www.universohq.com/quadrinhos/2004/review_manga_tropical.cfm MANGA TROPICAL ISBN 9788586932878; ISBN 8586932876 Título: Manga Tropical Autor: Via Lettera
Tasmanian devil bookbilby (talk · contribs) has got hold of pdfs of the book. I can email it to you if you want, although you have to email me first because wikimail direct doesn't allow for attachments YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 08:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Book present from Bilby deliveredYellowMonkey (new photo poll) 03:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC) You are receiving this because you have commented on either Autogynephilia, Homosexual transsexual, or Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory in the past two years; all such commenters have received this notice. It has been proposed to merge these three articles to eliminate WP:Redundancy, WP:UNDUE, WP:POV, and to keep the focus on the specific Blanchardian theory of M2F transsexuality (in contrast to Transsexual sexuality, which would be to focus on the subject in general). Please feel free to comment on the proposal at Talk:Autogynephilia#Merger proposal. -- 70.57.222.103 (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Yume Tsukai analytical concourseMany salutations!!! I am pleased that you have taken an interest in my newly-emancipated brainchild; still, I do have to wonder the rationale behind its newly-created talk page. I am at a loss for what there is to further discuss about the »Yume Tsukai« episode synopsis page; I would be extremely grateful for any insight you can provide in this regard. Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
{{unreferenced}} tagsPlease put these at the top of pages per standard practice. Article tags, which is what these are meant to be, are always placed there.陣内Jinnai 17:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC) Devilnot sure what else is needed YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 08:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Template:Sect-stub listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Sect-stub. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Sect-stub redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Japanese yaoi articleHi Malkinann; I came across a copy of the Japanese magazine Queer Japan that has Akiko Mizoguchi's 2000 article Homophobic Homos, Rapes of Love, and Queer Lesbians: An Analysis of Recent Yaoi Texts, which seems to be quite interesting (and also an interview with Akimi Yoshida), but it's in Japanese. If you know of anyone fluent in Japanese who is interested in the article for the betterment of Wikipedia, could you point me to them? Thanks, JRBrown (talk) 17:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Changes to Cite HansardYou've made a fairly significant amendment to this template by adding the jusrisdiction field to it. However, have you added it correctly? I'm no expert in amending templates but I would have thought that the desirible outcome was for the jusrisdiction element to be ignored if blank which doesn't appear to be the case. Looking at an article where the template is used it now has {{{jurisdiction}}}, Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, 13 July 1888 , columns 1279–1281 which I suspect was not your intention. can you investigate and amend if necessary, thanks. NtheP (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
help me{{Help me}} I need some help making the |jurisdiction field in {{cite hansard}} optional, for some reason it doesn't want to work when I try. It goes like this or , Parliamentary Debates, etc. etc. Thank you for any help! --Malkinann (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
a few questionsat the current articles of NGE are out there, what do you think about the usage of quotes in the main article? another question i would like to ask if how to actually AfD an article, instead of just a proposal>Bread Ninja (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
GAR replyi have read it several times, but i have a phobia of proposing, but i'll try and see if i could do it again. Problem is, i can't fix the problems in the GAR as fast as most.Bread Ninja (talk) 05:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC) Hi, Thanks for you help on Little Fluffy Gigolo Pelu. Furthermore can you give a second look to the article as i think there is material for a DYK. Thanks again. --KrebMarkt (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC) DYK?Any idea for the DYK hook? i'm running out of brain juice.
So much i'm running out of brain juice. You can drop a line in DYK if you have more inspiration than i. Thanks --KrebMarkt (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC) Mizoguchi paperCool, thanks! I went to YaoiCon and caught the last half of a panel by Mizoguchi, although it was mostly chit-chat by the time I got there. I've also managed to get ahold of a her article in the US-Japan Women's Journal, “Male-Male Romance by and for Women in Japan: A History and the Sub-Genres of Yaoi Fictions” (along with a couple of others); it looks juicy but haven't had time to really read it yet. - JRBrown (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC) Question for administratorI'd like to take Little Fluffy Gigolo Pelu to WP:DYK, but it was started as a copyright violation. I've placed the {{copyvio-histpurge}} template on the page, but my past experience indicates that this will not take place within the DYK window. Could you please delete the portion of the history with copyright violations? --Malkinann (talk) 01:53, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
NGE quotesi made a section about the over usage of quotes and which ones i think should be booted out or not in quote format in the main Neon Genesis Evangelion talk page. I wasn't too specfic because the quotes would take a while to read.Bread Ninja (talk) 08:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC) Ok i will.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC) I'm afraid someoen might not agree to the edits i do. but if it doesn't require discussion, then that should be easy.Bread Ninja (talk) 22:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 10:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. DYK for Little Fluffy Gigolo Pelu
The DYK project (nominate) 18:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I bought this. There are some interesting essays and interviews. The one on Josei/Shojo caught my attention as it demonstrates how fluid is the frontier between those two categories in Japan. However i need to read more stuff about Josei before making any edit in the eponymous article and i confess a lack of knowledge on what else has been written about Josei. Any idea where i could find more writing about Josei? --KrebMarkt (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
MarksThanks for the good wishes. Yeah my results are pretty good. I can get into any course apart from medicine. Now my problem is choosing what to do next year =) Extremepro (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC) GNGI've recently realized why we've had our differences with the GNG view. You tend to justify GNG alone for alot of things, but not with WP:CFORK, and the GNG you just use for a section, not the entire article itself. i think you should consider that too. i can't reply to you in New Angel talk page. i have some odd setup at my internet manager, and the talk page is restricted. Regardless, reception alone won't be much help and copying and pasting the release won't either. Instead i think a list of episodes article and list of chapters should be more concern to clean up the main article.Bread Ninja (talk) 07:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Riyoko IkedaJust for information Riyoko Ikeda will a guest of the 2011 Angoulême International Comics Festival and she will have an exhibit as the #1 foreign guest this year. A pity that both ANN and the so-called manga blogsphere missed this one. --KrebMarkt (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
GA reassessment of LoliconI have conducted a reassessment of the above article following its nomination for reassessment. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Lolicon/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Concerning the query about why Lolicon was delisted. I don't pay much attention to those sorts of thing, because they can be an endless cycle of wiki-arguments and getting-nowhere-in-a-big-hurry. Sure, they're a lot of fun, addictive, and stuff like that -- but they won't get us anywhere. There is always room for improvement in an article, and that won't change, whether or not the article makes it to GA. Frankly, I think moving on is the best strategy. And, more personally, that means I can check in from time to time and suggest references as I find them. But I won't participate in another round of GA reviewing -- it isn't worth the time for me. Timothy Perper (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Ito paperGot the Ito paper and scanned it to PDF; I haven't had a chance to read it yet but it looks like the main focus is more general theoretical analysis of Japanese culture rather than lolicon specifically. I can pass on the PDF if you like; I don't know if Wikipedia supports private messages, but if not I can give you my email address. - JRBrown (talk) 18:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
re image at LoliconThis edit did not necessarily show good judgment. Especially since it was added in as part of a string of other edits, and without even an edit summary. You shouldn't add problematic material like this. If you do want to add problematic material like this, you need to have a full and extensive discussion first, at the very least. If you don't see why this material is problematic, you probably should consider whether you should be adding images to Wikipedia articles generally. Herostratus (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
New material for LoliconI hope you're still with this article -- did I say anything to offend you? I certainly hope not. I put in some new material to reflect your reorganization. I hope it's OK with you. Timothy Perper (talk) 23:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC) McCarthy referenceI seem to have misplaced/can't find a question you asked me about McCarthy & Clements' book on erotic anime and lolicon. Can you tell me again? It has a whole chapter on lolicon anime, starting in the 1980s. I can look up stuff for you too. Timothy Perper (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Eva edits
FWIW, I appreciate your recent editing on the Eva pages; I've been busy and remiss and have let the burden fall on others. --Gwern (contribs) 17:14 14 September 2009 (GMT) Why have you attributed those edits to this person when it was clearly me? - Jake Talley (talk) 16:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Play, creativity and digital culturesHey. I didn't get a chance to reply to this until it was archived on WT:ANIME, so I figured you'd be more likely to see a response here :) Unfortunately, I've looked through the collections of the National Library of Australia and the state libraries, as well as a couple of university libraries, and no holdings :( However, I have found some other books by the same author that look like they could be good references for some articles, if I ever get the chance to have a look at them. Sorry I couldn't help, but I figured I'd pass on the results of my search anyway. Confusing Manifestation(Say hi!) 02:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of minor Winx Club characters for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor Winx Club characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Winx Club characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marasmusine (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC) Sakura Wars TV series episode listMalkinann, I've noticed you have readded the Sakura Wars TV series episode list to the main Sakura Wars article. I still think the episode list does not belong in that article. The article is almost entirely about the video games, and having an episode list for the TV series in that article seems totally out of place. I think that if the list needs to be anywhere, having it in the List of Sakura Wars episodes article is fine (though someone needs to add an explanation that these are the TV series episodes, not the OVA episodes). Note that someone else has already undone the redirect from List of Sakura Wars episodes, so the list is back to being in two places. If you still feel that the list shouldn't be in a stand alone article, another option that I think would be alight is to add the episode list to the Sakura Wars TV series section in the List of Sakura Wars media article. That is the article that currently has the most information about the Sakura Wars TV series, so if you think the list can't be in its own article that would probably be the best place for it. To reiterate, I think the main Sakura Wars article is the worst place to put the list among the various options, and if you think the list should be kept somewhere then please either allow it to remain at List of Sakura Wars episodes or merge it to List of Sakura Wars media. Calathan (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 01:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. —Farix (t | c) 01:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC) ThailandHi! I think I still have the book, but I'll have to look in my closet and see where it is... WhisperToMe (talk) 07:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC) Picture for Boys’ Love I just noticed that you asked Niabot for a yaoi-picture. I got this picture a while ago to illustrate Boys’ Love, respectivly the term Shōnen Ai wich is more used in German. Maybe it can be of use in the English Wikipedia too. I'm sorry they are not shirtless ;) --Don-kun (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Tasmanian DevilHi Malkinann. Thanks very much for the barnstar, which I really appreciated, and for your quick replies to the things I raised on the talk page. Tasmanian Devil is a great article, very interesting and well pitched at encyclopedia readers. It was a pleasure to work on it. Best regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 14:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Thank you...... for your little "Fledgling award." I appreciate the gesture in a time when things aren't exactly rosy over here... but yes, things are starting to look a little up. Thanks for asking. :) Bobnorwal (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC) Torikaebaya MonogatariI am copy editing Torikaebaya Monogatari, but I have the initial question about which English is expected for this article. For example, "scandalised" or "scandalized" as the proper spelling. As an American English speaker, I may not be the best person to copy edit. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Back in September, you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider taking it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC) September 2011
SurveyHi Malkinann! I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate! It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate! Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google! Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Reference library request updateYour request (over here) has not been forgotten. Please check there for the update. Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC) resource requestHi Malkinann, I've managed to obtain the article "Censorship of Pornography" that you requested at the resource exchange on October 2nd. You can find a link to the article on the resource exchange page. Best, GabrielF (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Re: How to read Oricon pages?Hi! I answered here: User_talk:Moscowconnection#How to read Oricon pages?. Sorry for the late reply. It's because I just knew that it would take a long, long time to list all the links. ^^; Moscowconnection (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:DarkAmi.PNG Thanks for uploading File:DarkAmi.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE:
Talkback Message added 00:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. SKATER Is Back 00:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC) ORArticle is filled with areas big areas without sources. And there are areas. Providing proof of or to specific areas? There are too many for you not to see them. So if its to vague for you, its probably because it asks for further analysis.Lucia Black (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC) Formal mediation has been requestedThe Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Sailor Moon (English adaptation)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 5 December 2011. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you. Request for mediation acceptedThe request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Sailor Moon (English adaptation), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee. As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear. For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 21:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC) "Case talk page"Just to let you know, you completely fubared your link to the talk page of Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation). It should have been to Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation) where I have moved it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 11:44, 29 November 2011 (UTC) I have also eliminated the various redirects that will be broken because Talk:Requests for mediation/Sailor Moon (English adaptation) should have been deleted.—Ryulong (竜龙) 11:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Be sure to notifyYou seem to have been making actions to defend the articles or somewhat change tags that are on the verge of WP:OWN. Anyways....the revert over the name was over clarity when the current isn't anymore clear and made you no attempt to add any assurance of the article's creation for the disambiguation. Overall seems lack of knowledge of naming conventions occurs. (USA) isn't an appropriate form of disambiguation considering the notes say one was originally from canada.Lucia Black (talk) 12:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Sailor Moon formal mediationHello—Sunray and I will be your mediators. We will be sharing the job of mediation, so anything shared with one of us should be expected to be shared with the other, unless specifically requested otherwise. As you may or may not also know, discussions during formal mediation are privileged, meaning that they cannot be used against you later; for example, if the case is referred to arbitration. This allows participants to speak freely and candidly about the issues. To start off the case, we've decided to invite participants to share, privately, their perspectives with the mediators, Feezo and Sunray. We'd like to hear your thoughts on what the major issues are, what the ideal result of mediation would be, and what alternatives might be acceptable. Other relevant thoughts are of course welcome. Send these by email with the form at Special:EmailUser/Feezo. Let me know if you have any questions. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC) resource requestHi Malkinann, I've got the manga article you requested at the resource exchange. You can find a link to the article on that page. Best, GabrielF (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Sailor Moon mediationThe issues have recently been updated here. I believe this reflects the issue you wished to add. If you agree, please sign as agreeing. I note that the other participants have all done so. Sunray (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Beginning discussionWe've initiated the discussion for the Sailor Moon mediation here. Sunray (talk) 02:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Featured article review for Katie HolmesI have nominated Katie Holmes for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Brad (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Moto Hagio in ParisHi, just to inform you that Moto Hagio will be in Paris. I will have 2 opportunities to see her in real flesh. That said not sure that i will be able to have her sign my copie "A Drunken Dream and Other Stories". --KrebMarkt (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Phage Sailor Guts.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Phage Sailor Guts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)  The article The Trix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
Nomination of The Trix for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Trix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trix until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 10:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Announcing the debut of the »Alps Monogatari -- Watashi no Annette« episode synopsis pageMalkinann: Many salutations! I was looking over your 17 @ July 2011 edit of the »Ai Shoujo Pollyanna Monogatari« episode synopsis page and I was impressed at how you were familiar with the Japanese kanji titles to the final twenty-four episodes even before I added the English titles. You really helped me out by doing that. Unfortunately, I seem to have drawn the attentive ire of Oda Mari whose editing has a rather punitive ambiance about it that I find rather disturbing because it turns the article that I worked so hard to write into a battlefield; as you can imagine, nobody really wins in this situation. I have taken to burying romanji/kanji episode titles and also only listing the kanji names of the lyricists, composers, arrangers, and singers of the anime soundtrack in a bid to keep the peace and avoid the accusation of committing an act of war against Wikipedia. It is on this note that I entreat your assistance. I am about to release one of my brainchildren into the ether -- this one an episode synopsis page for »Alps Monogatari -- Watashi no Annette«. If you look carefully at the code, you will see that I have hidden away the romanji that I believe could rock the boat; I would like for you to proofread it for me. Here is the URL: List_of_»Alps_Monogatari_--_Watashi_no_Annette«_Episodes. Try not to be too rough, please; I worked hard on this. Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Dairi no Kenkyo (talk) 03:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC) New Sailor Moon animehttp://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2012-07-06/sailor-moon-manga-gets-new-anime-in-summer-2013 Brace yourself for a crapload of work. (Distinguishing between series is gonna be hell) Oh and there is a third manga re-release announced. --Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 04:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC) WikiWomen's Collaborative
Orphaned non-free media (File:DarkAmi.PNG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC) WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
The article Image song has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Nomination of Image song for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Image song is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image song until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC) Phineas Gage "Good Article" reviewHaving make ten or more edits to the article on Phineas Gage, or commented on its Talk in the last two years, perhaps you will be interested in the Good Article Review currently underway. I am particularly interested in gathering broader opinion on the following comment by the reviewer: "Many sentences are much too long for easy reading and to my mind overuse complicated constructions ... I will very strongly recommend a copy edit with ease of reading in mind, breaking up complex sentences and disentwining some of the flowery language." EEng (talk) 22:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC) SailorMoon: Chibiusa's articleThe article was moved without permission. Someone wants to change it from Chibiusa to Sailor Chibi-Moon, and did so without discussion, breaking Wikipedia rules... Ummm... I think moving it back and then discussing it would be the wiser move. There have to be more criteria for a move than were listed. =P Spread the word, too. 'cause it should be fairly discussed. --Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 17:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Wiitis listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiitis. Since you had some involvement with the Wiitis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. sst✈ 15:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Category:Blade Runner has been nominated for renamingCategory:Blade Runner has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Black Lady Sailor Moon.jpgThanks for uploading File:Black Lady Sailor Moon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of The KimberlysHello, Malkinann I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Kimberlys for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC) "Princess Nausicaae" listed at Redirects for discussion
"Mens' Love" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
||||||||||||||||
![[1]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Lum-Beautiful-Dreamer.png){kind=link}
){kind=link}
