|
User talk:Majorly/Archives/4
September Esperanza Newsletter
validationHi, I submitted an entry on the 10th of September, entitled "RDKLeague", that was never accepted or declined, would you mind checking it for me? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.80.230.241 (talk • contribs)
oksoz wont happen again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.30.227.71 (talk • contribs) whats withwhat's with the warnings? I don't try to change or vandalize anything.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.116.138 (talk • contribs)
The Halo's RfA
Date linksDuplicate dates do need to be links because of formatting preferences. Not years, just month/day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.86 (talk • contribs) I am sorry, i will leave my messages here. actually i have never tried logging into wikipedia before. i edited without logging in. i hope that's not a problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Telephone Company (talk • contribs)
faggot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.89.46 (talk • contribs) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC) deleting articlesPlease consider using {{prod}} or {{db}} instead of nominating an article for deletion, when there doesn't seem to be any controversy. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The article Dixie Heights High School has been updated. Could you please take another look at it? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks
Signpost updated for September 25th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Nishkid64's RfA thanks
ExpansionI expanded on my answers somewhat. However, that aside, was there something specific you were interested in, or wanted to ask about? - jc37 16:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC) WikiProject:South ParkIt's really great you've joined up to the project. Sorry I'm late to reply but I've been rather busy. Below is a template for the project. Here's a link to another user who has joined. User:Buchanan-Hermit Here's the template: {{User WP South Park}} Mr. Garrison 17:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
User tagI'm in the process of changing to manual template as we speak. Thanks for telling me anyway though. Hello32020 22:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC) SockpuppetryYou are right and I admit to sockpuppetry. I meant no harm by this. I am still not getting Wikipedia that much and don't know how to use it all that well. I will delete my barnstar from the non-edited user and malformed RfA request. However, I do not know how to change the RfA and delete it. I need help with that. I will not use the Wikiuser456 and then therefore I request to have some admin please delete the user and talk pages. Ify you could please help me unconvict this message, I would be most greatful.
I need your help...I was trying to put my name on the nominations for adminship section, but i was seeing "Wikipedia:Nominations for adminship/John Montagnino. How do you do this thing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Montagnino (talk • contribs)
Re: My reviewGlad of being able to help. Trying to make Big Brother (UK series 7) featured will be pretty hard, as it is an extremely long article, so I suggest first making it a good article, and then work with others until the article is ready, as otherwise it may just be impossible, or at least, take a lot of time. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 03:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Spamming?I am not spamming. I provided those links as references because Omicronpersei8 disagreed with an edit I made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScienoSitter (talk • contribs)
RfA nominationHello, and thank you very much for your message on my talk page. I was really surprised to be offered a nomination for next month, but I'm going to have to decline - or, more accurately - postpone it, for reasons that I've explained here. Thank you for your kind offer, but I don't think it'd be worthwhile to nominate myself as early as next month (which is why I've postponed admin coaching for the same period of time). :) Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 22:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 2nd.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC) i am sorry my little bro was on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.201.3 (talk • contribs) WikiProject Big BrotherHi, Alex9891. According to this page, you are a member of the Big Brother WikiProject. It would appear, perhaps because Big Brother isn't airing in Australia, the United Kingdom, or the United States at the moment, that activity on Big Brother-related articles has died down quite a bit. Between seasons is a good time to be editing Big Brother-related articles as this is probably the only time where Wikipedians can focus on the articles that seem to have been forgotten about without too many Big Brother-related distractions. There are a few articles just waiting to be worked on, and proposed article changes on the Project talk page that have received little feedback. Nobody is forced to do anything as a Project member, but please try to edit whatever Big Brother articles you can and help with the WikiProject's aim - to make the Big Brother articles the best that they can be! Thanks. jd || talk || 20:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC) Reply to messageYour message:Thank you for experimenting with the page Psychological trauma on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alex (Talk) 16:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Answer: The link I added to the page Psychological trauma on Wikipedia was done with good intentions. The site I added a link to (www.akuttjournalen.com]) should fit well on Psychological trauma on Wikipedia. The site has many interesting articles related to the subject available for free downloading. Please inform what I did wrong with posting the link. Thank you. Regards (a brand new) Wikipedia poster: Mr.TCB —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.TCB (talk • contribs)
Soviet Republic of NaissaarDear Alex, at 16:16, 4 October 2006, you wrote:
Well, it seems that your bot is a bit quick tempered, ain't it? Any human can see the obvious gain in quality for this arcticle comparing it before and after my recent edits:
P.S.: I see in your user page you are polite; that's good: maybe you could make polite bots too, huh? 62.48.171.17 20:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC) (user Tuvalkin in Portuguese and Esperanto Wikipedias)
RE: Another user...You seem to have sorted that one out fine. -- Steel 21:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Don't want to be a pestI have a dilemma. I really do appreciate all of the comments made, both positive and negative. But if I respond to them, it seems like I am a hot head, and I'm not. I also don't want to bother commenters on their talk pages. But I do disagree with the basis for some of the comments and would like to clarify some concerns. In all, I really want to be an admin and to be told close and on the path, but not yet, especially when you have no guidelines to specifically point to ... I'm sure you can understand my situation. The reason I'm bothering you. The edit summary issue is not sufficiently brought up when users first enter Wiki. In 2004, when I joined I got a message telling me about using the four tildes but nothing about summaries. The how to edit page, in no way mandates using summaries on talk pages or for every edit. It implies to do it for major edits only. Unfortunately bad habits develop over time. That's why I didn't know about the edit summary issue. It's unlikely if your responding to something, someone will remind to add an edit summary, or if the edit is something as minor as removing a double period. Ramsquire 19:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
