User talk:Majorly/Archives/34


Signpost updated for October 03, 2007

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 3, Issue 40 1 October 2007 About the Signpost
WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox" News and notes: Commons uploaders, Wikimania 2008/2009, milestones
Wikimedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST
Automatically delivered by COBot 02:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

University Painters

Majorly, thank you for your help on the University Painters entry. It's pretty blatent and desperate vandalism by the CEO himself if you ask me. So thanks once again. Oh by the way, where does it go from here? Is the page protected forever? Sorry I'm still learning the back-end of wiki.209.190.55.139 19:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

The page is protected until someone unprotects it - I didn't set a limit. Majorly (talk) 20:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Ronald A. Carson

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ronald A. Carson. Since you deleted and/or restored this article at one point in time, you might want to participate in the deletion review if you have not already done so. -- Jreferee t/c 23:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5

The Biography WikiProject Newsletter
Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007
Project News
  • The three-month long Summer Assessment Drive, organized by Psychless, was a huge success! It ran from June 1 – September 1, and reduced the backlog of unassessed articles from 113,385 to 56,237. In all, over 100,000 articles were assessed. Over 60 people contributed in some way.
  • A barnstar has been created for exceptional work on Wikipedia biographies and for assisting the project. The Biography Barnstar is listed with the other WikiProject awards and can be awarded easily with a template. See the template page for more details.
Member News

Congratulations to the editors who worked on the newest featured biographies: Augustus; William Shakespeare; Adriaen van der Donck; Alfred Russel Wallace; Alison Krauss; Anne Frank; Anne of Denmark; Asser; Bart King; Bill O'Reilly; Bobby Robson; Bradley Joseph; CM Punk; Ceawlin of Wessex; Colley Cibber; Cædwalla of Wessex; Dominik Hašek; Elizabeth Needham; Frank Macfarlane Burnet; Georg Cantor; Gregory of Nazianzus; Gunnhild Mother of Kings; Gwen Stefani; Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery; Harriet Arbuthnot; Harry S. Truman; Henry, Bishop of Uppsala; Héctor Lavoe; Ine of Wessex; Ion Heliade Rădulescu; Jack Sheppard; Jackie Chan; Jay Chou; John Martin Scripps; John Mayer; Joseph Francis Shea; Joshua A. Norton; Kate Bush; Kazi Nazrul Islam; Kevin Pietersen; Martin Brodeur; Mary Martha Sherwood; Mary of Teck; Maximus the Confessor; Miranda Otto; Muhammad Ali Jinnah; P. K. van der Byl; Penda of Mercia; Pham Ngoc Thao; Rabindranath Tagore; Ramón Emeterio Betances; Red Barn Murder; Richard Hakluyt; Richard Hawes; Robert Garran; Roman Vishniac; Ronald Niel Stuart; Ronald Reagan; Roy Welensky; Rudolph Cartier; Samuel Adams; Samuel Beckett; Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough; Sarah Trimmer; Sargon of Akkad; Shen Kuo; Sophie Blanchard; Stereolab; Sydney Newman; Sylvanus Morley; Tim Duncan; Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft; Uncle Tupelo; Waisale Serevi; Wallis, Duchess of Windsor; Walter Model; William Bruce; William Goebel; Yagan; Zhou Tong; Æthelbald of Mercia; Æthelbald of Mercia

New Members

Congratulations to our 225 new members

From the Editors

The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below)

We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future.

This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page

New irc channel

Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network:

#wikipedia-en-bio

Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up.

Contributors to this Issue

We couldn't do it without you!

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32

Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 32 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/09/episode-32-trust-me/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 08:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Wikipedia Weekly

A couple new episodes - we're posting the infobox to save duplicating info.

Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeeklyWikiProject WikipediaWeekly
Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly
Wiki Loves Monuments
Fuzheado, Gamaliel, Effeietsanders, Nikikana, LilyOfTheWest, and SuperHamster discuss the annual Wiki Loves Monuments worldwide photography contest
Onsite · Offsite
Subscription · Feedback


For the podcast crew -- Tawkerbot 20:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

If you could...

I'd like your feedback at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship#Subheadings for discussion sections. Consensus seems to have shifted towards this being helpful, but I'd still like have all the bases covered. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Not interested - that sort of thing is why I've cut down here. My opinion is not cared for. As a liberalist would say, it's the tyranny of the majority that makes RFAs suck. Majorly (talk) 19:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Eh, fair enough. Still thought it would only be fair to ask. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, thanks for telling me, I appreciate the thought :) Majorly (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008/Conference of the Americas

Hello, As you may or may not know, Alexandria, Egypt was selected to host Wikimania 2008 [1]. So as to prevent the hard work of the many Wikimedians involved in the Atlanta bid from going to waste, we have decided to host a conference for the Americas. This is in no way an attempt to compete with Wikimania or make a statement against Wikimania.

As one of the people signed up to help with the Wikimania Atlanta bid, we hope you will join us at the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas. We will be having a meeting tonight in IRC tonight (Oct 15) at 9:30PM in #cota-atlanta on irc.freenode.org to discuss the conference. For more information about IRC see [2].

For more information about the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas see http://www.cota-atlanta.org and our wiki http://www.cota-atlanta.org/wiki.

If you do not wish to receive further notices about the COTA please remove your name from our notify list. --Cspurrier 20:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 42 15 October 2007 About the Signpost
From the editor: Brion Vibber interview
Wikimania 2008 awarded to Alexandria Board meeting held, budget approved
Wikimedia Commons reaches two million media files San Francisco job openings published
Community sanction noticeboard closed Bot is approved to delete redirects
License edits under consideration to accommodate Wikipedia WikiWorld comic: "Soramimi Kashi"
News and notes: Historian dies, Wiki Wednesdays, milestones Wikimedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Military history Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Question

What's wrong with him? @pple complain 18:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Run out of fuel. Majorly (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Cheadle Hulme High School

Hey, you removed a speedy from this article. While the speedy was in error, you are the original and primary contributer to this article, and so you should not be the one to remove it. The admin that saw it next would obviously deny it. I presume you already knew this, but I thought I'd point it out again. As a side note — I'm glad you haven't left entirely. i said 19:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cheadle Hulme High School

Cheadle Hulme High School, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Cheadle Hulme High School satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheadle Hulme High School (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Cheadle Hulme High School during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Voxpuppet (talk • contribs) 11:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Majorly. I understand now that CSD A7 doesn't apply to schools but, not only was it a little questionable for you, as the original creator of the article, to remove the tag, but to do so without giving any explanation seems rather unfair: it certainly fails WP:CIVIL horribly.--Voxpuppet (talk • contribs) 11:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
It does apply to schools when they are obvious speedy candidates. This is obviously not - it has several references that backup notability. And furthermore, it's been around over a year. To simply tag it as A7 is ridiculous. If you'd bothered to do an internet search, you'd have found further evidence of notability. I reverted your poor decision just in case an admin happened to agree with you. It looks like the AFD is going for keep so far though. Better luck next time, and try to do a little more research before tagging well established articles for deletion. Good day. Majorly (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Rudget RfA

Dearest Supporter,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed unsuccessfully with 39 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. I would have liked to gain some experience of being an admin, but it wasn't to be. At least I gained some valuable time there and will use my knowledge picked up to my next candidacy. I would like to say once again, thank you for voting and I hope to see you at my next request be it a nomination or self-induced, I hope I don't get as many questions!
P.S - I like your comment :)
Rudget Contributions 09:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 33

Great news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 33 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/10/26/wikipedia-weeekly-30/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP (?) 07:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 43 22 October 2007 About the Signpost
Fundraiser opens, budget released Biographies of living people grow into "status symbol"
WikiWorld comic: "George Stroumboulopoulos" News and notes: Wikipedian Robert Braunwart dies
WikiProject Report: League of Copyeditors Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

RFA question

Can a vote in a RFA be discarded? PatPolitics rule! 16:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Why do you ask? Majorly (talk) 16:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
It is under discussion in the RFA of Hdt83. PatPolitics rule! 16:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I have expanded. I added that he has applied 4 times. I do not base on edit count, but should have added at the beginning that he has applied 4 time in 6 months. PatPolitics rule! 17:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Your whole rationale is edit count. Majorly (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


WP:COOL

Hey, sorry I lost my cool back there. That wasn't acceptable, either, but I really wasn't expecting this notice. Your comment has definately been noted and I have stopped. I hope (inspite of my meltdown) you don't consider me as a vandal, troll, spammer, or an otherwise harmful user to the project. I hope this is all behind us.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Village pump: Anonymous page creation

I'd like to remind you that the reenabling of anonymous page creation is temporary (a month) so deleting AFC would be premature. Also, I think AFC would have a life even if it sticks: it could be a place where people with limited experience can post their efforts and receive comments to lower the chance of speedy deletion affecting their entries. Also, I don't think comparing en-Wikipedia with any other wikis is accurate when this issue is concerned. English Wikipedia is the largest wiki in existence and anything here is on a scale many times larger than on any other wiki. A mere glance at WP:AFC shows that a majority of the entries are still declined and reenabling anonymous page creation will allow all that to seep into the mainspace. Result: Unsuitable entries that any could cleanup are now exclusive admin terrain and even worse, if they're not technically speediable, they also cause unneccesary work at AFD.

Unless I can get a bot running to help me counter floods of crap material with minimal clicking, I'm not even going to bother with newpages patrol or deletion when this happens. An extended month-long wikibreak would be a lot less stressful. - Mgm|(talk) 12:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

No, it's permanent unless there are significant problems with it. Maybe AFC will continue, maybe not. My opinion still stands. I can compare, as it is the same principle. Maybe admins should work harder if there's bad articles "seeping" in. If they aren't technically speediable, then why does it matter? If you don't want to do it, don't. There are plenty of others who will. Majorly (talk) 13:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

My (KWSN's) RFA

Thank you for supporting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 44 29 October 2007 About the Signpost
From the editor: Florence Devouard interview
Page creation for unregistered users likely to be reenabled WikiWorld comic: "Human billboard"
News and notes: Treasurer search, fundraiser, milestones WikiProject Report: Agriculture
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Qst

Hey Majorly ;) I've left a comment at User talk:Qst#Highly hypocritical, regarding the dispute at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gurch 2. I'd like to apologise here, on behalf of Qst. As you'll understand, he's still settling in to Wikipedia and, although I hope he develops this skill fairly soon, he is still re-adjusting to the skills of calm and reasoned discussion.

I hope you can forget about this incident, and give him another chance?

Anthøny 21:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

This was already discussed and long forgotten. Majorly (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfA

Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Remove per subject request?

Hi, I am confused by this edit. Can you please explain the reason? The link in the edit summary leaves me with a login page. (Perhaps an elaboration on the article's talk page is needed, I'm not sure.) -- Pepve 13:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

It's because the text was incorrect. The login page is from the OTRS system for Wikipedia, that the band emailed and complained to. Majorly (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining this to me, I wouldn't have figured it. -- Pepve 16:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/LaraLove

It looks like you removed my oppose post on this RfA. Could you restore it, please?--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 19:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, completely unintentional. Majorly (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
No worries.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 19:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
But aren't you supposed to strike and indent your removed oppose, rather than just take it out?--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 20:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Or does it not matter?--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 20:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
People can do it as they like. Majorly (talk) 21:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I was only asking because I did that same thing, and it was re-enstated, striken and intented. But I'm sure people can do what they want, though.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 22:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


IRC

Hey Majorly, I saw that you removed my request from WP:WEA, but I haven't been invited yet. I'm registered with NickServ as east718 and cloaked as wikipedia/east718. Could you please get on this when you have some free time? Thanks! east.718 at 00:13, 11/4/2007

I didn't add your cloak, I'll do it now :) Majorly (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Nope, still not working. Looks like Sean Whitton hasn't gotten around to cloaking me yet, I'm still <redacted>. Regards, east.718 at 01:13, 11/4/2007
Come into #wikipedia-en and we'll sort it out. Majorly (talk) 01:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)