¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Droit du seigneur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- interpretation by Jörg Wettlaufer - Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol 21, Nr. 2 (2000): 111-123 [[http://www.fibri.de/jus/arthbes.htm]).</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I see that you are trying to stop Wikipedia's character assassination of Alexander Dugin. I tried to do that at one point but gave up.
But I have a question for you about something completely different: why do you have multiple accounts? What is the problem with doing everything from one account? – Herzen (talk) 00:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The cheap trick used in the Dugin article is totally beneath rational discourse - "playing the Nazi card" - http://postimg.org/image/t06j7tou7/ .... Reductio ad Hitlerum
- The answer to the different question is that I didn't always remember the username/code, so I just saw it as more simple to create a new one. Another aspect which has come more lately is the total blandness I see in wikipedia. You can't properly respect a project that isn't anymore ready to stand fast on maintaining encyclopaedic standards. So I relax and just put some stick about when trendy-truth promoters are selling a Pig in a poke without realising it themselves.
- ps. travelling tomorrow, but later this week I will check with the Dugin article, maybe you should also. Cheers, Koldewe (talk) 03:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with your deletion of the Ettore Carafa paragraph. If you wish, I suggest that you insert statements that you find unsubstantiated by footnotes. Or better yet, footnote the statements themselves. To call them a fantasy is far-fetched.
For example, lets begin with the statement Carafa died young. He died at age 32. That is substantiated by the biographical sources. You can not claim that is fantasy. That is false.
If you wish I can footnote the statement that the victories of the Parthenopean Republic were meager.
The statement is true. You are deleting factual information.
The statement that Carafa went against his aristocratic lineage emerges from the tradition of his differences with his parents, and also his dealings with the republican authorities. If you wish all of Wikipedia to be just paraphrase, then I can cite this using text from the sources.
While I can always find reasons to revise by statements, blanket deletions of text should be performed carefully. For the reasons above, I do not think yours were. For example if you are going to delete the statement that he died young, I place the onus on you to find a source that contradicts this. A source in the article already supports this.Rococo1700 (talk) 11:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attacks on article talk pages (Crimea annexation, Aleksandr Dugin). Thank you. Kalidasa 777 (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
