User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2013/July
EatOut Article: More ContextHi. Thank you for reviewing my article on EatOut. Can you tell me specifically which areas/sections of the article need more context?
Downsize Fitness: Help with NeutralityHey, I have been scanning over my article again and am looking for anything that has a promotional tone. You said you noticed some things I was hoping you could point them out, or let me know what the issues are. Is the article allowed to reference goals of the firm? Also I put the "press section" in external links. Is that appropriate? Thanks very much for the help! IntelCapitalA user whose only edits are to AfC is not one who is intending to become part of the community. As far as the links in the article ... well, at some point soon it will be accepted (in which case it will be cleaned up) or rejected and deleted. If that's how they think they can promote their business, more fool them. Daniel Case (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Acronym overkillRe: WP:Acronym overkill, when I saw the link addition, I thought it was going to be a duplicate of WP:WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG! but I'm glad to see it isn't! ;) Just thought that might amuse. –Quiddity (talk) 21:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Farms and Farmers (FnF)You wrote: The claim that this organization is "commonly referred as FnF" is not supported by the references. Reference 1, which is an article in the Times of India (leading national newspaper in India), clearly mentions "...In February 2011, they founded an NGO, 'Farms n Farmers (FnF)', which does everything..." Even Reference 4 states "...I present to you Farms n Farmers (FnF) – a nimble...." These are just a few of the multiple times the acronym FnF has been used in the references. Please consider the submission.
Financial Intelligence Unit Network (FIU.NET)Dear RadioFan, Thank you for reviewing my very first submission. I've added the the citations you sugested. Please be so kind to further review and advise me. Very much appreciated. Djulant64 (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
HogMaw (band)Dear RadioFan, Thank you for reviewing my submission, "HogMaw (band)". I appreciate your feedback. I'm hoping you'll consider that, in the world of progressive bluegrass, the subject of the HogMaw article appears to meet the Wikipedia requirement for Notability. HogMaw meets criteria #12, a band that "Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio...network" by its frequent appearances in Folk Alley, which has 105,000 subscribers nationwide and thousands of listeners on NPR. The article references the Folk Alley appearance, but does not overhype Folk Alley's significance (which might seem like hyperbole or promotion). By playing on the main stage of the Philadelphia Folk Festival as the result of a competition, HogMaw joins a select group of musical acts, including Bob Dylan, Levon Helm, and countless names, established and emerging. This fact qualifies HogMaw as notable under criteria #9, "Has won or placed in a major music competition." While fans of other kinds of music may not have heard of the Philadelphia Folk Festival, the festival's longevity (mentioned in the article) and size (mentioned in the article), cumulatively evidences the significance of the band. Finally, Progressive Bluegrass is significant enough to have its own entry. A review of the article for Progressive Bluegrass shows that band Railroad Earth has no more apparent prominence or press coverage than HogMaw, yet has its own entry. In fact, HogMaw has more press and citations. This review has been helpful for me, and I will continue to try to improve the article based on your suggestions. For example, DelFest is cited by the Progressive Bluegrass article and has its own article. One of the references for the HogMaw article mentions that the band has also played DelFest, further evidencing its significance in the progressive bluegrass community. I will make the change and add to the article to reflect this performance. I'm also confused about the referencing. I took pains to reference every fact in the article, and all are verifiable. All but one is independent, and to the extent that the HogMaw article references the band's statement (the fact of Dom Flemons' involvement in the band's latest album), the claim is not one of opinion, but of verifiable fact demonstrated in the YouTube video from an independent source. Such techniques are best practices in journalism and law, and I'm trying to figure out why Wikipedia wouldn't find it acceptable. Please clarify. Thanks again for your feedback. I hope with your help I can get the article where it needs to be to be included on Wikipedia. Jdubbleu (talk) 19:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC) jdubbleu
IMACDDear RadioFan, In the second version of the article I changed its contents according to your first comments. Indeed, I went to check immediately the wiktionary principles and could not see how to fit this article there. So I rewrote it. It is no longer a "dictionary" entry but deals with misconceptions by many specialised engineers on the importance of these services and the outstanding and very disquieting issue of recycling the huge amounts of waste generated by these services. Finally, and maybe I should explain this somewhere in the article - the business of IMACD is a huge industry world-wide and is thus notable in that respect and is completely absent from wikipedia. Would you care to re-read the final submission? Your review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GradSaveHi RadioFan, I had helped Lroma006 with the GradSave draft and had hoped we had resolved the spam issues; yet that's still why you declined it. Any advice on what still needs to be improved in that regard? Huon (talk) 22:45, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
It's as factual as it gets. Where do I need to change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lroma006 (talk • contribs) 22:54, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!Thank you so much for the help with the Richard Green article. Igs cu (talk) 22:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Belated replyRe this: If your ego is that badly bruised by a UAA report being rejected, soak it in cold water or give it a rest for a while. (And think ... do you really want this exchange being dredged up if you ever request adminship? It would cost you votes, believe me). Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan, Thanks for reviewing my article, I appreciate your input. However I'm slightly confused as to the comments made, could you clarify for me? maybe narrow down exactly what I should change? Thanks in advance Sembleton (talk) 09:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation - Michael SilberlingHi there RadioFan, Thanks for reviewing my piece on Michael Silberling (declined as references don't adequately evidence the subject's notability). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_Silberling Any guidance you could give me on which of the references are insufficient and/or if there are any statements that are still in need of references would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much, MPCaspell (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Nomination of James Bates (sportscaster) for deletionA nomination is taking place as to whether James Bates should be deleted or not. The discussion is held at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bates (sportscaster) and everyone is welcome to join in on the discussion. However do not remove the AfD notice on top. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 20:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC) Hello, MadeYourReadThis. You have new messages at Rohijarohija's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Delta Dental of New JerseyThank you for your review of, and feedback on the article I submitted. I'd like to provide some insight that will hopefully support the argument to leave the article as-is. If you do not agree, please let me know. The article was previously deleted by an editor because there were elements that appeared to read like advertising. The editor provided specific examples, which I promptly fixed (phrases like "24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.")You can view the talk page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jamesx12345/archive2#Delta_Dental_of_New_Jersey The remaining information is all factual, and backed by third-party sources, as mandated. The article you cited (http://www.deltadentalnj.com/company/facts.html)is a fact sheet from the Delta Dental of New Jersey website, which is owned and operated by Delta Dental of New Jersey, who has approved this submission. Facts cannot be changed, however I can certainly break them up or rearrange them. Thanks for your time on this Sgwwiki (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Paraparaumu Beach Golf ClubThank you for your review of the article for Paraparaumu Beach Golf Club. I am a first time user and had spent considerable time collating the information and learning the various aspects of putting an article together. I understand that the article has been blanked due to potential copyright violations and wiki policy and may be deleted. The concern was that it had been lifted off the Paraparaumu Beach website. I am the General Manager of the club and had written that copy for the website which I referenced to, hence I used it for this article. Is there a way that this can be viewed as acceptable by Wikipedia and or I can verify that it is my work and the Club allows its use? If not am I able to get access to the copy again and modify it as considerable time was put into constructing tables, forming lists and adding photos as well as linking etc. Appreciate any consideration and advice. Thanks and Regards Bunkersb (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan, Thanks for reviewing my piece on Michael Silberling (feedback was that references don't adequately evidence the subject's notability). Any guidance you could give me on which of the statements need further/other references to evidence notability would be much appreciated. Thanks very much, MPCaspell (talk) 08:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC) Hello, MadeYourReadThis. You have new messages at Lisa Butler's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hi RadioFan. Thank you so much for your review of the following article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lisa_Butler_%28makeup_artist%29. Your comments have been very useful. What do you suggest in terms of validating Lisa Butler's portfolio? I'm afraid the only real evidence of her work is the work itself (the images that appear in magazines for which she receives a credit). I included Vfiles because they are a company that works specifically to archive such things (editorial shoots, advertisements, credit lists, publishing information, etc.) I guess this is a semantic question, but is there a better way that I can explain the use of images as a reference? While Lisa Butler is not widely (or prominently) acknowledged by magazines (outside of the normal credit list), her work is incredibly visible. I think she is there in terms of notability for this reason. Her contributions to the fashion world have been enormous and widespread, but this can really only be expressed in images at this time. I'm having some trouble reconciling that. Any advice would be wonderful. Its a bit difficult to prove notability for a makeup artist no matter how deserving. --Charlotte
Sure, it's a mess, but it could be a target for mergers of even messier stubs. Will you reconsider your prod, or send it to AfD? Bearian (talk) 23:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
NoticeYou added your opinion to an earlier deletion nomination of this article. Decision was delete, in August 2011. The article was recreated in 2013. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bells (band) (2nd nomination). Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Angel MedFlight Worldwide Air Ambulance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Hi, as you approved this through WP:AfC I thought you should be alerted in case you want to comment. Rankersbo (talk) 11:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Your review of my article about Nik Kershaw's "Dancing Girls" singHi Radio Fan, Thanks for your comments on my article - to be fair, I created that piece of text simply by adapting it from an existing Wikipedia article on one of Kershaw's other single, so it is perhaps no more promotional than what is already on Wikipedia (inasmuch as it is possible to be promotional about a 28 year old single). However, I have taken your advice and removed the offending word from the description. However, perhaps you can advise me further on the remainder of your comments. One of the other reviewers suggested that the article should contain more reviews, so that it is not simply a list of tracks and chart placing - fair comment. On the basis that it is impossible to add reviews without quoting them, I have done just that, only to be told that I should remove the quotes. Similarly, although I accept that they could be paraphrased, I felt that Kershaw's 1984 comments on the song were worth quoting, for their insight into the subject matter. Or is it the bit about the chicken? Metabelis (talk) 19:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Hello I just submitted the article on Charles Edmund Beard former CEO of Braniff Airways. You declined the article stating that the subject already exists on Wikipedia. It does not exist as a separate subject. I have written articles on other Braniff Presidents such as Harding Lawrence, and repaired articles on Ed Acker and Paul Revere Braniff as well as the Braniff International Airways article. You stated that I could address this subject at Braniff International Airways. I wrote the majority of that and this person is worthy of his own subject page just as Harding Lawrence, Ed Acker and Paul Revere Branff. I also have an article I am preparing on Paul's brother and co founder of Braniff, Thomas Elmer Braniff. I think this was declined very quickly. Apparently there was nothing wrong with my article other than you feel that it is already on Wikipedia. I must respectfully disagree and ask that you please approve this article. This gentlemen is certainly worthy of his own subject article separate from the Braniff International Airways article. THanks mmb777e Mmb777e (talk) 21:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
review questionHi RadioFan! I was wondering, when reviewing submissions, how do you edit the reason for it? for example, instead of a dropdown reason you put Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Braniff International Airways instead. Is there a tool for this? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Kadzi (talk • contribs) 21:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
NC HunterHi. I submitted a page on N. C. Hunter, which was rejected for lack of references. I was wondering what kind of references I could add to get the page ready for resubmittal. A lot of the info I have on N. C. Hunter comes from his IMDB page at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0402976/ and http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0402976/otherworks. They document several of the plays he wrote and the famous actors that appeared in them. There is also some additional info, which I didn't include, about how his plays have been produced for TV intermittently over the years. The reason he's in the news recently is that one of his plays has just been revived off-Broadway in NY. I included the Wall Street Journal's review of that production, but could include the New York Times's and New York Post's review if that would help. Additionally, he's mentioned in various books I found via Google Books, including in Noel Coward's diary (http://books.google.com/books?id=Pwx7sZo5wvIC&pg=PA520&dq=n.c.+hunter+noel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XifiUeD0E5St4AO65YCQBQ&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=n.c.%20hunter%20noel&f=false), and in a book about Kenneth Tynan (http://books.google.com/books?id=3U0q-DTHHDgC&lpg=PA206&dq=kenneth%20tynan%20n.%20c.%20hunter&pg=PA206#v=onepage&q=kenneth%20tynan%20n.%20c.%20hunter&f=false). I could include those in a new section about his critical reputation. What do you think? Mdavidlevy (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
BabelverseHello, can you please explain what about the Babelverse article is too "addy" and how it can be improved? I read other startup articles to see how they were written.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berard (talk • contribs) 17:30, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Nils O MyklestadHi - I just submitted the biographical page for Prof Myklestad (1909-1972) and included a portrait photograph reference and signature image reference in the infobox as 'place holders' but did not upload the images. I need to check the provenance before uploading, so thanks for pointing out that error. I have removed the references in infobox. I will reread the Wikipedia information on notability before resubmitting the page. He was a tenured faculty member at a number of major US universities, he published several important, peer-reviewed technical articles and was issued five United States Patents during his career. I will locate and reference the patent information and other secondary sources to document his contribution. Is that the type of information that would be helpful? I've made edits to some Wikipedia technical pages, but this is my first attempt to create a new entry. Thanks for suggesting the changes necessary to make it viable. Kllwiki (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
AfCFYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 15Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mo Sabri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Roe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Thomso(festival)HI, My recent article for creation has been rejected http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Thomso_(festival) but a similar page of our institute's technical fest has been accepted with less content. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognizance_(festival) Can you please review it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apsdehal (talk • contribs) 14:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Article about Hannes Thor SmárasonHello! Oops! The other day I intended to update and expand the "Hannes Smárason" page but accidently created a new page ("Hannes Thor Smárason"). Is there a way I can quickly enter the text of my new page into the original page? Or is it possible for the earlier page to be deleted? Thanks! Goattender (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Gallery Server ProI have a question about notability regarding the rejected article for Gallery Server Pro. This software fits into the category described in Comparison of photo gallery software and the article was modeled after many of the entries it references. Either the standards for notability have changed or my article can be improved to better prove its notability. Can you clarify which is the case and would it help if the article mention the following? (1) Has 250,000 downloads (most of are through the verifiable Microsoft WAG distribution channel and has a 4/5 rating) (2) Has an active forum with over 2,000 members (3) Availability of a DotNetNuke module version that is highly rated (4.89/5 among 19 reviews) (4) Has more than 100 inbound links (link:galleryserverpro.com) (5) Is top 5 Google search result for generic terms such as 'photo web gallery' and 'video web gallery'. Thanks for your feedback.
Articles for creation/Artist RajasekharanDear sir. I am writing this for your comment:You seem to be basing the claim of notability here around awards and recognitions received by this person (who's name isn't really all that clear, is it a one word name? Does his name include Artist? Please clarify). However I, and I'm sure many other English wikipedia reviewers, am familiar only with the Guinness World Record mentioned. The others are of unclear notability. If that is how you'd like to demonstrate notability for this person, wiki links to articles on these awards will help reviewers gauge the notability of this person. In this, The name does not include 'Artist'. The name is "Rajasekharan" and "Artist" is the profession. Guinness World Records is familiar all over the World. The others Limca, Unique, Miracle etc are familiar in India. They are also World Records. Kindly do the necessary arrangements for the Articles for creation/Artist Rajasekharan. Thanks a lot With regards Rajasekharan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajasekharan Parameswaran (talk • contribs) 12:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/SecureTeam Java DecompilerThank you for taking the time to review my article. Looking at other similar topics I found no clear evidence for notability, in fact some of the articles don't contain any citations at all. I wonder how come the citations I've added aren't sufficient when there are clearly other similar entries that haven't gone through this process. I did notice that these entries were marked as 'stubs', perhaps stub articles aren't required to stand by notability guidelines? is there anyway I can decide to convert my article to a stub and publish it, while I'm still looking for proper citations to change its status from stub to notable? I'd appreciate your help on this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edror (talk • contribs) 05:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Articles for creation/Brigid HarringtonThank you for your input on the page. I spent a considerable amount of time correcting it based on your comment. I believe it now has significant coverage with many reliable secondary sources that clearly demonstrate notability. The article still has links that identify projects the subject is involved in. I did this to show a vast variety of work throughout different fields of entertainment. Comparing the subject with her peers in the industry already included in the encyclopedia, I believe this now shows adequate evidence of the subject's notability. Thanks again for all your help. Mywiki2664 (talk) 21:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Aplos SoftwareThanks for your help in reviewing our page. It is my first article from scratch, so I am still learning. I added a few more citations and another stat to demonstrate its size and am about to resubmit. From my understanding, notability is primariy justified by extensive coverage in multiple third-party references, so I feel that is covered better now. The citations used include extensive coverage of Aplos, not passing mentions, and are multiple examples of established third-party sources (Accounting Today, CPA Practice Advisor, AccountingSoftwareWorld/K2 Enterprises, About.com). In comparing similar companies within the industry of similar size, history and references Cougar Mountain Software KashFlow Kashoo Sage 50 Accounting I believe the Aplos page shows comprable if not better references and notability. Thanks again for reviewing and if you review again let me know if you have any other specific changes I can work on. CaliAggie (talk) 22:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC) Jerry KennellyDear Radio Fan: Thanks for your time and I understand your views on objectivity. The problem with this subject is that there is not a lot written anywhere about the man or his companies and there is nothing whatsoever that smacks of criticism or a different point of view on him. I have read your views in general and note that you lean towards being exclusionist. That is all very fine but in this instance you are excluding someone who has created badly needed and high paying employment during a recession and at a time when the banks have nothing to give decent people as they broke the country in giving billions to high flying developers. While Jerry Kennelly is thought unworthy of inclusion hundreds of footballers and sportspeople of pretty ordinary skills are included, though they have never put a dinner on the table to a single household. I am not an employee, friend or one who receives any benefit from the subject of the article but I have said hello to him once in a bar and I am fortunate to see at first hand the employment he gives. If the article were to be allowed stand then other people may well be able to improve it over time, as new information becomes available. At the moment I am sorry to say that I cannot find differing points of view which don't exist. Since the last refusal I have tried to find another perspective but was quite unable to do so. So here we go again and I hope you will look more kindly on the article. Kind regards. KemiahKemiah (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. As reviewing admin, I think this at least somewhat informative, and not entirely promotional, so speedy deletion declined. It is encouraged for people with COI to write using AfC The problem is that it does not really show notability, and I have so advised the author. DGG ( talk ) 00:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Wwo-logo-bldg-2010-cmyk-h1.jpg)Thanks for uploading File:Wwo-logo-bldg-2010-cmyk-h1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:WRUF-FM logo.jpg)Thanks for uploading File:WRUF-FM logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC) With respect, those sources are fine - I checked them myself. Would you please go ahead and do whatever is needed to create this article - I've unsalted it. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 08:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi RadioFan, Many thanks for taking the time to review my article submission! I understand your concerns about the validity of the source for the Chains section. As I am still new at this, I am trying to ensure the source is not promotional accoridng to the guidelines. In this instance, it's a little bit of a grey area finding a website listing the Amari group's properties, which does not fall under the promotional category. For example, would Tripadvisor or Agoda are about as credible a source as you could find, yet at first thought I would consider them to be promotional. However, on the other hand, Why would Agoda for instance be selling a chain of hotels that aren't legit? Look forward to hearing from you so I can better understand how to go about obtaining an appropriate source! Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchhh (talk • contribs) 10:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Radiofan, I am looking into this at the moment, but some of these hotels have been open so long, finding an online news source will be very difficult. What about using an Internet Yellow Pages? Failing that, is my only other option to remove this section? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchhh (talk • contribs) 02:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Regarding your merger proposalHey RadioFan! I am here to tell you that your proposal to merge the articles Satish Dhawan Space Centre First Launch Pad, Satish Dhawan Space Centre Second Launch Pad and Satish Dhawan Space Centre Third Launch Pad into Satish Dhawan Space Centre has been rejected as per consensus and the discussion closed by me. Vote count - 0 Support, 2 Oppose and 0 Neutral. The discussion has been archived. You can take a look at it here. Feel free to leave me a message. I know that you are aware of the closure but this is a customary message of mine to all the users whose unsuccessful merger proposal have been closed by me. Have a nice day. Regards. - Jayadevp13 02:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. You have declined on the notability issue. I have included lot of media references across India. Even Former Indian President Dr A P J Abdul Kalam, has appealed to the cartoonists to create cartoon characters like PRince. The copy of his speech in his site is also given as reference. Even Wall Street Journal carried the cartoon with courtesy to the cartoonist. I have given the screen shot also. Can you please reconsider and guide me further. Varsha 02:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varsha1990 (talk • contribs) Corsica stubI have probably broken all the procedures in relation to the AFC process, apologies for that. Will keep away from that thing (AFC and its protocols) in the future, there was a personal off wiki reason for moving ahead on this particular stub, - keep up the good work - cheers sats 03:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
My apologies...My apologies, it was only one of the most important books of the 18th century and a precursor to what has been described as the most important biography ever written. I was responding to a request that at least a 'stub' be created for others to then add their weight to the material. Your response not only disappoints me from the pov of the content it appalls me that you could respond to someone who has been here less than 48 hours and who is filled with enthusiasm in such a dry 'you know better' manner. May I respectfully suggest you address the points I raise and not as though the response came from a committee of computers.... Thanks - Calamity Hill (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thousand Hours (musician)Dear RadioFan, Thanks for taking the time to review our submission http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Thousand_Hours_%28musician%29 Since your review, to my knowledge my employee Becca Lautier has made the changes you requested to meet notability and verifiability guidelines. FYI I am an internationally successful multi-million selling hit songwriter, composer and producer, whose songs have been hits for artists such as Curtis Stigers, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Martin Sexton, European Pop Idol, UK girl-group Eternal and UK indie band Laura and the Tears. My songs and compositions also appear in films such as the Warner Bros. picture Practical Magic starring Sandra Bullock, as well as HBO, Fox, Sony, Warner Bros., CBS, TLC and DirecTV network and cable television shows. More info on my songs and compositions can be found at: standupsound.com. I am executive producer and co-writer for Thousand Hours (Paul Mansford), because Paul is super-talented and I am a big believer in his artistry. Everything in this article is true and has verifiable sources to the extent possible, and represents what is currently available for Thousand Hours. Because Thousand Hours is a developing, independent artist and performer, he may not at this point meet the traditional 'notability' guidelines requested. However, please understand that we are doing all we can to make this work for you and Wikipedia, and would appreciate your support. Thanks in advance for your assistance. Best Wayne Wayne Cohen Stand Up Sound wayne@standupsongs.com US tel:+1 917 842 0759 UK mob: 0779 068 3835 Skype: waynecohen www.standupsound.com www.thousandhoursmusic.com
Back in May 2011 you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Delaware Community FoundationHello RadioFan, Today, my page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Delaware_Community_Foundation_(2)) was declined for a second time. I noticed that you mentioned my username on "Wikipedia:Usernames for administrative attention" (it says "reporting Delawarecf"--am I being "reported" for something?) Additionally, your comments suggest that the Delaware Community Foundation does not meet your requirements for notability, yet your notability page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CORP) clearly mentions charitable organizations as an example of a notable subject for a wikipedia article. I'm afraid that I do not understand what the problem is or if you have even reported me, which sounds like an extremely negative action to take (although of course, if report means something different in this case...). I would appreciate any suggestions you have on editing the page I am working on Thank you, Delawarecf Delawarecf (talk) 17:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
AFC IcephobicityHello, RadioFan, Could you please provide a bit more specific comments on why the article "Icephobicity" was declined? The comments says: "This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner." However, the submission DOES summarize the secondary reliable sources (see references), DOES NOT contain opinions or original research and writes about the topic from a neutral point of view. Could you please provide more specifics on which parts of the article read more like an essay than an encyclopedia article? That would help a lot. I wrote and edited in the past articles for various encyclopedias and handbooks (e.g., Springer's Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology) and in my opinion this submission is in an encyclopedic manner. However, I am new in Wikipedia and may misunderstand standards here. So, if you could please provide more comments to me, that would be of great help. I talked yesterday to APerson and he/she suggested to create sections within the article, which I did (following more or less the "Hydrophobicity" and "Lipophobicity" template). Thank you, Duchifat
afc usageHi RadioFan -- Thank you for reviewing many of my articles submitted through AFC. And thank you for your note of encouragement to my Talk page just now. To let you know, though, I am restricted from creating articles in mainspace for a year, however, by an arbcom ruling. Brief version, my view: this had to do with long-running harassment against me by a couple editors. One editor and I were banned from interactions, which is simply wonderful, but confusion generated over a long time about the notability of NRHP articles helped convince arbcom to come to the ruling about my creating articles, despite the fact the articles are obviously valid, wikipedia-notable, etc. I accept the arbcom ruling because it ended the worst of horrible long-running contention. Anyhow, I cannot just start articles in mainspace, and I have been helped by other editors through a user category and also through the AFC process. If my submitting articles through the AFC process seems burdensome, then I could stop that, but there has been some welcoming of my articles in AFC, too, in discussion at AFC's Talk page and in other notes. Anyhow, thanks again for your reviewing of many of my articles. I have come to appreciate what you and other AFC editors do, all the time, as a great service for wikipedia. Keep up the good work! Cheers, --doncram 16:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
DeniedHello, you have just denied a request for a new Wikipedia page. Please can you explain how a page displaying information about one particular published book is allowed, such as one from JK Rowling as an example - which also appears to be an advertisement as you put, and another is disallowed for the same purpose, content and reasoning. If WB create an article about a new film, do you disallow it on the basis you think it's an advertisement? Also, you stated the article wasn't neutral. Please explain? Where on the article is either a positive or negative view taken? Finally I thought you should know there are spelling errors on your profile. This doesn't give me much confidence in your levels of judgement. Please can you refer this onto someone else for review. Thank you. Pnholt (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. Could you please be a bit more specific about your reason for denial. As it stands it's too vague. I can then try to improve it. Pnholt (talk) 21:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC) username policyOur policy is explicit that. "N at Appcelerator" is considered an acceptable username. See WP:ISU for other examples. DGG ( talk ) 21:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
N guidelines
File source problem with File:Paris Las Vegas interior.JPGThank you for uploading File:Paris Las Vegas interior.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Paris las vegas boulevard interior.JPGA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paris las vegas boulevard interior.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:BellagioChineseNewYearDragon.JPGA file that you uploaded or altered, File:BellagioChineseNewYearDragon.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Caeserstrevi.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Caeserstrevi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:00, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Spirit RoverMy edit might not have been ideal, but saying that the Spirit is a Rover is just poor english, even if as you rightly say it then confirms the years active. Is a skeleton still a person? It wouldn't make sense to say "The Titanic is a ship, active between 1911 and 1912." would it!? It needs rewording. The voyager probe still IS, as it is still alive, transmitting, you could even make an argument that once it is dead it still is as it will still be fulfilling some of it's functions, but the Spirit rover as far as I know died, and even if the article makes it clear in the ned that is has gone, starting the article in a way that suggests it is still an active mission, or it is still going, is misleading and reads badly.
Ko-Jo CueHello RadioFan, can you help me out with references for the Ko-Jo Cue article so it wont be denied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StreetsGh (talk • contribs) 21:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
In March you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has now been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
citation formatYou rejected an AfC (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zaga Christ saying "Rather than using numbers in parenthesis, use citation templates for your inline citations and resubmit your article.". That is not correct. Any clear form of citation is acceptable at WP as explained at the guideline WP:Citing sources. (The AfC does need improvement; I will re-review it.) DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Your review of "The European GNSS Service Centre (GSC)"Dear RadioFan, You recently rejected my proposed entry The European GNSS Service Centre (GSC). I am working on improving it to get it published but I'm not sure of having quite got the meaning of all of your feedback:
My goal here is to build a good, useful article. I will much appreciate if you could elaborate a bit in your feedback. Many thanks in advance for your time! Oivs1976 (talk) 09:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
DVLP (Producer)Hello RadioFan, Appreciate your work on Wikipedia. You denied my article for the music producer DVLP stating that his notability isn't inherited. I beg to differ, considering the work he does is substantial to the importance of the artists he produces for. Without him (and others like him), artists wouldn't have the music to make their pop hits that reach gold and platinum status. In my opinion having gold and platinum records should warrant enough notability to deserve a Wikipedia page because that's part of recorded history, not just for the artists but for the producers. Also, a lot of his peers like the Djs Craze and Infamous have Wikipedia pages and they belong to a special place in history for whoever followed late-nineties DJ competitions that eventually birthed their careers and of others like A-Trak. I added some new sources, like the RIAA and Billboard pages. Please reconsider your decision. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.50.255.26 (talk) 15:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Resist Article Denied!Hello RadioFan, I recently submitted an article to be accepted called Resist and you denied it on the bases that the sources were not reliable. I have had a lot of problems with my sources, first I used the Boston Globe articles but they rejected them because there were pay walls. Then I used smaller new sources that were freely available but they said they were not reliable enough. This time I used 3 Historical scholarly books, the New York Book Review, the Harvard Crimson and well known philanthropic websites and still it was rejected ( by you) for unreliable sources. What are some examples of sources that are reliable? Can we not use books because the full text is not not online? I have New York Times articles but they also have a pay wall and so would be the same as the Boston Globe ones. Any suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saify111 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
CooperVision - Article SubmissionHello RadioFan, I have a question about the declined submission of this article. I am actually trying to write and create content not just for The Cooper Companies (as a group) but also for CooperVision and CooperSurgical (both divisions). Is there any way I can do this? I have just noticed that a search for 'coopervision' directs to The Cooper Companies and I am not sure if I can change this in any way. Thank you for letting me know, that would be great help. Best regards, Lukas
Question and clarification regarding your submission feedbackRadioFan: Thank you for reviewing the Prelert submission at [[1]]. The sparseness of the submission is because we have cut content based on other reviewer’s feedback. This is our third attempt, so I am wondering if you can provide some clarification on what we can do to get the page created. Prelert is a notable company in a growing predictive analytics industry. One thing that we edited out of our original submission is that it has OEM relationships with Computer Associates (CA) and a partnership with Splunk. Third-party news organizations are writing about the company and these relationships (see reference links below). Because of the nature of these relationships, Prelert cannot cite CA or Splunk customers directly by name, nor do they have permission to cite their own customers by name. So all we have to reference are these publications. If we add these in to the citations, will this satisfy your concern or is there other information you believe is required for page creation? MSPToday CA to Boost Performance with Machine Learning Bloomberg Prelert and CA Technologies Form OEM Relationship ZDNet Prelert Anomaly Detective for Splunk is on the case Virtualization Practice Prelert Automates Detection of Anomalies in Splunk Data BusinessCloud9 Detecting Anomalies Datanami Prelert Introduces Anomaly Detective for Splunk Thank you, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianS88 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Trying to improve tone in AASOC ArticleHey RadioFan, First off thanks for taking the time to review my submission. I wish that it met your criteria on the first pass but I'm now trying to rewrite it to improve the tone. I've made a few improvements to it but I was wondering if there were any other areas it could improve. Is there anything specifically about it that I should remove or change? The article is [[2]]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyee7 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Notable and Indpendent SourcesHello RadioFan, I have been working on an article on an artist: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lana_Z_Caplan You reviewed it and asked me to add more independent sources. I am not sure what would be more independent or notable than articles about her in Boston Globe and The Boston Herald and The Experimental Television Center's History Project, which only includes biographies of notable film and video makers of our time. Please advise as to what I should adapt or include. The Boston Globe and Herald require subscriptions to read their articles online, which I have so I have read them and included information about this artist from there. She had shown her films in festivals around the world, been invited to museums around the world for exhibitions and she teaches at one of the best universities for art in the country. I am not sure what else to include. Thank you for your help, Anagram1001 (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Anagram1001
Nomination of WBSC (AM) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article WBSC (AM) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBSC (AM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I am One of Many (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Middleburg AVA listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Middleburg AVA. Since you had some involvement with the Middleburg AVA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neal Morgan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Callahan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Murphy Rocks, Australian Antarctic TerritoryReference; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_Rocks,_Australian_Antarctic_Territory The feature is notable and significant due to its historic connection to Surveying and Mapping in the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT). During the 1978/79 summer season, three widely-spaced Transit Doppler satellite fixes, of which this was the north-eastern most, were observed along the Ingrid Christensen Coast, Princess Elizabeth Land. This was the first time that the then state-of-the-art precise Doppler satellite fix technology had been applied for mapping purposes in this part of the AAT. This technology has since been replaced by GPS. The subject feature completely satisfies the "Guidelines for the Naming of Geographical Feature" as set by the Australian Antarctic Names and Medal Committee. Otherwise, it would NOT have been approved by the Committee for inclusion in the Australian Antarctic Gazetteer. Names approved by the various national Antarctic names committees have automatically been included, by agreement, in the SCAR Composite Gazetteer which covers the whole of Antartica. The feature MCCALLIE ROCKS, which is located some 9 kilometres to the south-west of the subject feature, was named at the same time as the subject feature over 30 years ago and has very recently been approved for inclusion in Wikipedia (as a stub). In terms of its description, this feature is identical to the subject feature (i.e. pair of ice-free rocks lying off the coastline of Antarctica). Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCallie_Rocks,_Australian_Antarctic_Territory. The feature MURPHY ROCKS, referred to in the REFERENCES section of the subject feature, is located in Marie Byrd Land and forms part of the unclaimed section of Antarctica, has been included by the US Geological Survey (USGS) in its gazetteer, and consequently in the SCAR Composite Gazetteer, and also in Wikipedia. This is despite the feature having very little, if anything, to suggest its notability. I hope that the above satisfactorily answers the points you have raised. Bmurphy99 (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/RajasekharanDear RadioFan. I am new here. I tried Articles for creation/Rajasekharan.[1] As per your advice, I had added the references and other requirements for notability. Will you please rewrite my submission in a more encyclopedic format.... Thanking you. With Regards RajasekharanRajasekharan Parameswaran (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Blac Haze article for creationHey RadioFan, On my recently submitted article for Blac Haze (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Blac_Haze_(2)) You declined it stating that "claims such as "considered to be one of the best rappers to have ever come out of Fort Lauderdale by fellow rappers" is not supported by the references given." but I can quote from the source given - "(Mike West says that of all the local rappers, he holds Haze in highest regard: "Lyrically, he's the only one who can really give me a run for my money.") Mike West is a rapper himself, from Fort Lauderdale. Should I just reword the sentence and say that just Mike West thought so? Dre (talk) 18:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Oh, I understand now. Thanks RadioFan, I'll make changes and resubmit! Dre (talk) 02:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Asking for help to improve my articleDear RadioFan, Thank you very much for taking the time to revise my article on Carles and Sofia piano duo. I am new using Wikipedia so I will appreciate your help as I am planning to publish some more entries after this. In order to make my best attempt on this firs article, I have been assist by other senior wikipedians, and I’ve taken my time to study in-dept other biographies in Wikipedia from other music artists both famous and not, and I took them as a model regarding their style , redaction techniques and structure. I tried my best and I have to confess I am a bit lost now and I don’t really know how to make the appropriate changes. For that reason I would really appreciate if you could help me improve the article so that it could be approved. First of all the banner said the article didn’t seem to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Could you please be so kind to specify what sentences of paragraphs present tonality problems so that I could try to fix them? I have also tried to maintain a neutral point of view by not making direct judgments and justifying every statement with a reliable reference. Could you please also help me identify which sentences should be reviewed to make the article from a totally neutral point of view? The sources I’ve used are mainly secondary and most of them are from media. Maybe you could also clarify which sources aren’t considered appropriate in terms of being independent, reliable, published. And finally there is also an alert regarding the use of “peacock” terms. I want to clarify that any opinionated or “flattery” adjective I might have included I put it after finding an external reliable source where it was said. It will also help me a lot if you could help me with this point. I what to thank you very much in advance for taking the time to revise my submission and for giving me guidance to make a very good article. Kind regards, Littleparrot
Dear RadioFan, Thank you very much for your prompt response. I will go through the article again and see if I can make it sound more informative. Regarding the peacock terms I totally understand what you mean. However, as I told you earlier, I have been studying other biographies on Wikipedia from different artists and have found several sentences which are quite “spectacular”, as you said, that don’t even have references to support them. That is why I thought that the references I gave should be enough to justify the statements I made. I can give you some examples of this:
Spanish version: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katia_y_Marielle_Lab%C3%A8que First statement: “Las hermanas francesas Katia (nacida en Bayona el 11 de marzo de 1950) y Marielle (nacida en Bayona el 6 de marzo de 1952), son uno de los más prestigiosos dúos de piano contemporáneos, reconocidas artísticamente con el nombre de Hermanas Labèque.” NO REFERENCES English version: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katia_and_Marielle_Lab%C3%A8que “The French sisters Labèque, Katia (born 11 March 1950) and Marielle (born 6 March 1952), form an internationally known piano duo. NO REFERENCES.
Pollini is especially noted for his performances of Bach, Beethoven, Schubert, Chopin, Schumann, Brahms, Schoenberg, Webern and for championing modern composers such as Pierre Boulez, Luigi Nono, Karlheinz Stockhausen,Giacomo Manzoni, Salvatore Sciarrino and Bruno Maderna. Important modern works have been composed for Pollini, notably Nono's …sofferte onde serene…, Manzoni's Masse: omaggio a Edgard Varèse and Sciarrino's Fifth Sonata. No references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Anderson_(pianist) Anderson performs as a solo artist around the world. He is known for his exciting thematic programming which runs the gamut from standard piano solo repertoire to his own compositions and arrangements. No references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vronsky_%26_Babin First statement: Vronsky & Babin were regarded by many as one of the foremost duo-piano teams of the twentieth century. It’s the very first statement and there are no references at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_and_John_Contiguglia FIRST STATEMENT: Richard and John Contiguglia (born 13 April 1937)[1] are American classical duo pianists with a worldwide reputation, who consistently attract superlatives from critics. Again no references For the rest of the article, all the sources are their own website. No one journal, no one critic... nothing...
I would be so grateful to know what does make these cases different from the ones in my article and why where they accepted. Please understand that my only intention is to have a better understanding of wikipedia’s rules and policies and learn what is acceptable and what is not. Thank you very much for your help Kind regards, Little parrot
Dear Radio Fan, Again thank you very much for your response. I totally agree with what you said that the existence of other articles with similar problems, shouldn't keep me from solving those problems in my article. As I said, I will follow all your useful pieces of advice and will revise and rewrite the parts that need to be reviewed. I just want to make it clear again that my only purpose pointing this examples of other articles was just to have a better understanding of the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. Now I feel I’ve learnt a bit more about how to make quality Wikipedia articles and will keep working to improve my skills. Thanks for all your help, Kind and warm regards, LittleParrot |