User talk:MDEVER802

Hi.. Im trying to figure out how many beds the prison camp has the maximum capacity and how many inmates are at the camp now. Ive tried calling the prison no answer all information on google is not updated. Can you help?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:25B0:8F1E:A3F1:977B:58A0:881A (talk) 02:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Welcome

Hello MDEVER802, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Demiurge1000

MDEVER802, good luck, and have fun. ----Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ADX Florence

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I believe that the edits you've done to the "notable current inmates" section of the article ADX Florence have had the effect of making the section more disorganized. The table is now much larger in width, but contains little new information. Additionally, the dates of release have been removed and the "status" and "details" columns seem to be indistinguishable. The sorting functions of the columns have also been rendered useless since there is no uniformity and there are gaps of information in the "details" columns. Also, some of the references you have listed are broken or dead. If there are specific improvements that you are looking to make to the list I would like to help, but I'm not too sure what you are trying to do. – Zntrip 23:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize you weren't finished. – Zntrip 23:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I like the way you linked the Register Number directly to the BOP website, great idea.

Capital Punishment

I have reverted your edits where you appear to have deleted large sections of the page. Rmhermen (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique Camarena

The only thing that was established with Enrique Camarena is that political correctness in USA (only) prompted the nickname change, as shown in Google results. Following this, and WP:COMMONNAME I will allow your edit. Please discuss changes to articles when they are contested, and void Wikipedia:Don't be a dick. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

If someone reverts an edit that you feel is a good one, usually it's a good idea to check the article talk page and chat about it. By the way, thanks for the good contribution. If you'd like any further help, contact me on my user talk page or put a {{help me}} template up on your own user talk page and someone will be along to help you. :)

Banaticus (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Welcome to Wikipedia :)

Teahouse logo
Hello! MDEVER802, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Please sign comments

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 08:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to ADX Florence

For the second time, you have removed factual information from this page without explanation. You don't see fit to include an Edit Summary to help your fellow editors tell what you're doing, which is not nice.

The information you removed from the page can be verified on the BoP web site, which I did: 

1.	 TEX MARIN HERNANDEZ	02536-748	 57-White-M	 LIFE	FLORENCE HIGH USP

If you don't stop abusing the encyclopedia, you will be referred to the Administrator's Noticeboard for further action. I urge you to discuss what you're doing before you do it. This is a community project and its success depends on editors working together.

If I can help you with anything, please let me know, but respond here, not on my Talk page--it keeps the conversation together.

Thank you. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 03:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Hi, sorry about that. According to the BOP Inmate Locator, Inmate Tex Hernandez (02536-748) has been transferred to USP Florence High and is no longer at Florence ADX. USP Florence High is located in the same complex as Florence ADX, but is a different facility and is not a supermax facility like ADX is. USP Florence High therefore has a separate wikipedia page. That's why I made the change. I moved Tex Hernandez to the USP Florence High page. Sorry I didn't explain my change when I first made it. Won't happen again. Still getting used to this thing... MDEVER802 (talk) 22:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. Thank you. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 04:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Your contributions to the prison articles are much appreciated, but please don't delete the categories at the end of the articles as you did on United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy and Federal Correctional Institution, La Tuna. That lands the pages on the cleanup lists for other editors to fix. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Won't happen again. MDEVER802 (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

images deleted

Hi there MDEVER802. I have deleted some of your recent upload images. Wikipedia does not, in general, host AP images as they are a for-sale item and hosting them here is exactly the type of use they charge for. Also please note that just because a news website does not charge for content, does not mean that work on it is in the public domain. Meir Kahane.jpg was hosted on a website that had a section (under terms of use) that clearly stated all work on it was copyrighted - no indication anywhere of public domain - Peripitus (Talk) 21:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry I'm new to photo adding. I found a John Gotti photo that has already been uploaded and approved and used that one. Thanks! MDEVER802 (talk) 23:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SHAC GROUP.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SHAC GROUP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted the photo. No problem. MDEVER802 (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:VIKTOR BOUT.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VIKTOR BOUT.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I found that the same picture has already been uploaded onto wikipedia commons, so I used that one. MDEVER802 (talk) 23:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:1993.WTC.BOMBING.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1993.WTC.BOMBING.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry I'm new to photo adding. I found a photo that has already been uploaded and approved and used that one. Thanks! MDEVER802 (talk) 23:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Correctional Institution, Oakdale

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Federal Correctional Institution, Oakdale, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.saveonprisoncalls.com/federal/oakdale.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Federal Correctional Institution, Oakdale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Federal Correctional Institution, Oakdale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wer900 • talk • coordinationconsensus defined 18:18, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FCI Oakdale

Why are you not following the chart's structure? Why are you removing Mr. Brown from the chart? This is vandalism! Please stop and explain what you are trying to accomplish before you're reported. Please reply on article talk page.--XLR8TION (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One more article reversion sis a violation of the 3RR and will be reported. STOP! and discuss on article page!--XLR8TION (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I copied it from the Federal Bureau of Prisons website (http://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/oak/index.jsp), which is a US government agency. MDEVER802 (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to remove anyone, I'm just adding more detail and rearranging them from most well-known to least. Not done yet. MDEVER802 (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have broken the 3RR rule and will be reported. You should have been civil and discussed the article on the talk page --XLR8TION (talk) 23:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. MDEVER802 (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported and will most likely be blocked. Learn how to be civil and follow site guidelines instead of being a rogue editor. --XLR8TION (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not changing or removing anything. Just adding more detail. MDEVER802 (talk) 00:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest stop editing this article. You're making it worst for yourself. --XLR8TION (talk) 00:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Zachary.Chesser.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zachary.Chesser.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just replaced it with an approved photo. MDEVER802 (talk) 03:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gov.John.Rowland.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Gov.John.Rowland.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The photo of John Rowland is on the ct.gov website, so it is in the public domain. MDEVER802 (talk) 08:32, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mugshot of Louis Daidone.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mugshot of Louis Daidone.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I thought mugshots taken by federal agencies were in the public domain. MDEVER802 (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect blanking

Please stop! If you have an issue with a redirect that doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, please take it to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion rather than blank the page. Blanking page does not cause it to be deleted. Please also don't blank the page because you are making a request at Wikipedia:Requested move. If an administrator agrees to move the page, they can move it over the redirect. Thanks! KTC (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I put in a few move requests earlier today so I hope they get approved quickly. MDEVER802 (talk) 21:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to get rid of some redirects I made earlier. Can someone help? Thanks! MDEVER802 (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only redirects where you can simply ask for deletion are the ones you created: USP COLEMAN, United States Penitentiary, Coleman I, and United States Penitentiary, Coleman I. To have them deleted, simply add a {{db-author}} tag to each redirect. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 22:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! What about the other ones? MDEVER802 (talk) 22:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Page moves by administrators can be done over existing redirect or they can delete the target first before moving, so if your request at WP:RM is successful then that's not an issue. For other redirects you think should be deleted, then Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion is the place for you to raise it. KTC (talk) 23:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Butner Correctional Prison

You tagged this article as a CSD#G7, but you were not the original author nor the only contributor, so this is an invalid tag, thus removed. Please read WP:CSD to learn more about the proper applications of speedy delete tags. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 00:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry about that. MDEVER802 (talk) 00:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oakdale FCI

I have reverted your edits. Please avoid edit warring again. This is getting tiring and your actions will be reverted and reported. Discuss on article talk page. --XLR8TION (talk) 02:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did discuss it on the talk page. I said, "How did my latest edits violate your proposal? The photo I used fit in the infobox and I put significantly fewer details in the chart than before. In addition, I did not use hyperlinks." MDEVER802 (talk) 02:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, your edits seem ok to me. --Kim Bruning (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allenwood Medium

Good Evening!

I didn't realize there was a separate page for "Medium", by all means please feel free to move the record as appropriate. Thanks for keeping me honest :D

Liastnir (talk) 03:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for the contribution! MDEVER802 (talk) 03:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FCCMED.YAZOO.CITY.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FCCMED.YAZOO.CITY.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FCI.OAKDALE.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FCI.OAKDALE.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FCI Sandstone

Great job on some of your edits. Please stop removing the specific types of fraud for Dreier. They may seem like it should simply be labeled as fraud, but these little details provide increased knowledge and depth about a subject. It's beyond me why you keep eliminating them.Donmike10 (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted contributions

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Federal Correctional Institution, McKean article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Lone boatman (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:John.Rowland.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:John.Rowland.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to == Notable inmates ==

I see that you are trying to clean up prison articles Wikipedia-wide. However, I wonder if it matters if a notable inmate is still held at a facility? In other types of articles, such as universities, we mention notable former professors even if they moved to other institutions. Or take the case of Rafael Cancel Miranda, held at Alcatraz and then transferred to Leavenworth. Does this mean that the Alcatraz article should not list him as a notable inmate?

Anyway, your talk page reminds me of my own when I started editing Wikipedia, with lots of slightly aggrieved users posting. I used to think that one could not make progress editing without bruising a few egos, but nowadays have found that appeals to consensus are far more effective. Speciate (talk) 06:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hey, thanks for the message. Most, if not all, inmates in the federal system are held at facilities designated as Federal Detention Center, Metropolitan Detention Center or Metropolitan Correctional Center after their initial apprehension and/or during court proceedings. This would make the "Notable Inmates" list at one of these facilities incredibly long. And after the notable inmate is transferred to a permanent facility, they would be listed there too, which I think is redundant. For example, Tony Rezko was at MCC Chicago during his trial, but was transferred to FCI Pekin after his conviction, so he is now listed as a Notable Inmate in the FCI Pekin article. MDEVER802 (talk) 04:52, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: USP CANAAN - Yasith Chunn

You are welcome! – Zntrip 18:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, good find! – Zntrip 06:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Deputy Todd Fatta.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Deputy Todd Fatta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Federal Detention Center, Houston does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jprg1966 (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Correctional Institution, Sheridan

Sometime we throw the baby out with the bathwater in order to get the message across, plus its easier to revert them all and force person who wants the changes to conform. My edit summary refers to these edits: [1] [2] where you removed three inmates you apparently do not think should be listed. That would be going off your opinion as opposed to the reliable sources that say those folks were there. Regardless of any transfers, the list is a list of those who were incarcerated at the facility (or even detained, or in essence anyone who is there against their will). It is not a list of only those who spent a certain amount of time, or served their entire sentences there. People can be listed in every prison they served time at. And as to your comment on the talk page about the porn star, I'm sorry but please explain why a porn star should not be listed? Because they are a porn star? If that's the only reason, sorry, but that is not relevant. The only thing relevant would be if they are notable, and the guy has a Wikipedia article, which is usually the key indicator or notability for purposes of these listed in articles. The absolutely only other relevant issue would be whether or not there is a reliable source saying the person spent time at the facility. That's it. Otherwise we get into censorship and editorial selection, and Wikipedia is not censured. Otherwise, feel free to re-introduce the other edits. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usmcfp springfield

A tag has been placed on Usmcfp springfield, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

bad title and redirecting is wrong

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ushau97 (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego Detention Center

Hi! When you remove stuff from a page, please state in the edit summary why you did so. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ADX.CELL.DESIGN.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ADX.CELL.DESIGN.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FERDAUS.LICENSE.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FERDAUS.LICENSE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ecemaml (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gary Ridgway 1982 Mugshot.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gary Ridgway 1982 Mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ecemaml (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Drug seizure Mexico.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drug seizure Mexico.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA talkedits 10:17, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Louis Daidone Mugshot.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Louis Daidone Mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. LGA talkedits 10:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FCI Florence.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FCI Florence.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:FPC.YANKTON.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FPC.YANKTON.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One big list?

Hello! I know you do lots of wonderful work on lists of inmates in federals prisons, and I wanted to know what you think of creating one centralized list of current prisoners of the United States federal government? In addition to the lists of notable current and former inmates on the individual prison articles, one centralized list can be quite helpful for readers and easier to maintain. What are your thoughts? – Zntrip 20:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MDEVER802! If you have some free time, I'd really appreciate your input on this idea. – Zntrip 20:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry it took me a bit to get back to you. Thanks for the compliment, I really appreciate it! Regarding your idea, that would be one huge list indeed. You're proposing making one article entitled something like, "Notable Federal Prisoners"? Is that correct? MDEVER802 (talk) 20:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. The idea is to make one list for notable current inmates. A list that includes former inmates as well may be quite long, but perhaps there could be two lists. – Zntrip 21:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I like doing the separate facilities lists because they are not so overwhelmingly huge and I think more manageable. MDEVER802 (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the status quo might be fine as it is. However, one thing I was thinking about was that sometimes inmates are moved around, and that would be easier to change if there was a centralized list (of course, I wouldn't propose getting rid of the prison-specific lists, even if there was a centralized one). Also, it would be easier to get a big picture of which inmates are where and what there sentences are with a big list. Currently, if someone wanted to find information on inmates in general, they would have to visit multiple articles. – Zntrip 07:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of "List of U.S. federal prisons" article

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that in the List of U.S. federal prisons article that you deleted my comprehensive list of federal prisons by "short name", and I am wondering why (since your edit summary does not give a reason). Would you please help me to understand?—DocWatson42 (talk) 07:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DocWatson42, sorry it took me a while to respond to you. I actually proposed deleting the "short name" section on the article's talk page a few days before I did it, you can check that out. I thought the section was unnecessary and redundant because the prison names are only three or four words long as it is. MDEVER802 (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I missed that. I added the list because it gives a comprehensive tally of all of the federal prisons without regard to type, making it easy to find a specific institution by name, something I want at least once a month (and without resorting to a "find" function, especially since I look up prisons that may be purely fictional, since they are mention on television dramas). It also allows users to sort all prisons by location, which the current article does not.—DocWatson42 (talk) 00:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello?—DocWatson42 (talk) 08:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bishop

If you want to nominate this page for deletion then you need to follow the three steps here. Just putting the template on the article isn't enough by itself. Hut 8.5 10:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Doing it now. MDEVER802 (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Penitentiary, Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, McDowell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Computer hacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Oxford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabaab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijacking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metropolitan Correctional Center, San Diego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabaab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Milan federal prison

Hi! I went through Federal Correctional Institution, Milan and found that you removed the sourced information on the prison being in York Charter Township from the lead. While it still said that in the infobox, your edit also removed all of the sources. Please don't make edits that remove sources.

I restored the content in question. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADX.CONTROL.ROOM.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ADX.CONTROL.ROOM.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. teratogen (talk) 15:36, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Penitentiary, Big Sandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Pollock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecstasy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Federal Correctional Institution, Manchester may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In August 2009, [[Jeff Smith (Missouri politician|Jeff Smith]], then a Missouri State Senator, pleaded guilty to two counts of [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Detention Center, Philadelphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bystander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Beckley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semi-automatic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:USP Pollock.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:USP Pollock.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FDC.OAKDALE.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FDC.OAKDALE.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Petersburg Med.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Petersburg Med.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 01:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!!


E-e-bayer_lover (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, McKean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecstacy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Medical Center, Lexington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bravo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Federal Correctional Institution, Victorville without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 02:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acorns for you!

Squirrel Award
Thanks for the compliment and for the explanation. Cheers! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Ashland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conspiracy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Three Rivers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anonymous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Correctional Institution, Aliceville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glacier National Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illegal alien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please update, not just remove outdated info

Hi! I saw your edits to Federal Bureau of Prisons. Remember to please update and not simply remove outdated info. This is for several reasons:

  • Information can still remain relevant for years, if not decades
  • Often it's a matter of simply plugging in new figures, rather than removing the info outright
  • Most importantly: People want to see their contributions endure. If people find their work getting removed too much, they'll say "What's the point of my writing on here if it's just going to get removed?" (and this has to do with this project's difficulty in retaining editors). Yes, I am aware that the project warns people that their info can be changed or removed, but we still want people to "come back for more".

WhisperToMe (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I usually (I know it should be always) put a proposal on the article's talk page before I delete something and if no one respond I delete it. MDEVER802 (talk) 02:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good practice to use the {{Asof|}} templates. That way other editors can routinely replace/add info as it gets outdated. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Penitentiary, Lompoc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable

Please don't add people without Wikipedia articles to prison articles. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MDEVER802. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:FCCLOW.YAZOO.CITY.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FCCLOW.YAZOO.CITY.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MDEVER802. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

You moved Talk:Thomson Correctional Center to article space, obviously an error. Found it on new page patrol. You're likely going to need an administrator to sort it out. Beyond my qualifications, so I just moved it back to get the talk page out of mainspace. John from Idegon (talk) 03:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MDEVER802. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dept of Justice Seal.png

Notice

The file File:Dept of Justice Seal.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, with a superior SVG version available (File:Seal of the United States Department of Justice.svg)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikiacc () 01:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FCI.ELKTON.jpg

Notice

The file File:FCI.ELKTON.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FCI Danbury.jpg

Notice

The file File:FCI Danbury.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FBI.AGENT.OLIVER.jpg

Notice

The file File:FBI.AGENT.OLIVER.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FCI Aliceville.jpg

Notice

The file File:FCI Aliceville.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FCI Beaumont Medium.jpg

Notice

The file File:FCI Beaumont Medium.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FCI.BUTNER.LOW.jpg

Notice

The file File:FCI.BUTNER.LOW.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FBI.AGENT.COLER.jpg

Notice

The file File:FBI.AGENT.COLER.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FMC.BUTNER.jpg

Notice

The file File:FMC.BUTNER.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

low resolution and not used anywere

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]