User talk:MB/Archive 9

Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15

"We don't strike out text"

Hey there. Please note that your aforementioned statement is simply incorrect. Regarding airport articles, defunct IATA and ICAO codes are striked out by default as can be seen in many airport articles, such as here or here for major ones and here or here for airfields as well as many others. You might argue if this is useful, but you cannot state this currently isn't done regulary. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.162.194 (talk) 09:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

188.174.162.194, we don't use colored text, strikeout, blinking, or other decorative text per convention. See WP:NOSTRIKE. I was referring to what the WP:MOS says. Articles that use it should be fixed, not used as justification to do the same thing elsewhere. MB 23:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


DYK for Arizona Falls

On 14 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arizona Falls, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arizona Falls is a functioning small hydroelectric plant designed as public art? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arizona Falls. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arizona Falls), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of S. Morgan Smith

Hello! Your submission of S. Morgan Smith at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 10:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Ramsdell Theatre edits

The code of <small><small>[text]</small></small> that appeared at the Ramsdell Theatre article before you reverted it is not a mistake or an error. It is coding that makes the enclosed text the next size down from a simple small, which is an appropriate size to render text as it appears at the bottom of a historical marker.
For instance small text renders the enclosed text as a small, but if an editor wants to render the text down to an even smaller size then smaller text makes it even smaller. If there is a reason that the small/small coding is somehow Wiki-unacceptable, I don't know it and would appreciate you letting me know the applicable guideline. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Shearonink, See MOS:SMALL. Text should never be smaller than 85% of the default. This is an accessibility issue. "simple small" is already a reduction to 85%, so that is the smallest that should ever be used. WP does not stylistically replicate other sources when doing so is contrary to WP style. Text needs to be readable to all users, especially those with poor vision who adjust their browser accordingly. MB 15:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
At the time, that explanation would have been nice to have at the page where we were having the issue. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 15:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Shearonink, I do hundreds of AWB edits every week to catch a variety of issues like this and can't leave a specific edit summary for each one. But I will always provide more info when asked like this. MB 16:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Paul Korver

Thank you for your pass edits on Paul Korver page. I am asking for your help. Someone only looking at his limited soap career has tagged the page for deletion. Paul Korver is much more that a soap actor. Please add a bold *Keep with a signature ~ ~ ~ ~, to the article's deletion discussion page [1]. Thank you Telecine Guy (talk) 02:01, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Telecineguy, you should read WP:CANVASS. I have made no substantial edits to this article, only some minor cleanup over seven months ago. MB 02:07, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Etemad Newspaper

Hello my friend, the article is available Etemad Newspaper. Why do you make my page like it?--89.32.108.157 (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Because you can't hi-jack an existing article. MB 01:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Navab eb7 (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Just FYI

Just so your aware and don't get into edit wars...Wikipedia:Wikipedia book creator status "The namespace and its transclusions are still retained in the hope that the WMF will come up with a solution. As a result of anticipated future solutions, template transclusions should not be removed from articles."--Moxy 🍁 03:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

  • Moxy, thanks for the note. I ran across some articles where this was used as the only entry in a "See also" section resulting in an empty section. I don't think there are that many of those but any empty sections should be fixed (this template seems to be used both in the See also and External links section, so it can probably be moved if it's in an empty section). MB 03:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
If they are all by themselves in a section I do remove them....😈--Moxy 🍁 03:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

OPJS University

Greetings. I noticed with this edit that you included an honorific for Dr. Rakesh, and you added a number of links to the external links section. Please be aware that per MOS:HONORIFIC, we do not normally included honorific titles such as "Dr.". Also be aware that per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, we do not normally included a list of additional websites for an organization such as you did with this edit. The link to the university's website is sufficient by itself. I am removing the honorific and the additional external links. If you have questions about this, please let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Hammersoft, our changes were so interleaved in an E/C that I just saved mine and went back to re-introduce yours. Thanks for finishing. MB 16:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Hammersoft, I do remove honorifics routinely except if there is only one name specified, as in this case it was Dr. xxx. But you added the full name. Did you go searching the web for that? That is more than I do. MB 16:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Interpersonal relationship

I've partially reverted your edit as it left the hatnotes a mess and I'm not sure how to achieve the result I assume you were going for; you might want to have another look. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of South Main Street Historic District (Memphis, Tennessee)

Hello! Your submission of South Main Street Historic District (Memphis, Tennessee) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for S. Morgan Smith

On 10 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article S. Morgan Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that turbine manufacturer S. Morgan Smith Company made large gun lathes during World War I and large aircraft carrier, gun, and tank parts during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/S. Morgan Smith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, S. Morgan Smith), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NanoInk (network)

Notice

The article NanoInk (network) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any significant independent coverage, having searched on Google Scholar and Google in both English and German. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We Believe (yard sign) (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on We Believe (yard sign) (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphan Francisco González Bree

Hi MB, thanks for your "orphan" notice about Francisco Gonzalez Bree's article. I have already created the links to other articles. I ask you if you can remove the orphan article template or if I can do it. Together we contribute to make this encyclopedia better and better. Thanks --Miskito89 (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)--Miskito89 (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Miskito89, I have removed the orphan tag. You could have done it yourself since you had corrected the issue. Thanks. MB 21:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for South Main Street Historic District (Memphis, Tennessee)

On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South Main Street Historic District (Memphis, Tennessee), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site of the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. later became part of the South Main Street Historic District (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Main Street Historic District (Memphis, Tennessee). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, South Main Street Historic District (Memphis, Tennessee)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Spontaneous Combustion (band UK)

Hi, MB. Thank you so much for editing the Spontaneous Combustion band UK page! This is the first article I've ever created and I really wanted to make sure it's accurate and written well. Best regards, GoldDustProspector GoldDustProspector (talk) 04:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Infobox University and nuking alumni

The change to infobox university when alumni was depreciated suggested moving that fact into the text, are you doing so, or just nuking the field?Naraht (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Naraht, In most cases it was not referenced so not moving into text. I may have missed a few that did have refs and weren't already in the text. MB 14:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanx. I expect that there are a *lot* more that we haven't seen yet. As far as I can tell, they don't show up in the category unless an edit (even a null one) is made to the page.Naraht (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Della Reese

You broke a couple citations in this page. What happened?
Vmavanti (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Vmavanti, I hadn't noticed that. Somehow, spaces were added to the url. All fixed now. Not sure how that happened, definitely not intentional. Thanks for mentioning. MB 01:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing it—and so quickly. Very few people do either one. You made my day. Thank you.
Vmavanti (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Bagathikishore

Hi MB, Firstly thank you very much for guiding me to improve the article on Chowdary Satyanarayana. As per your suggestion, I have established link and the article is no longer orphan. Would you please remove the tag put by you? Please let me know, if you have any more suggestions for me. Thank you.

Sign so this will archive MB 01:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

CSD

  • Hi

Why did you delete this page so quickly despite 21 resources? Have you seen anything bad about masih Jafarzadeh, this Iranian character? Anshan Engineer should not abuse any position of power By doing so, you have shown that you are anti-Iranian In fact, you did not even let the page stay for 5 minutes or the problem would be solved I'm sorry for you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashkan1399 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

MB.You hit pages very fast

You can complete the resource debt by tagging the timed deletion But you did not even allow this Why did you delete this page so quickly? In the case that I had given 21 external sources In general, I am not at all satisfied with the type of move you made . ASHKAN (talk) 17:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

FulushouFloruitShow orphan suggestion

Hallo MB! Thank you for helping me improve the article FulushouFloruitShow in a very detailed way. According to your previous suggestion, I added the section 'See also' into this article, which contains several links linking to Chinese music related pages. With this, is it still an orphan article? If it is, what should I do then? If not, can you please remove the orphan suggestion? Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:7C7:1180:813:8D8A:5989:9276:C30B (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

LI-LOGICA, an orphan means there are no links to an article from other articles. FulushouFloruitShow does have a link from Chinese rock now, so it is no longer an orphan. I have removed the tag. MB 00:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Enterr10 Movies

please write the subject of the Hindi movie channel enterr10 movies. 1.39.78.148 (talk) 05:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Bloomsbury Lead

Hi, thank you for doing some edits on the Bloomsbury page.

I just wanted to query your removal of the link to the conservation committee mentioned in the lead. You cite linkspam as a reason. While there may be reasons to remove the link as per Wikipedia's guide on links, I don't think it qualifies as spam. The page is obviously relevant and contains a lot of planning information relating to Bloomsbury that would not ever be available to Wikipedia due to copyright reasons (e.g. interactive map of the area, and formal policy documents for the area, a great deal of photographs, along with news articles etc on the area). It's therefore a decent resource for people to learn more about this aspect of Bloomsbury.

For now I have added the link back in but please discuss so we can work out the best course of action. Oward98 (talk) 11:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Oward98, the only links in articles are wikilinks to other articles. I have removed the ELs in this article. If you feel that any external sites meet WP:ELYES and are not restricted by WP:ELNO, they can be added as links in the "External links" section. MB 22:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for this, I was aware of this recommendation although it is not a hard and fast rule and should be employed with common sense. Probably it makes sense to not include an EL in the lead as this is definitely uncommon. However I do feel that an external link in the body of the text would make sense in the Conservation section of the article. Wikipedia does not have any pages on conservation area advisory committees as they are these days rather rare. The particular page has a lot of information that would be helpful for those reading the article to understand, as mentioned above. I will leave it up to you to decide though. If you don't add a link I will edit the section in a few days as it now reads a bit differently without the link.
Also 'conservation area' is not capitalised so I did undo those edits. I assume they were yours!
Oward98 (talk) 11:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Wismoyo Arismunandar

Sorry, why you always reverted edit to picture on that article? The image is too big so I resize it. Thank you --Tensa Februari (talk) 06:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Question?

Hi, hope you are well. I just wanted to ask you that recently you added me to User:MB/Tools page. What does that mean? I'm not asking you to remove that or why did you do that. But I didn't understand that? Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 16:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Empire AS, I was just "bookmarking" it - you have some icons I may want to use. MB 16:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Well that's fantastic. I've no problem. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 16:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Cree Inc.

You added a short description which is outdated. Can you fix that?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Weedon railway station

Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK stations). COnvention is to use xxx railway station unless it's an interchange with other forms of transport (e.g. metro or tram), which isn't the case at Weedon. I've reverted the move. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Tags on Nikki Turner article

Hi there, thanks for the editing of this article. I will keep what the tags say in mind as I aim to improve the page although I am not totally convinced that is essay-like or my own opinion. That is just the nature of the person - who she is and what she does and says. Never mind, it will be a learning experience for me. I will start a conversation in Talk on the article, and perhaps you can join in there? Realitylink (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


Yes, and when looking at how the guidelines describe 'essay-like', I don't think this article meets the criteria.

'Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the opinions of experts). Although Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of such knowledge.'

Everything in the article is related to the person and what she said or did. How is that my opinion or feeling? It is good for us to discuss these things, though because I would love to have those tags removed and support the right process to do so. Respectful conversations in this forum are crucial. So, thanks once again for your interest in the article. Realitylink (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding reason. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is ".eco".The discussion is about the topic .eco.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Aerobee

Hello! I do appreciate your interest in touching up Aerobee. Please note that I am currently in the process of updating it, and it'd be best if you didn't work on it in the near future as we will be working at cross purposes. Thank you! :) --Neopeius (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

And I see you're still making edits. Please stop for the time being. Thank you! --Neopeius (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Neopeius, I didn't see this message for about 10 minutes after you left it. In the meantime, I did make one more edit but none since I read this. You could have but the "in use" tag up earlier if this bothers you so much. MB 00:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. --Neopeius (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to have yelled. ^^;; --Neopeius (talk) 01:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Article

Hello. Please see my article - Victor Orlovsky. Ranked in importance? I tried to collect only serious sources. Thank! Namerst (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Omos/Amos

Hi. There is apparently an edit war ongoing regarding the redirect target of Omos. In the time since I added the hatnote to Amos, multiple editors have been going back and forth with it. Personally, I have no idea why Omos even goes to Amos in the first place, but oh well. I'm getting tired of all this drama. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 03:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

GhostOfDanGurney, I opened a RFD to settle this. See here. MB 04:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I was about to do the same and you did it much more succinctly than I could have. -GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Two-room schoolhouse

Hi, I wonder if you could be interested to develop concept of Two-room schoolhouse (currently a redlink)? Please see One-room schoolhouse article. The need for an article about this kind of pair-house(?) comes up for me right now, while starting Draft:Lacombe School. To me this topic seems obviously needed, and would not properly be addressed as a subsection of any other article. I am pretty sure I have seen sources discussing the architecture and teaching/management issues, relating to many ones listed on the U.S. National Register. I am pretty sure there must be some standard designs for two-room schools among other designs in the Rosenwald Schools system.

I have just started by creating Category:Two-room schoolhouses and beginning to populate it. And I barely started a draft at Draft:Two-room schoolhouse. If you choose to develop the topic, as I know you could do very well, I would be fine with your developing it there and allowing me to contribute as well, but for you to copy-paste it into mainspace eventually so that you would show properly as the article creator/developer. Or fine if you'd develop it anywhere else.

I hope you might be interested. cheers, --Doncram (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

P.S. Argh, I am just confronted by this revert of a sensible addition to intro of One-room schoolhouse article, with edit summary suggesting doubt that there are any one- or two-room schoolhouse buildings surviving and existing as museums or listed on any heritage registers. (Sigh) Well, can develop out the two-room category and/or get a two-room article into mainspace, before restoring that or otherwise linking from there. --Doncram (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

FYI, had some okay back-and-forth with that editor. Rosenwald School example Emory School is hard to classify: it is of the "one-teacher" design, which had one classroom and a work area room. Hmm, maybe that and others like it should be put into "two-room schoolhouses" category, and explain about them in the article. I was expecting "two-room" ones to be two classrooms; obviously many historic one-roomers started literally with just one room, but added a kitchen on same level or in basement, and in cold climates added a cloakroom, and so on...I would count those still as one-roomers. Reviewing Category:School buildings on the National Register of Historic Places by state categories for Colorado, Michigan, and a bit more, so far, i make many adds to categories for "one-room schoolhouses in STATE" and a few adds for "two-room schoolhouses". I will continue through those categories, any which way. --Doncram (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Doncram, I looked for sources and found nothing written from a cultural/historical perspective. I added what I did find to the article for use as sources, all period-design type info. I don't think there is the making of a great article here. But the one-room article is pretty lousy too. But there is probably enough for an article. MB 04:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, the one-room schoolhouse article is not very good at all. The concept should be defined, about whether it is a ONE-TEACHER school (so having a teacherage attached doesn't disqualify it), or whether minor rooms disqualify it (I think they should not, in terms of what people think is a one-room schoolhouse). Its section listing 40 or so towns where some editor believed there was a current one-room school, but doesn't bother to support the assertions, is particularly galling. While i think a "two-room schoolhouse" topic should be legitimate, it would be after the one-room topic were better/decently covered. By marching through the NRHP school buildings categories by state, I am finding many additions to Category:One-room schoolhouses in Arkansas, etc. For Arkansas, I think most of the NRHP-listed ones are Depression Era replacements (having 1 to 4 classrooms) of older clearly one-roomers. This is the Ozarks schools MPS that keeps coming up. Added interesting Norway vs. U.S. comparison study, to one-room schoolhouse article. With my own assertion of how many NRHP-listed one-roomers exist (i said more than 200, but now I think it is far higher), vs. ZERO being listed in Norway's equivalent to NRHP. Have found only one Canadian listed one. Seems the concept is more narrowly USian than I would have expected. I dunno, can you be interested in developing that? --Doncram (talk) 05:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
But it would still be helpful to have a two-room schoolhouse article in mainspace relatively sooner rather than later. There are now 16 inbound links to it, and Category:Two-room schoolhouses has 8 members currently. I am wondering if in fact something about "Two- to four-room schoolhouses" or "Small school designs" or "Two to four teacher schools" or such would be a better article. There may have been, appear to have been, standard New Deal program designs for schools of these sizes, and there were Rosenwald School designs for these sizes. There is some degree of difference in architecture requirements for these than one-room schools. I also am not seeing so much specifically about the level of two-roomers. But a two-room article could be expanded to this. If you could start out a two-room article, as you suggest you could, I would appreciate it. :) --Doncram (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Doncram I started something at User:MB/draft5 but I don't think I will spend that much time on it - I just feel it is going to be a rather boring article. MB 03:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I think that is pretty good, would be happy to see it in mainspace. Somewhat boring is okay, and it is a start for collection of more stuff, including whatever may show up in sources in two-room schools being added to the category and/or directly linked from there. Wikipedia is good for allowing accretion/creation of knowledge in cases like this, I figure.
Oak Grove Rosenwald School is one of 20 two-room Rosenwald schools funded in Arkansas in 1926-27, out of 38 schools, 5 teacherages, and 11 school expansions that year, per its NRHP document (available at link in National Archives... for me I seem to have to hit the down-arrow download button at below left of where the PDF should usually show, to get to see it). 389 Rosenwald schools total in Arkansas up to end of program in 1949. It was based on "Floor Plan No. 20 for a 'Two Teacher Community School' from Samuel L. Smith's Community School Plans. Smith was the General Field Agent for the Rosenwald Fund, and he developed..." plans especially focused on allowing for lots of natural light, including with seating such that light came from students' left, for helping right-handed students. The two-teacher ones had 2 classrooms and are referred to as two-room schools sometimes, including at least twice in this NRHP document, though had an "industrial room" as well. Designed also to avoid interior hallways. Designed to include a stage somewhere and a moveable partition wall, so assemblies/events using stage could be handled. I don't myself see Rosenwald school plans uploaded to Commons (not at main level category "Rosenwald schools" anyhow), but i think it would help the article to have at least one plan example. --Doncram (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
There are plans for 2-teacher schools within the MPS document linked from Samuel L. Smith article, taken from his Community Plans book which is surely in the public domain. --Doncram (talk) 06:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Doncram yeah, was going to add some floorplans and maybe expand from other sources, right now it is mostly based on one source. MB 14:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Doncram Two-room schoolhouse is now live. Go ahead and make any corrections if you see typos or anything. I found another NRHP one in Peoria, AZ without an article. If you create that, since you seem to like making starter NRHP articles, let me know. MB 04:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: Uzumba-Maramba-Pfungwe District, Zimbabwe

Hello, MB. You have new messages at Talk:Uzumba#Requested move 14 February 2021.
Message added --Bejnar (talk) 05:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Editor

Content Editor for Malayalam Channels — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mibu567 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahudi Jain Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tirtha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Talk:State farm (disambiguation)

Please see Talk:State farm (disambiguation) AntoineHound (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

AntoineHound, I don't think you will get much response there. You can go to the the redirect itself and list it at Redirects for discussion. MB 03:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! AntoineHound (talk) 04:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

oops

Thanks for cleaning up after me on St. George's Independent School. You would think I would know that field name by now... Meters (talk) 05:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Area in infobox

Ref edits at MK, uou may be interested in the discussion at Template talk:Infobox UK place#Elevation (and Template talk:Infobox UK place#Area). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

John Maynard Friedman, I just noticed in a prior discussion there that the template has |area_footnotes=, so you could add the ref back in the infobox. MB 18:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and help

Hi ,Thanks for improving the article. I want Hazhr Saleh article to reach its best quality. Please help me make changes to keep it going. Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 08:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

thank you so much for your help

Thank you Infinitepeace (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

your incredible! thank you Infinitepeace (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


Tag

Take a look at this article again, most likely the orphan tag can be put out. Thank you for reviewing -Shakil Hosen Talk 16:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done MB 16:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

WP:OR

Do you know anything about WP:OR because I am at a complete and utter loss. SOS lol. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Infinitepeace (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Infinitepeace, the policy seems very clear to me. If you don't understand it, you definitely should not edit any articles with which you have a WP:COI. MB 05:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Two-room school

On 15 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Two-room school, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the US government once mailed rural school districts scale models from which carpenters could construct actual two-room schools? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Two-room school. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Two-room school), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Need Help

Hey there remember you have helped me improve article: "List of internet phenomenon in Pakistan „ But there is a user deleting stuff please check it out Notaeditor101 (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Notaeditor101, I responded at Talk:List of Internet phenomena in Pakistan. MB 16:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, he is keep removing it Notaeditor101 (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

FAW Jeifang

Hi MB. it seems you have undone all my edits to the page FAW Jiefang, why did you do it? I'm looking to update it again and hoping you won't undo my changes again. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlhk 2021 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Mlhk 2021, I reverted the changes because they are promotional and had no references. You also removed all the references that were in the article. An article should not have sections like "Brand positioning, Corporate mission and vision". It certainly sounds like you have some relationship with this company and really shouldn't be editing the article. I left a message on your talk page about how to handle a Conflict of Interest. If you have not done so, you should read the information there. You must first declare your COI. If you make the same kind of changes again they will be removed. MB 03:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi MB, I believe my latest set of changes (different from the first set of changes), has removed all the promotional elements from the page and keep that as a factual and impartial piece of information. I dont think your latest edits, which removed all my inputs, are justified. Happy to discuss certain sentences/sections that you have doubts about but i think removing all my inputs is a little bit over the top, and made me question the impartiality of your position and intention to remove one's inputs entirely. I saw that you left a comment "It's not overly promotional but needs cleanup at the least" on the Conflict of interest Noticeboard - as said i am happy to discuss where on the page requires "cleanup" but i don't agree with the fact you have removed ALL my inputs.
Mlhk 2021, I did not make any further edits to the article. It was edited by Possibly (which you can see in the article history). Please discuss with them on the article Talk Page, not here. MB 15:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red Caboose Motel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Red Caboose Motel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red Caboose Motel

The article Red Caboose Motel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Red Caboose Motel for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 16:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Town Center at Cobb

I have recently spoken with the mail management and the wish to have their company name listed on this Wikipedia as manager & leasing. So, that is why I made that edit. They also request that this article be referenced on the Wikipedia page as well telling how they have taken over the mall’s management and leasing. They were hired by Deutsche Bank .

https://www.ajc.com/news/town-center-manager-says-its-business-as-usual-at-cobb-mall/2TCSPCUQTFGZRGF5IUXV5DDVBQ/ Rwils (talk) 00:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

1. The field of the infobox displays as Management. That is hard-coded and any change to it would have to be done at the common template used in thousands of shopping mall articles and would change the label in all those articles.
2. The change you made caused nothing to be displayed because "manager & leasing" is not a valid field, so the mall manager was not listed in the infobox at all. I restored it so it is at least displaying as Management
3. WP has no interest in what the mall management wants in the article.
4. As your are somehow in contact with mall management, you are strongly discouraged from editing the article yourself due to Conflict of Interest.
5. You should instead go to the Town Center at Cobb talk page and make an WP:EDITREQUEST. As stated above, you can't change the field labels in the infobox, but you could propose text for the body of the article. Don't just say something like "add the new manager"; write the change out as it would appear in the article and include sources. An editor will respond to the edit request. MB 02:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Abdullatif M. Al Shamsi

Hi MB,

I noticed you've reverted all the changes I made to 'Abdullatif M. Al Shamsi' page. Is there a specific reason why? The revisions were far less promotional in nature. They were objective with citations provided. So I just want to know what the reasons where, since entire blocks of promotional/praisy text returned.

About the article being orphan, there is another Wikipedia page linking to it here: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher_Colleges_of_Technology". But it's still flagged for some reason. Is this a mistake or does it need other articles linking to it as well?

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.73.233.32 (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I definitely made a mistake. I restored your version and did a little minor cleanup. MB 17:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estadio Florencio Sola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independiente.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

BARNSTAR

A good portion of what you formatted has now been deleted. If you are interested in this subject, or just want to help a stranger out, take a look.... Have a great day man. Peace. Infinitepeace (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Newfangled things? ;) --Doncram (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Modest flowers

Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk, - see also Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-03-28/Obituary! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

infobox artwork

Hi. Regarding this, I copied the template directly from template:infobox artwork. Doe the spaces matter? Just entirely curious. --- Possibly (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Possibly, no - the spacing does not matter all. Many people find it easier to read if everything is all lined-up, so I did that while I was making a change that does matter - this infobox requires the artist to be linked. If not, it is put into Category:Pages using infobox artwork with unlinked artist field MB 23:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, I was just curious. It sounds like you should get the template editor bit!--- Possibly (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

about tripuri people page

Why are the information has been removed? Merakiwi (talk) 04:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Merakiwi, I did not remove any information from this article. I made one edit to the format an image. Looking at the article edit history, I can see that Alivardi removed information you added. According to the edit summaries - the reasons were primarily unsourced. All information needs to be have citations to reliable sources. You can also read this guide for help on how to format citations. MB 13:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Countess Markiewicz House

Hi, after you tagged the article for additional citations I added some more. Are there enough to remove the tag or does it require more work? Autarch (talk) 12:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Autarch, I removed that tag now that it has six references. But I see it has since been tagged for a COPYVIO due to close paraphrasing, so you need to work on that. MB 14:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks - I think I was so narrowly focused on getting architectural terms right that I didn't realise that I'd reproduced source text verbatim. I've followed advice given on my talk page and written a draft that doesn't seem to have that problem. Autarch (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Big Nose Kate

Not a big issue – I don't want to raise a stink: I did not include Kate's YOB in the short because the sources give two different years. I'm inclined to use the gravestone. Thanks for the edit. – S. Rich (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Srich32977, I just grabbed the YOB from the lead & IB and was unaware of any controversy. I just looked through the article and it doesn't say anything about this. The article only says 1849. You have look at the grave marker to find 1850. I checked the TP and there is a note there discounting information about her birth supplied by a local doctor or coroner. MB 20:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

MB Reverts to Rutledge, Georgia Caption

MB, you reverted in clean-up my caption for the skyline for Rutledge, Georgia, Hard Labor Creek State Park is couple of miles away and has some out-of-place movie references you could efficiently reorganize, if you would, please. There may still be some movie references and other under Agnes Scott College that could use some major reverts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I20sc (talk • contribs) 21:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I20sc, I reverted the caption because it was way too long and did more than put the photo in context. If any of the general descriptive information about the town can be sourced, it could go into the article. As far as the other two articles, I don't understand what you are asking or why you can't make the changes. MB 23:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't care if you reverted it or not, it needed it.

Your GA nomination of Red Caboose Motel

The article Red Caboose Motel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Red Caboose Motel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 10:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Review This Article Page

Hi sir review this article Triangle Film Company ध्रुविल९०१२ (talk) 14:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)