I tidied up the link to the award so it will go to the information section about the award. I'll give the reference a polish. There are templates when editing to format references. I find them very helpful!
If you're looking for more to edit, the section on Pullinger's "Career" could really stand some organization - specifically chronology. But, that's up to you. Let me know if I can be of any help! WikipelliTalk23:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I really want to do that! I am gathering my articles! Right now, I am just pulling together all of the pages that need updating for electronic literature authors. I have been trying to figure out the adding references, but it is difficult to follow.
The easiest thing is to use the Cite tool in the toolbar when you're editing. At the top of the editing window you should see a Cite button. When you click that, you'll see another set of buttons. Click "Templates" and choose the source you're using (web, book, news, etc). Then it's just a matter of filling in the boxes and the reference will be formatted for you. This page might help: wp:RefToolbar/2.0WikipelliTalk10:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
THank you so much! I have just retired (July 30, 2022) and one thing I have always wanted to do is accurately portray women electronic literature writers. I am going through the major references and I have a spreadsheet going. I wanted to see the drafts so that I could build on them rather than starting from scratch!
So hmmm... I don't know who MoleculeMoleculeMolecule is, but I left a message on their page. Would it be ok if I just worked on their drafts in my effort? Or could I just see their drafts>
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi LoveElectronicLiterature! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Easy editing assignments?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
Hi there, LoveElectronicLiterature, and welcome to Women in Red. It looks as if you are going to be an important contributor with your interest in women electronic writers and your related wikiproject. You could also introduce WiR to your project by posting something about it on the WiR talk page. As a new contributor, I think you will find it useful to look at some of our Essays, especially our Primer. As for identifying women to be covered, you can browse through our Redlist index. I think it would be useful for you to pave the way forward on your project by creating your first biography. You can let me know when you think the draft is ready for article space and I'll let you know how it's going. Please let me know if you run into any problems or need assistance, either with your articles or your project. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh thank you! I was hoping to start us all off a LOT smaller than a biography at first. There are 16 of us signed up so far for our monthly Third Thursday Task meetings, and we all have varying amounts of time to devote to this project. Some of us are university profs who will be explaining source citation, etc, using wikipedia tasks. We have a list of women to cover, our core members, our task list, etc. and I can email you that list. I am at clearlyconsistent AT gmail DOT com. I had hoped we could learn about wikidata, get our 400 women electronic literature writers into the wikidata first with as much info as we know, and then start identifying the women in red to turn to blue articles. This is the approach Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, a Wikipedia Administrator, suggested.
I also requested all of the draft articles we know about back as they had been inactive, but I never heard back on that one--do you know who to follow up with for those drafts? (e.g., Ana Maria Uribe, Anastasia Salter)
Thanks LEL for responding so quickly and explaining your approach. I'm happy to hear you have been in touch with Rosiestep who is a real expert on women writers. If you feel you are not ready to embark on biographies, I have a few suggestions. I see you have been working on List of electronic literature authors, critics, and works. (BTW, if you search for List of electronic writers), you will now be redirected to it.) Using this list (and the similar Category:Electronic literature writers), you could pick out some of the women's biographies which need extra work, such as Lynda Clark (author), Kathleen McConnell, Cathy Marshall (hypertext developer), Allison Parrish and Sarah Smith (writer). On the basis of how information has been included in biographies in the list already rated C Class or higher on their talk pages, you should be able to make improvements by adding more details backed by referencing from good secondary sources. You might also be interested in working on some of the women's biographies under Category:Interactive fiction writers. Sooner or later, I think you should put together a List of electronic women writers, not just as a list of names but with basic information such as date of birth, nationality and specific interests along the lines of List of women cookbook writers or the lists under Category:Lists of women writers by nationality. As for Wikidata, I see we have electronic literature writer (Q113663593) in which all electronic writers on the EN wiki should be included. If you turn up Annie Abrahams and click on :WEF Person in the LH margin under Wikidata Edit, you will see details of her Wikidata person data. If you click on Profession, you will see that one of the occupations is electronic literature writer. If you follow the same procedure for Mabel Addis, you will see that ELW is not included. It can be added by clicking on + to the left of occuptation. I'm afraid I am not an expert at creating new Wikidata entries as I always use the method just explained to add an entry in connection with a biography I have just created. In my opinion, trying to tackle Wikidata for new entries is not likely to encourage people to edit on Wikipedia. I'm not sure whether these are the kinds of task you are interested in. If not, please let me know more about what you would like to do to gain experience. If ever you do get around to starting a new biography, I would be happy to help you along. Now that you have already been able to gain some basic experience on sourcing, it may be the most useful way to proceed.--Ipigott (talk) 08:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In connection with the above, we now have a List of women electronic writers. It is based on those who are already covered by biographies in the English Wikipedia but could be extended to those in other language versions and those supported by good secondary sources. Perhaps you and your colleagues could check it through for accuracy. Any new biographies of women involved in electronic writing should be added to the list.--Ipigott (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! We will spend our first Thursday going through this list. We will keep a spreadsheet with basic information (birth, nationality, works, education) going on our own and then add that to wikidata. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think most of our other 300+ women electronic literature writers do not have published articles. We are working on developing those articles in a shared google doc so that we can ensure accurate and objective information as we get articles going. We anticipate that this will take a few years. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 16:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
LoveElectronicLiterature: For a project of this type, it is quite reasonable to suppose it will take a few years to incorporate some 300 biographies. It would nevertheless be useful if you could keep us informed of some of those who seem to be backed by sufficient sources at the moment. Adding one or two new biographies a month would keep things moving. For me, Google docs is not ideal as I am not a member of Google. Why not begin to develop a redlist as part of your project. This is the way most wikiprojects have managed to encourage support. We can then also use appropriate wiki tools to investigate redlinked names. Initially, you could for example aim at including ten significant names a month. I see by the way that there is already a list of potentially interesting names at the draft Lskains is preparing on New Media Writing Prize. I could begin to look through these myself and select a few for development.--Ipigott (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Lskains is part of our project and she just did that draft article this week. What wiki tools should we use to upload the names we have on our spreadsheet into wikidata so far? We do not have the birth, death, works done yet. Just the names. Maybe it would be easier to upload all of those names into wikidata as red links and then add the property info as we get it? I've been going through wikidata and I just don't get how to put in the new articles. Will I need to search each name and then add to wikidata? I tried to add Agnieszka Przybyszewska, but I did not see where to add her language (Polish) or her statements? Thank you for your patience with us :) LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
LoveElectronicLiterature: As I said earlier, I really do not think Wikidata is the best place to start. It's not easy to edit unless the person involved already has an article in which case you can use the gadget. I cannot advise you how to add info on Agnieszka Przybyszewska unless you first start an article. Our Wikidata expert Tagishsimon may be able to help. I have nevertheless made a quick search on her name and see she is still an assistant professor. That might be a problem for the acceptance of her biography unless her work is supported by awards or critical assessments. What I would suggest is that you start your own crowd-sourced list in the format used by Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers/Missing articles. You could for example call it Wikipedia:WikiProject Women writers/Women electronic literature writers/Missing articles. You could list Agnieszka Przybyszewska with a reference to elmcip. Others might then be able to add other useful sources, date and place of birth, etc. If you could start a list of ten or so, the rest of us could no doubt add to it. One we have a red-listed name, we can then carry out searches to see if the person is mentioned in existing articles, in other language versions of Wikipedia, or in reliable sources such as JSTOR. Thanks to Lskains, I've written a short biography of Amira Hanafi which could no doubt be expanded.--Ipigott (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red in September 2022
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
LoveElectronicLiterature: Your colleagues might be interested to know that we now have a List of women electronic writers which includes a few new names. It would be useful if the list could be checked for accuracy. If you do not want to edit it yourselves, just let me know what needs to be changed. One of my problems in expanding the list is that I do not know to what extent women involved in digital art and digital games should be added to the list. I've listed some candidates for inclusion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women writers/Women electronic literature writers. Please let me know if they are suitable or not.
I would also very much like to have access to your list of 400 women in electronic literature. Ideally it should be made available as a project page but if not a web link would be useful. It would also be good to try to develop a shorter list based on names with links to at least three reliable independent sources, especially critical assessments, background on awards, or coverage in the press. On this basis, some of us would no doubt be able to start creating more biographies or at least providing feedback on what else is required.
I hope the meeting goes well. Please let me know if you think I can help with any of the difficulties you encounter. I would be happy to assist anyone who wishes to become an editor.--Ipigott (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, our list of women is at tiny url dot com slash welwbrain and our drafting doc is at tiny url dot com slash welwwrite. My email is at clearlyconsistent at g mail dot com. We have an odd difficulty at the moment--we want to upload images of screenshots from works. But these images need to be uploaded by the original author of the work so that we follow all creative commons, copyright issues, right? So if the author uploads her own work and says it is ok to use as a creative commons image then is it ok for one of the other editors (not the original author) to upload that image to the notable person's page or to wikidata? This does seem like a catch-22? Thank you so much! LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for these details. I'm afraid I cannot access your lists. Perhaps you need to be a member of Google to do so. If you need help with your lists, it would be far better to develop them on Wikipedia, possibly in connection with your project. Names should be supported by at least one good independent secondary source (ideally three).
I'm not very familiar with all the copyright procedures on Commons but there should certainly be no problems if the creator of the image uploads it. If someone else does it on their behalf, then I believe the creator is required to confirm to Commons that the image is in an appropriate Creative Commons category. See also Commons Licensing. Maybe WomenArtistUpdates can offer further explanations.--Ipigott (talk) 06:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, we are getting image creators and writers to upload their materials. This will be a long-term effort. I did try to add two people to wikidata, but bovlb took them down as not being noteworthy, so I have to write their biographies before doing anything with wikidata as well. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
September 2022
Hello, LoveElectronicLiterature. I noticed that your recent edit to Jaron Lanier added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. An external link, even to Commons, will not display an image. Sumanuil.18:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I took this image as a screenshot from Jaron's talk at the Future of Text Symposium, where we all agreed to be recorded. Please let me know exactly why this is not allowed? Thank you. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 08:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red October 2022
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woollahra Digital Literary Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, LoveElectronicLiterature!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Identity verification
As your user page claims the identity of someone who has an article, please verify your identity by sending proof to Info-en@wikipedia.org
Thank you so much. This is part of the Wp:WELW project, and any info would help a lot! Today I am going to edit and resurrect all the drafts, and we will keep working!! Please let me know if you want to be part of this fun and exciting and long term project to document women electronic literature writers! LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, LoveElectronicLiterature. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
I have clarified that I am not receiving any contributions or renumeration, financial or otherwise. I am also not advertising or publicising. I am using third party references from universities, etc. to clarify our field, update accomplishments, etc. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Women in Red in December 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name, like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.
Hello, LoveElectronicLiterature. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woollahra Digital Literary Award, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th
Tip of the month:
Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.
Speedy deletion nomination of Hazel Smith (writer)
Hello LoveElectronicLiterature,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hazel Smith (writer) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!
When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful
Howdy. Give me few minutes, but I can tell you the citations need to be consistent date formatting of Day Month Year since they are from Argentina and it needs to be written out like 12 November 2023.Mitch32(won't you bemy neighbor?)16:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ana María Uribe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:34 North 118 West and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
34 North 118 West, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
First of all, I'm glad to see you are active once again, Deena, and have arranged a zoom meeting on on the 22nd. That should indeed prove useful in drawing attention to the new wikiproject. It's good to see you have added a link to the digitally accessible Electronic Literature Collection on Electronic literature. Thanks to the efforts of Lijil, the article has now been promoted to GA. One of the suggestions I have for the evolving wp:Elit page is to include a fairly short list (say up to 20 items) of deserving authors (both men and women) and titles of works which deserve articles. It would help (but not essential) if up to three reliable secondary sources could be included for each item to help contributors along. But if you and your colleagues can provide suggestions, I can look for sources. I know there are many, many more which could be included but if we can post a fairly short list (which can be updated from time to time) those participating in the project will have something concrete to work on. If there's anything else you think I could help with, just let me know. It's always exciting to help a wikiproject along in its early stages.--Ipigott (talk) 07:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your help, @Ipigott! Deena, would it be OK if we made a Wikipedia version of the list that is currently in Google Docs? I don't have access to the doc, though. Lijil (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have a list of 400 plus folks on our spreadsheet at tinyurl.com/welwspread, but what I can do is create a much smaller list on the Electronic Literature project? And just caveat it? LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, LoveElectronicLiterature, and thanks for all your recent biographies of women in electronic literature. I've reviewed and assessed them all, done a bit of copy editing and wikilinking, added authority control, sort and categories, and included them in the relevant lists. Although in general you include pertinent sources, you should make sure each paragraph contains at least one source, preferably at the end. Please let me know if I can help you with anything else. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much @Ipigott! I'll remove them from the request to review. You are amazing, and I am learning. If sources have different information, should those go at the keyword for that info or should all the sources go to the end of the paragraph? LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
References should be included where necessary, just as you have been using them up to now. It is nevertheless important to make sure that every paragraph has at least one reference. Reviewers often tag articles if they discover there are paragraphs without citations. If they are included at the end of a paragraph they are easy to identify. If necessary, the same sources may of course be referenced again and again. Let me know if you run into any difficulties. Happy editing.--Ipigott (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Placing cites at the end of each sentence is also common. Citing keywords is much rarer, but can be done when needed. For example, citing each country in a list of countries. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
As the article is a biography of the living person, we expect seeing references that are independent to the subject. See, WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMICS.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reham Hosny and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I tried to comply with your request on my talk page by moving Jo-Anne Green to article space as quickly as possible. I had hoped you would follow up with my request for more citations over the following hours but that has not been the case. As a result, I have had to draw attention to the missing citations in the hope that they will be added soon. I see that Jo-Anne Green has also faced problems by including her CV on her user page. It would therefore be useful to sort things out as soon as possible, perhaps with her assistance. I'm sorry you are encountering these problems but there are strict rules attached to the biographies of living people. Happy editing.--Ipigott (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Mark Bernstein (publisher). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because I note your request on the talk page to move to draft, as you don't think that it's ready yet. That seems like a very reasonable plan!.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Yes, thank you. @KlbrainKlbrain, if I link other articles to this draft space, will that work? I am working on other articles in this field, and we do need to refer to the correct Mark Bernstein. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 17:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't seem to be notable per WP:NPROF, and apparently no reliable, independent, secondary sources; multiple external links in the body; all major key points of the draft cite references to sources influenced or composed by the subject. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephanie Boluk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
In connection with this and your comments on the draft's talk page, LEL, I've tidied up your Metagaming draft and moved it to Metagaming (book). Please check it through carefully and make sure my edits have not brought about any unintented changes in meaning. As for your three drafts which have not been found sufficiently notable, I think the problem may have something to do with the way they are presented. I'm rather busy at the moment but if you could send me links to the drafts, I might be able to bring them up to standard over the next week or two. I think part of the problem is a result of including primary links in the lead. In future, rather than submitting drafts to AfC I suggest you let me know when you have completed a draft biography. In some cases, a few minor improvements are all that's needed. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigottsorry, I have been swamped on work deadlines. But yes, I do want to get back to these. The last wikipedia athon was working in Indian languages. We are focusing for a moment on translating the electronic literature article into Hindi, etc. so that we can share notable developments in Indian Elit. But yes, I will ping you from now on! LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response. I had a good Indian friend when I was a student and learnt a bit of Hindi at the time but I'm afraid it's not good enough to help you with translation.--Ipigott (talk) 14:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott I am working on Daniela Cortez Maduro this morning. We can delete it if this is not notable enough.
If you know of any Wikipedia editors in other languages, I would love to ask them to join the project and translate the main article Electronic Literature into their language... LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 21:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In a previous discussion you showed some interest regarding Growth Add a link feature. Hence, I'm sharing with you the recent post we wrote about it, as it will soon be available at English Wikipedia.
In short, this feature allows newcomers to discover that they can edit Wikipedia, by adding missing suggested links to existing articles in a guided way. It is also an excellent way to get more easy tasks newcomers can work on, as only a handful of easy tasks are available for them at the moment.
Hello, LoveElectronicLiterature. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Bernstein (publisher), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.
We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.
Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here
Tip of the month:
Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.
Getting Started
Tips
