An article you recently created, Ronnie Lahiri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, please ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.
You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)
If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected.
This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.
In particular, see and refer to WP:NCREATIVE for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.
This draft has been reference-bombed. The reviewer has not checked all of the references and should not be required and is not required to check all of the references. If the author wishes to have some of the references evaluated in review of this draft, please specify, in AFC comments, which of the references are key. Please specify not less than three nor more than five. This draft will not be reviewed further until the author identifies the key references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronnie Lahiri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Lord Alan B'stard!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
VERY URGENT: Please immediately update emergency@wikimedia.org about this message
To admins Bishonen and Cullen328 Please update emergency@wikimedia.org that a Hindu Raksha Dal volunteer has conveyed me that an unsigned reply dated 14.12.2022 has been received from Wikimedia Foundation legal email ID addressed to JP Sinha of SJM for my case. Which reply although is not presently fully in my actual knowledge, however I can simply confirm to have authorised the NGO helpline persons mentioned therein to complain to Fondation on my behalf so as to maintain my privacy outside India. Lord Alan B'stard (talk) 08:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added: I only imperfectly understand your note above, and would hate to be asked to explain it to Emergency. If you want to be able to communicate directly with Emergency yourself, while remaining anonymous, I'm pretty sure you can open a Wikipedia e-mail account even though you're blocked. Go to your preferences –> User profile —> E-mail options. Then they'll be able to write to you, and you will be able to use the "Message the emergency team" link at WP:EMERGENCY. Bishonen | tålk10:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Hello, Lord Alan B'stard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ronnie Lahiri".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Getting Started
Tips
