User talk:Logical Fuzz/Archive 1

Archive 1

Images

For images from flickr, only those marked strictly CC-BY or CC-BY-SA are allowed. Both the "NC" and "ND" parts of the Lafferty image are considered problems. "No derivatives" is unfree because of the whole wiki nature of WP - just as one can edit and modify other people's text, we want to be able to edit any images. As for the "noncommercial" part, although Wikipedia itself is not considered commercial, it is expected that others should be able to use the content commercially if they so desire; the classic example given is selling printed copies of Wikipedia. The general concepts of what constitutes allowable free content are described more at Commons:COM:L; the short form is that images should be usable by anyone, for any purpose. --dave pape (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

re removal of content per copyvio on Ian Somerhalder

Note:this is a "cropped" archive. The WHOIS info says that a Ms Hutchins registered iansomerhalder.net on 12 August 2001 and that Mr Gardner has owned damonsalvatore.com since 29 September 2009. Ms Hutchins still owns iansomerhalder.net for at least the next 3 months, unless she renews it, though there is no active host for the domain. I'm not including their other info here for their privacy and google results bringing up this page if i were to put in their first names and contact info but you can look it up at http://whois.domaintools.com/ iansomerhalder.net was mostly a repository of information, copies of pretty much every piece of Ian info in the print media from across the planet. While i would say that for WP it would be better to cite the original publications iansomerhalder.net is a great means of finding out what is out there, especially from his early years. It is still available on archive.org http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://iansomerhalder.net You can read the "Ocean Drive" article from October 2002 that is used as a reference on the archive, here. Many of the articles included on iansomerhalder.net include at least a scan of the first page of the print version of the article, such as this one which i cite the online version of from Entertainment Weekly's current website in reference for Young Americans (TV series). Looking up when a fansite was created and checking an article history is the best way to see who copied from whom. Sometimes that information is not available. Then you would have to look to see what version of text is on the other site and see if there is a different version of the paragraph in the article history that maybe has typos or poor sentence structure that was fixed (which would indicate WP is the source and the other site is a copy). I recently removed copyvio episode summaries for Vampire Diaries. Easy rule of thumb, The CW is not going to copy the summary from Wikipedia :P Actor bios and copyvio can take more investigation :S which is why i rarely do it but Ian is one of the few people in my watchlist. While i do agree that "Ian is ... hot ... and ... should ... call me!" i still revert edits like that if i find them first. If you happen to also be a fan of Young Americans then feel most welcome to contribute to that article. It hadn't been touched in forever until i noticed the tag for lack of references. delirious & lost ☯ ~нuɢѕ~ 18:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

User groups

Hi,
I just put you in the WP:Reviewer user group and noticed that you revert quite a bit of vandalism with Twinkle. Would you want me to put you in the Rollbacker group so that you can use the MediaWiki rollback function?
Cheers, Amalthea 16:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

That would be great! Thanks very much. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Alright, added. Obligatory note, rollback should only be used to revert vandalism, and misuse of the tool by reverting good-faith edits or revert-warring can lead to its removal. But I have no doubt that you already know when an edit summary is constructive and required.
Happy editing, Amalthea 19:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Glory Daze

I had no idea you were working on creating an article for the show, Because created one for it, just now. :) Feel free to make the edits you need on it. QuasyBoy 23:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Hey, no problem. No reason to apologize. I really haven't done much, I haven't been that interested in writing the prose. (I hate to create an article with only a few lines, although I know a lot of people do it that way and then work on it "live".) You got to it first. ;) It looks great! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank You. :) QuasyBoy 18:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
I would say leave as Wisconsin for now, at least until the show premieres. As for the episode list, you can create it, if you want. :) QuasyBoy 19:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
It's Indiana alright, good job on the episode list. :) QuasyBoy 17:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Need Your Assistance on How to Properly Update Leeza Gibbons' Bio and Photo

Hi there, my name is Bobby and I manage all of Leeza Gibbons' media online. We'd like to update her bio and photo on the Wikipedia page, but don't know how to properly do this. I tried posting a new photo and bio the other day and someone took it down.

Can you help? Everything I tried to post is OWNED by Leeza Gibbons. Therefore I'm not sure why the content would be deleted. She wrote her own bio too!

Many thanks...

Bobby & Leeza Gibbon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leezagibbons (talk • contribs) 19:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

"The Whole Truth"

I don't care if those edits I made to The Whole Truth (TV series) are unnecessary redirects or not. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Mea culpa

Hey, LF! I owe you a long overdue apology. Remember that little discussion we had regarding comprised v. "comprised of"? I stand corrected -- comprised is correct! Gad, how long have I been making that error? I shudder to think. Bless Strunk and White, and Happy New Year! Drmargi (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

No need for the apology. ;) I am glad we have a definitive decision, though. Happy New Year to you, too! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Winners and Losers (TV series)

Completely uncontroversial move. Didn't need to go to Requested Moves; you could've just placed {{db-move}} on Winners and Losers, which I've done. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I tried my best, I definitely don't know everything. Thanks. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Katerina Graham

This link you posted ( http://www.katerinagraham.org/information/biography/) does not exist in references. please stop removing all my work in regards to other references please. -KatGrahamKnows. Thanks so much.

Chaos TV Series

I created and commented on the talk page of the Chaos TV Series stub you created ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_%28TV_series%29 ). Thanks. Sunflowergal34 (talk) 23:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

As I commented on the talk page, I have no relationship to the subject of Chaos (TV series). I regularly edit the TV show articles and create or expand articles for new series. If you feel this show is not notable, please feel free to take it to a deletion discussion. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. I didn't think you did have any relation. COIs are my thing now! Sunflowergal34 (talk) 15:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

G.A., Uk dates

Hi. That's okay. We don't put UK Dates ;) Bye. SecretStoryStyle 13:31, 14 January 2010 (CET)

Re: Directors at List of Hellcats episodes

I actually got them from IMDB. :( Yes I know, IMDB is not 100% reliable. But they get it right 98% percent of the time when it comes to director and writer info. I'll comply with your edit, though. QuasyBoy 16:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Cool, I'll add them back. I was iffy about adding IMDB as reference, so I just added the names without refs. QuasyBoy 18:43, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Hellcats reference

Your welcome! It's the same page but it has been moved to a different URL, that's why it was not working. Thank you for all your help in Hellcats article :] Decodet (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Help please.

Hi, Logical Fuzz. I know this is very stupid, but can you help me with 90210 (season 3)? I am currently engaged in an edit war (yes, bad on me BUT). The user keeps moving a character to recurring when the source says he'll only be in one episode (episode 18). So I moved it to guest stars, which, according to guest appearance is a one-three episode cast members. I posted that link and this one: recurring to his page, but it went ignored and removed. His last edit summary was: "Jay09 you need to stop being so controlling over this page, and let other people make edits. And just because you don't agree, doesn't mean they have to get removed. Provide source for the status." Obviously a lie considering the source says one episode. I was just wandering if you could say the same? Then maybe he'll listen. User talk:CloudKade11, I would warn you though, judging by my previous encounters he likes to critisize, call you names and bully and use lots of capitol letters. Thank you in advance. Jayy008 (talk) 12:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey there. Sorry I wasn't around to get back to you sooner. I see you have discussed the situation with Moonriddengirl and also brought it up on the WikiProject Television page. This situation is a bit sticky. I have tried to follow both your arguments, but not sure I can really provide an opinion. In ways, I think each of you are right. (Although I'd say you are trying a bit harder to be polite about it.) I do know (or have seen) that CloudKade11 can be extremely unreasonable and I'd really rather just stay out of it. I am not well-versed in the nitty-gritty about what makes someone a guest star, or the "7 episodes to be recurring" rule. Hopefully the WikiProject TV page can give you some better advice. Sorry about that. :/ --Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
That's fine, I appreciate the reply! Somebody has commented on 3O anyway, so it should be resolved soon. Thanks anyway. Jayy008 (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Aaaah, I'm glad you got another opinion. I just went over and checked out the 3O. Glad everything worked out, well.....assuming CloudKade is willing to accept the opinion! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, that's something I'm not too sure about. I've just asked MRG what would happen if he doesn't accept it, just waiting for her now. Jayy008 (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Train Your Dragon (TV Series)

I closed this as a bold redirect to the film's article for now. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:25, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

discussion

Please voice your opinion here Thank you. Jayy008 (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Kitchen Boss

FYI, the website http://tellymad.blogspot.com/2011/01/kitchenbosss01e01hdtvxvid-shotv.html has copied the show information for Kitchen Boss from Wikipedia, not the other way around. Please check next time before making any removals. -- azumanga (talk) 04:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Upcoming TV series category

Uh, I don't know. It don't have problem with all the upcoming shows being in one category. An American category isn't really needed, in my opinion, But it's whatever you wanna do.It it is created i won't bash it. :) QuasyBoy 18:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

No Problem. :) QuasyBoy 21:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

kat graham

please provide me an email where I can email you the correct refernces for kat graham as there are constant revisions and misinformation posted that is not accurate with IMDB or ms graham herself. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by KatGrahamknows (talk • contribs) 20:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Rena Sofer

Regarding your recent revision of the Rena Sofer article, can you please provide a link to the guideline/rationale that supports your claim that awards do not belong in the lede? Guidelines for lead sections are specifically designed to provide a summation of why an individual is significant or important. The lede defines the topic, establishes context, explains why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarizes the most important points. Content supporting notability is critical information to present in the lede. Professional honors and awards, including Emmy Awards received clearly meet the criteria found at WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENT. I appreciate your time in attempting to clarify the discrepancy between the logic that you present and stated Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you, Cind.amuse 12:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I think you have misunderstood my edit. Awards do not belong in the lead sentence, but they are fine in the lead paragraph. Unfortunately, in the case of Rena Sofer there is only one sentence in the lead "paragraph".
I did some searching to try to find the guideline for this, but (of course) I cannot find the page I want right now. All I can do is direct you to any of the feature articles, such as Angelina Jolie, Reese Witherspoon, Judy Garland, Diane Keaton, or Brad Pitt. In each case, you will see that the actor/actress is not mentioned as award-winning in the lead sentence. ( e.g. Angelina Jolie is an Academy Award winning actress....) Rather, it is mentioned later in the paragraph, or in the case of some well-developed leads, sometimes in the second or third paragraph. Sorry, that's the best I can do right now. Just add a second sentence to Rena Sofer if you want to mention the Emmy. (e.g. Rena Sherel Sofer is an American actress, primarily known for her appearances in daytime television, episodic guest appearances, and made-for-television movies. She received a Daytime Emmy Award for her work in the soap opera General Hospital...) --Logical Fuzz (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Respectfully, I believe you are mistaken. That said, your suggestion to simply include a second sentence is acceptable. Please let me know if you ever find a guideline that supports your ideas about the lede. Thanks for replying. Cind.amuse 15:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
I have seen people quote WP:UNDUE when removing awards from the lead sentence. Maybe the sixth bullet on this to do list at WP:ACTOR will help. Honestly, I have no interest in doing any more searching for it. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Working Class (TV series)‎‎

Hi

Thanks for that, I was not aware of that rule, I learnt something new today !

I will gen up on that page, something I suppose I should have done before I put the tl on there :¬(

Chaosdruid (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Um..

I know you told me not add them to TV info boxes. But how come other articles like List of The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes episodes and List of Iron Man: Armored Adventures episodes in them?
Sorry. Also, I've check out the article, again.--WikiEditor44 (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

You destroyed my edits labelling them as mostly Garbage to Harry's Law

I wasn't trying to create garbage, I was trying to add content based on truly watching the show. I guess you like skinny, non-meaningful entries in your Wikipedia. I thought Wikipedia was about meaningful entries. You deleted it all. Sorry if I offended you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.84.23 (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, But, No Thanks.

Look. My job on Wikipedia is to make each and every article featured taught, precise, clean, and factual. I am doing just that. If you have a problem with that, take it to the Board of Trusties. Otherwise, I would appreciate you not raining on my parade of hard work.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethanbauer24 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I hardly call removing references and valid information to be "hard word".--Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Excuse me!? I work my duff off through countless hours of research. Whether it is to delete information or add it. I find your behavior repulsive and incomparable.--Ethanbauer24 (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Logical Fuzz. You have new messages at Drmargi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SHUT UP!

You put meaningless and repetitive insights on these pages. I am just cleaning up your colossal mess! I have dealt with you nicely until now. Leave me alone or else I will personally see that the Board of Directors hear of your antagonizing and evil behavior.--Ethanbauer24 (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

It is 'NEVER a good idea to remove ALL references from an article, as you did to Pan Am (TV series). You left the article completely unsourced. Go ahead, say whatever you want, to whomever you want. You are in the wrong. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:07, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Your crazy. I wanted to take back the things I said (forgive and forget?????). But I guess thats impossible with you. Is Wikipedia really worth this strife?!? Keep harassing me, and I am going to the police.--Ethanbauer24 (talk) 01:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Interesting, you thought that blanking my talk page would be more effective than an apology? When you learn to read and follow Wikipedia's guidelines, policies and rules, I will leave you alone. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 11:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Interesting

The person removing unsourced information and requesting sourcing on the talk page gets warned for "edit warring" but the person adding unsourced information doesn't. Harley Hudson (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

You have 3 reverts, he does not. You are in jeopardy of violation right now, he is not. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Reference List

Okay, I'm sorry for removal. Will stop now. Just one thing about the Falling Skies page. Some references need cleaning up. Can you do something about that? I can't seem to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyDarmodyRules (talk • contribs) 20:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for agreeing to stop. Do you mean formatting the references? I can do that, but I only format those which I consider to be reliable sources. I like to do ref formatting. ;) --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, on the main page. xD — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyDarmodyRules (talk • contribs) 18:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

The plot summary you just removed from Wilfred (U.S. TV series) was not taken directly from any one source. --Boycool (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I beg to differ. From the official website here and here :
Elijah Wood plays 'Ryan,' an introverted and troubled young man struggling unsuccessfully to make his way in the world until he forms a unique friendship with 'Wilfred,' his neighbor’s canine pet. Everyone else sees Wilfred as just a dog, but Ryan sees a crude and somewhat surly, yet irrepressibly brave and honest, Australian bloke in a cheap dog suit. While leading him through a series of comedic and existential adventures, Wilfred the dog shows Ryan the man how to overcome his fears and joyfully embrace the unpredictability and insanity of the world around him.
"Your words" (duplicates in bold): Wilfred follows Ryan (Elijah Wood), a young man struggling unsuccessfully to make his way in the world until he forms a unique friendship with Wilfred (Jason Gann), his neighbor's canine pet. The world sees Wilfred as just a dog, but Ryan sees a crude Australian man in a cheap dog suit. While leading him through a series of comedic and existential adventures, Wilfred shows Ryan how to overcome his fears and joyfully embrace the unpredictability and insanity of the world around him.
This is a copyright violation. It is NOT your own words.--Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Interesting how this free encyclopedia treats sourced plot summaries as copyright violations, but not images, press releases, etc. --Boycool (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Images (not-free use) and press releases (copied) can also be copyright violations. I don't make the rules. Maybe you should read up on WP:COPYVIO and/or visit WP Copyright problems Project Page and its talkpage. I can also direct you to some editors who are very skilled in the subject. Learn the guidelines, rules and policies, and then you won't need to call me a dickhead again. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
FX wouldn't have released the summary if they didn't want it to circulate on the internet. --Boycool (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
As per my statement above, I don't make the rules, so I don't know why you are telling me this. Read the guidelines again. I don't see why it is so hard for you to put the plot summary in your own words. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Falling Skies Reception

Do not write that it has a mixed response. It has a positive response based on a score of 70 on Metacritic. Just because a show has mixed reviews does not make it mixed. For example, Boardwalk Empire received some mixed reviews but it was still very well received. I am right and you are wrong. Favorable means positive. Now go back to preschool with the rest of the 5 year olds! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyDarmodyRules (talk • contribs) 15:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

I think you need to learn to control your temper. This is not the first time you have made unnecessary and rude remarks. You have not even attempted to discuss things rationally with me before making an attack. Maybe try counting to ten before posting? "Generally favorable" = not all favorable = not all positive = mixed. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Actually, if it were mixed it would have gotten the score 60 or lower, indicating "Mixed of Average reviews"

"Generally favorable" meaning mostly positive. If it received mixed reviews it would be in the yellow. 70 is quite high. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.40.52.122 (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Quick Comment

It looks like the conflict of interest regarding Annapakman on The Glee Project might not be too much of an issue from this point onwards - the user has not been active since March 5, and appears to only be active once every couple of months according to the contribution history (creating articles and providing those articles information on a number of shows, sourced or not, and leaving us to determine what stays and what goes). I myself only heard of the show this evening as it debuted on Slice here in Canada today (my sister berated me for not knowing despite being in the know on a lot of other Glee happenings); meanwhile, the third episode aired on Oxygen this evening on the south side of the pond as I call it. I feel disadvantaged because I don't know what is spam during an episode's airing; at one point, Emily was considered safe by one editor but was in fact the eliminated contestant. I'm wondering whether we need semi-protection on that page someday during episode airings, particularly the finale...but let's hope not.

If anything, it might be necessary to know when this user logs on in her once every two months session and figure out what she's creating; thus, we can fact-check and make it neutral if it's worth keeping, and not have an issue with who created it (even though it rings of COI). She just knows about the shows before us, and we can always delete what isn't notable. CycloneGU (talk) 03:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Revenge

I'm sorry I didn't know that. Won't happen again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

editing of Fallen Skies

I am a new editor to Wiki and I am interested in editing the Fallen Skies episode recaps, as the current writing despirately needs editing.

I have read through the wiki-pillars discussion and editing discussion, but it appears others are not following the same guidelines. For example, I edited two prior episode recaps because the original recaps were not reflective of the content in the episode. Later, I returned to edit the Sanctuary 2 recap and both the Santuary 1 and Silent Kill were either valdalized or changed back to the illiterate standard that prevails.

Hey, I want to have 'fun' like everyone else, but where is the 'fun' in poor use of grammer and syntax and a demonstration in English stupidity?

Good luck, Logical, see you around.

wintersgato — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintersgato (talk • contribs) 02:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello there. Sorry, but I am not sure why you came to me. I am not a major contributor to the List of Falling Skies episodes page, and I have not made an edit there in a month. In addition, I have never contributed an episode summary there. How is it that I can help you? --Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

edits

Is it just happy co-incidence that you keep popping up to "copy edit" every article i've edited in the last few days? Pat (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

I edit TV show pages, predominantly shows that are upcoming or that began within the last few seasons. I have all upcoming TV show pages that I know of on my watch list. I like to copy edit, and sometimes expand, those articles. If you edit there, you will probably see me.
You may want to review WP:OWN, because reverting my corrections to your writing is unacceptable, or those of editor Another Believer, especially when we are improving the article by correcting typos, overlinking, and applying other Wiki policies. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for copy editing Common Law, its easy for me to miss typos when i'm writing large ammount of text. Pat (talk) 16:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem, that's what I like to do. It's easier when you are not the one who wrote it. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 17:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Logical Fuzz. You have new messages at Calabe1992's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Logical Fuzz. You have new messages at Sybrexx's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Username/edits

Dear Logical Fuzz,

Would you like to change my user name? How do I do that? I'm happy to do that.

As to the edit that was removed, may I submit documentation to support the edit? I did not want to link to a copy of the lawsuit, as it contains the home address of Aubrey O'day, and I would not want to fuel any stalker type behavior.

XO,

Agente_Inc 173.17.197.47 (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

You can change your username in one several ways. Since you have very few edits, you can easily just register a new account (and not use this one). This is probably the preferred method, but let me note again that you must abandon the Agente Inc account. Otherwise you can get into trouble for using 2 accounts (sock puppetry). Alternatively, you can apply for a name change here: Wikipedia:Changing username.
Regarding "required documentation", Wikipedia is based on verifiability. It is not enough for something to be "known to be true", it must be verifiable in a reliable source. So, for example, a private internal document from a company cannot be used as a source. I really know nothing about quoting lawsuits, so I searched the archives for the reliable source noticeboard and came up with this discussion: [1] It seems, though, that it was never really resolved. If you have further questions about it, you'd be best to post a new topic at reliable source noticeboard, and link to the archive discussion. (If you need help with that, let me know.) The editors there have more knowledge of unusual sources and may be aware of other discussions/archives that may help you. Sorry I cannot be of more help. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

HELP

Dear Logical Fuzz,

How do I source a pdf of a pending federal lawsuit?

Thanks

Agente Inc (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

See above. ;) --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for comments

Hello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Thanks.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my talk page. Those links are great, but could you somehow incorporate them into your own comments? My own comments are up already and indeed someone has endorsed them. So I'd rather not change my initial statement, as it might then be confusing about who endorsed what when.
You could put your own comments under Other attempts (since you have posted WP policy information on the editor's talk page), or under Users certifying the basis for this dispute. I would not worry about the format so much as just to get all the information out there for the community to see and comment on. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox television/doc clarify location field

Hi. I see you undid my edit to Template:Infobox television/doc. At the time, I explained my reason for the edit at Template talk:Infobox television. It was in response to an WP:ANI discussion now archived here and received support here from Admin Kim Dent-Brown. Your thoughts please.  ⊃°HotCrocodile…… + 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I still think it needs to be discussed at WikiProject Television and consensus reached before it is changed. This parameter is often a topic of misunderstanding and conflict, and IMO changes should not be taken lightly. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I shall bring it up there. Yes, the location parameter really seems to have been causing much argument, let's hope that some consensus on clarification can be reached. Thank you for your time.  ⊃°HotCrocodile…… + 23:57, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles

Thanks for your great articles :). I'm giving you the "autopatrolled" right, awarded to those trusted to write consistently high-quality content. Thanks for the good work! Ironholds (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch! Much appreciated. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheNeighbors ABC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TheNeighbors ABC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

List of Awake episodes FLC

List of Awake episodes has been copy-edited by Davejohnsan, hope you will vote at the Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2 now. Thanks, and good luck with your work. TBrandley 03:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your many comments and concerns at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2. I have fixed and addressed your concerns, and feel it is, finally, ready. You said it should get a copy-edit, and has by a below editor. Feel free to vote now. Clearly you have a better eye than I do :) Hope you enjoy your cookie! TBrandley 03:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Awake episodes

Have addressed and fixed your final (hopefully :) comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2. If I have done something wrong please, let me know. Thanks! TBrandley 04:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Done your new comment. TBrandley 13:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Still not done properly, I give up. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Now, you say to change it to how it was originally. I have now changed that part back to this version of the page. Sorry for the misunderstanding. TBrandley 20:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
All new issues have been addressed. TBrandley 23:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
I've add new replacement sources. It is from IGN, who praised Jason Isaacs, Dylan Minnete, and Laura Allen, and from The Washington Post who praised BD Wong, and Cherry Jones, but disliked Isaacs. If those still don't work, please see here for more. Thanks! TBrandley 00:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but I'm not about to search for sources for you. That is your job. That sentence appears properly referenced, finally. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for replying. I wasn't expecting you to search for sources. TBrandley 01:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Amanda Righetti

I respect your input and have not reverted. My question would be, if IMDb is not the source of this information, what is?

These are not bluelinked titles, where the movie articles themselves would have supporting cites. Other actors' articles missing cites or being cited to IMDb are incorrect in that respect; there's even a template tag for that. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Also, another question. You mention in your edit summary, "Don't think you understood previous editor, IMDb is *not* being used as ref, it *is* being used as EL." However, Thief12 in his 04:57, 24 July 2012 specifically says that IMDb is being used as a reference: "removing several citation tags, the imdb page is ref below." I'm not quite sure how I misunderstood, since "ref" means "reference." --Tenebrae (talk) 17:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
And that is exactly why I said that you misunderstood him/her. If you would have looked at the edits in question, you would see that IMDb is not being used as a reference citation, it is an EL. S/he was removing the {{cn}} tags, not adding IMDb citations. No one said IMDb was *not* the source of the information. Your edit summary stated "Wikipedia disallows the wikia IMDb to be used as a reference citation, as it frequently gets cast information wrong. It can only be used as an EL, which by definition is only a "for further reading" link". It was *not* being used as a citation, it *was* being used as an EL. Your edit summary didn't say something like "I feel these need citations because they are not blue links". --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Not sure we're interpreting it the same way. Thief said "the imdb page is [the reference]." Since we don't remove citation requests from unreferenced claims, it appears to me he was saying that he removed the citation requests because IMDb was the reference for those claims.
In any case, it's all academic at this point: A template tag is probably neater and less cluttered anyway, so all's well that ends well! With regards and continued good Wiki'ing, --Tenebrae (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2

Hi LF. The FLC linked above could use a re-review, to see if your final batch of comments were addressed to your satisfaction. I understand you must be annoyed at how long it has taken for some issues to be fixed, but we're getting near the point where a decision must be made on the list, and I want to know where you stand on whatever edits have been made. Thanks. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

K.Michelle merging

The correct spelling is the one without the space "K.Michelle". The other article "K. Michelle" should be merged to that one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.234.89.102 (talk) 00:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

episode list

I do not have time to follow Wiki protocol here so please excuse. Please research "promotional" as it applies to Wiki copyright policies before you delete any more content on The Real Housewives of NJ episode page again. The particular content that you have repeatedly deleted is posted online at the NBCU media village, where it is freely available for promotional use. Your reason for repeatedly deleting the episode descriptions is/was, "copyright" violation, so maybe you will understand that it is not a copyright violation. There was a complaint on the main RHWONJ page about too much "promotional" info being used, but that is not the reason that you are giving for deleting it. Personally, I think that it is TOO promotional in nature, but as I first directed you, go look at many many other television show Wikis and you will see that many use the network promos for episode descriptions. I really hope that you don't want to make an issue of this because I don't have time for this right now, so can you make an issue with some other show if you must?68.37.29.229 (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Like Fuzz said, its a copyright violation; read WP:COPYVIO. TBrandley 22:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Look-if I waste my time schooling you guys about this by finding and giving you a link to the Wikipedia page where this is cited as "promotional" use-will you give it a rest?68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I am assuming you missed this on the bottom of the NBCUMV page? © 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc. Copyright © 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Permission is hereby granted for use of the photo* herein depicting the NBCUniversal program solely for editorial purposes in newspapers and periodicals to promote the NBCUniversal program only and for no other purpose. I stand by my statements, it is a copyright violation, and you are clearly misinformed. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
  • this has been bothering me-it refers to a "photo", not episode synopsis. In any event, use is/was granted for editorial purposes to "promote" the program and no other purpose, and I would interpret that as Non-free use permission being granted. 68.37.29.229 (talk) 00:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

May I direct you to Wikipedia's non free use policy? Quoted from Wiki's page: "Other promotional material: Posters, programs, billboards, ads. For critical commentary." that covers the use understand? Wiki ALLOWS promotional use so it is EXACTLY what you have posted is NBC's policy.68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

That section you are quoting from (WP:NFCI) is regarding images. Please read the sections on text. This is not a case of acceptable Non-Free Use. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

>*************************************************************************< !!!!!!!This topic has been updated on my talk page and elsewhere. If you want to continue behaving like the "CopyVio"-police instead-of addressing the issue, have fun. Either way I will win-because I already know that I am correct, at this point I am mainly waiting to see what happens. Maybe you should ask yourself this question, "How could someone make legal claims of copyright protection on something that was distributed widely to the media and public as promotional material and media information?-and WHY would it be an issue to the content creator?" About the only thing that you are correct about is that the content was copied verbatim, which yes, is generally a "CopyVio"-but in this case it is "non-free Use" I assure you. Maybe English is not your language? Or you are so busy that you use a bot to find "CopyVio"-----but this is not what is meant by "CopyVio" even-though it is verbatim cut and paste. `ohsorrysignbot

Sorry, I am not at all interested in discussing this further. Face it, you are wrong. I am not the only one to tell you that, there have been at least a half-dozen editors who have agreed, and tried to explain the matter to you. Your continued ranting is completely out of control, and I will not be a part of it. On the other hand, I will continue to remove copyright violations in episode lists. You are wrong--it is just too bad that you refuse to accept it. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


who cares leave it alone!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:36FE:3140:D8B2:74F5:9749:5C5 (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

You cannot copy/paste text (episode summaries, show descriptions, character descriptions, etc.) from other sources. This is a copyright violation and it is not allowed. Read the guidelines. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

catfish

Just curious as to how all of that was copy written when I sourced it and referenced it? Lady Lotus (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Adding a source/reference does not eliminate a copyright violation. It is still a cut-and-paste copy, and you cannot copy large amounts of text like that. A brief (sourced) quote is fine. Anything else must be in your own words. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Awake

Hi, if you would like to voice your concerns about the verifiability/plagiarism issues in Awake, please reiterate them here. Regards, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't know anything about plagiarism, but I will try to transfer over my comments from the FAC regarding clear misquotes and inaccuracies as soon as I can. It's not just a simple copy-paste, I need to look it all over again, and Ive been dreading that. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Oprah: Where Are They Now?

Sorry- I thought that I could copy episode descriptions, as long as I sourced the website. I think the page looks incomplete and lacking the way it is now- you should try to improve it instead of just criticizing and deleting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by WillowFeldman (talk • contribs) 00:15, November 14, 2012‎ (UTC-5)

I did improve it--by restoring the episode list using proper templates--which you removed without a valid reason! And I removed the completely unnecessary, duplicate fluff which added no value to the article. As for the episode descriptions, no, adding a source does not eliminate the copyright violation. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

LOL- so defensive. Whatever.— Preceding unsigned comment added by WillowFeldman (talk • contribs) 12:50, November 14, 2012‎ (UTC-5)

Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaakeli (talk • contribs) 13:30, November 14, 2012‎ (UTC-5)

Your welcome! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:38, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MalibuCountry ABC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:MalibuCountry ABC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

why are you trying to get my page banned ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.128.51 (talk) 01:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know who you are or which article you are referring to. Please read the details in the deletion notice (pink box) at the top of your article. Everything is explained there. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of VZLU

Hi. I noticed you recently tagged this page for speedy deletion under A3. However, you should wait at least 15 minutes before tagging as A1 or A3. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 13:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


Trevor Donovan

Why you canceled my version and deleted all the things I wrote, in my editing Has a source, And mostly based on IMDB, , why you quickly delete, I think my editing makes the article more interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.222.114 (talk) 09:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

IMDb is NOT a reliable source for information. It is user submitted, meaning anyone can add to it. Without proper sources for verification, your edits did not belong there. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 19:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Devious Maids

About Devious Maids, what I added was real.. A nice source, the first one about the show, and always have REAL infos.. So bad you deleted all.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2788:C4:7DE:4DCC:D366:12BD:D019 (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Fan sites are NOT reliable sources, see WP:RS. I don't care if you say that the info you added "was real". Feel free to re-add the information, with a proper, reliable source, of course. It should be easy to do if the info is real. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:18, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

This is a reliable source :) Know by cast and crew, and by the Devious Maids official accounts.. But anyway ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2788:C4:7DE:F892:3505:BACF:141A (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Fan Podcasts are not like fan websites. Fan podcasts are extensions of the show and help drive brand awareness for the property - as most all are not paid to do what they do the amount of work that goes into the podcast should get recognition in the article with the show they helped to create awareness for.

I agree that an I love So and so actor page does not belong in Wikipedia but relevant content should be part of the shows page. Did you know that it was the fans and the fan podcasts that got FOX to renew Fringe for a short fifth season. Should that podcast not get credit for their efforts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.97.60 (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Captain Assassin ANI

I've reintroduced the ANI in regards to CaptainAssassin!. Having seen Lugnuts and Betty Logan's talk pages, I felt this needs to have some form of resolution. Rusted AutoParts 15:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, but I don't see anything at WP:ANI? --Logical Fuzz (talk) 11:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

BAMS Deletion

I think you may have misunderstood thearticle I posted, It is not complete yet and needs alot to be added by me and my fellow cohort members. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyromaster225 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

ZyngFing

There is an open sockpuppet investigation request for users that have edited this page (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Extrause)

Any users that edit this page and have only ever done so, please add them in to the report. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 09:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Extant (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • drama television series that will air on [[CBS]]. It revolves around a [[female astronaut]] ([[Halle Berry]]<ref name=Berry>{{Cite web|url=http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/10/04/academy-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Submit Express

Hello Logical Fuzz. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Submit Express, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

the crazy ones removal

It was removed because 1)Digital Spy is a British not American website 2) It hasn't EVEN been shown on any TV channel in the UK, yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.64.94.157 (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

WHy

Why did you ask for deletion of my page. That was a work in progress! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesray55 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

The messages on your talk page will give you that answer. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Tomorrow People

I do not understand why the link to http://www.gopha.net/tomorrow has been removed from the wiki page for the Tomorrow People TV show. It may not be an official TP site for the 1973 version but it might as well be as it is the most comprehensive page in existence (and the only current/active one) and has been on the web since 1995 (even before Wikipedia). It has been on the TP wiki page for nearly as long as there's been one. There is no official web site for the 1973 version, and again, this is the closest there has ever been to one. In fact the company that put out the UK DVDs back in 2003-2004 copied every word off of my site since they had no data compiled themselves. Please reconsider. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.70.200 (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Ping!! Any thoughts, consideration on this? Thank you! 100.40.152.173 (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Second ping! --steinein (owner of TPEGPG) 173.62.70.92 (talk) 11:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Jon Jemrano

I realize that you were trying to keep Wikipedia a pristine website. I respect your decision about my article and there are no hard feelings.

Love,

BarelyLegalHotChock — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarelyLegalHotChock (talk • contribs) 18:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey

Remember to be careful when dealing with COI investigations, don't out them if you've made a connection with their IRL identities and the article(s). §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Tomorrow People

Why was the information about a tomorrow person killing, for the first time in over 40 years removed. It is relevant to the show, has been apart of the premise since the show's original incarnation in 1973? That would be like removing information about the official doctor in a series of doctor who being a woman, it is historically significant.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjawarriordex (talk • contribs)

As my edit summary stated here, the information was unsourced. The reference you provided had nothing to do with the text you added. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing

Hi, I notice that you undid an edit saying that sources were needed. Technically you only need to source something that might be challenged or is a quote. See WP:V. Editors are more picky when it comes to BLPs, but the article you reverted on was not a BLP. I see it's a new article, and there may be a history with the editor. I won't challenge the change, but just flagging up the question to be clear that, no, not everything requires a source.Span (talk) 18:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Yes, I know about WP:V. I am guessing that you do not edit the television articles much. My revert was no different than what any other regular editor of the TV pages would have done. Lets just say I challenged the information. The editor added information in several places and, in each case, squeezed it between sourced info and the citation. As per WP:V, Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed. In addition, The citation must clearly support the material as presented in the article. This was not the case. And by the way, I did revert "in good faith", and then re-added a portion of the info after I found an appropriate source.--Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Span (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

So sorry about the Resurrection links. I genuinely was unaware of that rule. It will not happen again. Resurrection Fan

CCI update

Wizardman 21:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Red Band Society

My intention in adding an {{About}} to Red Band Society was not merely to link to the original series. There is a disambiguation issue: the English title under which Polseres vermelles is marketed is The Red Band Society, and on the English Wikipedia, The Red Band Society redirects to the article on the Catalan series; so confusion between the two series is certainly possible. My original edit made the reason for the {{About}} more clear, but I changed my mind and simplified the hatnote; maybe my original edit was better. I reverted your reversion of my edit on the assumption that you will agree that this is a valid use of {{About}}; if not, please let me know.

See also my note on the talk page.

Thank you.

Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

!

Nice wall. Terrible poster. Darkvne (talk) 04:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC) 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkvne (talk • contribs) 04:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

!

Thanks for all you put into the Battle Creek page!

Looks great!

So far all my contributions have been minor, and my knowledge of the complexities of setting up a page layout is almost nothing.

I was thinking I would have to spend the next few weeks struggling to figure out how to get it all done and piece it all together as I had time, but you've got it looking great in almost no time!

I appreciate the assist!

Dlairman (talk) 16:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome! That's what I like to do....so it was no problem at all. Glad you like it. Of course, feel free to add more to it at any time! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Somebody's Gotta Do It

My edit [2] was not original research. That show airs on CNN. This is from the article. "Eight channels owned by Turner Broadcasting, including CNN, the parent of this web site, were blacked out in Dish homes for about a month, beginning on October 21. The channels were restored on November 21, and the contract for the channels is now believed to expire in early 2015." Removing the channel from their lineup effected the ratings. --SportsMaster (talk) 02:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

SportsMaster, I think you mean ""affected", but the main issue here is that sources need to directly support claims. The source needs to say that "Somebody's Gotta Do It"'s ratings were affected, but it does not. Making the assumption that ratings were affected because the channels were blacked out constitutes WP:SYNTH, which is a specific type of original research. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
If you look at the ratings numbers on the article itself you can see a drop from 772,000 the week prior to 469,000 the week after the dropping of CNN occured. --SportsMaster (talk) 02:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Still, you need the source to explicitly support the claim. Equating the drop in ratings to the channel blackout is classic WP:SYNTH. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Aussie has done a good job of explaining this to you. Please read WP:SYNTH. While you are claiming that the ratings were affected, nothing of the sort is directly stated in that source. You are welcome to re-add the statement if you find a new source, one which clearly states' that The Last Man on Earths ratings were decreased due to the blackout. (Thanks for taking this on while I was offline, Aussie!) --Logical Fuzz (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate the clarification from both of you.--SportsMaster (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Kirby Buckets

Is this some new WP:TVUPCOMING thing I missed? — Wyliepedia 05:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey there. I'm probably not the best person to ask, because I wasn't part of the development/rewrite of WP:TVUPCOMING, but I would say that it does fall under that. A new episode list cannot be created until there is enough sourced info for it, right? So I'd say that, technically, the numbering (or renumbering or column-adding) of episodes for a second season is still an assumption--they have not been produced yet. Hope I helped. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FairlyLegal-logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FairlyLegal-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Star-Crossed (TV series)

Your revert doesn't make sense. The series is not currently broadcast anymore so the section is out of date (for which we do delete entire sections such as this) as well as no longer applicable. The Haz talk 16:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Crowded

Crowded Suzanne Martin created the show and that means Samjen Productions logo will air — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forchef (talk • contribs) 02:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

This is called synthesis, see WP:SYNTH, and is not allowed. You still need a reliable source.Logical Fuzz (talk) 09:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the warning

Thanks for the warning about copyright infringement. I typically watch Limitless on this site called jetflicks.mobi and when I looked at the wikipedia page I noticed that jetflicks' descriptions were better. I had no idea that they got their descriptions from another site. Next time I'll be sure to check. ClarinetMinuet (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Thats an Article on my own self bro!!

Hello, thanks for your message. But I created that artice on ME! So how can that be offensive to anybody else? For God's sake let me do my thing! Show me a way to my article work bro!! I'm so worried but that wouldn't matter you so just lemme get through this!! :(

Regards: AJ AlyJayOfficial (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


Barnstars

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Great job on removing fansite links (which I loathe and basically gave up on trying to remove!) and other gnoming tasks! Pinkadelica♣ 06:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for demonstrating your great cleanup skills in the KSM (band) article!  Gongshow Talk 19:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Well done!

The Editor's Barnstar
For particularly fine work expanding My Generation. Well done! Marcus Aurelius (talk) 02:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
You're awesome. Recollected (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I wasn't expecting that, but thanks. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Nice work

Nice work on Ethan Peck. Your changes are a big improvement to that article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Rizzoli & Isles

Excellent work on this page! After seeing the semi-fannish page for Angie Harmon, it was such a delight to see your pitch-perfect, beautifully referenced and encyclopedically toned writing and research at Rizzoli & Isles. Bravo! --Tenebrae (talk) 13:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1