User talk:Lmmnhn/Archive 5
Protest grouping / chronological order?Hello Lmmnhn. I noticed your edit in Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019 about the chronological order of the protests [1]. I wanted to discuss with you why I believe it should be grouped. First, the bill here is the focus and the protests are the result of the conflict. Grouping the protests together make the whole article much tidier and easy to read. Also, as there is a new article (2019 Hong Kong extradition bill protests) which is created to separate the bill and the protest against it, grouping it makes it easier to summarize and reduce the excessive content of the events, and redirect readers to the new article for more information. As I mentioned, the focus of the bill article should not be the protests. I hope you can consider reverting your edit. Cheers. –Wefk423 (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Please can you use the article talk page so other editors may contribute to the discussion? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC) ITN recognition for Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019On 10 June 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Viztor (talk) 16:00, 12 June 2019 (UTC) Redirect loopHello. Your recent edits caused 2019 New Territories East by-election and New Territories East by-election, 2019 to redirect to each other. Presumably there is some article on the topic that you were trying to make the target, but I don't know what the title is. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ALLinHK logo.jpgThanks for uploading File:ALLinHK logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Please provide justification for future undo operationsHello, I see that you have been undoing some of the articles that provided incorrect/inaccurate information and I appreciate your work. However, please provide justification in your undos in the future to avoid possible misunderstandings. Thank you. SammyknowsitallCriticize 02:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Citizens Party.pngThanks for uploading File:Logo of Citizens Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Hong Kong Indigenous.jpgThanks for uploading File:Logo of the Hong Kong Indigenous.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC) Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tung Chung Central (constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Draft:Kwai Luen (constituency) concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kwai Luen (constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Draft:Cheung Chau (constituency) concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cheung Chau (constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tai Pak Tin East (constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageYour submission at Articles for creation: Hoi Nam (constituency) (November 20) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Otr500 were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
"Camp" Control table heading conventionRe 2019_Hong_Kong_local_elections#Results_by_district Thanks! Amazing stuff! Knowsitallnot (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC) Unneccesary removal of content on 2019 Hong Kong local elections.Hello, I'm Symes2017. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2019 Hong Kong local elections without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Symes2017 (talk) 14:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sai Kung District Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Kung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC) Sai Kung resultsThe pic showing the results of the election has the consituencies of Cheung Chin-pang, Christine Fong Kwok-shan, and Chris Cheung Mei-hung in gray instead of blue or yellow. This is because they are part of the centrist Professional Power, which is part of neither of the two main camps. Their names should be moved out of the pro-Beijing column and into the "other" category. User:DunkyMatchette 04:56 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kwai Luen (constituency)Hello, Lmmnhn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kwai Luen". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 15:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Tai Pak Tin East (constituency)Hello, Lmmnhn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tai Pak Tin East". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Tung Chung Central (constituency)Hello, Lmmnhn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tung Chung Central". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Cheung Chau (constituency)Hello, Lmmnhn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cheung Chau". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Tai Po Democratic Alliance logo.pngThanks for uploading File:Tai Po Democratic Alliance logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 11An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrie Lam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolfson College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Hi!Hi!, I am so interested in Hong Kong, I just wanted it to share it with you, but I can't contribute further because I don't speak Chinese. :) I particularly love Mr. Sham for his LGBT activism. You that know much more than me, is he known better for what activism, political or LGBT? Have a extraordinary end of year! :) -- Iván. --CoryGlee (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Taiwanese local elections infoboxPlease do not mass-change infoboxes to the versions you have. They have several problems.
Ythlev (talk) 19:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
You mean with your subjective perception or with actual numbers? For yours, the width ratio is 135/128=1.055, for mine, it's 170/162=1.049.
Either way, even if you fix the height, the widths will still be different. I suggest using images with standard ratios.[3] Ythlev (talk) 08:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Explain how it makes any sense to list MLYs representing different areas on the same row just because the number is the same. How does that do anything but mislead? Ythlev (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
As for the images, setting a fixed size makes them un-adjustable, which goes against guidelines. Your versions still have uneven images, just in width not height. I believe it can be fixed, but you show no intention of fixing it. You still haven't snapped a screenshot of the versions with re-cropped images, or provided the image dimensions, so I have no idea what you're talking about. What you've described is what would happen if you set the thumbnail size smaller than 220px, so at least tell me what your setting is. Ythlev (talk) 07:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC) By the way, if you've edited hundreds of election articles, you should know that the template has the parameters image1_size etc, but they are not listed in the usage section of the doc because they are not supposed to be necessary. I wonder how it makes sense to you to have to manually set the image sizes for every infobox when other infobox templates can deal with images with no problem. How do you even come up with the sizes? Trial and error? Ythlev (talk) 08:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 25An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harbour City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Updating the logo of Tin Shui Wai ConnectionHi Lmmnhn, Would you mind update the new logo of Tin Shui Wai Connection. The sea green one is not the latest one. File: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qpj4TDXZ0RBaS1wezQAabJCFhR1mnrfl/view Image above is given by TSW Connection (with size reduction) and they know that it is used in Wikipedia. I am glad if you can help. Pakho (talk) 03:36, 3 January 2020 (UTC) Category:District Councillors of the certain districtsBecause most of them are no longer district councillors. If they are still assigned to certain district councillor categories, they will be confused with the current ones. I also tailor it with the category's Chinese version. Ckh3111 (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Warring: 2019 Hong Kong local electionsYou have now three times reverted my action to add a subsection title to the 2019 Hong Kong local elections. I note that your first revert was accompanied by no edit summary. An editor of your long standing and experience ought simply never to display such arrogance and disrespect to any other editor. To revert anyone's material must be explained. That was a very poor first step. I invited you to take the matter to Talk and you failed to do so, going ahead with a second revert. I am not invoking the formal edit warring complaint process because I believe we can happily sort this out between ourselves but that does require a little respect and circumspection from you to start off with. That's the preamble. Now, as to your objection to my creating a subsection title, firstly, this is not something of such vital importance, taking into account what you have said in the two edit summaries you have provided, as to justify this sort of major dispute you have taken up. It's just a section title. So you might consider just reducing the temperature a bit before your next thought on the subject. Secondly, the reasons you have given don't amount to saying that the title is wrong in any respect, merely that you think, as a matter of weight, it creates an overemphasis. This is, clearly, a pretty subtle question, not one arising from any fundamental principle or other central theme of the encyclopaedia. Thirdly, to say that there are other important matters which have not been graced with such a subsection title is no objection to this subsection title; it is an invitation to create those further subsections, and you are at liberty to do so if you are inclined to invest as much effort in such an enterprise as to plague another editor with your warring reverts. I shall leave this matter to simmer for a bit and then proceed to reinstate the subsection title. A further revert will result in the formal edit warring complaint process. sirlanz 14:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
April 2020You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for four reverts on multiple articles (2016 Taiwanese legislative election, 2020 Taiwanese legislative election etc) within eight hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Number 57 12:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Draft:Hoi Nam (constituency) concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hoi Nam (constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Hoi Nam (constituency) (April 28) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Still tirelessPerusing the edit history of People Power (Hong Kong), I note that you have contributed in every year since its creation, 2011-2019 (and there's still another nine months of this year ..). Representative of your enduring hard work on HK issues. Keep safe in these troubled times. - Onanoff (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ythlev (talk) 11:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 15An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Hong Kong legislative election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helena Wong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 22An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunny Cheung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Hastie. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC) DYK for Winnie Yu (nurse)On 31 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Winnie Yu (nurse), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in response to the Hong Kong government refusing to close its border with mainland China to contain COVID-19, Winnie Yu organized a labour strike among hospital workers in February 2020? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winnie Yu (nurse). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Winnie Yu (nurse)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Urgent! 2021 Legco vote should be a new articleHi, I was going to write to all contributors to the 2020 Legco election article - but it's nearly all your fine work. Thanks for all the effort. From a Wikipedia point of view, the 2021 event is surely due a separate article?
At the talk page, I've posted: Your comment, and I hope assent, are greatly welcomed, there. Then I'm happy to help with the transition. Cossaxx (talk) 13:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
DYK for Wong Pak-yuOn 2 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wong Pak-yu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Wong Pak-yu nominated Woo Kwok-hing in the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election, he decided to cast a blank vote to protest against the election's lack of democracy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wong Pak-yu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wong Pak-yu), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC) I found thisHi!!!!!! ^_^ , I think I found a news that further 5 pro-democracy activists have been DQ. Among them Jimmy Sham and Sunny Cheung. Here is the source in Chinese you may understand more ! It's for the 2020 Hong Kong Legislative Council candidates' disqualification controversy - Cheers! --CoryGlee (talk) 13:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020Your addition to Postponement of the 2020 Hong Kong legislative election has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Carson Wen
A tag has been placed on Carson Wen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054642/https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=5854367&capId=136596879&previousCapId=&previousTitle=. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 10:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . MER-C 18:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Lmmnhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I never edited Duncan Bluck. Lmmnhn (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: Other than the fact that this doesn't address any of the reasons for why you were blocked, what's this? Are you claiming that isn't you? You clearly edited Duncan Bluck. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 19:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Lmmnhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I have edited more than a thousands articles and my contributions have been widely recognised. I don't think it is fair to block me indefinitely for one or two copyvio allegations. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: You need to provide us assurance that you understand the copyright policy before being allowed to edit again. PhilKnight (talk) 19:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Lmmnhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I understand it. The article Carson Wen I got banned for was edited five years ago. I have learned and edited much more quality articles since then. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Speedy deletion nomination of Carson Wen
A tag has been placed on Carson Wen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054642/https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=5854367&capId=136596879&previousCapId=&previousTitle=. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 10:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . MER-C 18:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Lmmnhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I never edited Duncan Bluck. Lmmnhn (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: Other than the fact that this doesn't address any of the reasons for why you were blocked, what's this? Are you claiming that isn't you? You clearly edited Duncan Bluck. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 19:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Lmmnhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I have edited more than a thousands articles and my contributions have been widely recognised. I don't think it is fair to block me indefinitely for one or two copyvio allegations. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: You need to provide us assurance that you understand the copyright policy before being allowed to edit again. PhilKnight (talk) 19:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Lmmnhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I understand it. The article Carson Wen I got banned for was edited five years ago. I have learned and edited much more quality articles since then. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. The article Carson Wen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Captain Calm (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Hoi Nam (constituency)Hello, Lmmnhn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hoi Nam". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Civic LegCo membersA tag has been placed on Template:Civic LegCo members requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk) 23:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Democrats LegCo membersTemplate:Democrats LegCo members has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 02:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Democrats out of LegcoHi. It seems there is no real coverage yet of the mass resignation of democrats from Legco - or have I missed something? I notice a little addition stuffed into 2020 Hong Kong Legislative Council candidates' disqualification controversy but that seems inappropriate. I suppose you'll be putting in your usual good work? Cossaxx (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 Hong Kong legislative electionA tag has been placed on Category:2020 Hong Kong legislative election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Category:Hong Kong people of Fujianese descent has been nominated for deletionCategory:Hong Kong people of Fujianese descent has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Li Shu Fan.jpgThanks for uploading File:Li Shu Fan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC) List of Executive Council of Hong Kong unofficial members 1946–1997Hi there, I have been editing articles related to Hong Kong politics recently. In List of Executive Council of Hong Kong unofficial members 1946–1997, what came to my attention was the list stating the number of official and unofficial members. Instead of 4, there should only be 3 official members excluding the Governor by the end of the colonial period, i.e. Chief Secretary, Financial Secretary and Justice Secretary. I would genuinely appreciate it if you could provide the source for that, or at least list out which 4 of them were. Cheers. -- NYKTNE (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:2006 Election Committee Subsector ElectionsTemplate:2006 Election Committee Subsector Elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:2011 Election Committee Subsector ElectionsTemplate:2011 Election Committee Subsector Elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 Election Committee Subsector ElectionsTemplate:2016 Election Committee Subsector Elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Hong Kong urban council and regional council elections, 1986Template:Hong Kong urban council and regional council elections, 1986 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Hong Kong urban council and regional council elections, 1989Template:Hong Kong urban council and regional council elections, 1989 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC) |