User talk:Littledaniel 93

User talk page blanking concern

Regarding user talk pages, it is best to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here [1], under "When pages get too long." Your talk page is intended to serve as a place to discuss your contributions. It ends up being a sort of a history of the work you've done and the conflicts you've been in, or the praise you've received. It's alright to archive comments or warnings, but blanking your talk page is not considered acceptable, as it is not actually yours. Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:TALK. Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages can often be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil. For this reason, if your deletion of notices and concerns on your user talk page is to keep the "clutter" down, I suggest that you instead create archives for these messages. I would be happy to assist you in doing just that if you ask me to. -Kukini hablame aqui 20:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ace4.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ace4.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 13:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use images on Your User page

Please remove them, see WP:FUC #9. Thanks. feydey 13:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the fair use images from your userpage. You have had two days to comply with feydey's request.Bass fishing physicist 23:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since sufficient warning had been given I have removed the fair use images from your userpage. 86.27.71.155 13:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't reinsert those images again. You're not allowed to use fair use images on you're userpage. I've removed them again. There are also some images for which you have used the wrong license. For instance, screenshots can never be licensed in the public domain. I've removed those licences. Please only use that license (public domain) for image that you've taken yourself, with a camera. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks! --JoanneB 08:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've also removed the fair use images from the userboxes you've created. See Wikipedia:Removal_of_fair_use_images for some explanation. Kind regards, --JoanneB 09:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed fair use images again, please don't replace them. Bass fishing physicist 17:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop replacing the images on your User page. Bass fishing physicist 20:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Littledaniel 93! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Wow... somebody's a young SG-1 fan... enjoy, and welcome. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bedtime_For_Bonzo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bedtime_For_Bonzo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 23:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Verica Karanfilovska.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:XXL.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Szilvia Péter Szabó.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

I note that you're originally uploading most of your images as being your own creations. This seems unlikely to be accurate, but you'd be well-advised to add evidence supporting that when you do so. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rosica Nikolovska.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Marija Nikolova.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ivona Dzampovska.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Advice on uploading images

Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.

  • Pick an image name.
When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.
  • Source the image.
On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so. If it's from the web, give a URL. If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.
  • Provide copyright and license information.
This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.
If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you own the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.) Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like {{GFDL}} or {{PD-self}}. Be sure to mention that you created the image. If you're using {{PD-self}}, you may also want to use {{NoRightsReserved}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.
If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content. This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use". Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under fair use, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.
  • Describe the image.
To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page. Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Fair use, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 10:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovision

Leaving a message is several user's talk pages to promote your oppinions is considered both cpamming and canvassing, which are strongly discouraged in Wikipedia. Please avoid doing politics here. Thank you, --Mariano(t/c) 13:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Acewho.jpg

Hello, Littledaniel 93. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Acewho.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Littledaniel 93. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:106006774 f03b4b4b07 s.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:106006774 f03b4b4b07 s.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Punkmorten 22:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Wogan

Are you sure it was 1971 - all the references I've found say 1980, with some intermittent work in the late 70s. Can you point me to a source to back your version up? Cheers, --Fritzpoll 19:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that's when he was first asked to do it, but I don't think he did it every year from 1971, only every year from 1980, so I'm going to revert your change. If you can find a source that says it was every year from 1971, or that can tell us what years before 1980 he did the work, we can include that info. Cheers --Fritzpoll 13:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Acewho.jpg

Hello Littledaniel 93, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Acewho.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Littledaniel 93. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Babes_In_The_Wood.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Babes_In_The_Wood.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baal template

Are you sure that this template is needed? --Tone 19:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The templates i have created help u see wot over episodes they have been in and wot the story line is around these characters they are there to help the readers follow the story

Well... ok, I won't object. By the way, don't forget to sign your posts on talkpages. --Tone 19:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Travelers stargate.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Travelers stargate.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templates up for deletion

TfD nomination of Template:SG-1

Template:SG-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Maelwys 17:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Russell01.jpg

It's not PD - it's actually Non-free promotional. My bad - that was early on in my Wikipedia career when the exact tags that were appropriate were not available/not clear. I'm correcting it and adding the proper rationale. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 01:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Blestyashchie.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blestyashchie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 06:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:LennaK1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:LennaK1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 06:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improper licensing of images

Please don't list images as self-taken unless you took them. This is a copyright violation, and is taken very seriously. Serial copyright violators are often blocked, and may actually be sued to the license holder. Thanks for your edits, and please continue to contribute. The Evil Spartan 06:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Jenniferkeller 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jenniferkeller 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jenniferkeller 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenniferkeller 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Stargate

Project Logo Hello, Littledaniel 93! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Stargate, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for update the activity of the wikiproject. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list.

Thanks! – sgeureka t•c 16:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Queensbury Upper School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Littledaniel 93! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 15 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Marija Nikolova - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Ivona Džamtovska - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Rosica Nikolovska - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Verica Karanfilovska - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]