Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Max Mezo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, LimeKiwi29!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The references that you have added are not changing the equation here. Firstly, notability cannot be supported by his own Facebook profile, his own self-published website about himself, "student life" profiles on the website of the university he attends, or his own work metaverifying its own existence on YouTube -- to be notable enough for an article, he has to be the subject of sufficient media coverage to verify his significance, such as critical attention being paid to his work by professional film critics and/or winning or being nominated for significant awards (e.g. the Canadian Screen Award for Best Cinematography. And of the three footnotes that are media, one is a blog and one is a neighbourhood community weekly, neither of which are sources that can be used to show that a person clears the general notability guideline either. The only source here that counts for anything at all is the Toronto Star, but a person still needs quite a bit more than just one source of that calibre before they're notable enough. Please note as well that the number of views a music video got on a social networking platform like YouTube is not a notability criterion in and of itself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Max Mezo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Limekiwi29 was:
Notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
A couple of months ago you reviewed my article and declined my submission. I understood the reasons you gave as to why it didn't fit the criteria and have now made the need adjustments.
I hope the article now fits the criteria and can be approved.
Hello, Limekiwi29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Max Mezo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Limekiwi29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max Mezo".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Youtube, Vimeo, etc shouldn't be used if possible.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Limekiwi29. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:
A lot more work needs to be done. Several sections need to be cut as they are not suitable for an encyclopaedic entry. Kindly rewrite the article as plainly as possible sticking to the facts and provide reliable sources for each.
For example: the entire paragraph of "After high school, Max pursued a career in film by attending film school at Toronto Metropolitan University, where he met his mentor, Julian Lomaga, known for his work on music videos for artists like Martin Garrix. This connection significantly influenced Max's career, marking his transition from videography to cinematography. Under Julian's mentorship, Max began working on larger-scale productions, including commercials and narrative film projects." needs to be cut down to just the facts states as plainly as possible, for example: "Mezo has a BFA from Toronto Metropolitan University. While at university, his mentor Julian Lomaga encouraged him to pursue cinematography, after which Mezo began working on commercials and narrative films.", since the rest of the paragraph and descriptions qualify as puffery.
Please refer to the subject by their last name/surname, as this is the formal style of Wikipedia. Similar condensations as in the example above need to be done for this draft to be considered. Please also consider using reliable sources from the news, magazines, or books. Social media and interviews are not considered reliable. Please feel free to drop by my talk page if you would like any help improving this draft. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This is based too heavily on primary sources that are not support for notability, and does not cite nearly enough proper reliable source coverage about him to pass WP:GNG. The notability test for a Wikipedia article is not merely that his work exists, and requires third-party coverage and analysis about him in reliable sources, but that's not what you're showing. Your closest attempt at getting toward that, "widespread news coverage from prominent media outlets", is listing things like Ryerson Today (a university student newspaper that is not a notability-building source), BlogTO (a hyperlocal city blog that is not a notability-building source) and Beach Metro Community News (a hyperlocal neighbourhood pennysaver that is not a notability-building source). You also say he got coverage from Global News, but the only Global News hit actually being cited in the article is one where Max Mezo isn't the subject of the piece, but merely the bylined contributor of a photograph of somebody named Jonathan Otter -- which also isn't helping to establish Max's notability, because the article isn't about him. The only solid source here that's actually about Max Mezo is the Toronto Star hit, and that's not enough by itself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Mezo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
