User talk:LiberatorG

Welcome

Hello LiberatorG, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

LiberatorG, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 06:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Liberator G Please go through the link https://www.rediff.com/movies/2002/sep/13dinesh.htm Dushman was first release of the year 1972 was released on 7 January 1972...

URI schemes

Hi, thanks for explaining the reasoning behind your reverts on URI.

My reasoning for adding strange URI’s is to show the difference between webpage addresses and URL’s.

In practice, most people glance at Wikipedia and move on; they don’t follow all links. That’s why I want strange URI’s in the article.

Happy to reword or pick another place in the document to put these. I think they make the encyclopedia friendlier, funnier, and clearer.

There should be a way to do this that does not harm the clarity of your text or the rest of the exposition. Crasshopper (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Crasshopper: I'm not sure what you mean by "show the difference between webpage addresses and URL’s", or how a long list of obscure schemes shows that. Most of them are not even wikilinks; I don't see how anyone would know what something like "things" refers to in your list or how it would help them to have it listed with no link or other explanation. Three of your links point to disambiguation pages, which is also not helpful. Even the provided links are generally of no help; links like adiumxtra just take the reader to the Adium article which has no information about the adiumxtra scheme. IP over Avian Carriers is not only an April Fools joke but is also below the network layer and not even related to the URI scheme. There is already a table for schemes with articles in Template:URI schemes, which is already included at the end of the URI article. If you still think that listing obscure schemes in the URI article is appropriate, please bring it up on the article's Talk page; I am happy to follow whatever consensus is decided there. -LiberatorG (talk) 01:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Tucker quotes

You are welcome to add the quotes you like — Preceding unsigned comment added by HHHIsMyHomeBoy (talk • contribs) 18:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LiberatorG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for opinion

Sir, can I request your opinion on the discussion "Timeline of computer security hacker history" which is located on my talk page? Please leave your opinion/comments on my talk page instead of here if you have one. Mdikici4001 (talk) 02:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LiberatorG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Code page 866

Thank you for that. I was, of course, purely thinking in terms of box drawing in existing text files in OEM-437 (hence "OEM box drawing characters"), and that 866 is the only encoding supported by modern browsers that will display them correctly. I had not noticed that I had made an incorrect statement (because, of course, the characters themselves are included in Unicode and thus UTF-8, just not in the same representations).

I'm somewhat considering adding it back with corrections, but suspect viewing old pre-Unicode text files with box drawing in a web browser is probably too niche a usage case to be worth mentioning. -- HarJIT (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HarJIT: If you want to share old pre-Unicode text files containing non-ASCII characters, it is generally better to convert them to a Unicode encoding first. That will work regardless of its code page, and you wouldn't have to verify that the only non-ASCII characters in use are the box drawing characters. You could then use the content with a wider variety of modern tools and editors, copy and paste into other Unicode files, etc. -LiberatorG (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article Sarojini Naidu

Hello LiberatorG, this image is a clear portrait of the person. Don't you think so? --Gpkp (u • t • c) 15:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only intended to revert the IP edit before yours and your first edit which was fixing leftovers from that one, but you made another edit in the mean time. I've restored your second edit. Thanks for pointing it out. LiberatorG (talk) 15:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. Thank you for restoring. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 15:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wth ?

'scuse me but did you get confused about what you were talking about or something ? cf ten-four-fox, I know Cameron a little, he is not the type of person to waste the little spare time he has on worthless junk. He didn't wake up one morning and think, "Oh gosh, I guess I'll write a browser for the older Mac systems !" and then discovered that by gosh, Mozilla is ending support for that platform ! What a coincidence !

He started the project BECAUSE of the end of old-mac support, not in parallel !

And that's not a biased point of view, it's simple fact and common sense. Why would anyone just accidentally decide to write an application for OS/2 if IBM were still doing it ?

I'ma gonna go back there and revert your revert, because I think you were not thinking clearly on this one. If you want to argue I'll ask Cameron to phone in on the subject.

thanks !

216.189.15.112 (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only part of your changes that I reverted is where you referred to modern Firefox features as "pointless dreck". It is fine for you to have that opinion but articles must be written from a neutral point of view. I did not revert your change from "in parallel" to "in response"; that was a good change and is still in the current article. LiberatorG (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LiberatorG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bidhan Singh vandalizer

I guess the filters aren't going to work, as Bidhan Singh is back causing disruption. Apparently, Wikipedia can't stop him. Very disappointing :( GoodDay (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GoodDay, Please join WP:ANI#Bidhan Singh vandalizer for any discussion on this topic. --DBigXrayᗙ 19:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Japanese succession

Howdy. Now I gotta deal with a shifting IP over at Naruhito, Crown Prince of Japan & Masako, Crown Princess of Japan. Trying to explain to the IP, that Naruhito's reign begins on April 30, 2019 (when his father abdicates) & his era begins on May 1, 2019. GoodDay (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GoodDay: The best way to settle it is with a reference to a reliable source. It seems that the japantoday reference used in Naruhito, Crown Prince of Japan#Akihito's pending abdication is expired; do you have another one? A Google search turns up https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/12/31/national/well-wait-mid-april-learn-name-japans-new-era/#.XGD_HWRKjeY which says that Akihito abdicates April 30 and Naruhito accedes the next day May 1. -LiberatorG (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect they're getting confused with the Accession/Era dates. For example: Emperor Akihito ascended the throne on January 7, 1989 & his era began January 8, 1989. I'll just remove the hidden info on those infoboxes & wait until the abdication actually occurs. It's possible, Akihito is abdicating at the end of the day, at midnight. GoodDay (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bidhan Singh vandalizer

Please see and share your thoughts and experience about Bidhan Singh vandalizer on benefits of reporting the IP at WP:AIV and WP:RFP--DBigXrayᗙ 07:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Have you considered getting the WP:ROLLBACK rights, as a fellow vandal fighter, I would suggest you to request it at WP:PERM It will allow you to quickly revert all the edits by Bidhan Singh from his contribution page, and quickly. Twinkle is alright, but it is slower than Rollback. I would also suggest installing WP:POPUP for reviewing the diffs. Good work. --DBigXrayᗙ 09:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good work never goes unappreciated. Thanks a lot for your contributions in actively combating vandalism on wikipedia, especially of the WP:LTA types that need specialist eyes. Keep up the good work. DBigXrayᗙ 09:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keerthy suresh

Hi John Nithish (talk) 20:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LibertatorG bro, Pls add a nickname name to Indian actress Keerthy Sureah! The nickname is 'Makkal Selvi'. Its a title given to her by her fans John Nithish (talk) 20:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dude Indian actress Keerthy Suresh called as Makkal Selvi! Its a nickname /title which given to her by her fans.. Pls let me to add that or u add it!! John Nithish (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@John Nithish: All contentious material about living persons is required by Wikipedia policy to be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for further details on this policy. -LiberatorG (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Red face...

Thanks both for the correction and for the lesson here. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Polish Wikipedia article

I wanted to link to Polish article.

My account

My talk

My edits

08:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

@Monniasza: Linking to a Polish Wikipedia article in the English Murder article is not constructive. Please use the sandbox and not an actual article if you want to experiment with that. -LiberatorG (talk) 08:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

That LTA you reported to AIV

Hi, I removed that IPv6 you reported AIV. It is a Jio mobile IPv6, which means blocking it 5 hours after the edits occurred would have no impact other than preventing someone else from editing. If it continues, requesting page protection of the affected pages would be the best option. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) TonyBallioni Please know more about WP:LTA/BS. We have seen instances where the IP has returned after 12 hours to vandalize from the same address. So I would block that IP without batting an eye as soon as it can be confirmed to be BS (which is pretty easy to spot). --DBigXrayᗙ 17:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DBigXray, I’m very familiar with how Jio works. It’s a highly dynamic ISP, especially on IPv6, and the ranges are very active. I have no problem blocking disruption that is active or even making range blocks as needed, but typically these cause a lot of collateral damage. My preferred way of dealing with disruption from those ranges is page protection if it is long term. While there may be individual cases of the IP being stable for a long period, this is the exception rather than the rule for this ISP. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni. The purpose of my comment above was to let you know about the LTA case page, in case you were not aware. Looking at how WP:LTA/BS works, I think its best to simply block the errant IP rather than range block. Whack a mole basically. User:Zzuuzz has his own ways of dealing with it as he noted it here User_talk:Zzuuzz/Archive_36#Bidhan_Singh_vandalizer--DBigXrayᗙ 18:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sure, but this was two months ago... I typically don’t find LTA case pages that useful, and usually take what’s in them worth a grain of salt. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes, my apologies for whipping up an old thread. I just reported him to AIV few mins ago and saw this thread here. I didn't see the dates until I made the comment. I did not self revert since I think the admins at AIV should be aware of it just in case they aren't. Cheers. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: We have seen this user using the same IPv6 /64 block for several days in a row, for example this one was used for 5 days before the whole /64 was blocked. I have never seen one of these /64 blocks that had earlier edits from someone else, so they don't seem to be reused often if at all. -LiberatorG (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LG, TonyBallioni after knowing all this info, can you please share your preferred way of dealing with him. --DBigXrayᗙ 19:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I usually block /64s (heck, I wrote an essay on it) I don’t know why I declined this one, because it was a few months ago, but it’s usually because I’ve looked at the range and didn’t see much disruption. Anyway, we all seem to agree now. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

indeed, glad that all agree. We are 4-5 volunteers who know this LTA and monitor it. We would prefer to see fast actions on this LTA as its easy to mistake him as a test editor. Thank you for your good work. --DBigXrayᗙ 19:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keerthy

Hi there, I'm hoping you can shed some light on this edit, please. You note "she is not in the lead role; the lead role is played by Nithiin", but I'm unclear on what your position is, exactly. Are we talking about a world where only men can have a lead role? Because that would not be consistent with reality, and it still wouldn't explain why you still indicated that she has a lead role, only that it is a "female lead role". I also don't understand why, when we're talking about a female actor, we would ever need to say "female lead" since that's what a female actor would be playing 9.9/10 times if she had earned a lead role. In contrast, Robin Williams played a female lead role in Mrs. Doubtfire, but then so did Sally Field. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Absolutely there are numerous films where the lead role is played by a woman. This is about reliable sources. In the case of this particular film, the reliable sources consider the lead role to be the one played by Nithiin; some do not even mention Keerthy at all. There would be no issue if the article said that Keerthy had "a lead role" in this film, as there are reliable sources for that, but as for "the lead role" the sources that I found do not back that up. However if you do have a reliable source that states that her role is "the lead role" then please add that reference to the article. -LiberatorG (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still a bit confused, because by that argument, "the lead role is played by Nithiin", would be equally incorrect if there are at least two lead roles. Anyhow, perhaps the better phrasing the contributor could have added would have been with the indefinite article rather than the definite article, ex: "as a lead". Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miscalculations in article about Unicode encoding

The character ranges for UTF-8 in the article «Comparison of Unicode encodings» are wrong. The formula for calculating how many possible characters can encode UTF-8 per n-bytes is:

For ${\displaystyle n=1}$ possible characters are ${\displaystyle 2^{7}}$ or 128

For ${\displaystyle n>1}$ then the formula is ${\displaystyle 2^{5n+1}}$

Example: For ${\displaystyle n=4}$

${\displaystyle 2^{5n+1}}$
${\displaystyle 2^{5(4)+1}}$
${\displaystyle 2^{20+1}}$
${\displaystyle 2^{21}}$
${\displaystyle 2,097,152}$ 

Therefore, UTF-8 encoding ranges are:

• 128 Unicode characters using 1 byte: encodes for Unicode range between code points U+0000 to U+007F (including both)
• 2048 characters using 2 bytes: The first ${\displaystyle 128+2048=2176}$ covering from U+0080 to U+087F
• 65,536 characters using 3 bytes: ${\displaystyle 65,536+2048+128=67,712}$ covering from U+0880 to U+1087F (covering and exceeding the remaining of Basic Multilingual Plane [which ends in U+FFFF] and covering part of the Supplementary Multilingual Plane)
• And finally, 2,097,152 using 4 bytes: ${\displaystyle 2,097,152+65,536+2048+128=2,164,864}$ which covers and exceeds all the remaining 1,040,399 Unicode code points from U+10880 to U+10FFFF

In the mentioned article, this information is distorted due to miscalculations and the encoding ranges are wrong. Ajñavidya (talk) 03:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajñavidya: In theory UTF-8 could have been defined that way in order to allow more characters to be encoded with fewer bytes, but that isn't how UTF-8 is actually defined. Instead they went with a simpler mapping, where each bit in the Unicode codepoint maps directly to a bit in the UTF-8 representation, with no need for any addition or subtraction of an offset. As a result, the first 128 potential 2-byte encodings (beginning with 0xC0 or 0xC1) are not used because they would duplicate the 128 ASCII characters. Similarly, the first 2048 potential 3-byte encodings, and the first 65536 potential 4-byte encodings, are not used because they would represent characters that already have a shorter encoding. The UTF-8 article has a pretty good explanation. -LiberatorG (talk) 04:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. They chose the easy mapping trade-off instead of the compact but computationally-expensive format that would be required for using the tiny fraction of redundant code points.

Sorry for this misconception of mine. Ajñavidya (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore contribution Nov. 2019

Hello LiberatorG, please restore my contributions to the Embedded System page Cyber-Physical System pages. As I understand it, contributions should be treated with respect and amendmends made/suggested rather than being removed. My contribution (which evolved based on the talk page) has been removed several times by the same user. I believe he is acting out of personal interests and so I have created a report on the edit war page. Ultimâ (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [e-mail], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [e-mail].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ID3v2

The presence or absence of a wikilink for ID3v2 tags on Ogg or VorbisComment doesn't bother me, but your not related theory doesn't match the Block handling info on the VorbisComment wiki page, or on the FLAC METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE definition: The picture type according to the ID3v2 APIC frame, both referenced here. –84.46.52.229 (talk) 09:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My edit comment could have been worded better. Yes, some of the fields such as the picture type have the same meaning as the similar field in ID3v2, but that doesn't make it an "ID3v2 thumbnail"; for example the format is different than that used in ID3v2. –LiberatorG (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO

HELLO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.69.84.70 (talk) 21:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]