|
User talk:Libby norman/Archive 3
THIS ARCHIVE IS FOR 2014 Eagle Eye (Rejection of)Hello Libby. I note the decision about Eagle Eye (1 Jan) -- i.e insufficient demonstrated notability. I am disappointed, but I'll get over it !! -- I'm not altogether surprised, actually. Eagle Eye is a new (young) organisation, founded in 2011 (as the wikipage stated). Perhaps it was much too early to be thinking about a wikipage. I wasn't quite sure exactly where the threshold for acceptability would lie. I accept the decision. I'll not be pursuing a request for a wikipage about this organisation at the present time. Apologies if I have wasted your time. Happy New Year, and all that. Habizhpeh (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve David Sims (photographer)Hi, I'm Nechlison. Libby norman, thanks for creating David Sims (photographer)! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Provide more content in each section(selected awards, personal life etc) you mentioned in your article. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nechlison (talk) 19:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC) MarksI personally dislike including mention of hobbies and youthful pursuits irrelevant to notability , but now that you've improved it, the article is no worse that way than a great many others. As you realize, the problem more generally is people who are covered mostly from a social, not professional standpoint, and how much of that should go into an encyclopedia. I have no fixed view on this: we reflect the world, but we don't necessarily copy it. DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC) So true. Mentioning hobbies and one's own interest doesn't show notability DGG . Nechlison (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC) This article has the same issue as we are talking about Maria al-masani. This article entirely depends upon URLs Nechlison (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Talkback Message added 03:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 22Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All Saints Church, Haggerston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen of England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC) All things GrimaldiFirstly, can I thank you for your continued interest in Joey. I brought the old clown up to featured article status in 2012 and I'm pleased to meet someone who shares my enthusiasm for our greatest clown. I see you have helpfully updated the St James's/Grimaldi Park information for which I am truly grateful. Re Dibdin however, I have copy edited your latest addition as I don't feel that the park's name change and Joey's plinth are relevant to Dibdin's article. Best CassiantoTalk 17:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
Ally CapellinoThank you for your help on the Ally Capellino article Libby - I wondered if you'd be able to help me add some images to the article? I'm struggling to work out how to take it to the next stage to improve it. If you think you can help, that would be great! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steph Davies (talk • contribs) 15:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
reason for rejectionNo reason was given for the rejection. I don't know if it was a content problem or a misunderstanding of submission technique. The incense page says that benzoin is used only in Orthodox Christian Churches, particularly Russian Orthodox, and that is not true. I thought of making a note on the incense page and may have done so in brief, but then I thought that the subject is important enough to Churches of the Liberal Catholic Movement and perhaps Churches of the High-Church Anglican/Anglo-Catholic movement that it deserved some further elucidation.Tmrdean (talk) 23:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Rejected Article for submissionI see that you rejected an article I submitted to Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Midtown_Village - stating that "Solid references are essential – currently they don't support the statements in the article." Yet this is simply not accurate. While the topic is not widely recognized (which is part of the article itself) and there are limited references available, these should not be held against the article itself. The concept embodied in the article is unique and novel as well as relatively new (resulting in limited source material). Nonetheless, it (the subject of the article) exists. The article consists of 6 statements, 4 of them are in fact supported - some by a page in Wikipedia itself, which implies that you don't think Wikipedia is "solid." It is this somewhat irrational policing of Wikipedia which caused me to not donate last year and will probably continue. I realize that my donation should in no way influence the editorial content of Wikipedia and I wouldn't respect Wikipedia if it did, but at the same time, the management and control of the site becomes an effective repellent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JStanwood (talk • contribs) 01:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Your response to this seems similarly illogical to the original rejection. The idea of Midtown Village is relatively new so indeed there is little information to cite as authority (or "beef") and I am sure the many people who live, work and shop there will agree. But now, due to your fiat, it suffers even less recognition. Midtown Village, like, e.g., Tribeca, is a neighborhood that started kind of as a grass-roots thing. What I offered for citation was legitimate and I get that you won't say, "Maybe I was wrong" (you are). So many times I see unsupported pages on Wikipedia which don't suffer such scrutiny (for example, the first "random article" that wikipedia sent me to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandinam_a_Coed_Deri - a "site of special scientific interest" with no references at all other than the referring page). Rather than simply approve the page and improve it with the citations you actually found on your own, you deem it better to just reject it. Which to me makes no sense at all. Part of the reason the article was sparse was because I wanted it to be approved first (knowing that the risk for rejection is high) and then I and others would have added to it (as is my understanding of Wikipedia). Whatever, Wikipedia works despite people such as you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JStanwood (talk • contribs) 14:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing listHello Libby norman! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions! If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Articles for CreationDear Libby, I would like to find out how I can improve this article. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Ritz Carlton Residences, Singapore, Cairnhill Its all factual in nature and I would appreciate if you could let me know which part sounds like its an advertisement so that I can improve on it. I thought we were supposed to be factual about our submissions. Regards, John AKM — Preceding unsigned comment added by John AKM (talk • contribs) 07:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Article for Creation Lyndhurst Hall, Kentish TownHi Libby Norman, Just to say a big thank you for your help with my article. Christine Dyos Christine A Dyos (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 27Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Bardfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braintree (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)  Hello Libby norman: WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive! Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation Writers' and Artists' YearbookHi Libby, thank you for your edits on Writers' and Artists' Yearbook. Thanks for getting it live. I wondered at your excisions. I'm not sure why most of the reception section was cut. Why remove reviews from the Independent and the BBC? Why not mention that the book has sold over 2 million copies, sourced by the BBC? The previous reviewer (wrongly) stated that there was not enough independent coverage of the book. There is now less than before and some other editor could well rock up and challenge notability. I have to say, the whole AfC system seems to be in a hell of a mess. Anna (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Why the article was declined ?The article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/jEmbryoS was declined as not complaining with notability guidelines. But it completely resembles the situation with another article (jNode) , which was not declined and contains information about a system of the same class - the Java Operating System. No notability differences exist for two systems. Then here is the question - why the jEmbryoS article was declined ? Alexbav4anystuff (talk) 10:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Mark Sheldon Ross articleHi Libby Thank you for your feedback about the page I am trying to create on Mark Sheldon Ross. I have now rewritten the article, and added a number of references. I will add hyperlinks to the various key words (e.g. Goldsmiths) once the text itself has been validated. Best regards 17:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdouardGris (talk • contribs) International Comparisons page submissionThank you Libby very much for the kind regards and feedback! This is my first time writing a wikipedia article, and i'm hoping to keep on the right track here. If there's anything else on there that's indicative of NPOV issues, i'd like to eradicate them and am willing to address them. Hopefully, with the other edits you mention and a few additions i'll mention below, there won't be too many more NPOV concerned edits necessary. I removed the help wanted piece out of the description for the InternationalComparisons.org section. Also, i changed "The site is easy to use and has a consistent interface and format," to "The site has a simple, consistent interface and format," to convey a more objective tone. I made minor edits to the OECD description to convey a more objective tone. I converted all of the off site links to wiki links and cited references. Please let me know if i did this incorrectly or misunderstood something. I also corrected some attempts at wiki links that had errors. Most noticeably, i added site-data coverage survey tables to demonstrate what kind of subjects each source's data site covers. It also demonstrates to what extent these sites are executing original research in each subject or are deriving their research from other sources (often each other). Hopefully, this also address the issue you pointed out for me in your response, and that InternationaclComparisons.org, based on subject coverage and other prominent sites heavily depending on derivative research, belongs in the list. I'm not certain that "primary" and "secondary" are the best terms. Can you think of any alternatives? Also, you might notice that the references to the sites in the tables are repeats of references to the same items in the "Examples of International Comparisons." I'm not sure how to get around the repeat listing. If the first time i use it i make it a "Named reference" would it keep it from repeating itself in the reference list? Again, please let me know if there are other edits necessary (content, NPOV, otherwise), and i'll be happy to do my best to accommodate. Hopefully though, this takes care of the issues you've already mentioned. Here's the url just in case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/International_Comparisons I have not "resubmitted" the article yet. I wanted to get your feedback first. Dylbertiii (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I re-directed this AfC to the article for the hit song. You declined its submission, but it has become a hit. Who knew? Bearian (talk) 19:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Articles for creation/Funko Pop! VinylHi Libby, thanks for your input in regard to the Funko Pop! Vinyl page I've created. However, despite improving on the article by adding further references and fine tuning some content, I get the feeling it's all for nothing. Given your reason for declining the article "subject appears to be a non-notable company or organization", I'd like to ask if it's worth my while optimising this article given it's non-notable? I don't want to put time and effort into fine tuning the article to find it'll never be accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darthfyer (talk • contribs) 14:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Libby,On 10March you communicated rejection of a proposed article on the "Renouveau catholique" suggesting that the article was a translation of an already existing article "Catholic Renewal" which already exists on Wikipedia and that the sketch of the proposed article lacked context. With regard to this assessment, I would point out the following> 1. The article on "Catholic Renewal" is an article about the renewal of sourcing of Catholic theology in the period immediately priod to the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). This article is about a subject which POST dates the proposed article on the "Renouveau catholique" by at least 40 years. 2. The proposed article "Renouveau catholique" is about a socio-cultural movement which finds expression in literature (especially in the Catholic Novel) which flourished from 1870-1914. It would not be possible to integrate this with a theological article in any sensible manner. . As for context, the article on "Renouveau catholique" using this specific terminus technicus already exists on the German version of Wikipedia and may be consulted here if an idea of context is needed in the event of the revisor not being expert in this field. The article may be consulted here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renouveau_catholique It would be an improvement for the English wipipedia to have an English language version (not translation) of this article. Please review your review of my sketch in the light of the above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.146.207 (talk) 00:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hican you please elaborate the reasons for not finding the article regarding Eduwave up to the mark, specially when many of the article with almost contents about other companies are functioning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EduIITprep (talk • contribs) 07:21, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Bacon
hearingImpaired.netHello We updated the article for your review but we are unsure how to re-submit it. Can you please take a look at it for us? Thank you Realstonesquared (talk) 03:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Realstonesquared Scarlet Rd article notification Thank you for the way you've managed this.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Article: Fall of the Berlin Wall - posted 30th March 2014I can accept the reasons behind my contribution being declined for inclusion: reasons being that it is more of an essay about the event than an encyclopedic entry. This may appear to be truthful, but on reading the other accounts of personal accounts of the event I found that a great deal of the detail about the actual night was missing and in many cases incorrect having been written by people who arrived after the actual event and by people who I can only surmise had bad recollections of the night. Much of my background detail pertaining to the european build up to the night of 8th/9th November 1989 is indeed covered on more formal inserts. My impetus for submitting my recollection was that a personal account of the event with actual detail, hour by hour, is not covered by any insert and through my long years of research into many subjects for a an array of notable world figures I have found that it is the personal accounts of historic events that most arouse the interest of a reader. Given this reasoning a personal account of a world historic event is most valuable to future generations as it is an 'on the spot account' and as I say, an hour by hour, blow by blow account of the historic night in world history. Whilst facts can be digested, without the emotion of a eyewitness account they are just lists of events - personal recollection can add a great deal of substance to events. I would submit that the other personal accounts be re-read, as I say, many are factually incorrect and no one account gives such a wealth of eye witness information of the actual events around Potsdammer Platz on the morning of 9th November 1989 which is where the actual breach of the Berlin Wall took place. Again I submit that my account gives detailed information about who was actually responsible for the breach in the wall and the manner in which the assembled crowd greeted that moment before and after. I therefore respectfully ask that the 'idea' behind the inclusion of the article 'Fall of the Berlin Wall - A Leap to the Horizon' be revisited and some thought given to the relevance of the personal account in knowledge for historical purposes for those researching the event say on its 100th anniversary and onward years. Barton Fox (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Gaviña Gourmet Coffee for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaviña Gourmet Coffee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaviña Gourmet Coffee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nominated for deletion by DGG. Notification delivered by davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC). Clements Ribeiro is an awesome suggestion!You're right - they really should be represented here. SO many good names, so many missing articles... Mabalu (talk) 12:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
I think I fixed it!Libby, I'm new so I'm not sure if this message is necessary (or annoying!) but I've made the changes requested, and got input from the live chat as well. Please let me know if I should make any other changes. Much appreciated! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Brenden_Shucart Jordangoody (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Christ Holy Sanctified Church of America, IncHello Ms. Norman: Thank you for your feedback. This is my (our) very first time in creating an article for the organization, Christ Holy Sanctified Church (CHSC) so there was a little fogginess regarding submission versus Sandbox, etc. Regarding the references, I have attempted to add a "Notes" section and the references to the page per Wiki's instruction. I see that it is formatting reference numbers, etc. Also, additional external references (books and other journals) regarding the validity of organization have been updated in the article. Before his death in 1985, Bishop U.S. King wrote a booklet on the history of the organization from his vantage point - it was never in major publication - but it is yet a valuable and credible resource. There is also the church manual (Discipline) which contains the history and facts of the organization which jive with external publications on the organization. And, like many organization/churches, information concerning the history is documented on the organization's webpage (www.chschurch.org), which I have started referencing. I trust that we can meet the standards and terms and, even though some references may be limited, everything can be confirmed as true. Oh, yes - hopefully, the article can be updated to be in the neutral tone. We look forward to working with you and getting an acceptable article regarding the organization published on Wikipedia soon. Warmest regards, Chschurch2014 (talk) 09:48, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Craig Brown
A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
Notification of a June AfC BackLog DriveHello Libby norman: WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive! Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. Dave Malloy pageHello, thank you for your feedback on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dave_Malloy. I made your and another reviewers suggested changes, removing promotional language, giving further references and replacing all but one reference (for a list of works) to the composer's website. Would you be willing to re-review? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.164.155.109 (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Mark Sheldon Ross OTRS grantedHello Libby , Awaiting new page below about Mark Sheldon Ross to be released, following OTRS confirmed by your Permission Team early May. What's next from my end? Thank you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mark_Sheldon_Ross EdouardGris (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Libby Thanks for sorting out my half attempt at my first ever article. Whilst the one you've used is good, there are a couple more pictures of the island on my blog that might sit well on the page - http://islandbaggers.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/disaster-averted-and-our-first-nightbag.html - I don't know how to upload pics - but I am definitely going to learn! Sam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.34.223.1 (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Clements Ribeiro) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Clements Ribeiro, Libby norman! Wikipedia editor Mabalu just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Disambiguation link notification for July 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Net-a-Porter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Wang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Deletion of BourlaschouwburgHello Libby norman, This page already existed in Dutch and all I wanted to do is to provide the English translation. I am not sure what went wrong and why the page is flagged for deletion. Thanks Eheritage (talk) 14:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Bourla Theatre did not exist as such but only as Bourlaschouwburg, otherwise I would have not translated it, but you are indeed right in making sure that there is only one page. I agree with that of course, there was a mistake there. Thanks Eheritage (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Stiff + TrevillionHi Libby, Thanks for the advice and for the sources you found. Its incredibly helpful! I will work more on the article and then re-submit it when I think its better. Mjtaylor35 (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
15:12:03, 27 July 2014 review of submission by Mattginsberg1
Mattginsberg1 (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
Rebecca and RowenaSo, you have thrown away my submission Rebecca and Rowena. The idea was that it is better to have some nucleus of the article and that the result of searching for the text of the novella would be better linked than not. Thank you for reminding me why it is absolutely stupid idea to believe that bunch of idiots who kill others contributions just to cover their feelings of inferiority and ignorance about the subject they decide about cannot every build something which could be reliable source about anything more complicated than the latest TV show. I should really go and visit the doctor because after many failed attempts to contribute to this stupid project I always try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceplm (talk • contribs) 07:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
08:32:39, 4 August 2014 review of submission by Sefdik
Sefdik /0^0\ (talk) 08:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 4U
 This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sheridan Barnett, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.quidecco.com/cgi-bin/cgi_ref_by_path/referer/http_3a_2f_2fen.wikipedia.org_2fw_2findex.php_3ftitle_3dUser_3aLibby_5fnorman_2fsandbox_26amp;amp;amp;amp;curid_3d39465926_26amp;amp;amp;amp;diff_3d618146307_26amp;amp;amp;amp;oldid_3d618145968/url/http_3a_2f_2fen.wikipedia.org_2fw_2findex.php_3ftitle_3dUser_3aLibby_5fnorman_2fsandbox_26amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;curid_3d39465926_26amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;diff_3d618146307_26amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;oldid_3d618145968/. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
06:45:05, 7 August 2014 review of submission by Sarikasahu
Sarikasahu (talk) 06:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
09:57:44, 12 August 2014 review of submission by Monika-D-LO
What part of the article is copy right protected, please? And wouldn't it be helpful to include that info in the first place? Monika-D-LO (talk) 09:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
14:41:28, 12 August 2014 review of submission by EmpireGS
I have made many edits. Am I ready for submission EmpireGS (talk) 18:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Image without licenseUnspecified source/license for File:Peter Russell evening gown IwM D23778.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Peter Russell evening gown IwM D23778.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Unspecified source/license for File:Peter Russell evening gown IwM D23778.jpgThanks for uploading File:Peter Russell evening gown IwM D23778.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: James Bond (2012 Album)I have declined this speedy deletion request, because WP:CSD#G5 applies only to pages created "in violation of their ban or block". This was created before the user was briefly blocked, so G5 does not apply. JohnCD (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Wow - another fantastic article.with Peter RussellYou're really doing amazing work here - thank you!! I just wanted to gently point out that the category "Fashion designers" should ideally not contain individuals, please try to narrow it down by nationality where possible, as I notice you tend to add both Category:Fashion designers and a more specific category such as English/British fashion designers, it's not necessary to have both. But a tiny, tiny quibble as what you;re doing is brilliant on such a formerly underrepresented field. I'm really excited that you and user:Edwardx are both actively working to expand this field at the moment. Thank you both! Mabalu (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Alice Pollock
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 15:55:11, 24 August 2014 review of submission by 193.205.6.111
193.205.6.111 (talk) 15:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC) Sir, I have edited the present page and now I think it fits the Wikipedia editorial guidelines. Can you please supervise it again? Thanks
User:Bknysak asked for help at The Teahouse and so far there are no answers. I don't like to see questions go unanswered but I don't have a response. I was wondering if you had any ideas about how to get help. Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Peter Russell (fashion designer) has been nominated for Did You Know
Disambiguation link notification for September 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saffron Walden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haverhill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC) DYK for Peter Russell (fashion designer)
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC) Angele DelangheAnd another cracking article! A great designer image here: http://sheepandchick.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/angele-delanghe.html Mabalu (talk) 11:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
John Boyd, Aage and millliners in general...Blimey - I've just realised that there isn't an article on John Boyd the milliner here - or indeed, for Aage Thaarup who REALLY ought to have one too. Now I'm thinking on it, there's Claude Saint Cyr too - it seems that the only (British based!) milliner of that era to have an article is Simone Mirman and only because I did one years ago! Just wondered if they were on your radar at all as it seems every time I start thinking about a new subject you're already whistling up an article on then...! I'll pop these onto Requested for now... Mabalu (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Elspeth Champcommunal
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC) DYK for John Michael Ingram
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC) DYK for Michael Sherard
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Eolienne and other fabrics.Glad to see you're tackling some of the generic fabric articles now too - I've been working away at these bit by bit, recently sorted out Metal lace (absolutely astounding there was NO article for any of the metal laces!) and expanded Crepe (textile) quite massively. although I've been looking more at individual garment articles such as Sailor dress. They make a nice break from biographies as they tend not to require quite as much research. Mabalu (talk) 21:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Philip Somerville
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Foreign-language articlesHi: Just a note about tagging articles like Troca Ticket (now deleted as an ad): being in a foreign language in and of itself is not a reason for speedy deletion; being in a foreign language where there is an article on the topic on the Wikipedia in that language is (A2) and if there is already an English-language article here on the topic, that's a subset of A10, but simply being in a foreign language is the first on the list of non-criteria. Rather, report it at WP:Pages needing translation into English. Thanks for doing new page patrol! Yngvadottir (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Otto Lucas
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC) So this article has come up at AFD - I've been fixing and sorting it out a bit but wondered if you had any additional sources or cites of your own to add to my own fixes? I certainly don't think it should be deleted (as you can tell!) Mabalu (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright checks when performing AfC reviewsHello Libby norman. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Rejection of Article On BlackHouse MediaThe submission has been edited. Additional links have been added to support the claims made in the article. No promotional statements were made in the article. I do not see any other reasons why this article should not be approved. Or what do you think? Hephef (talk) 09:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Hephef (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
If you need any help on referencing or other points I've mentioned, you can get advice from the Teahouse (I sent a link to your Talk page) or ask me a question here. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 11:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Thoughts on Riding Mac Fashion?Any thoughts on Riding Mac Fashion - just reminded of this article by a bot move when it popped up on my newsfeed. Appears to hold a ton of original research, some of which is actually sort of kinky. The writing is... remarkable, I think is the only thing to describe lines like "It uniquely ripples and rustles with a susurrus as it moves and radiates a captivating aroma varying subtly with ambient temperature." Just glorious. Do you think this can be rescued, and is the title even the right one for what's in the article? Mabalu (talk) 13:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Jill Stuart has been nominated for Did You Know
DYK for Jill Stuart
|
