|
User talk:Lgcsmasamiya/Archive 4
Disambiguation link notification for November 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco Pelayo Covarrubias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comondú (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of José Isidro Moreno ÁrcegaHello Lgcsmasamiya, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged José Isidro Moreno Árcega for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blurred Lines 18:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Mexican parliamentariansHi. Thanks for your efforts in creating articles for Mexican politicians. Just a friendly advice, it's better to use "As of 2013, X was a deputy..." or "X was elected to the Y congress in the Z election" rather than "Currently...". The problem with using "Currently" is that is obliges wikipedians to update all the articles after next election, and in many cases this doesn't happen. --Soman (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC) I have unreviewed a page you curatedHi, I'm Randykitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nintendomagasinet, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Curtis AustraliaHey Lgcsmasamiya. I've re-reviewed Curtis Australia, which you just reviewed; it had several problems with it, including the bare URLs being used for references. When reviewing, please try to ensure you mark the problems with the article so that other users can fix them. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Marco Alonso Vela) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Marco Alonso Vela, Lgcsmasamiya! Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page. Learn more about page curation. AN/I
Speedy deletion nomination of Panorama PornoHello Lgcsmasamiya, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Panorama Porno for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tritario (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC) BlockedHi Lgcsmasamiya. Over the last year or so several users have expressed concerns over the way you review new articles. This is ok - we all make mistakes and can learn from them - but as you haven't responded adequately to these concerns it leaves me with little choice but to block you. If you want to discuss this then please do so on this talk page. If you feel this block is not needed then you may use the {{unblock}} template to appeal it. Regards Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 20:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Response Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Ok, i think that i got this so far,but however, there are a lot of unreviewed articles, some of then have been well structures, at least you have to tell me for how many time i will be blocked Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 20:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Decline reason: We're going to need to hear more than "I got this", because you've said things like that before and then the trouble has continued. What is it that you've "got"? What do you think was the problem with how you were editing, and how do you intend to change that? Are you willing to have a long conversation here with experienced users about how to patrol correctly before you touch a single new article in the patrol queue? Do you understand that it might be the case that you will have to stop patrolling for a long time while you learn how things work, and that if you're unblocked you can not go back to doing things the way you have been doing them? A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A page you started (Luis Manuel Arias Pallares) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Luis Manuel Arias Pallares, Lgcsmasamiya! Wikipedia editor Daniel Cavallari just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Daniel Cavallari's talk page. Learn more about page curation. New Page Patrol banAs per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ban proposal the community has enacted a topic ban as follows:
Accordingly, until and unless this topic ban is lifted by community consensus, do not engage in New Page Patrol or the review of recently created articles under any name. Failure to abide by this restriction would constitute valid grounds for you to be blocked by any administrator. I am sorry to have to be the community's agent in imposing this restriction. Fortunately, any time that you can convince a set of experienced editors that you will do NPP within community norms as specified above, the topic ban can be lifted. DES (talk) 23:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
Long overdue, too, if you ask me. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Hi there, I just wanted to let you know I declined the speedy deletion nomination of Doge (meme). For better or worse the article does at least attempt to establish notability, and provides multiple legitimate sources. You may wish to initiate an AfD on the article, which is the next logical step. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your hard work at patrolling. – Juliancolton | Talk 04:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 29Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adriana González Carrillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Action Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC) Thanks & requestHello Lgcsmasamiya. I would like to thank you for reviewing many articles I created in the past. Can I ask a favor? If you can take a look at three more articles of mine that haven't been reviewed and if they are OK review them? The articles are: Thanks again. TeamGale 14:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Trouble with user ZebbeI'm having trouble with a user called Zebbe who keeps changing information on my article. On several attempts the user changes the credits on the article Descent_to_the_Underworld(album). I tried talking to user Zebbe but he ignores mz request. I come to you for help as you're the administrator who reviewed my article. I request blocking the user from further changes as I believe he'll never stop vandalising the article. Thank you Csabi911 (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Moreno Valle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Action Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC) A page you started (María Elena Orantes) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating María Elena Orantes, Lgcsmasamiya! Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page. Learn more about page curation. ReviewHi Can you review article The Hobbit: There and Back Again (film) please...--Joseph 03:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC) HowdyHowdy Hondurian mate, just curious, why do you need to "review" a page? What happens then? Cheers! --That Amazing Guy (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of XERC-AMHello Lgcsmasamiya, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged XERC-AM for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
 You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. —rybec 00:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Hunter Hunted (band)Hello Lgcsmasamiya. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hunter Hunted (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Band has been the subject of press coverage (A7) and article doesn't seem overly promotional. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC) A bowl of strawberries for you!
HelloOne question: I've created two pages today, but the links are not turning blue. Wikipedia is having some problem today? Janperson (talk) 23:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Yes, i've noted this problem since yesterday, but the pages are still active Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 23:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC) ThanksThank you for your comment! Happy New Year. Twozenhauer (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Arrayán (TV series)Hello Lgcsmasamiya, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arrayán (TV series) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC) What?But i'm not blocked right now and i wasn't blocked in that moment Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
New Category:Czech cheesesHi Lgcsmasamiya, thank you for reviewing my first page! I'm not sure that "Balkansky syr" can be categorized as Czech cheese. It's not a traditional Czech cheese, it's just produced there as other cheeses as Edam, Gauda etc. It's something as Czech variant of the Greek feta or the Bulgarian sirene. These are just details, I'm trying punctual :-) Tuzemak (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Tuzemak ANISorry to have to do this, but :
Blocked {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 19:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: F*** this, i'm leaving this sh*t right now, block me for 30 years if you want, this is so ridiculous, there are worst things on this site, bye Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Decline reason: Neither of these are unblock requests. Please don't use this template to ask questions, express your frustration, or converse with admins. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There are a lot of good articles in the unreviewed split, can them considered "not-improved"? Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I don't know, but... Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
OK Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 00:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
I can't locate any more administrator Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Question for administrator
What can i do so you can block me or, at least, how many time i'll be blocked? --Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Please, i'm not sure about this, but i promise to not violate the typical patrolling standards and rules, i think this is my last chance con convince you all so can you give me more recommendations in case i¿ll fail again?. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Decline reason: You are banned from new page patrolling. That is all; simply agree to stay completely away from it and you'll likely be unblocked. ----jpgordon::==( o ) 16:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I agree to stay away from NPP Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Please respond, f*ck Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Unblock request #3Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: There's a low number of unreviewed pages, now you can unblock me if you want Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 8:45 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0) Decline reason: "There's a low number of unreviewed pages" shows that you're still monitoring NPP. "I've...lowered my desire" does not mean that you actually intend to stop reviewing. "I will assume all responsibilities if I may again exceed" suggests that you consider breaking your topic ban to still be a possibility. None of these statements is a clear and unambiguous commitment to abide by your topic ban and stop reviewing new pages altogether, which is what will be required before an unblock is considered. Yunshui 雲水 15:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Of course, in this one month block i have just learned to stay away and i've just completely lowered my dessire of patrolling Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 22:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC) So what? You were blocked for violation of a topic ban. Nothing will convince us that you did not understand the terms of that ban. Just 'lowering your desire' to patrol pages isn't enough. We need to hear a clear understanding that you will not patrol, review, or tag pages under any circumstances until such times that the community decides you are free to. Also that you understand that this would be a very last chance and that one single violation would result in immediate blocking again with your talk page access being withdrawn. Your only appeal for an unblock then would be to the Arbitration Committee. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I understand all about the topics bans, assuming that this will be the last warning about the NPP, I will assume all responsibilities if I may again exceed. I'm willing to listen to all the advices and warnings from administrators and other users, seriously, sorry if in the previous three times I went too far. Greetings and hope to get lucky on this site (if you allow me). Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 00:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC) One More Chance?C'mon guys! Just give this person one more chance. TDFan2006 (talk) 22:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Lgcsmasamiya Do not delete that as it is part of the Oracle Seas, so if you do, I would not be happy as I hope to improve this article with other contributors. Sincerely, Stratojet94 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stratojet94 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Unblock request #4 Lgcsmasamiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This block is no longer necessary because i have already understood the reason of this ban. I agree to stay completely away from NPP. Sorry for all this mess, sincerely. Accept reason: On that basis, and on the understanding that you accept what Kudpung wrote above t 00:27, 6 February 2014, I am willing to unblock. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
|
