This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lemonaka. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cybernet Systems Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Lemonaka!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 14:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
I hope the editor will calm down. We can only advise them, we cannot control them. I feel their idea of reporting the other editor is likely to rebound on them, so have advised calm. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Welcomed. If they are attacking each other on their talk pages, is better for them to go to noticeboard, having a discussion there and then getting a result. However, I will try to advise calming down next time. Lemonaka (talk) 12:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
We are never wrong when we advise restraint and calmness.
Your advice to go to the noticeboard was exactly correct. I was heading to AN/I over it after a bit more brouhaha, but there is likely to be no need now.
The moment someone mentions race in any form of justification I suspect a racially motivated discussion. It is up to the person who played the race card to prove that it was not one. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Anyway, I'm so glad that I could help when I patrolled edits by newcomers. Nowadays, more and more newcomers just come, making vandalism and then blocked away. Hoping more great ones will come in the near future. Lemonaka (talk) 13:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
It is their own actions and their own behaviour and their own choices that have created their own particular disaster. We may lead, advise, guide, but we can never control other editors and their actions.
Hi,
Firstly I would like to thank you for your message.
I am removing the Chinese name for dramas as some actors have their Chinese name for dramas removed. So if the Chinese name have been placed someone would just remove it so I am trying to make it fair.
Hello Lemonaka. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:82.201.250.158, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Just a new IP editor starting out. Who knows, they might become a productive editor in the future. Please re-read WP:BITE . Thank you. User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Oh, and The Drive, the other source I used, is used as a source five times on the page. Don’t see you removing any of those, nor should you. Tomissonneil (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Beeblebrox. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
This is my point: I shouldn't have to do further research to understand why you reverted an edit, it would be better if you left a clearer edit summary. Upgrading to something as simple as WP:DE would be a significant improvement as it at least makes it clear what your reason was. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
I saw you tagged Category:Wikipedia glossaries using tables for speedy deletion but didn't post a notice on the talk page of the category creator. You are using Twinkle which should have taken care of this step. Please check your Twinkle Preferences and make sure you have the "Notify page creator" box checked off. It's important to let content creators know that pages they have created might be deleted, especially if mistakes are being made that they can avoid in the future. In this case, the category was only temporarily empty, which happens some times, so alerting the category creator that the category was tagged for being empty might get them to remedy this issue. Thank you! LizRead!Talk!19:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, @Liz. I have ticked "notify page creator", but this seemed like G8 which twinkle won't notice them automatically. If you wish, I could show you with a test case. Lemonaka (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. "She will also star opposite Salman Khan in Kisi Ka Bhai Kisi Ki Jaan, directed by Farhad Samji, which is scheduled to release on 21 April 2023.[65]" This sentence must be in 'Upcoming projects section'. 103.166.245.91 (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Think you have few more steps before the RfC is published, as it still has the draft notice on the top. (or alternatively the draft notice needs to be removed). Slywriter (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
I see you tried to ping me at the Teahouse, but IPs don't receive pings. We do get yellow banners when someone posts on our talk page - that's about it as far as notifications go. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, can you please explain why you reverted the last edit on the LIHTC page? I would like to come to a shared understanding of the issue so the page can be as accurate as possible. Thank you. Adldc (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Lemonaka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cybernet Systems Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hey in the religion section. Can you correct the part a little bit.It would be better if you added chandragupta initially a follower of Brahmanismas it gives half information only before. We have ample of evidences of chandragupta performing various brahmaincal rituals and sacrifices according to Greeks and various other sources ((sastri 1988 pg no. 163-164. )) And many other sources in Chandragupta official Wikipedia page. I started this discussion in talk section as well but there was no reply. 103.81.215.247 (talk) 09:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Lemonaka, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Rahul Jangid, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Are you Wiki Viola
Your edits are so similar! Come on, we all know that your are not Ukranian. No Ukrainian in history has claimed that the repressions of Crimean Tatars that the Russian government fully owned up to and apologized for are hoaxes, as it is self-incrimination on the highest level the strongest kind of evidence. You know that Planespotter knows her place and will never write anything that humiliates the Russian government again so you don't need to demand a fake confession of trying to "humiliate" Russia by writing "hoaxes" that have lots of sources on them in Russian. Just delete the articles you want deleted for political reasons with a speedy delete and stop threatening everyone that ever spoke to Planespotter. There's no way that somebody who wrote so much about Russian and Ukranian pilots is with the Mejlis so stop throwing around those accusations, they clearly went very far and fell on their sword to prove themselves innocent of being American agent of Mejlis. But your conspiracy theories will not last, even most your own fellow Russian hardliners do not deny the fact that the deportation and special settler system were real. No Ukranian would ever side with a Russian agent like Tomasina who claimed that the Rashidov project the Mubarek zone/republic was a forgery in the face of dozens and dozens of books saying otherwise. Just stop trying to trick people into saying illegal things about politics because even if not everyone supports your agenda they do fear you and your minions of novoross.info and dont need to be threatened more because we know that Planespotter got no help writing anything except for books about World War II pilots and not politics of Crimea.--74.215.211.214 (talk) 10:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Oh, BTW, if you really want to harass someone, just please shutdown your computer and have a rest, we really don't have enough time to waste for your wall of text. -Lemonaka12:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion tagging
Hello, Lemonade,
I think you are mistaking some pages with the wrong criteria. You are using "promotional" for what seem to be vandalism or hoaxes. Please be sure that you are familiar with all the CSD criteria. Using the wrong deletion rationale only confuses the page creator and, unfortunately, sometimes admins don't carefully review the speedy deletion tagging. Unless there are major problems with a page, there is no rush to tag an inappropriate article or draft for deletion so think carefully to identify why a page merits deletion and tag it accordingly. Thank you for all of your contributions to the project. LizRead!Talk!06:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. Could you please review your edits before charging ahead with Huggle? I undid someone's sockpuppet account copy-and-pasting the content of other articles. (View their block log.) Then you reverted me, restoring the copy-paste spam. Thank you. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Glad I can help. Instead of focusing on people and their blunders, maybe technology stuffs can help us better in building this community. Btw, this case is really funny. -Lemonaka00:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank U, but U made an error. The notice I requested to be added should be in the Public patches of Windows 10 version 21H2 table, last row, not the Public patches of Windows 10, version 22H2 table, last row. Apologies for disturbing.41.226.105.197 (talk) 02:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks again. Also, sorry for spotting another mistake out while I was typing the Wikitables' titles in bold. For both tables' titles under Version 21H2, can U please add the comma in between? I have done two in Windows 10, version 21H1 as an example.41.226.105.197 (talk) 02:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Whoops, I made another slight mistake. Lemonaka please don't mind addressing my above request, as well as this tiny request. The sentence which U added should end with and IoT Enterprise LTSC editions only. instead of and IoT Enterprise LTSC only..41.226.105.197 (talk) 05:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
|-
!Version
!Knowledge base
!Release date(s)
!Highlights
|}
This applies to four tables: Preview builds of Windows 10, version 21H2, Public patches of Windows 10, version 21H2, Preview builds of Windows 10, version 22H2 and Public patches of Windows 10, version 22H2.41.62.235.20 (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Also, I realized U added an extra vertical bar which made a display bug. Can U remove that line? Replace:
|''This update is available for Education, Enterprise, IoT Enterprise, Enterprise LTSC and IoT Enterprise LTSC editions only.''
|
|-valign=top
with:
|''This update is available for Education, Enterprise, IoT Enterprise, Enterprise LTSC and IoT Enterprise LTSC editions only.''
|-valign=top
But U did not replace the background color I asked U to replace. This way, viewers will understand that build 10.0.19044.3208 cell is not in support and that build 10.0.19044.3324 cell is the only patch supported currently.102.157.219.237 (talk) 02:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
@102.157.219.237 I'm so sorry but these are really lots of work needs cautious, can you register an account and make these edits yourself? I'm currently in the hospital and may not be on time for your edits. -Lemonaka03:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
@102.157.219.237 Done, Nope, I'm not get bored about your edit requests, thus it doesn't need to be your last request. Be bold to edit and ask me for help in the future.I was really in the hospital and It was hard for me to use my powerless laptop, so that's why I'm a little bit upset yesterday. -Lemonaka22:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Ugh, the promise I made above is broken within twenty-4️⃣ hours, I guess. Yet again, If U find this teeny-weeny request infuriating, simply ignore it. The request is: unbold the build no. by replacing
But if you're actually fed up from my request, just place a WP:BREAK template on your userpage. I will understand your feelings and hope that U just recovered from your illness.23:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Phew, I literally got shocked! Good luck with the work out there! If U're free, can U please tell me Y ® U 1️⃣ of the few users, if not the only 1️⃣, who could accept edit requests on your talk pages? (BTW, I checked your archives) And also, is this a legal behavior among (extended-)auotocomfirmed users? If possible, please tell me more about risks, false positives or false negatives while getting used to such habit. If U would get into conflicts, which I don't hope 4️⃣, how would U resolve that?102.157.219.237 (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Anyone can accept edit requests on talk pages if they want, this is a legal behaviour to ask others to edit protected pages, unless you are a blocked or banned user while your ban doesn't expire, or something like you have COI issues with the topic of the article. -Lemonaka01:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
But normally, for a user who want to make the edit request, the most common way is requesting on the related talk pages of the articles, not on other users' talk page. If you request on the articles' talk page, any patrollers may find them. But if you request here, well, I believe since I'm not a great figure on this project, only a few people will have a watch on my talk page. -Lemonaka01:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi. It is me again. Per another IP user's edit request, please add these lines:
|-valign=top
|style=background:#fef8c6|10.0.19045.3324<br />{{r|1904x3324}}
|KB5029244
|'''Release Preview Channel and public release:'''<br />August 8, 2023
|
and replace |style=background:#d4f4b4|'''10.0.19045.3271''' with |style=background:#fef8c6|10.0.19045.3271. Please, can U do all of these within 1️⃣ edit?102.159.183.29 (talk) 10:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Removing your BLPPROD from the Melih Sezgin article
Hey @Lemonaka, just wanted to touch base with you really quick. I removed your BLPPROD because the article has external links. From WP:BLPPROD "To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contains no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.) which support any statements made about the person in the biography."
I know this is frustrating, I made this same mistake last month to a bunch of articles. If you have any questions please feel free to ping me. Again, you didn't do anything wrong it's a super common mistake. Dr vulpes(💬 • 📝)19:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hey, sorry to write this here. I don't mean to put any pressure or anything, but I just wanted to ask what your opinion is on making the edit to the page given the lack of opposition to he proposal and the fact that it all comes from sources in the page? Genabab (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
@Genabab This is a huge change to the article, although I inclined to accept it, we may still need another editor to have a read and agree this change. -Lemonaka06:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
DO you know of any way to directly request it. I doubt anyone else will show up to comment at this rate.. Genabab (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello again, idk if you saw (I only saw just now) but someone else appeared on the talk page and they are inclined to agree. Do you think this means the edit can now be made? Genabab (talk) 09:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. The arbitrators have decided to close your clarification request with the following response by Barkeep49:
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ currently has an appeal to the Enwiki Arbitration Committee and Stewards open. Scottywong could be unblocked whenever. So while today there could be no interaction, that situation could quickly change. If it does the interaction ban is present.
Was closed before I could reply, Haiyenslna is still active on the Vietnamese wikipedia from what I can see. I do not know why they just stick to the Vietnamese one, they have a ridiculous amount of socks here. I was wondering why the sockmaster wasn't globally locked. X750. Spin a yarn?Articles I've screwed over?21:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Sorry a lot. I'm not a sysop from Vietnamese Wikipedia, I cannot take action against them. Since there are local checkusers on viwp, stewards cannot do anything about that. You may try to contact their local community for help. -Lemonaka00:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
I've edited your drafts, trying to not change too much of your voice, but improved the language and clarity where I could. I have made some remarks on your draft, see comments in the article (in edit mode). If you could address them, that would be nice. Headbomb {t · c · p · b}19:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your copy edits. I really appreciate your kind help and thanks a lot for your visionary suggestions.
For first sentence in maybe a solution section, I've changed that sentence to clarify it.
As for UA, it now links to a Wikipedia article user agent to clarify it.
I've changed the last paragraph to make it more clear.
Hello, My Name is Casey. I am wondering if creating a Wiki page for my Artist name is a possibility? I am not very famous at all, I do have songs on Spotify, Apple Music, Audio Mack etc. Is the concept of creating a Wiki page for myself something that could be done? Thank you. --Ghostofrucker (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
@Ghostofrucker Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like this place and decide to stay here. However, the answer to your question is definitely no, writing autobiography is strongly discouraged here. For more policy about that, you can have a read on WP:COI and follow the instructions on that page. -Lemonaka00:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse host - belated welcome
Dear Lemonaka,
Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!
Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:
Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
Hi. If U have time, can U please replace the below lines:
|-valign=top
|style=background:#c1e6f5|10.0.19045.3391<br /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2023/08/10/releasing-windows-10-build-19045-3391-to-release-preview-channel|title=Releasing Windows 10 Build 19045.3391 to Release Preview Channel|date=August 10, 2023|work=Windows Insider Blog|access-date=August 12, 2023}}</ref>
|KB5029331
|'''Release Preview Channel:'''<br />August 10, 2023
|
* Added the ability to show a notification badge on the Start menu's user profile icon
|-
with the below lines?
|-valign=top
|style=background:#fef8c6|10.0.19045.3391<br /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2023/08/10/releasing-windows-10-build-19045-3391-to-release-preview-channel|title=Releasing Windows 10 Build 19045.3391 to Release Preview Channel|date=August 10, 2023|work=Windows Insider Blog|access-date=August 12, 2023}}</ref>
|rowspan=2|KB5029331
|'''Release Preview Channel:'''<br>August 10, 2023
|
* Added the ability to show a notification badge on the Start menu's user profile icon
|-valign=top
|style=background:#d4f4b4|'''10.0.19045.3393'''<br><ref>{{cite web|url=https://support.microsoft.com/help/5029331|title=August 22, 2023—KB5029331 (OS Build 19045.3393) Preview|website=Microsoft Support|publisher=[[Microsoft]]|access-date=August 22, 2023}}</ref>
|'''Release Preview Channel and public release:'''<br>August 22, 2023
|
|-
Thanks & have a great day ahead there. And I am sorry for archiving one of your sections earlier without your consent. I thought I was helping.102.158.228.49 (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I found a mistake in the article about Henry James on the en.wiki website. It is said that in 1875, James lived in the Latin Quarter, but this is not true. I've been reading a lot about James for my personal research, and James lived on the Right Bank, rue du Luxembourg, now called rue Cambon, which is not in the Latin Quarter in Paris (I'm a Parisian). Should I just change the sentence about the location in the article? --TashkaLM (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Question from Ryuaelv1407 (02:43, 15 September 2023)
Hi. If I write an article about a company, and the only available source about the company is the company's website. Is it possible to use it as references? --Ryuaelv1407 (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Question from Teigncombe (20:16, 11 September 2023)
Before I created my account with Wikipedia, I added information regarding the origin and meaning of the name "Tinkham." Should I re-enter that information now that I have an account? --Teigncombe (talk) 20:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
@Crazy-Magus669 For Dispute resolution, have a read on WP:DR. Truth is relatively, and it will have its historical issues, for example, some world records wee broken again and again, but some people may not get the newest report while the editor who change it forget to use reliable source to prove it, then dispute happens. Not all disputes need to be marked out, e.g. disruptive editing may also cause disputes, these kind of dispute may solve by WP:RBI. -Lemonaka12:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
@維基百科最忠誠的反對者 Okay, you dare to show up here. Let's be harsh since you cannot take advice, you are acting like an editing warrior on another project, stop ASAP, or you may be banned if that functionaries are working well. Oh, you are a Christian, then take please read bible a little more."Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."--Matthew 5:17-5:20 -Lemonaka00:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
If you continue to rely solely on your personal knowledge from the English Wikipedia and disregard the policies of the Chinese Wikipedia, while emotionally blackmailing me based on your own morality, I will forgive you because it is evident that you need more experience to understand that my actions align with the teachings of The Lord.
“Omnia non sunt partium, non est cupiditas gloriae vanitatis, sed in humilitate animo, unusquisque alium prae se existimet. Unusquisque non tantum suorum negotiorum sit curialis, sed etiam alienorum.”---Philippians 2:4-2:5
“Quidquid agitur, ne querellam effundatis aut contentiones suscitetis, ut irreprehensibiles et sinceri sitis, Dei filii immaculati in hoc depravato et perverso saeculo. Vos in hoc saeculo tanquam lux manifestamini, viam vitae ostendentes, ut in die Christi mei gloriari possim quod non frustra cucurri aut inaniter laboravi.”---Philippians 2:14-2:16
By the way, you seem to have forgotten to capitalise "bible". For Christians, God's guidance is always holy. But I think the good Lord will surely forgive us for our unintentional offence :) ——WMLO (talk) 06:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't read the Bible very often. So my understanding of Latin (I haven't used it for a while) may not be as good as yours. If there are any grammatical fallacies, please point them out. Thanks！ WMLO (talk) 06:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Oh well a block, what you deserved even here, please use you common sense, or let's talk about following section. “Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.” Revelation 2:16 -Lemonaka08:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Talking about forgiveness 😂, lmao. It's we forgive your incompatibility, your blindness and rogue actions. If your behaviours were here, an indef would be sooner. But for god's sake "Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake." --Matthew 5:11 Then we should do the following, right? "Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you." --Matthew 5:12 -Lemonaka09:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You should repost the bureaucrat's statements defending Mys 721tx. They banned me with unclear reasons and inexplicably intended to suspend RFDA. Even a fool knows what they're up to. If I can be banned by Mys 721tx for a month, I can certainly endure a decision even more absurd than this. History shows that the community will inevitably stand on my side😹. May Lord forgive them, amen.——WMLO (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
@維基百科最忠誠的反對者 You are blocked for outing others, which is something I despised most. Outing others and sockpuppetry are the reasons why I reported PlanespotterA320 to meta-wiki and WMF, taking me months to collect evidence on and off wiki. So just fuck away if you tried to troll me, may God forgive me for my foolish, who used to believe you are a trusted editor with good faith. -Lemonaka14:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you take a moment to think about whose personal information I've uncovered? If it's that group, even their own rules say that users can be quoted. If it's the age of the administrator, his entry or memorial page existed in the Chinese wikipedia until last year.
Even if I mentioned it unintentionally, that doesn't constitute a direct ban on my talk page. And even if J.Wong wanted to make it so serious, why didn't he block my comment? I am disappointed in your position on me, but you are right about one thing. I have never doubted that there is so much malice in my community. ——WMLO (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Just leave me alone! I don't want to get involved in your messy political fights at all. More comments are considered as harassment, stop wasting your valuable time. -Lemonaka14:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Then I will say one last thing. Where the gears of the Chinese Wikipedia go back to the right place and prove me right. At that time, please give me your blessing. Thank you. WMLO (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
@日期20220626 Yep, yes. I use Bing translation embedded in Edge to help me understand Chinese, I'm also learning in China now. As for native language, I'm a Som-N, but I don't have any intention to contribute there. Why not contribute on Arabic projects? Here's a tip, Office Action. Better not to say about that.
Without translation software, I can read a little Chinese, but cannot write sentences as you. After writing something really awkward to read, I put it away and refuse to write it again.---Lemonaka14:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Great, Somali. Here's one more head-up, dislike is usually followed by doing (gerund), or even to do. (inf) But dislike do is a little bit awkward. ---Lemonaka14:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Lemonaka. Since you created this account, you've been in violation of WP:RTV, particularly the bit about not editing under any account. But as a global renamer I chose not to do anything, because it didn't seem worth the trouble. However, I've now grown concerned that you are violating the more important policy of WP:CLEANSTART as well. Under your previous account, you were warned for misuse of projectspace pages, and vanished shortly after being rebuffed in a projectspace matter you initiated. In light of this, it's concerning when you make comments like this. You've pinged someone and taken up admin time to suggest taking a page to RFPP... when, if you read the previous comment, you'd see that the page is already protected. This is a little thing, but not the first comment like it I've seen from you at AN or AN/I, and the point of a CLEANSTART is to move away from past mistakes. Otherwise, it's unfair to other editors, who are unaware of your past warnings in this realm.
So the way I see it you have two options here, in order to come back in compliance with policy. You can disclose your previous account on your userpage, and I can un-vanish it, and you can keep editing in these admin areas, no longer obscuring that past warning and declined matter. Or you can make this a proper CLEANSTART and stay out of admin areas; and because I'm nice I won't un-vanish even though it's technically what policy says to do. (Of course I can't guarantee that no other renamer/steward will feel otherwise.) I think that's a fair choice to give you. If it seems unfair, consider that CLEANSTART violations are, as a matter of policy, per seWP:SOCK violations—so I think this is pretty generous. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 17:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Jovana lukina (22:16, 22 October 2023)
You'd better give us some secondary source references for this person. A book or article written by the subject himself is not suitable enough for citing. -Lemonaka02:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure what you mean. Lj Ristic published the first book ever on sensor technology and devices. I included the book reviewes by somebody else. I also included news articles where companies announced him joining their executive team.
I plan to write profiles of prominent people in technology. When I see people in the same field (for example, Roger T. Howe) i do not see articles about him in the reference. How is that different? Jovana lukina (talk) 23:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Plese read WP:SPIP, self publication are usually not suitable for providing notability. However, I find you also included some news as reference, you can try to go through WP:AFC process and ask for someone else to review it. -Lemonaka01:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Lemonaka,
There is not a single reference cited in my post that is a self-published article. What I listed are articles published in archival journals. This means means that they had to go through rigorous reviews and only after that be published, once they were deemed to be worthy scientific contributions. If anything, this is the ultimate notoriety - many experts in the field agreeing that Dr. Ristic’s work is valuable contribution to be preserved. This is no different from other notable technologist, like the example I listed in my previous message. Jovana lukina (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Lemonaka, the IP address you reverted on Confused!, was actually right to remove that edit. Please take a look, that edit clearly has nothing to do with the song article and it's a harassment edit against Joe Biden. It was placed there by another IP address yesterday here. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 (☁＝☁＝✈) 12:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, only when you pulished something, it will appear on wiki. There's no autosave on Wikipedia, so be careful not to lose your edit. -Lemonaka06:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thank you. I want to make sure I understand. While editing, at the top of the page, I can click "save" or "publish."
I'm not sure what "save" does. I thought it would let me come back later and make more edits before clicking "publish."
If not, then I should "publish" often while editing to avoid losing my edits.
? Even I used an Android mobile, there are not a button called save, there's an arrow button, I clicked it, then it showed me a preview page and only a button to publish. I will test it again later. -Lemonaka00:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
@Sambest2458 Hello, Wikipedia is not a place for collecting personal information, if there's no such information on that page, you'd better google it instead of searching on Wikipedia. -Lemonaka11:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't mind remaking my edits. I'm not sure whether double edits would cause someone to resolve them, but since I didn't publish that shouldn't happen happen.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Question from Niki Z Noiz (18:05, 3 November 2023)
question as to why concerning that this page is afraid, not for what goals related to this article listed as a class v5,
please explain why the username flags on my account This page should not be speedily deleted because... (it is for historical preservation purposes only, as I wish to preserve and honourable service for my ancestors, not for profit or purposes for gain personal or commercial in good faith I believe this improves all relations between a historical fact, and the preservation.) --Niki Z Noiz (talk) 18:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
On BMI history, I used the same source which is already cited after the first sentence (Garabed Eknoyan 2007). I chose to re-word and give more interesting information (like why BMI should be weight divided by height squared). 2A02:1812:1126:5D00:51C9:7929:D2CA:6FF1 (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
His article on Wikipedia is under edit it will go live again shortly probably even today, so please don't mark it or vote it yet Админ.МК (talk) 06:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Are you suggesting my proportion of article space edits is too low? It's about twice yours. I assure you that I would never upload any any LLM output to even a Wikipedia user talk page without carefully proofreading every word. Sandizer (talk) 05:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
？ To cut a long story short, your comments on Jimbo page are just some messy bot words. Why I need to carefully proofreading every word? I dealing with issues based on itself, not others.BTW, your discussion about wmf borad of trustee rights are something not so sensible. You cannot have them waived their rights or have some rights, especially for Jimbo. It need very strong consensus to do so and their willing to do so. -Lemonaka08:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the importance of attempting to engage with future leadership in oppressive countries, 1 being least and 5 most? Sandizer (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
I have no intention in political discussion, I'm here to build contents related to chemical or medicine, thanks. -Lemonaka23:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, Lemonaka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Banwu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
@Vchimpanzee Hi, I've asked that in VPT months ago, didn't get any useful reply from Wikimedia Foundation engineer. While other users said we are still using the same system. -Lemonaka02:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
_by_Ron.jpg)
