Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to [[]]. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--
Level 2
The recent edit you made to [[]] constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --
Level 3
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with [[]]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --
Level 4
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with [[]] --
A tag has been placed on Captain America: Super Soldier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Seriously? why did I get blocked now? How was I being "uncivil"? And really you deleted me enter user page? Now that wasn't really civil was it? Also why doesn't the other guy get blocked? He just goes off thinking he's the boss by going and removing things from peoples pages without even leaving a message? That's why I got angry. I get blocked and that guys gets a golden medal. I Know its not allowed to have that "fake message" Thing but its my talk page no one views my page. I don't really know how he found me my page. as you can see I've been good before my last few blocks and I would appreciate it if I you can either unblock me or undo waht you did to me my talk page because thats really "uncivil" --Lbrun1241517:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)`[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ok can you at least restore my talk page? I don't really see how i was using that wrong? Also why doesn't that other user get block? Isn't it against the rules to delete things off peoples pages without leaving a message?--Lbrun1241517:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While it might be considered a courtesy, there is no requirement that you be left a message for an edit to your user page (or pretty much anywhere, for that matter). Once again, see WP:OWN#User pages. In a manner of speaking, the "message" was left for you in edit summaries (the usage of which you are clearly aware). That being said, seeing as how you admit you knew it was "not allowed" above, I fail to see how a message would have changed your behavior. --Kinut/c17:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
it would of, lets put it this way. If i were to delete something off your page without leaving you a message, how would you feel about that?--Lbrun1241517:37, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All the user had to do was send me a massage saying "look dude I'm not doing this because im a bad guy but to look at for you, you cant have these fake messages in your user page".--Lbrun12415 17
39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hypothetically speaking? Long answer: assuming you removed prohibited content and provided a link to the discussion of the prohibition in the edit summary, I would read the provided link, not repeatedly violate it, and not resort to WP:NPA, and probably thank you for making me aware of a policy of which I was not previously cognizant. Short answer: this does not justify your behavior. Until you acknowledge that, you will likely not be unblocked. --Kinut/c17:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay i see what you're saying. I have a couple of request if you would be kind. Please restore my talk page back to this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lbrun12415&diff=510362926&oldid=510362875 with the block message you added. Also I went over and looked at what the other Admin said about my actions and I was being a little rude not to the user but to the Admins. Lastly I'm going to take a little break and cool down, hopefully when i return you'll still have me in you watch list and you can decide if i'm civil enough to use Wikipedia.--Lbrun1241517:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that is a good idea. Feel free to post an unblock request when you feel the time is right. As for your user page, as another administrator deemed the content inappropriate, I will not wheel war with him by undoing his actions. This is something that can be discussed further if/when your block is lifted. --Kinut/c23:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think i'm ready to use Wikipedia at all, I'm to stressed with work and school that i'm taking my anger with others. Jut wanted to stop by and say sorry to the Administers for all the trouble I've caused. Take Care.--Lbrun1241500:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
From one of the admins who's blocked you recently, I'm sorry to hear about your stress, and I thank you for the apology. Your personal life (work and school) is far more important than editing at Wikipedia. Good luck.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
