User talk:Lassefolkersen

Hi there

Something you might find useful is this tool that creates formatted citations from the PubMed ID number. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for your amazing contributions to Genome-wide association study. I am looking over what you did and it is thorough and understandable at my layman level. I know very little about this field but I appreciate what you have done. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --LasseFolkersen (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey. Looks like a nice cup of coffee. GoEThe (talk) 08:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Genome-wide association study, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SNP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidag 2012

Hej!

Den 23. september er der Wikidag 2012 i København. Der bliver workshops og oplæg og mulighed for at mødes "i den virkelige verden" med andre wikipedianere. Det vil glæde os at se en masse mennesker! --Palnatoke (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Genome-wide association study in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

— James Estevez (talk) 07:41, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
· · ·

GA Hold

The article Genome-wide association study nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 14 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Genome-wide association study/GA1 for things which need to be addressed. — James Estevez (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Borchskollegium.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Borchskollegium.jpg

Notice

The file File:Borchskollegium.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Borchs_Kollegium.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]