User talk:LFaraone/Archive/2016/April

This is an archive of past discussions with User:LFaraone. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Google Drive article, Data safety and privacy section and Apple iCloud article, Privacy subsection

Hi LFaraon, I have removed the wikipedia page references from the edits on end-to-end encryption as you were correct that better references could be added. Thank you for that.

The references now cited, which include a peer-reviewed journal, support my wording that “without end-to-end encryption, user’s information is left unsecured because it remains easily accessible to unauthorized persons.”

While all forms of encryption are theoretically hackable, some are easier than others. This is not my opinion, this is a fact agreed upon by people who specialize in this stuff as indicated in these and other sources. This article explains what I am talking about with relation to encryption key sizes. The wikipedia pages on end-to-end encryption and client-side encryption explain this as well in relation to client-side encryption vs. server-side encryption. When something is encrypted on your computer before it is transmitted to be stored on a server somewhere, it is a fact that its more secure than if it were encrypted by the receiving party. Only you would have the key needed to decrypt it. They can still try to guess your key but that would still take a lot more time than if they didn’t need your key at all.

Thanks! :)

Crice88 (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the One Laptop per Child page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

FYI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 03:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, kelapstick. I admit I was a bit confused as to what I was being accused of; unless the admin corps grew the ability to get notified about users caught in a hardblock they placed and nobody told me about it ^_^. I do intend to improve the docs on proxy blocks, though, since Template:Blocked proxy eventually leads people to meta:WikiProject_on_open_proxies/Help:blocked, which leads people to an archived page. LFaraone 17:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

No worries, at this stage, nothing surprises me. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Finding an online administrator in an emergency

Hi. Thanks for your recent actions. In the future, should the need arise, if I need to contact an admin privately as suggested at Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm, how exactly do should I go about finding one (bearing in mind the whole private + emergency thing)? fredgandt 07:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Emailing the Oversight team (or any other mechanism listed at requests for oversight) works — all members of the Oversight team are also administrators. LFaraone 17:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

For concision and clarity, might it be best then, to remove the suggestion from the guideline? fredgandt 19:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for The Chickbusters

An editor has asked for a deletion review of The Chickbusters. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ranze (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)