User talk:L.Willms

Rail Transport in France

Are you positive there aren't other articles on French railways with your information included within them? Also, please capitalize your article titles. --Theunicyclegirl 20:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My start was articles like Rail transport in the United Kingdom and the template "Rail Transport in Europe", pointing to 14 articles of that type, but not on France. So I added one on this major country, because I looked for statistical figures on the size of the various networks. Currently there are such articles on the following countries: Austria · Belgium · Denmark · Finland · France · Germany · Ireland · Italy · Netherlands · Norway · Romania · Russia · Sweden · Switzerland · Ukraine · United Kingdom.
L.Willms 02:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Eurostar Response

I have left one under your comment. Hencetalk (talk) 17:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cuba in Angola

hello l.willms, may i turn your attention to a discussion for deletion of the article "cuba in angola" as well as to the article itself. i feel like a lone fighter and i would appreciate your contribution.Sundar1 (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, L.Willms! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 00:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Fotopic.net. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. I understand that you were trying to provide information but we cannot report rumors, even qualifying them as unsourced. Wikipedia has to stick to the facts as reported by reliable third party sources. See also what Wikipedia is not. Mfield (talk) 01:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Eurostar#New_destinations_and_competition

By all means revert my edit if you think it changed the sense of what you wrote. It was not necessary to leave a note on my Talk page.

While the standard of your English is clearly high (and certainly much better than my German), it's not quite as good as that of a native English speaker. Most of my edit was therefore attempting to improve the readability of your contribution, as well as correct errors with a couple of the links. I also deleted a clause in the middle of your paragraph which I thought was not readily comprehensible to most people, and which I felt was anyway too detailed for the article. If you decide to put this back in, it would be helpful if you could re-word it to make clearer what you meant. --JCG33 (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yoani Sanchez

You reverted with out explanation. Please discuss your reversion on the discussion page. Thanks (olive (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

This is an extremely unhelpful edit, I suggest you refactor it and discuss it rationally in the section immediately above it. Dreadstar ☥ 19:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:COI, I would like to know if you have any affiliations with or interest in Cronon AG or its subsidaries? Thanks! Dreadstar ☥ 21:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I have no relationship whatsoever with Cronon AG. Cronon is for big corporations, ad I am not a big corporation. Also I don't know if Cronon AG has any subsidiaries. What I know is that Cronon AG is itself a subsidiary of Strato AG. Strato sells to the mass market (where I could get web space), and Cronon to corporations. This is like Chevrolet and Cadillac. --L.Willms (talk) 21:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

São Tomé and Príncipe

You recently added:

  • A Cuban medical team of seven doctors, nurses and other health workers is working on the main island, with occasionally visits to Principe.

Please provide your sources for this statements, If you would like help researching it, I am happy to help. Just let me know. Senator2029 | talk | contribs 10:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • As to the IBB facility on São Tomé: I saw it with my own eyes. I have several photos on which the antennas do appear; I have to revise the photos though if there is one which shows the entry with the sign identifying the site as belonging to the International Broadcasting Bureau.
  • As to the Cuban medical team: the Cuban Ambassador to Angola and São Tomé (Pedro Ross Leal) told me so, and I also met in person the medical workers themselves.
I happend to be in São Tomé on the occasion of the "tomada de posse" of Manuel Pinto da Costa.
Yours, L.Willms (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transporte Colectivo Urbano de Luanda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Transporte Colectivo Urbano de Luanda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 07:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moxico Province

please be careful with edits when posting them, such as recent change you made to Moxico Province . It required cleanup. --RichardMills65 (talk) 23:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem there? What "cleanup" was required according to your view? Please be specific and not so evasive in your comments. --L.Willms (talk) 23:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
you could go back and look at the history, but i guess I will do it for you. Please try not to assume that others are out to insult you. In another, more recent edit, Uíge Province here's what you put :

Here's what it was changed to:

A simple typographic error! So what? Good that you spotted that problemito, and thanks for correcting that minor error of mine, but there is no need to make a big fuss about, right? Cheers, L.Willms (talk) 23:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
not making a big fuss; just noticed that you made the mistake on 2 consecutive edits and wanted to let you know the correct spelling before you copy/pasted that to any more articles. Thanks - --RichardMills65 (talk) 00:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's good that you are so considerate, but by simply saying that I made a typo which you corrected would have avoided spending so much time on this minor problem. You could have used that time better by telling me something about you, where you are from for example. A better use of our time! Cheers, and bye bye! L.Willms (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SNCF Geodis

I should say this early on - - if you are going to add detail financial information to articles please provide references.

Additionally I don't want to criticise what are fundamentally good additions, but please write in english: 'In the perspective of industrial logic' is not that. Also please make use of links eg Établissement public à caractère industriel et commercial..Oranjblud (talk) 23:51, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also I didn't find some of the companies you added to the lead in the body of the article: Naviland Cargo, Modalohr Express, Novatrans, Districhrono, Ecorail, Froidcombi, Rouch Intermodal et Sefergie in the body of the article - have you got information on when they became part of the organisation? Note- as a general rule the 'lead section' (abstract) should contain a summary of key points in the article, and not contain information not covered in the body of the text. eg see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section.Oranjblud (talk) 00:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

..Sorry - I didn't realise english was a second language for you, please don't take my comments personally. I see that fr:Transport et Logistique Partenaires has been written - I will see if it is worth adding an article in english which may simplify things. As for the companies mentioned above - they appear to be small or splinter organisations, and may not credit significant mention - I will take a closer look and see if the article needs updating.Oranjblud (talk) 00:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might have noted that the french article fr:Transport et Logistique Partenaires had been written by meself. On the rest please see my comment on Talk:SNCF Geodis. --L.Willms (talk) 06:13, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry about my error describing Geodis as an EPIC - I have corrected that. I have added a reference noting that 'francewagons' has been merged into 'ermewa'. I'm not aware of any other ways in which the article is out of date, but haven't fully checked the current situation.Oranjblud (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Opel-Adam 3trims 279642.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Opel-Adam 3trims 279642.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, L.Willms. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 08:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 08:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, L.Willms. You have new messages at R'n'B's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hanns Eisler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ernst Busch and Bread and Wine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image Eislergrave.jpg

So the date was wrong. I see the image has now been deleted. Between 2000 and 2006 I took photos of literally 1000s of graves and certainly I can't now remember exactdates. Maybe 2006 was when I uploaded it - what exactly is the beef here?--Smerus (talk) 14:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hanns Eisler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mother (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wuling Hongtu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The '''Wuling Hongtu''' is a five- to eight-seater [[Microvan]] made by SGMW ([[[SAIC-GM-Wuling|SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile]]), a Chinese joint venture of [[SAIC Motor|SAIC]] with [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wuling Hong Guang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MPV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SAIC-GM-Wuling‎

I made some changes to SAIC-GM-Wuling‎. Please let me know what you think and if I made a mess of the references section. I'd be happy to clean it up! Fleetham (talk) 20:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As to the RE section -- you have again introduced inline REFs instead of placing them in the REF section (which shoudl be sorted by the name= parameter, please); inline REFs make editing of the source very very difficult, because one doesn't see the wood for the trees. You also deleted in the text a reference to a REF in the REF section, which leads to an error. As to the content -- I have to look at it more. Just for the beginning, I think the term "pint-size" is not appropriate; it sound pejorative to me. It also seemed to me that you removed the sentence saying that both SGMW and Liuzhou Wuling use the Wuling brand. I have to take a closer look tomorrow afternoon. --L.Willms (talk) 23:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
About placing the refs in the refs section, the only worry I have about that is that it would disallow using two sources to cite a single sentence. IDK if there's a way to do this (which can be seen on the sentence about the cost of SGMW products) using your refs method, but if there is, I think we should do so. I like doing this because it's often much easier to write a nice sentence using multiple sources even if it can introduce reference fragmentation, where the same reference will appear multiple times in the references section. If absolutely necessary, I could re-write everything in a "1 sentence, 1 reference" style, however. As for using the term pint-sized, I don't think it's pejorative. But it is something you might use to describe a child or something for a child, so I agree that it is somewhat out of context in an article about cars. I would be happy to have it changed, but I do think that it helps to alert the reader to just how small these vans are. In the US, a commercial van is going to be much larger than your average passenger vehicle, but SGMW vans are super tiny for commercial vehicles. For example, I believe that the Sunshine is shorter in length than the Chevy Sonic. Anyway, please do read it over tomorrow and know that I'm pretty open to any changes being made. Fleetham (talk) 05:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, L.Willms. You have new messages at Vanjagenije's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Berlin Ringbahn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |}
  • turn]]''), reflecting the need for trains to reverse there to continue their trip around the ring). Passengers could change at the ''Kolonnenstraße'' station across the platform to continue to ride

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Berlin Nord-Süd Tunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reichstag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bread and Roses and Citogenesis

Mein liebe L -

Viel dank for adding to Bread and Roses. Also, I love the Citogenesis cartoon. I believe I have experienced this phenomenon first hand. Is this, in fact, citogenesis? Here's what happened:

A few months ago, somebody was challenging a statement I made (sometime in 2011) in the lede for the Frederick Douglass article: " He stood as a living counter-example to slaveholders' arguments that slaves did not have the intellectual capacity to function as independent American citizens." I could not remember whether I had stolen that phrase from some writer, or come up with it myself. So I googled it. I probably spent an hour searching, and *I could not find a single reference to the 'living counter-example' phrase that was not from the Wikipedia article!* So I have no way to determine if I made it up, or stole it! Finally, more recently, I dug up 2 references that I believe support my assertion. Paulmlieberman (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Berlin S-Bahn may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |}
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Berlin Nordbahnhof may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • became the Berlin passenger train terminus of the [[Berlin Northern Railway|Preußische Nordbahn (Prussian Northern Railway]] to [[Stralsund]] via [[Neu-Strelitz]], and later also to [[Rostock]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Berlin Nordbahnhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PMview, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DCX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PMview, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot capella-1.01-12.05.1992.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot capella-1.01-12.05.1992.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 05:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation: Chevrolet Tracker

Chevrolet Tracker is already a disambiguation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan20102006 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Writer2epub, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OpenOffice and ODT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, L.Willms. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yosef Heller (Historian)

Hello, L.Willms. You recently added a link to Yosef Heller (Historian) on the page Joseph Heller (disambiguation), and in the process had a disagreement with some other editors. I don't believe anyone objects to creating an article about the historian. The "redlink" was removed from the disambiguation page because (1) the page doesn't exist yet, and (2) there don't seem to be other articles referring to Heller. Redlinks are only added to disambiguation pages when existing articles link to them. Yosef Heller is not mentioned at Hebrew University of Jerusalem and there are no articles linking to the title you added, as you can see: Special:WhatLinksHere/Yosef Heller (Historian). The people at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Science and academia might be interested to help create an article. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 03:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism against this scientist lookes increasingly as a manifestation of antisemitism or a disdain for scientific work. Why do you think that I added this person to the Yosef Heller disambiguation page? Because at least one of his works is being cited in Wikipedia, and the search for the name only shows some very insignificant persons, like a local priest in Brookly or to a 2-line article about a isignificant sportsman from the 1930ies. I added this title so that other users can identify this author of at least a dozen books as a researcher at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem what then can help to find biographic information on him. I found this university as identification in the book by this person which I am currently reading ("British Policy towards the Ottoman Empire, 1908-1914", ISBN 0-7146-3127-2, OCLC 875662221 (and other OCLC-numbers). One should be able to read Hebrew for creating the article on this historian, but I unfortunately cannot read Hebrew. As to your claim "there are no articles linking to the title" added, this is quite ridiculous. This Yosef (Joseph) Heller needs to be differentiated from the other bearers of that name. As to links to this scientist see: Special:WhatLinksHere/Yosef Heller (Historian). References to this book in the article space were deleted by political activists for European colonialism. The vandalism against the mentioning of the historian Joseph Heller in the disambiguation page looks like being motivated by the same political hate monger under the pretext of spraying some noodles from the alphabet soup. Just like articles e.g. on Angola are being manipulated by nostalgics of the South African Apartheid system and the Portuguese Salazar fascism, always hidng the real political motives behind this same alphabet soup as in this innocent disambiguation page, . Wikipedia is increasingly an instrument for reactionary propaganda. --L.Willms (talk) 07:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As it turned out, an article on this person exists, but with the given name transscribed as "Joseph", and somebody added that to the disambiguation page. I have created the REDIRECT page for the given name as "Yosef". --L.Willms (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please calm down: your talk of "political hate monger" is a personal attack on another editor. The link was being removed from the disambiguation page because Joseph/Yosef Heller was not mentioned in the article to which the blue link (to the university) was leading. It was being removed by disambiguation page experts, with no political motivation. There are firm rules about disambiguation pages, included in the "Alphabet soup" links which you were shown but appear to have ignored. Fortunately, as it turned out, there was already a page about the historian so he's now happily linked from the disambiguation page. But please accept that there was no politics in all this, just firm adherence to the long-established rules about what entries do and do not belong in disambiguation pages. (And the disambiguator would always have been "(historian)" with a lower case "h"). Happy Editing. PamD 08:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Based on my experience with Wikipedia in its various language versions, in 99.9% of all cases there is a political or other sectarian motivation behind such deletions "explained" by just spraying around the alphabet soup. Somebody serious would spell out concretely his motivations, as I do in case I change what other people have created. The "all the knowledge" claim is tainted by the fact that also in Wikipedia the ruling opinion is that of the (current) rulers, and everything else is being censored into the nirvana. --L.Willms (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Based on my experience, edits to dab pages by dab page enthusiasts are entirely motivated by the wish to have a consistent set of disambiguation pages which comply with WP:MOSDAB. The editor who first removed "Yosef Heller", at a time when he was not mentioned in any article, fully explained her motivation by directing you to MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION in her edit summary. These are not "alphabet soup" but links to clear explanations. But if you choose to see political motivation in everything anyone does in the encyclopedia, you won't agree. What a strange experience you've had of editing. PamD 23:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What happened was an orgy of destruction, instead of adding the article on Yosef Heller (historian) which did exist, just missing the necessary REDIRECT page -- if I hadn't resisted, this article would still not be added to the disambiguation page. And please, just throwing alphabet-soup links around is not an explanation of motives. Those destroyers of knowledge must not prevail. --L.Willms (talk) 08:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It appears that the page is in good shape now. If I may suggest, working with others is often easier if we assume good faith. While all manner of bad motivations do exist, it's usually most helpful to assume that people are trying to do right and that disagreements result from honest misunderstanding or sincere differences of opinion. "Throwing alphabet soup" may indicate a certain bias – thinking like an insider and failing to explain things sufficiently – but I don't agree that it is prima facie evidence of antisemitism or even reactionary politics. Of course you are free to disagree. Best wishes, Cnilep (talk) 04:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A caution

...if in my presence, you again accuse another editor of being in personal relationship with a family or organisation about which they are writing, or insinuate participation as paid editors rather than volunteer, or otherwise accuse another editor of bias without any basis, as you did at the Fred Trump article Talk page about myself and another editor, I will immediately take the matter to an administrative setting. You can hate the Trump family as much as you wish, and express this however you wish. You cannot, however, disrespect other editor's work or intentions and motivations, without there being consequences. This is the last you will here from me on this, barring further biased, misplaced accusations from you (regarding POV-interfering employment, Trump University affiliation, bias, etc.). Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 00:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look, this is the way to react with threats those people writing biased, interest driven texts in Wikipedia. As I said, Wikipedia is largely biased by paid and unpaid PR agents, and not really limited to presenting facts. --L.Willms (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, L.Willms. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sat-IP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Forte (notation program)

Notice

The article Forte (notation program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Can't find any independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. wumbolo ^^^ 15:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forte (notation program) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forte (notation program) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forte (notation program) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 08:44, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capella (notation program)

Guten Morgen. I have observed the article Capella (notation program) has been proposed for deletion and I have observed you have not been notified despite your contributions to that article. I also note this article was not allocated to any Wikiprojects and may not have come under the radar of such projects. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry noticed this had aleaady been de-prodded but the need for quality references remain. I may help a little later. thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, User:Djm-leighpark. The proposal to delete the Capella article came from the same User:Wumbolo who proposed the deletion of Forte (notation program). Working for the Competition? What more knowledge does this user want to destroy? --L.Willms (talk) 11:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And "wumbolo" has reintroduced the deletion proposal. What a nonsense. BTW, I have updated the article - version 8 is already nearly one year old. --L.Willms (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just a heads up to check AfD and note the syntax for voting ... also check the 'Guide' links in the top of that page.
AfD? Alternative für Deutschland? There is too much burocracy on Wikipedia, and that is helping those who want to destry knowlege, and distort reality to suit their political interests. --L.Willms (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, L.Willms. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-BAI Banco-Angolano-de-Investimentos.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-BAI Banco-Angolano-de-Investimentos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stadtmobil logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stadtmobil logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edilon Sedra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edilon Sedra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edilon Sedra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Desertarun (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Barra, you may be blocked from editing. Pipsally (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Writer2EPUB.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Writer2EPUB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PATAC logo-and-name.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PATAC logo-and-name.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Multicaixa debit cards in Angola, and the supporting ATMs and POS terminals.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Multicaixa debit cards in Angola, and the supporting ATMs and POS terminals.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can that happen? Big raid to destroy information? L.Willms (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

T

G 106.207.101.136 (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]