|
User talk:Kww/11032012Jay Sean page, what's wrong?Thanks for your quick reply, is there a email adress or phone number so that the management can contact wikipedia directly? Would you accept an accepted faq checked bio from the artist himself? Surely you must understand that often times bio's get pulled from strange places before an artists career affords him the luxury of getting a professional and factual one done. especially ones that come from a particular scene, such as Jay does that is rampant with false reports and strange headlines. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funsjacobs (talk • contribs) 07:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Help Pt. IIHey,Thanks for your speedy response. Im requesting semi-protection because there has been alot of information being added that isn't exactly factual. There are being going on and claim to be a current or former member of the group. False or missing details about past projects and partnerships. Not to mention, these are a group of kids that sings songs by some of today's best artist. Their YouTube page and videos gets bombarded with vandalism constantly and it would just help to nip it in the root before it can possible get to that point.--IamMusic111 (talk) 17:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC) Help with Semi-ProtectionHey, I need some help with semi-protecting a page. I've been trying to read up on it as much as possible, but this Wiki lingo really confuses me. Any tips or advice you can give me on starting the process? Thanks! --IamMusic111 (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC) One Direction album vandalism againyour an amazing editor thanks for the guidance today i understand know. but the unregistered user has once again vandalized the page removing charts that were properly sourced. please semi protect i'm tired of the edit war AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)AdabowtheSecond what's wrong with one direction book coverfirst it was wrong because there were two books but now there's only what's the problem? adabowthesecond — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC) CroatiaHow reliable is the Croatian charts being added like here? — Legolas (talk2me) 06:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC) An arbitration case regarding Muhammad images has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
Mlpearc (powwow) 16:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC) For the Arbitration Committee Charles againis editing with 86.173.58.96 (talk · contribs). Thank you in advice. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
3D Printing - ResolutionI will leave you the same comment I left for Sjö: I noticed you reverted the resolution section of 3D printing. Unfortunately, this has introduced an error into the text. The layer thickness of a 3D printer is typically from 50 μm to 100 μm. This is the same as 0.05 mm to 0.1 mm (or 0,05 mm to 0,1 mm using a comma decimal separator). I believe the author of the resolution section was trying to use both methods of expression because many people considerable less familiar with micrometers than they are with millimeters. Therefore, s/he used both forms in the section. I hope this explains why the units have been altered yet again. Best wishes, CaviaPorcellus (not logged in because I am not at my own computer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.117.13.130 (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC) VandalismHello kww could you semi protect cher lloyd home page, single pages, albums pages everyday they're multiple vandalism i don't know how?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC) responsewanted an account with a different name i always think people think my edits are not worthy cause of my obvious age that's stated in my name. couldn't think of an account name so i just named myself after an editor but then theSecond after it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 03:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC) How did you know my former edit name some kind IP address attached?? don't understand alot of wikipedia yet — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 03:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Thanks for being a LOYAL Wikipedian!Thanks for all your hard work and working on the page: Starships (song)! I appreciate it and keep up the good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach464 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Hey Kww--regardless of the copyright status of the links added by this user, they dont meet the WP:EL requirements, do they? Someone's cleaning them up, and I have to agree. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC) Rihannano1fanHi, one direction semi protectionplease semi protect they're home page . the semi protection expired and i have already reverted 8 vandalism please?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC) Is there any chance that this is an innocent user caught up in Iluvrihanna24 (talk · contribs)'s sockpuppet clean-up? I am not familiar with that situation and am seeking more experienced opinion. I've declined an initial unblock request as the user seems to be purposefully obfuscating their situation. This could be due to inexperience and I'd like to be as sure as possible that the user gets a fair shake. Thanks Tiderolls 01:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC) Follow up. It appears to be another attempt at block evasion. I would still appreciate your opinion on the matter, however. Tiderolls 01:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC) RainbowDash / Futtershy and an unsuccessful ArbCom candidate[1], [2] – Out of curiosity, are you the unsuccessful ArbCom candidate mentioned in these diff's? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 16:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Charlie's backas 86.182.147.206 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Charlie still static as 86.182.111.70 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Returned as 86.173.49.23 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 16:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
And now as 86.144.196.220 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
He has returned, now as 86.160.53.255 (talk · contribs) (see filter log). Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
HelpThis guys trying to get me blocked. and hes hounding me on my talk page. Cause he don't want to listen. Jivesh suggested I report them for harrassment but I don't know how to so she suggested I ask you. Could you please help? Swifty*talkcontribs 15:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Blue (LeAnne Rimes song)/Oh dear, somebody has now moved it back to single. Can you sort? Perhaps it needs some protection? BTW Thanks for your help in sorting out all the copy and paste etc. I was just about to put a requested move back to Bill Mack song, but can't now. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC) ReI'm not falsely accusing anything the dude wouldn't look at the facts as no one will. There was an edit war on that page that fastily warned an editer over and no one no one will look and notice that the references in question were used on the Blue (Bill Mack song) that was resolved the day before the page was made. That right there is proof that I'm not in the wrong! Why won't NO ONE SEE THIS?!?!?!?! Swifty*talkcontribs 18:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
But no one wants to listen to me. I use to be under User:JamesAlan1986 till it got blocked for being compromised and even User:Status could tell you I am a very good contributor along with a lot of others. I look thoroughly through sources and everything but I'm done I'm done trying to help on here I'm done with people starting stuff with me every time I turn around cause no one wants to either compromise or want to put everything on me when I sit there and try to point out things over and over and over again but there are very few people on here who will actually listen, like Status, Fastily, etc, they'll listen. Everyone else is too stubborn and do just what they want to prove their right and will go to extremes to get their way when someone points out they are not and proof is shown and staring them right in the face. But I really don't care anymore I'm done. Swifty*talkcontribs 19:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Most reliable sources use official sites like CMT.com not some random video they found on YouTube. I know the video exist on CMT.com as I was the one who posted it as an external link. I don't question prior recordings what I question is why post it as the writer where I see no reliable source stating Mack himself released the song as a single. globaldogproductions.info does not count to me as it's not Billboard.com the most used source to show such information in fact I went on Billboard.com and Rimes is the only person [3] credited to the song. No one else but should it be made notable that others have recorded it yes but should it be under Macks name probably not as I stated matter. And I'll go as far to show you Billboard.coms search results on Bill Mack. [4] Swifty*talkcontribs 17:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Here's to show Reba: My Story exist. [5] I'll have to get what pages from my significant other later. And here's something else, using my significant other as a prime example. He'd not consider "Does He Love You", Linda Davis' song just because Davis recorded it prior to McEntire. He'd consider it more McEntire song as she recorded it, and released it as a single where Davis did not. And "Blue" should be treated no differently. Swifty*talkcontribs 18:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
This is how it should've been done. Swifty*talkcontribs 18:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
You know it's funny but I've had WP:COMMON thrown at me and so many other stuff that support that it should be on the Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) that it's funny they don't apply now. Swifty*talkcontribs
ArbCom RfCTrying to get some path set here for how to proceed on the ArbCom RfC.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 06:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC) Scrooge McDuck in the United StatesRegarding your edit to Scrooge McDuck, The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck by Don Rosa explicitly shows him emigrating to the United States from Scotland. JIP | Talk 04:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Scrooge McDuck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Semi protect request
Hello kww could you semi protect cher lloyd home page, single pages, albums pages everyday they're multiple vandalism i don't know how?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Blue Part 2You know instead of questioning me why not question Moriori who seems to be doing this to more then one page. Swifty*talkcontribs 15:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC) This is what happens when you let vandals do what they want. They lass out at those of use who have been on here longer and I've been on here quite a while though i lost my User:JamesAlan1986 account cause it was compromised. I don't appreciate how people will sit here and pick and chose when it comes to the rules of Wikipedia. I'm sick of this and it has always been a problem on here. Things need to be restored on here and I don't appreciate what Moriori said to me. It was weak and a low blow cause they didn't like the contradictions shown to them plus they are doing it to more then one page instead of going by the WP standards. That's not their place or their right. They did not follow the rules before creating that page and I'm SICK of everyone picking and choosing I'm done and I will not return to Wikipedia because of this. And there will be a lot of people pissed to see me go. Swifty*talkcontribs 15:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Tell me where Mack says in there I released this as a single on my own. All I see is he wanted the song to be known and was doing everything he could to make it happen but no where does it say "I released it as a single" and that's the point. He didn't want credit for it he wanted the song known. Swifty*talkcontribs 16:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
It comes down to this. Rimes is most notable for the song which is how it has been on Wikipedia for years. As you can see here the page was created in 2007 where as the Blue (Bill Mack song) was created recently so let me ask this. Which should've stayed? The oldest or the newest. And isn't WP:COMMON state that we use most commonly known? Mack is not most commonly known for Blue where Rimes is. How many times do I have to say that? Swifty*talkcontribs 16:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
See look here at Safe & Sound. Safe & Sound (song) is the only one in existence but there are other songs by that by different artist. Should Safe & Sound (song) be moved right now to Safe & Sound (Taylor Swift song)? No cause no other pages of the song exist right? So let's see here Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) was created in 2007 but Blue (Bill Mack song) was created recently. Hmmm I think Blue (Bill Mack song) should've been the one redirected. Swifty*talkcontribs 16:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Now do you see where the edit war began on Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) and why I've been so against the creation of Blue (Bill Mack song) the page was being vandilized and because I contradicted Blue (Bill Mack song) was created. Swifty*talkcontribs 16:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
I pretty much am making a lot of good points but if you still want to agree with the ones who created the page and are wrong for doing so then what I stated on my talk page is how I feel and I am done. Swifty*talkcontribs 16:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
They have no business saying that to me NONE! Swifty*talkcontribs 17:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm an idiotJust curious: after all this time, how can you still wind up having discussions with Brexx instead of just letting me know he's back?—Kww(talk) 22:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: WP:BADCHARTSI didn't knew that! :O Thank you, I won't. :) - Saulo Talk to Me 14:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Talkback Message added 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Aaron • You Da One 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Hi, Kww. I'm reluctant to interfere with a mentorship so I'm bringing my concern here first. In your advice you mention a large section being inserted into the article with this edit. I believe the situation to be much more concerning as that edit essentially reinstated PhoenixJHudson's version of the article as editied on their talk page during their block. The two versions appear identical to me. That edit and the user's repeated attempts at block evasion are pushing me towards the opinion that this user has been less than sincere regarding their motives. I really don't know how to proceed from here but I wanted you to know about my concerns. Regards Tiderolls 03:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Civility Barnstar
Re:PhoenixYou are welcome Kevin. But I do think you are being harsh. Everyday I see thousands of IPs writing foul words on Wikipedia. And yet all that is done is giving them a warning or simply nothing. Frankly, I think you should unblock him. You can... hmm maybe apply some restrictions as blocking someone repeatedly kind of discourages editors. Nevertheless, I know you are a good person and I understood all the rules and regulations here only after being blocked thrice. Lol. Your job as an admin is really nice. Keep it up. Cheers, Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Re:Vandalism accusationsCheck her discography page tell me where she has soundtrack singles? I don't need this crap and I don't need everyone contradicting what I do I know what the h*ll I'm doing I've been on here long enough to know a great deal. So people need to back off me! Just cause my accounts new doesn't mean I haven't edited before as I said I use to be under User:JamesAlan1986 until it go blocked for compromising and if you check the contributions on there I have been a pretty good editor on here. I just don't like people who break the rules. Swifty*talkcontribs 17:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
National Report - ColombiaI think I found some reliable sources that references Colombia's "National Report" on WT:Record Charts. Erick (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Request for commentsHello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page. WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley Thanks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC) As you are online
TBrandleyCan you tell me how this user has the Chelsea crest on their userpage in the corner? I would like to remove it and warn them about fair use but digging through the templates and page I cannot locate it. This userbox is also against fair use because it uses the show's logo. Nate • (chatter) 06:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Bubbling UnderHow is it synthesis that the Bubbling Under is an extension of the Hot 100? Most other discographies use figures of 1xx for Bubbling Under peaks, and this is a common indication in the industry — Joel Whitburn uses 1xx peaks to indicate Bubbling Under peaks. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 08:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Just letting you know...When you unblocked TBrandley (talk · contribs) saying that if there were any more new redirect or articles created by the user, the block would be reinstated. However, he has created a redirect and is apparent also an article. Please review the user's contributions. I just wanted to let you know --Bmusician 14:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC) I'm not sure about the above, but he did create the redirect Nickelodeon Croatia today. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Nadia OhHi, Kevin. A user who goes by Jonnylovesvegas (talk · contribs) keeps changing/removing content at Nadia Oh without providing any reason whatsoever, and has been doing so for quite a while. An IP user, 79.71.83.26 (talk · contribs), has displayed a suspiciously similar behaviour. Both have been warned but neither has ceased making unconstructive edits. Care to do something about it? Thanks in advance. SnapSnap 23:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Is this....Special:Contributions/77.29.29.87 Phoenix again? - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Lime Pictures and HollyoaksHowdy, thanks for your quick block of Limepictures (talk · contribs). I'm not sure it would be safe to call that a content dispute, my assessment of it yesterday was a PR person trying to put his press release in place of the two articles (both unencyclopedic and a copyvio), see Wikipedia:ANI#Advertising_in_article. My plan was to block the PR person's main account IndieTVIndustryInsider (talk · contribs), but if you think it is a legitimate content dispute I can hold off. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 12:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 12:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC) TBrandley's IPHello Kww. I had a question about TBrandley (talk · contribs · logs). I know that his main account and secondary account Tate.B.Stockwell (talk · contribs · logs) have beeen blocked indefinitely, but I noticed that the IP address he has admitted to using (99.199.87.29 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS)) is only blocked for a week (expiring tomorrow, Sunday). I do not know the rules about applying blocks, but shouldn't this IP block be longer, too? Otherwise tomorrow he can just create a new account and start his havoc all over again. (At least until we recognize him and file an SPI.) Just wondering if the block could be extended. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC) One Direction album page Up All Night (One Direction album) vanadalismCould you semi protect the album page because of persistent vandalism an unregistered user keeps deleting charts, i have to revert everyday. I tried showing him WP:BADCHARTS. Semi protection would beneficent for page because only registered users contribute. Could you please semi protect Up All Night (One Direction album) like with Gotta Be You, One Thing, What Makes You Beautiful and their main page. I also think it's necessary because they're becoming insanely popular. they're album is positioned to debut a top the billboard 200. please semi protect AdabowtheSecond (talk) 13:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)AbabowtheSecond Response to your responsei did examine. i thought they're management would be good enough and examined the WP:BADCHARTS and i didn't say anything about wrong about the singapore, hong kong charts and unregisterd editor also removes aussie/nz year end charts. "my life will be better" my wikipedia edit life you mean. nothing personal here — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC) Some cleanupCould you also delete the redirect at [8] --Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
COI blockI guess there's not much for you to add, but just showing you this as you were the blocking admin: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IndieTVIndustryInsider. Cheers. WilliamH (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC) I think the Rfc is nearly finalized, but only a few editors have commented recently, not including you. Could you take a look & let us know what you think at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/11_February_2012/Muhammad-images#Finalizing_Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment.2FMuhammad_images. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC) Barbara Grizzuti Harrison as a RSInteresting comment here as an editor accuses you of edit warring in order to "get your views posted in the article." I think I might take this to the RSN and gain some opinions there. This discussion is going nowhere. BlackCab (talk) 04:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC) FYIThe sockpuppetry accusation made by User:Dreadstar against the IP in the content dispute on Talk:What the Bleep Do We Know!? (in which you also took part) is now being discussed on ANI. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 05:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC) NotabilityHi Kevin. I don't edit Wikipedia very often now but there's something that has been bugging me for a long time. Using a single chart (like Korean Gaon chart, R&B/Hip-Hop songs chart etc.) to prove the notability of a song/single. They're reliable charts indeed, but if this keeps up, there will be lots of articles, including permanent stubs, on songs. I think the community should discuss this issue. Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 07:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Your pending desysopKww, I've noted in the ANI thread you started re: Colonel Warden how egregiously wrong your interpretation of his edit summary is. I've also called upon you to apologize in your forthcoming unblock summary and resign the tools immediately. The choice whether to do that, defend your original blocking rationale, or do something entirely different is really in your court. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 07:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
How can I create a singlechart template for Media Forest?You created {{singlechart|Israelairplay|position|year=year|week=week}} for the chart, how can I change the name of the chart to "Israel (Media Forest)"instead of "Israeli Airplay (Media Forest)"? And once again, thank you for adding the chart. 2pac Is Alive (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Can you do something about this user? He keeps removing sources, and changing genres to whatever he feels like. He also personally attacked me. — Status {talkcontribs 01:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC) User:NusaccHi, I noticed you blocked and reverted based on WP:SOCK. Can you give a brief rationale for that please? --John (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
RE: Blue MondayI added a "reliable source on the subject of the song". Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Comment?Hi. I was wondering if you'd mind commenting here about review content for MDNA (album). The reception section has turned into a bloated mess with quotes from tabloid and lifestyle magazines. But at this point, it's a content dispute, so Im not doing jack without a consensus. Dan56 (talk) 03:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC) IF YOU'RE GONNA PUT CRAP UP FOR DELETIONPut that up for deletion and back off my edits! I'm a damn good editor and I'm getting sick of feeling harassed on here. You sit here and make me out to be this person who isn't a good faith editor when I am when it's actually people like you who aren't now I'm going to get that page kept and you need to back off me and do more constructive work on taking down pages like the one I linked to you. Do not reply to me either I have nothing to say to you. Swifty*talkcontribs 15:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay I'm going to ask you again NICELY to back off! Swifty*talkcontribs 16:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
Dude you are hounding me and watching me everywhere I've turn so yes you are personally attacking me and here's you're notice that I'm done with you and you need to leave me alone. Swifty*talkcontribs 17:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC) I've finished the article. I used some third-party sources, let me know what you think. 2pac Is Alive (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC) MariaIs back as 81.151.32.34 (talk · contribs), shouldn't Take a Chance on Me (JLS song) be protected? Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC) You need to stop assuming!
That right there that you said IS WRONG! I am very cooperative thank you ask Status, Fastily, Novice, and a few others who I have mentioned on my user page can vogue for that as they do right by users on Wikipedia. Sh*t me and status have had a few scraps before but we always work it out. See there are those on here who I respect cause they know I am trying to do my best on here and then there are those like you who will assume things and basically hound and spy on what a good faith editor like myself tries to do. And by the way how dare you go by my JamesAlan account being blocked for being compromised, that was cause my significant other doesn't want to have an account on here and didn't like how I've been treated which from everything I've told him he's not thrilled with you bothering me. He at least believes that I'm trying to do right by Wikipedia and has discouraged me from being on here cause of editors like you. So yes you do need to stop monitoring me because he's already threatened to report Wikipedia cause people shouldn't get away with harrassing other editors in anyway and then when caught in the act try to make themselves look good when they are indeed doing wrong. Swifty*talkcontribs 19:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Single vendor chartJust to inform you, in case you didn't know: Chartsinfrance.net is the official publisher of French music charts. The link you removed for "Sorry for Party Rocking" shows the entire chart history of the song. It is not a single vendor chart or a "second-hand" site à la Hung Medien which usually lacks behind in their updates. New singles charts are updated on Fridays at Chartsinfrance.net, but Top 50 is revealed on Tuesdays at http://musique.premiere.fr/TOP-50. And that update is now showing chart position 16 for this song. Widr (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC) Your noteYou're right about that...that was a complete epic fail! :/ Sometimes I do go too fast and forget to preview. Thanks for mentioning this to me. Best. Acalamari 13:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC) Semi protection requestThe One Direction Up All Night Tour page is having persistent vandalism's like all the other 1D pages have had before could you please semi protect could you also protect the UK & Ireland Arena Tour page it doesn't receive yet but i'm sure it will in due time since every 1D gets vandalized at one point even more know since then gaining popularity at fast rate. Thank you for your time AdabowtheSecond (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC) NPOV disputeWould you like to comment at Talk:The MF Life? It concerns unconstructive edits made to the article The MF Life. Dan56 (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Drecool/NickelbackThank you so much for dealing with him! I had suspected sockpuppetry, but just hadn't decided to pursue SPI or ANI or anything yet. I was getting pretty close though. Yeah, I'm not really a Nickelback fan or anything, but it tends to be one of those articles that is just a magnet for fans to gush about how great they are and turn it into a real POV-pushing mess. So I've gotten in the habit of watching over it. I appreciate your help, now and in the future. Sergecross73 msg me 01:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC) RE: WP:BADCHARTSI have never in my life included a United World Chart article or mediatraffic.de as a direct source on Wikipedia. Thank you for your contribution, however. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Last time I checked, general references are acceptable. — Statυs (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
About TBrandley's unblock...An editor on their talk page has pointed out this edit in which they made a list. Exactly what they agreed not to do! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Touch_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=485059727 . I think that reinstating the block is the only option here... They clearly cannot abide by their agreement! Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 04:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Kww. We haven't met before, but I'm an administrator over on simple wiki. As TBrandley has been unblocked here under probation, it's important that the community is aware of some recent concerns we've had with this user over copyright infringements. If he's contributing chunks of text, I'd strongly suggest running them through a search engine, at least for the period of his probation. I'm hoping this won't yield any problems (as I'm sure you agree, TBrandley is generally a well-intentioned editor). Best regards, Osiris (talk) 12:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC) Hullaballoo WolfowitzActually, it would appear to me that HW was indeed reverting massive NFCC violations in that article. What makes you think that the trivial typos that he fixed at the same time were his real intention, thus making his edits to be only "under the colour of WP:NFCC"? Repair of WP:NFCC violations have always been exempt from WP:3RR.—Kww(talk) 18:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
User:Jerome0012 sock?User:RomeAntic14. If not they are showing really fishy edits. Look what they had put on my talk page as well. Candyo32 02:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!Just a quick note to thank you for your supportive comments earlier today regarding the NFCC dispute I was involved in. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC) One Direction DVD?!i am confused if the DVD One Direction is releasing a live album or just a video like with Adele's Live at the Royal Albert Hall here is the link myplay going to be making the page soon so. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 14:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Responsethat's why i'm asking you i'm confused is it a video album or a video 2responseOkay Up All Night tour pagecould you please semi protect the Up All Night Tour page since their is persistent vandalism sometimes in good will. New dates are constantly being added without source i have tried explaining the unregistetd users on talk pages. Check the edit history you will see how many edits i have been reverting and i am tired of revertig please protect AdabowtheSecond (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Dispute resolution survey
Polish Music ChartWelcome. On the official site there is a new Polish music charts similar to Polish Airplay Top 5, but this is called the Polish Airplay Tip 5 it is equivalent to a Belgian (Ultratip 50). I write because I want to add it to the template;) Singlechart url = http://zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/nielsen/nowosci.php?idlisty=630, and "630" is a parameter chartid. Mihelpl (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Nickelback sockpuppet helpHi Kww. Last time we talked, you told me to tell you if I thought Drecool/Joseph etc was back with another sock. I think he may be. Please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Stuffat It's call all the classic elements of his editing style; 10+ pointless edits on his own talk page so he can edit protected pages, Adding the same old crap back to Nickelback, and their awards and whatnot, removing legit sources, editing Linkin Park related articles, no edit summaries, etc. Anyways, if you get the chance, I was wondering if you could take a look at it and let me know what you think. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 02:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Doesn't this user concern you? — Statυs (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Portuguese Singles ChartFair enough if it is in the Bad Chart list but at least the one that I have included is not a ring tone chart.QuintusPetillius (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2012 (UTC) T.S.I.Can you retrieve this deleted page, please? (The Spirit Indestructible by Nelly Furtado) the article was deleted before for some reason (I didn't know until I created a new version of it.) There are information being revealed about the project every second as the release date is getting closer and I really want to work on it and add new updates, I didn't have time to add my sources and citation but I'm going to if you make it visible again :( Shouldn't you be dead from a heart attack? Pathetic old git. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.48.80 (talk) 11:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Thank you for your message. I did try to move the page with the conventional method, but as a redirect was already in place at the "Beez in the Trap" page the tool refused to let the transfer take place. I thought my only choice was to cut and paste the information to the correctly titled page and fix all of the redirects myself, as I didn't know all of the licensing regulations that applied here. I now know what I should do in the future, so once again, thank you. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 15:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Yet again, TBrandley...Would you agree that using UrbanDictionary as he did here is certainly not acceptable? It's getting too obvious that TB can be pointed to our sourcing guidelines, but won't even apply those lessons. Nate • (chatter) 04:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Kww, rhetorical question, just because I want to understand: the user has been warned about coming up to the edge, about walking on thin ice and any other similar metaphor you'd care to use. When do we cross the line from aaaalllllmost violating the terms of his unblock to actually gaming the system? From my perspective, and no doubt that's in part the teacher in me, I don't see an editor who is making much effort to improve, just one looking to find a way to come as close to doing what his block prohibits him doing as he possibly can. I get why you can't block for violation of the unblock agreement, but I still don't understand why this level of problem behavior doesn't in and of itself merit some action. Any insight would be instructive. --Drmargi (talk) 23:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey Kww
User:HkCaGuUser:HkCaGu continues to add unsourced material to BLPs without adequate explanations in violation of BLP and OR policies. You have previously warned this user about his. Articles are Judy Chu and Mike Eng. 174.255.112.150 (talk) 09:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC) HelloYou suggested to Phoenix that he stay away from Rihanna articles, to which he agreed, but he still seems to be editing Rihanna articles, many edits of which are superfluous. Aaron • You Da One 14:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC) Game OverRemoval of unreliable source added by Phoenix, 10 minutes later, he adds it back after I clearly stated in my edit summary that it wasn't reliable. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Please don't edit war You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nelly Furtado. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Also, it appears you did not use the protection tools properly. Even though you did not reinstate a reversed administrative action, your action could be considered wheel warring because you were using your admin tools to give yourself an advantage in the edit war. Also, protection should generally be done by uninvolved admins per WP: COI. Am I in the right warning you? ChromaNebula (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
UKChartsPlusHi there, on WP:CHARTS the above publication is listed as one to avoid as it has discrepencies with the OCC and BPI. looking through the archive discussions on the talkpage it seems as though people, you included, agree it's acceptable and reliable at reproducing chart positions for the weekly charts. just the annual charts differ. do you still agree with this? if so can it be noted on wp:charts that it can be used to verify chart positions, but not annual ones? thanks. 77.101.49.156 (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13Hi. When you recently edited Fox's Animation Domination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Reilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Talk:So Good (Boyzone song)Could you protect Talk:So Good (Boyzone song), there are multiple sockpuppetry. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
SOLA2012Hi first please stop remove my edits about britney spears album sales and secound theres somthing doesnt make sense how RIAA give britney platinum for her 2011 album knowing that RIAA dont gives any album sold only 883,000 copies platinum . so that means that britney sold at least 1,000,000 copies in US . --sola$$$$$$$$ (talk) 11:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC) PesfI'm pretty sure 2.98.247.47 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is pesf again, based on [9] and [10] --Muhandes (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback ToolHey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool. For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 76.90.45.23876.90.45.238 (talk · contribs) keeps adding some unsourced "The Mysterious Black and Zero" BS to several articles, especially ones related to La Roux. SnapSnap 01:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC) You've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. — Statυs (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Block request86.182.64.127 (talk · contribs) is User:MariaJaydHicky, can you block him? Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Beyonce KnowlesWhat makes that list different to the others? I think its notable enough to stay. Oz talk 01:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC) Banning PolicyI'm not sure if you're aware of this, but when you made that change to the table in the "Differences between blocks and bans" section, you made it appear that any blocked editor (even one blocked for a few hours) can have their edits removed just like a banned editor's. To this day it reads like that. The category is Blocked (including "indefinite blocks"). So... for that...
Plip! Doc talk 17:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 1D Other venturesI Think the promo image should stay has i think the reader becomes more interested in the article --- i know it fails so kind of guideline as their are millions, however i used the exact same licensing as the Spice Girls#Other brand ventures and know one seemed to have problem with that since it was uploaded 2 years ago and has been sitting on the main article for 2 years see; 160px description page AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Ok peace out AdabowtheSecond (talk) 21:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC) OddHey Kevin, please see this, and your edit just before it. Drmies (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Corbin Bleu!No, he has not contacted me. Keivan.fTalk 15:46, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Kirby
Electra HeartCan you help me out here, this user insists on switching around the genres in the infobox, as well as a certain line in the article for his own liking. It contributes nothing to the actual article, and is only wanting an editing war. He also insists on hiding that edit by covering it up with a different title (ex. "cleaned up refs") in which he cleaned one ref, yet reverted the revision that was long standing prior to him trying to change it. Your help would be greatly appreciated, thank you!--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC) Like Toy SoldiersHello Kww, Apologies for coming across as rude and for the edit crap too, Usually what ever I write if I don't/can't provide source no one seems to care lol, Anyway yes I do apologize, Kindest Regards Davey2010 Talk 21:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC) It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. — Statυs (talk) 01:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC) Joseph Smith editI welcome the opportunity to explain my edit to the Joseph Smith article. I reverted the work done by the editor with only an IP address because he didn't explain his edits very well, and they seemed to be more detrimental to the page than helpful to it. In particular, the claim that Smith is seen by his followers as one of the most charismatic and inventive figures in the history of the world. Smith's followers believed he was a prophet. They didn't see him as inventive. They took what he said to be true. So it was inaccurate. And my edit was reverted with the reason that correction of spelling was not vandalism. But the edit I reverted was more than just a correction of spelling. It was describing something that is not true and is slightly redundant. The sentence in question is as follows: "He is seen by his followers as one of the most charismatic and inventive figures of American history, and his followers regard him as a prophet of at least the stature of Moses and Elijah." If his followers regard him as a prophet, how could they view him as inventive? Getting rid of the earlier "by his followers" makes the sentence read like this: "He is seen as one of the most charismatic and inventive figures of American history, and his followers regard him as a prophet." I would suggest tweaking the wording a bit and will try to do so. Thanks for your query. Please respond on my talk page with any further questions, as I rarely (if ever) check other people's talk pages. Thanks again. --Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable (talk) 19:50, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Given your block on 63.3.19.130, you might want to have a look at MuZemike's block of 63.3.19.129 (also see User talk:MuZemike/Archive 10#63.3.19.129) would a range block be better ? Mtking (edits) 03:12, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:1DTalk:One Direction#RfC: Should members of One Direction have stand-alone biography articles? i wrote something new can you answer a;l the way at the bottom AdabowtheSecond (talk) 15:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC) newi wrote something new AdabowtheSecond (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC) Your perspective would be valued.Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed in a significant way since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC) IP 24.112.202.78Just an FYI in case you want to pursue it. After your 72 hour block for block evasion was up, IP 24.112.202.78 (talk · contribs) is back doing the same old stuff. --TreyGeek (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 24.112.202.78Hi, this IP has resumed editing (and with the same motivation). ThemFromSpace 17:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Hallo meneer kwwik kan namelijk ook Nederlands(moedertaal) kan je het goed spreken of middelmatig want anders zou ik liever in het nederlands discussies voeren ik heb iets nieuws geschreven op de Talk:One Direction#excessive gushing removed, unfortunately restored pagina AdabowtheSecond (talk) 19:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Discussion at WP:RSNI continued our discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Use of ClevverTV's video channel on YouTube as source of interview content to see what others say. You may wish to contribute. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC) There is an ArbCom case involving youYou are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Nelly Furtado ethnicity dispute and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— Thanks, ChromaNebula (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
taal foutenik vandaag no een heleboel ingezet bij de section One Direction#Up All Night and debut tour en omdat weinig tijd de laatste tijd heb op de pc (nu op de ipod) door de haast heb ik nog opgemerkt dat er type fouten zijn kan je het verbeteren. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
One DirectionHi :) Just to inform you, I have removed some of the fan-cruft information about the members of the group and also left a message on the article's talk page. Thanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC) I am being Wiki stalked and hounded and having my contacts canvassedI am beginning to pull together information for a complaint against a editor for harrassment. I am having my name bashed by a couple of editors and one Admin stated inaccurately on an ANI stating that I had changed BRD policy. I think they are just being crude and baiting me with policy and guideline goal post moves, that disturb me, but more important is the suggestion from Dennis Brown to step up activity against me. If this is OK I wish to start actively taking to people he talks to in the same manner and exlain in detail his lack of knowledge for policy, his lack of ineterest in attribution etc. If this is unacceptable behavior I would ask that he be discouraged from further behavior as "stepping it up" will simply result in the same back and that is not working towards improving this encyclopedia. It is just a battle.--Amadscientist (talk) 16:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC) You've got mailIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Brendon ishere 16:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC) Artistryi want to add an artistry section for one direction like the Rihanna#Artistry and Lady Gaga#Artistry with influences, musical style, public image, except their a group so do i still call the section "Artistry". AdabowtheSecond (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
i get your point musical styles then like U2 and coldplay pages AdabowtheSecond (talk) 16:52, 19 May 2012 (UTC) How do i upload audio samples?how do i upload audio samples could you explain? AdabowtheSecond (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
AfD discussionHi. Would you like to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie hip hop? Dan56 (talk) 04:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Nickelback sockpuppet help (again)Someone is at the Nickelback article again, editing similarly to Joseph201/Zelda201/Drecool1/Stuffat, etc. It's User Talk:Wiiurules He hasn't been around as long, so I'm not as sure as past times, but I'm tired of his games, and some of the signs are there: Reverting without explanation, adding excessively long quotes and other material that does nothing but glorify the band, tinkering with genre and charts, making awkward rambling additions, etc. Thanks in advance if you get the chance to look into it. Sergecross73 msg me 19:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
FYIAlthough I'm sure you'll become aware of it soon enough, User:64.134.224.154 appears to be on a revert-spree, and is undoing your edits. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 02:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC) RFC: AfD Cat DaddyI was asked to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Daddy, but I am unfamiliar as to how the notability works in this case. Erick (talk) 03:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC) ThanksThanks for reverting the obvious vandalism on my userpage by a user who has nothing better to do. No doubt, it keeps him busy. Lugnuts (talk) 08:46, 22 May 2012 (UTC) Excuseme99Before I open another SPI for Excuseme99, I was wondering if you could take a look at this. I am thinking the IP could be additional Excuseme99 sock. First the history [11] on an article that Excuseme99 frequents. The IP 131.239.63.5 reverted the removed "Excuseme content" and started canvassing with the same old stuff that Excuseme99 has been saying for years. [12] Is a full SPI necessary here? Erikeltic (Talk) 01:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
FYI... looks like Excuseme99 is at it again. [13] Erikeltic (Talk) 19:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC) HelpUser talk:Bachmannlover is continually adding unreliable sourcing, synth, and original research to articles (particularly Kesha's second album) and it's time for a block. He makes no effort to communicate and despite multiple final warnings to stop adding unreliable sources he continues to do so. I'm tired of reverting him everyday. Can you please do something? - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC) "Croatian writer Giancarlo Kravar"Have you noticed anything similar from other IPs in the past? This "person" has been spamming from multiple IPs, and we're not sure of the total number of IPs being used. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Croatian_writer_Giancarlo_Kravar for details. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 21:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC) First off, totally sound block, no complaints there. It seems like he's starting to get what the problem was, I've asked for clarification on his talkpage just to make sure. If he provides an adequate explanation, would you be all right with an unblock? The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
British Englishvashappening kww happy editing today hope so anywho i was wondering how do you add a british english notification like on Susan Boyle's edit page in the beginning on an edit article to notify editors -- i want to add to various pages AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Owokay no real problems AdabowtheSecond (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Still A NobodyShortly after your two-week block (per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A Nobody/Archive#06 May 2012) expired, A Nobody began editing from the 24.112.202.78 IP again. It seems unnecessary to file yet another SPI on this, but if you think it desirable, let me know. Deor (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 18:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Swifty*talk 18:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Dumb questionWas this okay? I rolled back their edits based on no source and posted that welcome was that okay? Swifty*talk 18:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
One DirectionWhat do you think of the One Direction main article? just wondering it has really good reviews 4star+ for every category with over 5000 votes but i was just wondering what you thought as your so established. Honest opinion on Well-written-Trustworthy-Objective-Complete for every section would appreciate your thoughts AdabowtheSecond (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 23:06, 3 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 23:06, 3 June 2012 (UTC) Bob's BurgersI'd like to note that Bob's Burgers has been listed, still, as on review, but the review is done. It could be failed or passed. TBrandley • talk • contributions 23:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC) I Need your helpI have an user who is trying to remove the categories from {{albumchart}}, {{singlechart}} and {{grammy}}, just because he thinks they're "horrible names for a category and should exist", playing with those templates!. Pleas ehelp me stop this, he is edit warring with me... --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 02:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Category:SinglechartCategory:Singlechart, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC) re: ItHysteriaYou tell me :-) You're the one who blocked Danrivera as an ItHysteria sock, and Juandanikevin2012 is a 100% behavorial match of that user. I outlined it all in the SSP case. Oh, and only one of those cases was me. Nymf hideliho! 05:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC) For one, you can't delete an article unless you put it into the Articles for deletion page. This article does not fail WP:NSONGS because it does have charts, but assuming that you don't clearly read the source from where they came, you decided to delete everything that was on the article! If you wanted to delete the article, then you have to request the article for deletion because you can't just delete it without notifying people! ~ RomeAntic14 13:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 16:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Important message about something. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 16:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Brexx is back? Statυs (talk) 21:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC) WP:RFPPYou have a request at RFPP. [14] Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 07:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC) For you!
Thanks for all the help i received from you on both Singlechart and Albumchart and for your tireless work around those topics =) --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 20:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Canadian RockIs this reliable? it is on blogspot, just like the Chile Top 100. Should i remove it from "Somebody That I Used to Know"? --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 00:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Go and die you old git, I'll make sure one day you're treated to a punch in the face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.144.22 (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC) A little helpHey! I have a problem introducing a new parameter to the
I can use some help, since i'm trying using the
Re: Bob's BurgersIt's right on the main GAN page, same area as the on hold/review stuff. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
GenesectTalk:Pokémon#Genesect Swifty*talk 23:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC) RomeAntic14I don't know why you are so mean to me, but I'm sorry for whatever I done! You wanna know the truth?! I am the same person who made Jerome0012, but I wanted to come back (after a long time) and see how new things would be if I was to become a better person than I was before!! I don't wanna be mean and angry, but I have a lot of experience on Wikipedia and this is like my third Facebook!! I'm basically saying that I spend just as much time as I do on Facebook because you guys have a lot of experience on Wikipedia, I don't!! So I'm trying my best to accomplish whatever needs to be done!!! I know I used other content here from other sites, I know I vandalized Wikipedia a lot, but I wanna make things change over the past 5 years since I have known you guys!!!! Show me what to do and I can become the best user you want me too!!!! Wikipedia is a fun encyclopedia and I wanna make it fun by doing whatever it takes to become a high and professional Wikipedian!!!!! Please show me what to do Mr. Williams and I will accomplish several articles!!!!! Please get back to me soon and I hope you read and understand this message!!!!! Thanks!!! ~ RomeAntic14 22:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC) After School (band)Hi Kww. I have replied on my talk and opened a section at the article talk. Any feedback or idea you may have about this issue would be most welcome. Best regards and thank you for the useful idea. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC) The Art Institute of California - Orange CountyThank You. I believe the dispute was over before the protection was added, however. regardless, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.96.126 (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Heads-upI mentioned you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification request: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Insertion of "Michigan Rock and Roll Legends" material by COI SPA userI've come across new user Drjandlynn who has spent the past 6 weeks industriously adding mentions of non-notable "Michigan Rock and Roll Legends" to various music articles. COI is undeclared but fairly obvious, given the edit history and that "Dr J" owns the site and "Lynn Johnson" (wife?) also seems to be associated with it. Any recommendations on how to proceed? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
I think that there is some third-party coverage of the Michigan Rock and Roll Legends awards. See http://www.nilesstar.com/2012/06/05/sixth-generation-returning/, http://www.dowagiacnews.com/2011/07/17/this-is-their-time-again/, and http://www.mlive.com/entertainment/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2009/05/west_michigan_bands_vie_for_st.html so Michigan Rock and Roll Legends awards may be notable, despite the editor appearing not to follow the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide — Peter Loader (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Sockpuppet has returnedHi there Kww, It's been almost a year since we had this problem but User:Pesf is back editing and vandalising articles under the new guise of User:Eurowitt1234. I don't want to see him starting an edit war and my evidence for believing this user to be a sockpuppet is as you said in previous conversation that he always uses 1234 at the end of his new name such as he did in September 2011 with User:Madiera1234 and the time before however I cannot remember what he called himself then, perhaps you know? He is also vandalising the same pages as he did previously such as the Boyzone articles and the Progressed (EP) article amongst many others. Would it be possible for you to look into this for me as I know you have dealt with this sock puppetry before. Many thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. Yids2010 (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Mi Novia Se Me...I don't get it. The guideline says: "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable." It doesn't say they're not notable, but probably not. Also, that same guideline says: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." "Mi Novia Se Me Está Poniendo Vieja" has enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article outside of the main album article. Why then, the article doesn't meet that guideline, if it meets GNG already? --—Hahc21 14:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I will restore the article. I can't live with it as it is right now (a redirect). Feel free to AfD it of you wish. I'n not doing this to use AfD as a test: It's just the fact that i don't feel comfortable with the article being only a redirect with so many information bout the song that's not on the main article. Cheers! —Hahc21 17:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Summertime Sadness? the page doesen't exsit anymore! WHY? ARE YOU CRAZY!?!??! June 2012
 Peter.loader has given you a WikiTrout! Trouts promote WikiFun and hopefully this one has made your day more fun. Spread the WikiFun by giving someone else a trout, especially when they are doing something silly. Happy slapping! Spread the fun of trouts by adding {{subst:Troutalt}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Joe jobThanks. I learned a new term. Perfect fit. Toddst1 (talk) 01:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC) HiHave you got an email address I can contact you on? Aaron • You Da One 12:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Aaron • You Da One 13:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
List of vegansYou may recall I was involved in a dispute with User:SlimVirgin about the List of vegans a couple of months ago. You reverted her for using false edit summaries. User:Muleattack and I were in full agreement that adding images to the table itself and ordering the table by nationality are detrimental to the article (Talk:List_of_vegans/Archive_2#Suggestions). However, these objections were ignored and the changes undertaken. The table is ridiculously bloated now, and considering that veganism has nothing to do with nationality (it's not like it's a list of heads of state), then it is not a good criterion for ordering the list i.e. if you want to see if someone is vegan you are more likely to search for the name than their country; you may not even know their country! A further objection was voiced by Muleattack at Talk:List_of_vegans/Archive_2#United_States (see bottom of section), but this was completely ignored by SlimVirgin and User:Andomedium. What is more frustrating is that even though these edits are ongoing and and objections were being voiced on the article talk page, rather than responding to them, SlimVirgin accelerated automatic archiving from 90s days to 2 weeks. The talk page isn't a particularly active talk page, and there can be no explanation other than to get the objections quickly archived out of view: [15] However, while I bailed on the situation (I really haven't got the time and energy to deal with people who are truly against collaborative editing and have resolved to basically leave her to her own devices) I received a message today about the article from another editor, exasperated by Slim Virgin's tactics. Muleattack is a long-standing contributor to the vegetarian/animal-rights articles, and now feels there is no point to him continuing on Wikipedia. I understand exactly where he is coming from. His objections (which were more or less in tandem with mine) have been completely ignored and filed away. I don't really know what can be done about the situation, and I don't know if Muleattack would want to continue working on the article if the situation could somehow be worked out, but the whole things stinks if you ask me. I don't want to dump it in your lap, I appreciate it's not really your problem, but I went through 3/4 boards last time and got some pretty rough treatment for what I believed was a valid complaint. I honestly think something needs to be done about this admin, and I am shocked that someone who completely lacks a collaborative approach to editing could ever become an admin to be honest. Betty Logan (talk) 01:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Hello. I would like for you to please discuss your opinion on this matter. Thanks. Till I Go Home talk 11:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Lamia (D&D)Hello, as you took part in the 1st AFD for Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons), which closed on "no consensus", I'm bringing to your attention that after a second AFD with the same result, a discussion on whether to merge or not has opened on the article talk page. BOZ (talk) 11:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Luka (singer) and related coverage of acts from Asia, Africa, Latin America, Eastern Europe...Actually I used the Portuguese page as source. This is also indicated in the Talk page to the artist. Please refer to http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luka and to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Luka_(singer). You may refer to Brazilian and Portuguese charts as bad charts, but the #1 position is that of Brazil Hot 100. Luka actually has an international hit. So thanks for keeping the positions for "Tô Nem Aí" in Austria, Switzerland and Nederlands #61. Here is the debut single concerned http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meAdbab15IA broadcast on MTV. There is also a a version by Maria which was also greatly received. Here is that recording by Maria Dal Rovere http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4fWu-oazvg But let's suppose just for arguments sake that "Tô Nem Aí" didn't happen in Europe. Then what do we do with an act like Luka, an immense success in Brazil with multiple chart topping hits many #1s? Do we have to rely merely on the fact she broke European markets to be able to be recognized as a Brazilian successful acts if we cannot resort to Brazilian charts that reflect far bigger successes of her simply because they are bad? I see Luka as a great example and a precursor to the Brazilian craze that is engulfing Europe with Michel Telo ("Ae se eu te pego!") [16] or Gusttavo Lima ('Balada") [17]. Cidinho y Doca also achieved this fortunate status with "Rap das Armas" [18] ... It seems very strange and unfair to me to say "Ai se eu te pego!" is a hit in France, Italy, Germany, Sweden and not mention that it was an immense hit in its home country Brazil and in Portugal as well long before the Europeans heard of the song. Such an approach of relying on European charts to the exclusion of local charts from many countries unfortunately reinforces the Eurocentricity of many of our coverages. This would be the case for many other Brazilian hits and we end up by promoting just Western European and North Anmerican acts only occasionally a very few "third world" acts that do break these European charts. In any coverage of music we do for a huge majority of African local acts (say Nigeria, or South Africa or Angola or Morocco), they will appear in bad charts so will all Asian and Latin American acts. So will Eastern European acts from Romania or Greece or Russia. This is a great opportunity actually to discuss how artists and hits from the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe, Asia, Central and Southern America and the Caribbean artists need to be treated owing to lack of good charts in almost all these countries and how can we demonstrate their successes ion their own countries. My take is that we should be more accomodating and be able to give some references to local charts at least. There surely are at least partially reliable charts we can use. I know Billboard recently started a Brazilian Billboard chart of its own werldwayd (talk) 18:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Re:AvrilFirst I didn't used Google-translate, second I did do vandalism, and is that article exist in 60 languages diferentes, why not to have in 200 wikipedias? And while you use the block as a solution, there are other users who give help and guidance to contribute to most correct Wikipedia. It's about inclusion, not exclusion. But keep assured, I will make sure the next time. Thanks! Vitor Mazuco Talk! 21:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Unacceptable? Depends on poit of view, for you is, but I just saw many and many wikis that many others users just translate a article that the "violation" disappears. Vitor Mazuco Talk! 00:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC) Check thisWhat John L. Esopsito actually said was, “From a modern, historical perspective, Muhammad was the founder of Islam. From the perspective of Islamic faith, he was God's Messenger (rasul Allah), called to be a "warner,"” Brendon is here 05:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC) OpinionHey kww you never edit 1D related articles anymore does this mean they pose no problems? :D anyway in high respect of your edits as a user could opine on this do you think its better? AdabowtheSecond (talk) 22:26, 26 June 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 15:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Sleddog116 (talk) 15:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Stranded PirateHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC) Kww, the ANI topic is not about you, but I mentioned you too many times not to notify you, particularly if I inavertently misrepresented anything you said or did - so I thought a heads up would be appropriate.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
I think it's pretty obvious who this is. Statυs (talk) 01:12, 1 July 2012 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 10:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Brendon is here 10:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC) ANIHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Hahc21 06:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC) BlockingYou said on Calvin999's page that "blocked users aren't permitted to attempt to help the project." That would seem to fly directly in the face of WP:BLOCK's statement that "Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia." If a blocked editor isn't disrupting WP, there's no reason to prevent them from trying to help -- it's banning that retracts editing privileges. Blocking only retracts editing ability. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Dewan357Do you have time to take a look at this query regarding a possible spate of Dewan357 activity? If it is them then they are really moving around now, so perhaps I have got it wrong. - Sitush (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk page and editing contribs since being unblocked were brought to my attention, but I felt like you would be better to take a look. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 14:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Hey, Kww. I think this may actually be a case of mistaken identity; despite the similar names and subject areas, checkuser is showing that these users are editing from different geographic areas. I don't think they're technically related at all. Would you mind taking a second look at this? Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC) User:StatusHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the recent conduct of User:Status; I understand that you've been involved in his conduct lately. Thank you. SplashScreen (talk) 21:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC) You've got mail!Message added 22:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Statυs (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 30 Minute Love AffairHi. I was wondering if 30 Minute Love Affair currently fails WP:NSONGS? It has only just been announced as the next single, hasn't charted and won't be released until 12 August. I don't think there is enough information around about the song yet and the article currently contains links to two album reviews and two YouTube videos. I know that if I redirect it, my edit will be probably be undone immediately (there's an editor involved who I've had disagreements with in the past), so would you be able to keep an eye on it? - JuneGloom Talk 14:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Hey there, you protected 30 Minute Love Affair in July and it ends tomorrow morning. I was wondering if you could merge User:JuneGloom07/30 Minute with the article before it does? I think I've established notability and the single is released in a couple of days. - JuneGloom Talk 20:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. - JuneGloom Talk 15:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
CanvassingAny chance you could take a look at this case of WP:CANVASS at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born This Way Foundation? The commented user has since !voted to Keep the article. SplashScreen (talk) 08:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Haha, Kevin. The diff he is linking to it is clearly shown that he asked the user to help with the article; He never one asked to comment on the AFD. Statυs (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Might wanna check this out?[19] and [20] Statυs (talk) 21:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC) OpinionGoeiedag Kww, kan je even hier op je mening geven AdabowtheSecond (talk) 06:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. persoonlijk haat ik AFD's daarom bemoe ik me er ook bijna nooit mee AdabowtheSecond (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC) Sucker PunchThanks for that edit. I kinda felt the same way, but I feel like I've already done enough policing on that article, had enough battles, and have accordingly tried to minimize my activity there. But something about that (piece of crap) film does appeal to certain persons. Anyway, appreciate your call there. HuskyHuskie (talk) 00:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC) DewanHey Kww, I think he's back as 69.112.76.243 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Can you take a look, same ISP and geolocates cloese enough? I don't have much wikitime over the next few days. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 18:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Till I Go Home 04:51, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Notifying article creators of an en masse AfDHello Kww. I know we've discussed the practice of informing article creators when nominating pages for deletion before, but I was wondering if you could check on Edinburgh_Wanderer (talk · contribs)'s comments [[21]]. SplashScreen (talk) 23:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kww, you may take a look here: User_talk:OohBunnies!#Interaction_bans. Have a nice day! —Hahc21 00:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Add new chart in singlechartHello I'm from Poland. I am writing to add a Polish chart. The resulting page http://www.polish-charts.cba.pl archived on the polish chart - Polish Dance Chart. Chart derived from http://www.djpromotion.com.pl/page/charts#nav and these chart published on the official website ZPAV (http://zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/dyskoteki/index.php). Unfortunately, for some time chart is not published and the future there probably will not. I know that you have added to his Polishdance template, but you need to add Polishdance2;) Please quick reply. Mihelpl (talk) 15:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Skeptoid (2nd nomination) AFD closeSix people said the sources were enough to justify a keep, including Allecher who put a line through his original merge vote, and said keep based on improvements added to the article. Four said to merge it. And the nominator apparently wanted it deleted. Consensus seemed to be it should be kept. Dream Focus 14:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 6-4 isn't a consensus, but given the lack of one, then the decision should have been to keep. Moreover, you didn't even actually merge the article, just deleted the original, leaving out a whole bunch of work that editors did on the deleted article. Your comments reversing the original "keep" decision by Colonel Warden weren't very informative, except for slapping Warden for keeping, which I thought was his prerogative under Wikipedia's arcane rules and regulations. Absent your comments, I guess we can make a Deletion Review. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion review for SkeptoidAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Skeptoid. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CallawayRox (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit (E3) A tag has been placed on Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit (E3), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MrStalker (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC) Weirdness afoot......see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP_asking_editors_for_private_e-mail_addresses. Drmies (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2012 (UTC) HelpHey! Do you mind helping me out here? this user insists on removing sourced content from Call Me Maybe, threatens to report me for adding back in sourced content, breaks the 3RR, insults (which on one occasion I was guilty of, I just had enough of this bs), and refuses to look at the source. Could you give him a reminder, as a friendly warning and a talking to seemed to not be enough to make him stop. Thank you! --(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Robin Hood (2010 film)Dear Kww, thank you for contributing to the article on Ridley Scott's Robin Hood. Unfortunately, I don't agree with your reversion, because Babelstone initiated the dispute by removing consensus material, see Talk:Robin_Hood_(2010_film)#Historical_inaccuracies. The burden was on him to show that it was inappropriate, not on others to show that it was appropriate. Thus, in accordance with Wikipedia policy, the material should remain until a new/revised consensus is reached. However, I do not wish to engage in an edit war, so I will not revert the deletion at this stage. Separately, I notice that you lived in Bonaire: I will be going there this winter, staying at Dan's Habitat.--Gautier lebon (talk) 07:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC) ReplyYes, i understand that, but i didn't remember the preview option at the time and i clarified in my edit summaries it was merely a test edit, a test edit i reverted immediately upon seeing if i suceeded in adding addiotion sections to the infobox, with intentions far from simulating a false demise. Rusted AutoParts 19:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Strange markup problemHello, Kww. thanks for your recent contributions to my talk page on the subject of deletion of articles created by a banned user. For some strange reason, though, each time you post to my talk page, a big red message appears, saying "Citefout: De tag <ref> bestaat, maar de tag <references/> is niet aangetroffen". I have found that this can be cured by removing the &mdash (followed by a semicolon) </nowiki>from before your signature. Perhaps you might consider not including it, or else look into ways of changing it so it doesn't cause this weird problem. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC) Return of the Brexx?Hi Kev, Long time no see? I wonder if you could shed light on the following two users?
Now I've not been around for a good 18 months so dunno how active Brexx has been. I suspect Countdown is just a new user who's unsure of what they're doing. As for MPQzy i'm not so sure. He/She seems to have ignited some of the same old Ciara issues on her historic pages that Brexx did. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 16:34, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Bubbling Under discussionSince you changed the policy, you might want to weigh in here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 12:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Re your softblock of the MICH IP sock....Thank you, my son. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC) LopezHey buddy, long time. So I see an edit war brewing, so I'd like your input please. The article lists her at 70 million records and links to List of best-selling music artists, which lists her at 50. I told Status that this kind of blatant contradiction can't be allowed. Additionally, on that article, there has been consensus for an artist to usually require their certified sales to cover 50% of the claimed figure. Lopez's stands at (I believe) 26 million, so as you see, 50 is already pushing it. This was establish for this exact reason, to avoid fans from posting outrageous claims for artists like Gaga, Rihanna etc. If anything, these rules and consensus should be followed, or at least a new discussion opened. Also, this ridiculous talk of "Legacy" articles and what not, it needs addressing before they actually try to create something of that nature. Thanks!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:29, 5 August 2012 (UTC) Will you get rid of Brexx already, Kevin? :/ Really annoying me right now... Statυs (talk) 03:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
VandalismHelloow Kww tomorrow the semi-protection for the One Direction comes to an end and as we all now be now, fans of 1D like to vandalize so asking to be alert tommorow and be ready to re-protect the article, because once the page is unprotected it will be attacked. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Be alert vandalism about to go down. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Need Some AdviceHi Kev. Need some advice. I've been trying to add information to Woman to Woman (Keyshia Cole album) but unfortunately it keeps being reverted by a user who according to their personal page and the comments left on my page is an executive/works for Cole's record label. I've tried engaging with discussion (on my talk page, his talk page and the article talk page). I've let things die down a few days and then reduced by editing to improving reference formatting, prose and adding more references. All of which has been reverted. I did previously raise it at WP:ANI but it didn't seem to be taken seriously as an issue. The user's latest argument is "why expand an article if there is no need". What do you think I should do? Is it worth raising another ANI? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Okay, explain, pleaseRegarding your revert (despite my somewhat explicit suggestion to use the article discussion page instead of simply reverting), could you perhaps explain the "directly against guideline" bit? I don't think I am seeing the same thing you are. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Now thisIs eerily familiar Siawase (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Second opinion requestHi Kww! Rather than involving myself in a revert-war (over a redirect) at Beg, Borrow, and Steal, I figured it would be best to request to request a second opinion. When you've got a spare moment, perhaps you can take a quick look. Thanks! -- WikHead (talk) 17:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
New ANI requests server be told the clock has restarted on the Mich Ext link spammerDrive Safe! FYI, I have started a new ANI (UPDATE: now in archives but unresolved) on a matter in which you have previously expressed interest, the Michigan global warming external link spammer. Per WP:ILLEGIT, "in the case of sanctions, bans, or blocks, evasion causes the timer to restart". An admin still has to push buttons to tell the server that the timer has restarted before the server erroneously allows it to expire on Sept 2. Since the current 30-day range block was put in place, this Michigan sock has engaged in 10 block-evading editing sessions (six of which were caught in time to impose short term blocks on specific IPs used). It is my belief the blocked range is for the user's home and they are slowed down now only by the inconvenience of editing elsewhere. Please do not let the 30-day range block erroneously expire on the server. The quoted policy says the act of evasion is what restarts the clock. We still need someone to push those buttons. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC) Pending ChangesHi Kww, I was just re-reading your comment at the last RfC ... there aren't a lot of pro-PC2 anti-PC1 votes, so I'd appreciate any insights you want to offer on my talk page any time. I've mentioned some of the issues I have with Pending Changes in various posts at WT:PC2012. - Dank (push to talk) 17:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC) Range blockGreat stuff, thanks very much. GiantSnowman 13:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC) OpenCart should be reopenedOpenCart should be reopened so that it can be edited and improved. Else you should also close down Magento and prestashop. OpenCart exists as article on wikipedia.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.224.79.185 (talk) 19:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC) Hi Kww! I know that it seem to fail NSONG but as far as I see, it doesn't. It has become the fastest-selling pre order song and has charted on 40 charts of different countries about pre-order singles and certainly this is notable enough. (Sources: [26] [27] [28]) It is just what I conclude and your opinion might even differ but I wanted to get clarified that isn't this enough to be notable? An afd might even serve as a good platform to get input that what community thinks about it. TheSpecialUser TSU 22:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
EschatologyHello Kww. Do you know if there's a policy somewhere about this kind of thing? SlightSmile 01:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
AlbumchartI have an issue i've been unable to solve. {{Albumchart}} is not working well with the refname= parameter, not even the standar refname "sc_Chart_Artist" mode. I don't know why but it's not working. I tried to do some tweaks on my sandbox, but the result was unsuccessful. So, i would like to have you taking a look at the template and see what the hell os going on there. I'd really appreciate the help. Thanks. — ΛΧΣ21™ 04:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC) |
