User talk:Krj373/Pg9

Do Not Post Here this is an archived page

Please post any & all messages on my main page located

Here


This is the Talk page for both Krj373 & Krj373-NR. If you wish to leave a message for either user please post it here.

Talk Pages

Current Page

Oldest ➠ youngest

This is a Purge link for the page you are currently on. There is no reason to click it unless something looks out of date. An example would be if I did some archiving and the list of pervious pages is not yet updated on the current page.

Moynahan Syndrome

Hi KRj373,

I have tried to edit the "Moynahan syndrome" Wiki page since "Moynahan Syndrome" does not exist. Symptoms of patient "LW" described by Dr. EJ Moynahan FRCP (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians) in the Proc R Soc Med. 1962 Nov; 55(11): 959–960 was never defined as an actual "syndrome" nor was it named as such. Medical publication referenced here: </ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1896920/</ref>.

Thanks 70.196.193.31 (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. Much more practice I need. True. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk • contribs) 18:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC) Somebody tells me in conflict with sandbox. What is that.[reply]

Where'd they go now?

Dude, what happened to our Sysops? AIV is backed up to beat hell. Boomer VialHolla 20:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both the AIV & the username reports are and have been backed up for sometime. I keep getting server errors so maybe there is a glitch in the mainframe & they are not getting notifications. It is odd however to get this large of a backlog in the middle of the day. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 20:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, It's definitely a sight to see. AIV is only backed up this bad in the dead of night. Boomer VialHolla 21:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andy

Krj,

I am baffled by the edits and am somehow a "sock puppet" can you assist/guide me to update things there without stepping on someone's feet?

Regards,

Andy Langloisandy (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is a 6 year old post. I am not familiar with what happened that long ago.Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 22:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cum nimis absurdum

The article prior to the edits which you reverted were simply a copy of the text, with two citations, one of which refers to an apparently unknown "De Rossi". While a bare copy of the text is fine, it is more appropriately located in Wikisource. I had tried to add sourced observations on the document and its effects. I indicated the added Background, and an additional seven citations. Do you really think the previous version was an improvement? Mannanan51 (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

good edit comments could have prevented this misunderstanding. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 02:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand

Unless you're trying to get me to block you, I cannot understand what you are playing at. Please explain. I'm starting to think you aren't competent enough to be using tools such as Twinkle. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Georgetown Center for Liturgy

Hi,

I was flagged for vandalizing the [Georgetown Center for Liturgy] page. This page is for a small (3 employee) organization that has closed following the death of the founder/chair. As the organization is not significant and no longer operates, I tried to clean up the page and posted a link with information regarding the closure and what has become of the organization's assets. Why was I flagged for vandalism of the page? The page should honestly either be edited to reflect the closure or merely deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.97.70.150 (talk) 19:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kundan Srivastava

Hi,

I need the appropriate spot for my article. link please

Techguy91 (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments left at User talk:Techguy91. Mkdwtalk 19:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Mkdw:, I missed this comment on my page, Thanks.The orange bar of doom always caught my attention this new thing not so much. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 19:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Krj373. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]