User talk:Krish!/Archive 10

Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13

Need some work?

Hey Krish! I see you have a lot at hand right now, though it might not be the most encouraging. If you find some time could you take a look at Kalki Koechlin's FAC? I thought you might feel up for it, and it would help distract you from all the rest! Thank you! NumerounovedantTalk 10:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Sure, in few days.Krish | Talk 15:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! NumerounovedantTalk 16:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Bajirao Mastani (soundtrack)

Hi Krish! First of all, I'm sorry. In past, I don't know where and how we had frictions over something. I don't remember but I apologise, once again. Let bygones be bygones. Coming back to work, I have developed and expanded the article Bajirao Mastani (soundtrack). Whatever existed on the film's page, the contents are present on the soundtrack page with slight modifications. Since a long time, I had this wish to write for the film's soundtrack. Usually, I create and expand soundtrack pages for those film whose music has potential–commercially and critically (these are just few parameters, not all). I waited too long and wanted someone else to write but since months, no one picked up the work. So, I finally took up the work and it took me nearly six hours at a stretch to expand the article. I know, the article can be further refined. I wish you get bit involved with this soundtrack too and take care that it doesn't get vandalised. Lastly, I appreciate your work and talent. :) Arjann (talk) 16:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Arjann Hey! Well thanks for saying the last sentence. Not many people feel that about me here. Nevermind, I don't keep grudges against anyone so I don't think I have any problems with you or anyone. Coming to the soundtrack's article, I would like to tell you that I had created that article wayback in January but someone redirected it to the main article. I was planning to work on both the film and this article but whatever. I must say you have done a good job on expanding it and I think I might get involve with this. I think this was the best hindi film album of 2015 and the only album which had actual music (you know what I mean). It's a great album. My favourite songs on the album are "Ab Tohe Jaane Na Doongi", a song picturised on Chopra and Singh, which could not make it to the film, "Aaj Ibadat", and "Aayat".Krish | Talk 09:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Krish! Yes. I will never witness such Bollywood film until fifty years. My favorite song is "Aayat" and "Deewani Mastani". I loved the Persian character "Mastani". Arjann (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your Signature

Hi Krish!, not sure what's going on but something about the signatures you've left recently, for example at Template:Did you know nominations/Jennifer Lawrence filmography and Template:Did you know nominations/Felt (film) is preventing any comments below from appearing. Looks like the usual link to your talk page from the signature is not showing up so I assume that is related. I've fixed it on the filmography page by removing all the formatting and just leaving the links but you probably need to take a look - Basement12 (T.C) 11:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I really don't know what is the problem there as its working fine elsewhere.Krish | Talk 16:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Additionally, your sig talk link doesn't appear to be a link. Could it have something to do with the "!"? --A D Monroe III (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
A D Monroe III I tried to fix but just couldn't. I still can't figure out.Krish | Talk 22:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Krish!, it is good to see you again. I looked at the code for your custom signature and found it to be in proper working order. The reason the link is inactive here is because this page is the link's destination so there is no where for it to take you. You will notice that all other pages where you sign, the link back to this page will be active. This is exactly how it works by default; for everyone. I hope this was helpful for you. Cheers.--John Cline (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2016‎ (UTC)
My bad, I misread the original post and now realize I didn't address the issue you are dealing with at all. The problem results from the pipe you are using between your name and your talk page link, and the way it affects the template code present on the pages you signed. To fix it, and prevent it from happening elsewhere, change your custom signature from [[User:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''''Krish'''''</span>]] | [[User talk:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Black">'''''Talk'''''</span>]] to [[User:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''''Krish'''''</span>]] {{!}} [[User talk:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Black">'''''Talk'''''</span>]]. You will notice that I updated the code on one of the pages you were having problems on and it works fine with the fix in place.[1] I am sorry for my initial comments which likely caused more confusion. I think we got it this time however. Cheers.--John Cline (talk) 09:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey! John Cline Thanks for fixing it. I had a tough time figuring out the problem with my signature and never did.Krish | Talk 06:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

You might want to consider John Cline's suggestion by implementing the prescribed changes in your 'preferences'. —Vensatry (talk) 10:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

I just changed it. Thank you Vensatry for the reminder! Krish | Talk 16:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eega/archive1

This is my first solo attempt for FAC. If interested, please do leave your comments there. Yours friendly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Pavanjandhyala Sure but It will take some time as my exams have just ended. Cheers! Krish | Talk 06:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence

Hello! Your submission of List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

Hey Krish, if you find some time would you mind reviewing Waiting for GA? It's a relatively small article. It would be greatly appreciated! NumerounovedantTalk 12:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Never mind. NumerounovedantTalk 12:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

BH

Hey Krish, hope you doing well. I would like you to consider the discussions here and here and help me figure out a way to reach a consensus as most Bollywood articles fall in the scope. Could you possibly help me contact the publishers? NumerounovedantTalk 16:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For your edits on Kalki Koechlin's article, now an FA. And aslo your kind words during the FAC. NumerounovedantTalk 14:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Come on dude, it was your hard work that paid off. I just tweaked the lead and corrected few mistakes. Still I appreciate your gesture and Congratulations!! And, sorry for not looking at your above post as I was travelling. Anyway, the article looks so good with that bronze star. You deserve it. Krish | Talk 16:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you :D and still all your help is greatly appreciated. Don't worry about the previous query, it's all gooood. NumerounovedantTalk 18:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Punjab edit-a-thon

Hello friend,
A multilingual national-level edit-a-thon is being conducted at this moment with an aim to create or improve Punjab-related articles. A community that will create or expand the most number of articles during this edit-a-thon contest will be awarded a trophy during WikiConference India 2016. Best contributors' recognition may also be considered. We need your help here. Please join right now as a participant and help your community.
Thanks and regards. --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey! Titodutta I'm sorry for not seeing your message at that time. I am very busy right now. Hope you didn't mind. Krish | Talk 12:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Three years ago ...
actress
... you were recipient
no. 574 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Krish | Talk 14:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Golden Hollywood Contest

Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 06:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me buddy! I hope you have been well. Krish | Talk 09:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I am indeed. Thanks for asking.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 10:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quantico

Hi Krish, I wanted to discuss my recent edit on the Priyanka Chopra wiki page. I adjusted the details, specifically in relation to the genre of the ABC show that Priyanka currently stars in on television. Quantico has been advertised as a terrorism thriller, first and foremost, so it would make sense that it is classified as a thriller series with elements of drama, rather than a full blown drama series. I understand that you reverted my previous edit so I was wondering, could you please provide me with a reasoning as to why you changed it. If you can let me know, that would be much appreciated. Thanks. Have a nice day! Elainasla (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge for Indian cinema

Based on The 10,000 Challenge and within the scope of WikiProject India, a new challenge has been initiated to reach a long-term goal of 1000 article improvements and creations for Indian cinema. Article cleanup and basic referencing improvements, expansions, new articles, DYKs, Good Articles, Featured Articles etc, are all welcome. You and others are invited to participate in this challenge and help Indian cinema in any possible way. If interested, please signup here. Yours truly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Sure. Krish | Talk 19:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Anything new you are working on for the 1000 challenge? BTW, graduated from university recently (a week ago). FYI. Oh, and one more thing. Did you watch Masoom with English subtitles? If so, which website did you watch it from?  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations Dude! I mean I am so happy for you. Best of luck for your future. Now coming back to your question, well, I think I would like to take some of my GAs to FAs. I am also thinking to work on Amy Adams' article and will nominate her Awards list for FLC too. Do you have any articles in mind, which I can work on? Feel free to tell.Krish | Talk 16:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I guess you are busy with Priyanka Chopra's article. Nice. Do try working on other film-related articles as well when you are free. Improvements also qualify to be a part of the challenge. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Well, I only changed Chopra's lead which was too Bollywoodish. Coming to your question, well, I would like to take some of my GAs to FAs. I am also thinking to work on Amy Adams' article and will nominate her Awards list for FLC too. Do you have any articles in mind, which I can work on? Feel free to tell.Krish | Talk 16:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Anything related to Indian cinema is welcomed as far as this is concerned. Any sort of sizeable contribution to any Indian film-related article is fine. You can also work on something that can be termed a guilty pleasure of yours. All the best, buddy! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Krish!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Mary Kom

Hello there. I was just wondering why you dropped the idea of taking this film to FA all-of-a-sudden! You had conducted a PR a year ago for it and it might have achieved some feat. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Yash! Well, that completely slipped out of my mind. Since I took a long break from wikepedia, I kind of forgot about this one. Well, I think it will be next for sure. Plus, would you mind taking a look at my Aitraaz FAC? Thanks!Krish | Talk 19:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Sure thing. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Aitraaz FAC

The film really looks similar to Disclosure (1994). Did you find any refs relating to it? Kamath's review mentions it.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

A few more:1, 2, 3.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Well, I know about the similarities. Though I haven't seen Disclosure, I have heard about it. I deliberately avoided the addition about the similarities because I don't no where it should be used. Maybe I should add in the reception section saying critics noted several similarities between these two films. What do you think? Should I?Krish | Talk 14:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Maybe you can say it bears "thematic resemblance" to Disclosure (like how Andha Naal is to Rashomon) rather than just saying they are similar as the motifs of the two characters (Moore's and PC's) are the same.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
I have posted comments on the FAC page of Aitraaz. Could you please do the same for Andha Naal's PR? quid pro quo. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Sure. Krish | Talk 18:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Just a gentle reminder, now that I posted comments on Aitraaz's FAC which have been resolved. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
You could use some book refs if necessary. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

All the best for 2017!

Hello Krish!,
Enjoy the Winter Solstice and the Christmas and holiday season.
Thank you for all your good work during 2016 in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikipedia.
All the best for 2017! Cheers, — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard |  16:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2017!
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, ssven! I was offline for the whole week. Sorry for the late reply. Krish | Talk 18:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiCup

Hi! Am not sure if you have notice it or not, but the annual editing competition Wikipedia:WikiCup has started and the signup is open till 5 February 2017. The cup encourages content improvement and tries to make editing on Wikipedia more fun; and it did that for me last year. I have hence decided to drop this friendly note hoping that you would take part. Although the signup ends on 5th Feb, the earlier you sign in the earlier you start scoring. Happy New Year and Happy Editing! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

FAC

Sorry, Krish, but I'm not sure I'm going to be able to make it to the FAC. I'm running out of time before real-life work obligations that will take a big chunk out of my editing time over the next several months, and I doubt I'll have the time for a long FAC review when I have existing reviews to return to and FLC obligations. The good news is that you need source and image reviews more than anything else right now, as you appear to have plenty of support already. Best of luck with it, in case I can't provide a review. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

It's okay. I can understand. Krish | Talk 16:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Huma Qureshi

Hi. I see that you have helped make Huma Qureshi's a GA. But sadly, the current profile picture is quite bad. Could it be possible for you to help me change it to something better, such as this one or this one? I would have done it myself but the article is protected, sadly. 103.255.115.252 (talk) 17:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hey Krish, I was looking to improve upon some of my earlier projects. If you find some spare time would you mind taking a look at this? NumerounovedantTalk 16:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Will look at it tomorrow.Krish | Talk 16:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. NumerounovedantTalk 16:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Train-the-Trainer 2017: Invitation to participate

Hello Krish!,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?

  • Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
  • An editor must have 500+ edits.
  • Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here.
Regards. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations

@Kailash29792: Thanks buddy! Plus, your inputs at the FAC really helped. Krish | Talk 10:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

An award fo you!

The Rajinikanth Award of Excellence and Bravery
For bringing Aitraaz, a 2004 Hindi film article to FA status unmindful of its scope and how rewarding it would be. I give this award to those who make exceptional and moving efforts in the past. You too qualify for this. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Pavan. I really appreciate it. Krish | Talk 13:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
For bringing Aitraaz to FA. Keep it up!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks bro!Krish | Talk 16:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Congrats! Your success of a not-so-long film article and one so recent makes me want to try for one of the films I've worked on. – FrB.TG (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Frank! BTW Which article you are talking about?Krish | Talk 16:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Never mind. Plan halted; should leave some of my GAs the way they are. Right now I have Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hrithik Roshan/archive1; if you have the time and inclination, stop by for a review. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@FrB.TG: Didn't realise your post until now. Anyway, I will look at it in the next few days.Krish | Talk 10:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all the work that you put into articles relating what I believe is your true obsession here. 😁 Congratulations on another FA. NumerounovedantTalk 16:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
@Numerounovedant: Haha....Thanks bro! By the way, I intend to write the articles of Priyanka Chopra's important films (hits, acclaimed, flop but acclaimed, or hit but panned) and get them to FA status or GA (in case less info is available). It's quite a task.Krish | Talk 18:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I noticed. Also, would you mind taking a look at the PR for Waiting? It has some resolved comments from other editors. NumerounovedantTalk 06:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar filmography and Vijay filmography

Hey Krish, I was hoping you would do some quid pro quo by giving a source review for Ajith Kumar's FLC here. Also, it would be great if you could provide some comments for Vijay's FLC here. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Sure. Maybe tonight?Krish | Talk 10:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

What's Your Raashee?

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article What's Your Rashee? has been completed.

Good luck with your future GA and FA nominations.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of What's Your Raashee?

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article What's Your Raashee? you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Don (2006 Hindi film)


See User talk:Corinne#Don (2006 Hindi film) for further discussion.  – Corinne (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Shruti Haasan filmography

I hate to be too formal these days, so i'll keep it straight. Hope you would throw some comments here. Pavanjandhyala 10:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

@Pavanjandhyala: Sure thing. But please also look at mine here and here.Krish | Talk 14:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Former can be done. Not really comfortable with award lists, so i would skip it. Sorry. Pavanjandhyala 14:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Mary Kom tomorrow evening. I'll be leaving few comments there. Pavanjandhyala 16:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of What's Your Raashee?

The article What's Your Raashee? you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:What's Your Raashee? for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Kom (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Financial Express. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

O Lamm Gottes, unschuldig

Thank you for the fast review! If you mean GTG, it needs another icon ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of What's Your Raashee?

Hello! Your submission of What's Your Raashee? at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Yoninah: I have no idea what you are taking about. Whom are you even referring to? Me or the editor who reviewed my DYK?Krish | Talk 12:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm referring to the QPQ you submitted for this nomination, which is your review of Template:Did you know nominations/O Lamm Gottes, unschuldig. You commented on the expansion, the hook being referenced, the image being freely licensed, and the QPQ being done. In a DYK review, you need to comment on the newness, the length, the neutrality, any close paraphrasing issues, and the hook fact being cited inline. Yoninah (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@Yoninah: Done.Krish | Talk 13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Great, thanks. I like the new image you nominated; it's much better than the old one. But it doesn't appear in the article. Yoninah (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
And Krish, I think you need to do some adjustments with the pipe symbol in your signature. This has been a recurring problem with DYK submission pages. —Vensatry (talk) 13:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@Vensatry: I still couldn't figure out the reason behind the problem with my signature.Krish | Talk 13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Try this. Type & first followed by # and 124. End this with a semicolon. It displays the pipe symbol and is better for signatures. Pavanjandhyala 06:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Archiving easily

I know it sounds tedious to manually archive using Wayback Machine every time, but here is a quick suggestion: if you are using Firefox, you could install the add-on "The Archiver" which can allow you to archive via 3 sites simultaneously: Wayback, WebCite (though you'll have to fill in your email ID everytime for this until you enter an ID in settings) and Archive.is. There is also an option to "Check it" which I don't think I have to explain. --Kailash29792 (talk) 14:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

I archive all the links manually and trust me its tiring AF and thanks for the suggestion. I am gonna install that add-on. I don't really know about "Check it" by the way.Krish | Talk 15:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Mary Kom FAC

Krish, I can't promise anything in terms of being able to review your article. I've been so slammed with work that I'll barely make it over 50 edits this month (I think this will be my fewest in a month since I began editing), and things won't get better until the middle of next month. However, if I get enough of a break to do any FAC reviewing, I'll make sure to visit your FAC. Giants2008 (Talk) 15:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC) "@Giants2008: You took part in the peer review of the article, did you forget?Krish | Talk 16:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for What's Your Raashee?

On 29 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article What's Your Raashee?, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Priyanka Chopra (pictured) played twelve different characters, one from each zodiac sign, in the film What's Your Raashee?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/What's Your Raashee?. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, What's Your Raashee?), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

What's Your Raashee?

Hello. The "upright" syntax sizes an image according to user preferences (instead of assigning a fixed width for everyone). My intent wasn't to make the images smaller. I'd forgotten that my preferences differed from the default, resulting in larger dimensions on my end than on yours. Had I understood the issue, I wouldn't have reinstated the change in that manner. (Your edit summary is sincerely appreciated.) Apologies for the error. —David Levy 13:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC) @David Levy:

No problem. Krish | Talk 13:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Dostana copyedit

@Miniapolis: Thank you so much for the copy-editing. I really appreciate it. Your sense of c/e is amazing.Krish | Talk 12:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Baahubali FLC

Great effort on the list. But do take care to differentiate between the nominations for both of the versions (like say Best Film - Tamil and Best Film - Telugu) in case you have overlooked an award.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 03:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

An award for you!

The poignant sparrow of skill
For Amy Adams' awards FLC success. Good job! ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 02:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Need Help

Hey Krish, how are you?? I want to discuss something with you about Vidya Balan's article on Wikipedia. Since you're a senior editor, so I think that I would be good to seek help and guidness from you.

There is an article on Wikipedia about "List of Hindi film clans". This article also features the "Roy Kapur family" clan. Vidya Balan is married to Siddharth Roy Kapur, so that means that Roy Kapur family is also Vidya Balan's family and the members of the family are her in-laws. And everyone knows that In-laws are relatives. So I replaced this "|relatives = Priyamani (second cousin)" with this "|relatives = See Roy Kapur family" on her info-box section ("List of Hindi film clans#Roy Kapur family" also has name of Priyamani) but a user whose name is "Krimuk2.0" reverted my edits with these reasons "Her in-laws aren't her relatives, but her husband's" and "In-laws are what they are, not relatives. also, stop using personal attacks unless you wish to be blocked". Now you tell me what should I do. I know that I am right, In-laws are family members, but he reverted my edits twice with lame excuses. Now I need your help please guide me that what should I do now?? Leave a message on my talk-page. It would be so kind of you. Thank you. Many Words (talk) 16:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@Many Words: Only close relatives are added in the infoboxes. I mean we all know Ranveer Singh is somehow related to Sonam Kapoor but have you seen their names on each others' articles? Plus here, Krimuk2.0 is much more senior and experienced than me and he has a point. Don't take it in a wrong way. If you wanna work on wikipedia, you can choose any article and can contribute as per the rules. All the best!Krish | Talk 03:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Krish, if only close relatives can be added to info-boxes, then the "Bachchan family" should not be included at Aishwariya Rai's info-box. And the Kapoor family should not be added at Babita Kapoor and Neetu Kapoor's info-box. Mukherjee-Samarth family should not be added at Mohnish Behl's info-box, Bhatt family should not be added at Emraan Hashmi's info-box, Chopra family should not be at Meera Chopra's info-box and so on. And if only close relatives can be added to info-box then I think that Vidya Balan's in-laws are her close relatives then Priyanmani who is her "second" cousin. I know that Krimuk2.0 is a senior editor but that doesn't mean that he could not be at fault. He is at fault, in-laws are family. As old people says to a newly married bride "In-laws are your family now". Many Words (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Waiting ...again

Hey, are you planning to put up any comments? A fresh pair of eyes could really help. Thanks NumerounovedantTalk 19:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Numerounovedant: I was reading the article yesterday and didn't find any mistakes. Expect my comments soon. Meanwhile, would you please look at this? I am planning this for TFL for the 28th April, the release of the second part.Krish | Talk 06:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Purple Pebble Pictures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)