User talk:KragarSF

Welcome

Hi, KragarSF. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  09:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ようこそ You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people. Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes. Play in your user area. For example, create User:KragarSF/test. Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009. When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references. Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! --  Chzz  ►  09:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

September 2017

Thanks for contributing to the article Rockingham (album) . However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 05:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jax 0677:, thanks. (Did I do the ping thing correctly?) I know the article is lacking on proper sources. I've never created a page from scratch before, I'm just tired of the album redirected back to the bands page. I'm not really sure where all I would need to link to for it. I edited the page, after initial creation, with a link to the bands website and a link to their facebook even page for the release party (though I'm not sure that would be considered a "reliable source"). Could you give me some pointers on what else I might need to keep the page from being removed? KragarSF (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rockingham (album)

The article Rockingham (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable umreferenced album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have fixed some of these issues, but I could really use some pointers on whether or not I have done so correctly before I remove the proposed deletion. KragarSF (talk) 11:40, 23 September 2017 (AZ Time)