User talk:Kotzker

Hello

Hello Kotzker, I see that you made some vary nice modofications to the Skvere article and added some valuable information. Please contanct me to discus some of your changes as it needs to be revised, no one knows better then a Skverrer himslef. You seem to know alot and have a much better grip on the english language them I do. Together we can make this a very nice article.

Yours truly, A Skverer Chusid --Chusid 16:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hey Chusid, I'm glad to see a Skverer chusid here. I responded to some of your points on the Skver section. Please be aware that I'm not trying to just negate the things your'e saying. I think your input and knowledge of the subject is great. I just think the article should adhere more to Wiki standards.

BTW, are you a BP-Skverer or an NS-Skverer?

--Kotzker 21:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jew vs Jews

Wikipedia style is that opening paragraph reflects the name of the article. -- Cecropia 23:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's a Move request for this page to Jews. See WP:Requested moves. --Kotzker 23:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shalom. It seems you've missed the entire discussion and saw only a couple of newcomers who added their posts at the top of the Talk page. ←Humus sapiens ну? 23:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. See my comments on Talk:Jew. --Kotzker 00:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi:

In looking back over the discussion at Talk:Jew I noticed that you had previously written about using the plural form "Jews" (or "Jewish people") for the article title. Someone recently added a poll on a possible name change. Please take a look. I'm in support of the move for the sake of consistency with other "group" names, and have attempted to provide examples from the List of ethnic groups; some have come out strongly against it. Perhaps you have a different take that would be appropriate, and might like to comment. Thanks! —LeflymanTalk 19:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am russian j'activist Mond. You're contr's is very good! --212.48.202.169 23:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Languages

Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 21:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chilul Hashem

A klullah on whoever keeps re publishing the controversies section of the New Square article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.237.28.125 (talkcontribs) .

This is Wikipedia, not "Der Yid". Your edits were blatant vandalism. If you have a problem with the article please discuss it on the talk page. --Kotzker 17:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A klullah on the writer of this comment. --Daniel575 | (talk) 18:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You added some things about Skverrer minhagim on the talk page there and said you'd incorporate them into the article later. That was 7 months ago. Just a reminder. Would be nice if you could incorporate those things; I had never heard of them, these things definitely need a place in the article. (Until User:Meshulam shows up and deletes it, wildly screaming that it is OR, Original Research. If you want to see what I mean, see HaEdah HaCharedis.) --Daniel575 | (talk) 18:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Family Tree! what a beautiful thing. However, I think it rather belongs on the Chernobyl page and have it as a related link. Also, why did you put it at the top of the page?--Chusid 18:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This family tree is specific to Skver, showing it only in context to parallel descendants. I do plan to create one for Chernobyl as a whole (as an upgrade from the טשערנאבילער גזע outline I did in Yiddish), but that's a huge and complicated task. I took my cue from the Bobov page, which is why I put it on top. --Kotzker 20:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So what do you think of placing the Family Tree after Important Literature before External links? I think its fits in there better vs. at the beginning of the article, whats your opinion?--Chusid 23:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kotzker

I didn't know that there were any Kotzker Chassidim that were goyim. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.237.24.48 (talkcontribs) .

And I didn't know I could ever feel so determined to have someone blocked from Wikipedia for a very long time. It is YOU who is the chillul hashem here. Grow up, instead of acting like a baby. --Daniel575 | (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please evaluate the changes I made there last night. What do you think? Some feedback would be nice. --217.132.130.193 08:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Larry Kunofsky, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 04:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond

Hi Kotzker: It would be very helpful if you would take a look at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-29 Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty)#Summary Conclusions / Understanding and see what you think of the "understanding". Thanks so much and have a good Yom Tov. IZAK 10:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but since I'm not a party to the dispute I'm waiting for Klezmer to comment first. Not sure if his silence is equal to acquiesence... or he's just busy getting ready for Yom Tov, or something... --Kotzker 16:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for mediation/Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty)

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Mezhbizh (Hasidic dynasty), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. IZAK 16:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend please come to ‎« שמועס »‎ to see if we can use this channel as a place for Yiddish chats. This form should work at ‎װיקיװערטערבוך‎ when you are using Firefox, Konqueror or Opera. Unfortunatelly if does not work yet in Internet Explorer.‎
Please search in ‎װיקיװערטערבוך:הויפט זייט‎ at the seventh item in נאוויגאציע.‎ It is ‎« שמועס »‎.‎ I assume that you agree to add such an « שמועס » item at װיקיפּעדיע‎ to נאוויגאציע as soon as our friends m:n:en:user:bawolff ... have fixed the code. Please do not hesitate to write your comments in the comment section.‎
Please make proposals about translating of the text / help: Only Latin characters and Latin numbers are allowed as « Your Nickname: » . Exceptions are « tekhniker|avek » , « ales-viser » etc. Please add some explanations about accessing the channel « #kavehoyz » by using the page chatwikizine: One should select the channel « #kavehoyz » from the channel list, select a Nickname and hit enter. All other fields are optional.‎
Thanks in advance and Good luck! Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 05:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baruch HaBa Melech HaMashiach

Hello,
ברוך הבא מלך המשיח

שהחיינו וקיימנו והגיענו לזמן הזה
Could you tell me please if this song is from Avraham Fried or someone else? And on wich album does it appears?

thank you

Djampa (talk) 08:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request assitance

I'm now working on promoting different Jewish organizations that help our community. If you could take a few mins and help brush up the article on HASC that would be wonderful. Zei g'bentcht. Joe407 (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Kotzker! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. David Twersky (Skverer Rebbe) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kotzker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kotzker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kotzker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gemara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semitic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Izraelita requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Izraelita. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 11:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Machzikei Hadas (organization) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Machzikei Hadas (organization), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 16:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Kotzker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Machzikei Hadas (organization), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kotzker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Machzikei Hadas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 01:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, referred to talk page. @Drmies, you might be interested in UTRS appeal #98298 - does this line up with your CU data? -- asilvering (talk) 23:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kotzker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Drmies: I understand that it looks like sockpuppetry, but they were two genuine mistakes.

  • I was trying to help someone who genuinely needed help, and didn't know the way I did it wasn't allowed. It was not intended as deception.
  • I engaged in one discussion under an old username (opened for legit reasons), and didn't realize in that moment that it violated policies. It did, and I don't have an excuse. It was dumb, and I shouldn't have done that. I'm human.

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. Your denial does not outweigh this technical evidence. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kotzker (talk) 03:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I’ll give it one last shot

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kotzker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

PhilKnight: I wasn’t denying it, I was acknowledging it. If you don’t actually care to understand, that’s fine, just please kindly say so. Kotzker (talk) 16:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]]: I wasn’t denying it, I was acknowledging it. If you don’t actually care to understand, that’s fine, just please kindly say so. [[User:Kotzker|Kotzker]] ([[User talk:Kotzker#top|talk]]) 16:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]]: I wasn’t denying it, I was acknowledging it. If you don’t actually care to understand, that’s fine, just please kindly say so. [[User:Kotzker|Kotzker]] ([[User talk:Kotzker#top|talk]]) 16:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]]: I wasn’t denying it, I was acknowledging it. If you don’t actually care to understand, that’s fine, just please kindly say so. [[User:Kotzker|Kotzker]] ([[User talk:Kotzker#top|talk]]) 16:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Kotzker (talk) 16:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]