User talk:Konullu

Welcome

Hello, Konullu! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 03:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Check it out

[1]. Regards,--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 03:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on Armenia and Azerbaijan are subject to Arbcom sanctions

File:Yes
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Per this thread at ANI. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 Armenian parliament shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peace process (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Justice for Khojaly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Ararat

Mount Ararat

Little Ararat (left) and Mt. Ararat(right)
Highest point
Elevation5,137 m (16,854 ft)
See Elevation section
Prominence3,611 m (11,847 ft)
Ranked 48th
ListingCountry high point
Ultra
Coordinates39°42.113′N 44°17.899′E / 39.701883°N 44.298317°E / 39.701883; 44.298317[1]
Geography
Geology
Mountain typeStratovolcano
Last eruption1840[3]
Climbing
First ascent1829
Dr. Friedrich Parrot and
Khachatur Abovian[4]
Dear Konullu, Mount Ararat isn't located near Lake Van as you tried present. Ararat is of great significance for Armenians, but nobody denies the fact that currently it is located in Turkey. --Երևանցի talk 16:54, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Yerevanchi, no matter how it is important for Armenians (Ararat debate is another topic), it situated in Turkey and your map wrongly shows that it is in Armenia. It needs to be corrected. Best, Konullu (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Yerevanci. Here is the infobox. Does it show Ararat in Armenia? --Երևանցի talk 20:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the red triangle in Armenia?! Best, Konullu (talk) 20:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are you kidding me? --Երևանցի talk 20:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See the reply on my talk page. The map does not show the red triangle in Armenia. Viewfinder (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The map is misleading, the borders of Turkey and some other lines (seems like borders) show that it is not in Turkey. I think we need to ensure the following points: a) whether borders of Turkey are correct in that map; b) whether coordinates of Mount Ararat are correct. At least one of these is not correct, if both were correct, then this peak has to be within territories of Turkey. Best, Konullu (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry Konullu, but the red triangle is very clearly without the borders of Armenia. Ararat is close to Turkey's border. Therefore it is not clear from the low resolution map that it is within Turkey, but the border is question in with Iran, not Armenia. If you view the full resolution map, you can clearly see Ararat within Turkey. The coordinates are certainly correct, their author is an experienced GPS user and I have checked them against DEM data and topographic maps. Viewfinder (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On a separate matter regarding the youtube link on your user page about how a "ragtag" band created wikipedia: this came across to me as yet another attack on its creators that was quite frankly not even worth checking out, and I concluded that your coordinate edit was the work of yet another sneaky vandal with the aim of undermining wikipedia. I now see that "ragtag" was not used in a derogatory context, it was used by Jimmy Wales himself, and conclude that your coordinate edits, albeit mistaken, were made in good faith. Viewfinder (talk) 04:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ 2007 GPS survey
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference MinistryOfTourism was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference gvp was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Early American Expedition Of Mount Ararat

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Deukmejian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please brush up on the definition. I don't think you are well acquainted with Wikipedia's concept of ill-will edits.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetize template

I undid your addition of this template to Chinese cuisine. The order at the moment is not arbitrary but orders them by their notability or significance. Sorting them alphabetically would just be confusing, and hard because the regional cuisines have both Chinese and English names listed.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 01:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

?

RE: this: I don't see anything on the talk page that's relevant here. Drmies (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've been mentioned at WP:Arbitration enforcement

Hello Konullu. Please see WP:AE#Sprutt, where a complaint has been made that you made changes at Armenia Fund that are not neutral. If you wish to respond, please create a new section of that AE report and write your own comment. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement warning

As discussed in the recent arbitration enforcement thread, please take particular care to observe our neutral point of view policy when editing about Armenia or Azerbaijan, or you may be made subject to sanctions as described at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Standard discretionary sanctions.  Sandstein  10:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

You have been reported. Proudbolsahye (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for info, I will take a look. Best, Konullu (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Per this thread on WP:AE, you are now topic-banned indefinitely from all edits to articles or discussions relating to Armenian–Azerbaijani conflicts, broadly construed. This restriction will be logged at WP:ARBAA2. If you wish to appeal against it, you may do through the procedures outlined at the top of WP:AE. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

To enforce an arbitration decision,
you have been blocked from editing for 2 weeks. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 04:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting all administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ilgar Mammadov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Azerbaijani and Blogger
Central European University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blogger

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for continuing to violate your topic ban at [2] and [3],
you have been blocked from editing for 1 month. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.  Sandstein  20:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

Merging

Hello, Konullu. You have new messages at Talk:Gül Baba.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JediXmaster (talk) 05:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POV tags

Please don't do this: drive-by {{POV}} tagging without even an edit summary, let alone anything on Talk (as prescribed), and the edit marked as minor. That's simply below the standard, and particularly in the contentious topic area.

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning . Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee remedies that govern edits to these articles. You can read the full decision here. Thank you.

--Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

notice

Please see [4] --Երևանցի talk 20:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please strike out your two AfD comments mentioned in that report. That may improve the outcome. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Konullu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Konullu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Konullu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://rsf.org/en/news/reporters-without-borders-index-censorship-and-transparency-international-uk-urge-azerbaijan-lift, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Next Turkvision Song Contest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Turkvision Song Contest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Turkvision Song Contest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Grk1011 (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello Konullu! Your additions to Orbanomics have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]