|
User talk:Kolano123Hello. You violated Wikipedia policy on three counts. "No own". "I don't like". And also you gave NO EXPLANATION for your rude obnoxious arrogant disrespectful reverts. Of decent modifications and wording changes. They were good faith modifications that you removed for no apparent reason, except you personally didn't like it. Which is against Wikipedia policy and drift. Do it again, get reverted again. Stop breaking Wikipedia rules. Thank you. 2603:7000:A900:45DF:8D98:2B37:4B41:F518 (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Why you delete my editWhy you delete my edit Agk 72 (talk) 21:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Macarenia clavigera has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 19:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosa alexeenkoi has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Dcotos (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Your message to meI just saw your message that I was doing a test in yeshivat mir. This was not a test. The transliterations were wrong. Can you please let me know what I should do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nehushtani (talk • contribs) 12:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Closing discussion on Taylor LorenzI disagree with close. the discussion definitely was not WP:FORUMing, in that the talk section was actively talking about changes to the article. I am also not sure WP:HOUND should be invoked unless you can get an uninvolved admin to prove it. I can't tell from the WP:ANI section that any admin was agreeing. Def am not on awshorts side in removing the harassment section, but closing the talk section early probably does not bring consensus. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
|