en User talk:Koitus~nlwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Koitus~nlwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 14:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome again to Wikipedia. Please give explanations, at least an edit summary, to edits that you are making to physics topics. Also, please sign your edits, as you did not do here[1]. Do you have any connection to User:Alvaro12Lopez? Best wishes for your editing. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm DVdm. Your recent edit to Double-slit experiment appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Constant314. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 00:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not remove the targets of redirect pages as you did at Klein-Gordan equation. Redirects exist to help readers find the articles they're looking for, and removing the target makes the page useless.

I looked at your contributions out of curiosity, and saw that you've been marking all of your edits to articles, and many of your edits to talk pages as minor. Minor edits are changes such as fixing a grammatical error, adding a wikilink, or formatting a reference without adding new information. Examples of edits which should not have been tagged as minor include this edit to Nuclear force, this one to Erwin Schrödinger, and this change to population inversion, as well as most of the individual edits to Talk:Capacitor on 24 February]. Please review WP:MINOR and only mark your edits as minor if they truly are. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:BlackcurrantTea that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EN-Jungwon 08:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Thermal energy, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Metric tensor. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Even though you reverted your own comments, you should not have posted them in the first place, because editors can see them. — Anita5192 (talk) 03:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Einstein field equations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 23:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Einstein field equations, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 12:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Einstein field equations. - DVdm (talk) 16:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quartic interaction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preview, consolidate, summarize

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
- The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 05:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Double-slit experiment, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. - DVdm (talk) 10:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note regarding [2]: "For example, if two slits are separated by 0.5 mm. (d), and are illuminated with a 0.6 μm. wavelength laser (λ), then at a distance of 1 m. (z), the spacing of the fringes will be 1.2 mm." Periods for mm, μm and m? Really? - DVdm (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Double-slit experiment.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Double-slit experiment. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

Note regarding [3]: please do have a look at all the examples in the articles mm, μm and m. Do you see any of these units as abbreviations with periods as you added them here, called me an "IDIOT" in your edit summary? - DVdm (talk) 14:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 17:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 23:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that, if you call anyone an idiot again, you next block will very likely be indefinite. WP:CIV is policy. Girth Summit _(blether) 23:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In Dutch, last names don't always start with a capital

Regarding your edits [4] and [5], see artcile Pieter Hendrik van Cittert. I undid those edits. - DVdm (talk) 12:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: see also [6], listing Benjamin Pieter van Cittert being his father, and listing more names with lowercase vans: P. van den Ent and Jan van der Hoeven. - DVdm (talk) 12:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've only blocked you from editing article space - you can still edit talk pages, and you can explain yourself at the AN thread if you would like to. You simply can't keep edit warring just because you are confident that you are right. If you start doing this again when the block expires, the next one will most likely be indefinite. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I just mentioned your case at WP:AN. You're obviously unable to contribute there, but I am required by policy to let you know. The offer still stands - if you commit to abide by the WP:NPA policy, you could be unblocked immediately. Best wishes. Girth Summit _(blether) 22:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]