Hey, you helped me out so much with my Plymouth Colony map, as well as some other work, I thought I would bounce an article your way... The article on the Israelites, as well as other articles relating to the ancient Levant, are in some need of maps. I have not been involved with editing them myself, but I think they could greatly benefit from some more consistant maps, and you have such a skill in this area. If you look at the Israelites article specifically, this: File:1759 map Holy Land and 12 Tribes.jpg is the only map that it has, and it could GREATLY benefit from an updated version of this map, showing the allotments given to the Twelve Tribes. Again, I have no connection to the articles, but I did think to myself "These articles need a map!" and then I thought of your name. No rush on these, but just thought I'd see if it was in your interest to take them on. Toodles! --Jayron32.talk.contribs03:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This one I recommend checking with User:MapMaster - he did a bunch of nice historical maps dealing with the mideast so might have a good basemap of Israel ready to go. If you don't get a response there I could do it but will do the other request below first as they're easier ones. 16:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, that should be an easy addition. 16:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
On closer inspection there are other mistakes on that map as well, I'm going to do the ones below first and then do a complete re-do on the Amur map. Kmusser (talk) 21:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! However, LAS, which is a direct flight of PR (MNL-YVR-LAS-YVR-MNL), is labeled as a non-stop flight. Can you please correct this? Also can you please remove CYZ from the MNL map as Philippine Airlines recently announced that they'll cancel their MNL-CYZ-MNL flight this January 27 per [1]. Your help is once again very much appreciated! Thanks! pikdig (talk) 09:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Remove marking on Amur River- I was wrong. 2. Add Kyatkha if you can.
I accepted your river names and expanded them where I could. You obviously have better maps than I do. As for Tavda river, Forsyth implies a portage between the Tura and the Sosva branch of the Tavda at Vekhoturye, but I could not find anything definite. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin Trovato (talk • contribs) 23:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you interested in fixing the map again? I found a proper source for the northeast. The route ran from the mouth of the Lena by sea to the mouth of the Kolyma, then up the Bolshoy Anyuy and then down the Anadyr to the Pacific. In the portage area I think it was the Yablon (spell?) river which goes southeast to join the Anadyr at the point where it turns from southwest to south. The other side was one of the north-flowing rivers that join the B. Anyuy about halfway across its east-west part.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 03:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Found the relevant rivers. So this would be a new route in addition to the ones already shown? Also were there any significant towns along the way (there certainly aren't any around there now)? Kmusser (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I had almost forgotten too. Changes (I think): 1) Better remove Yablon River. This is probably correct, but the documents are not solid and I would not want to commit to it without better info. 2) Probably a blue line along the Arctic coast from the Lena to Kolyma mouths, since this was the main route. 3) If possible, stick in the Stanovoy Range, roughly from the northwest corner of the Amurrivermap Amur basin above the Amur loop east almost to the notch in the Sea of Okhotsk. This was an important landmark in the Russian-Manchu border conflicts and the Amur Annexation which I will finish in a week or so. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 04:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC) - Thanks Benjamin Trovato (talk) 03:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
French colonial empire
Are you saying that you have found maps in which these exact areas were shaded? If not, it constitutes original research on the person who decided to shade those particular areas. That is certainly not an "enclave", what is shaded in China. BTW can you please provide the exact links? The Red Hat of Pat Ferrickt01:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Original images are allowed as long as they aren't introducing a new idea (WP:OI), in this case it's a visual aid for something that is described in text. I found text descriptions of the shaded areas that confirmed the original mappers choices. In China the areas being shaded are the 4 provinces listed in the Exclaves article (which is clearly listing stuff other than just "exclaves"), both it and the map describe the shaded area as a "zone of influence", neither is claiming that it is anything more. Sources: Cambridge history link, another source, another, I do notice that these don't exactly agree on which provinces were included - they all include Yunnan and Kwangsi but Kwantung, Kweichow, and Hainan are sometimes included and sometimes not - given more time I could go through the relevant treaty texts and see which is correct.
I realise that original images are allowed, but they are introducing a new idea if they say that a certain part of the world was a colony or a sphere of influence and no reliable source can be found to verify that that exact area was that way (if you see what I mean). I don't dispute that European countries had zones of influence in China, but none of your references are maps and therefore it is impossible to say whether these areas are correctly shaded (that is why I removed it). (Also I am not sure that the two websites you provided are reliable sources). I would propose following the same convention as British Empire, where only "true" colonies are shown, and can be cross-checked against existing maps in reliable sources. What do you say? The Red Hat of Pat Ferrickt02:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're setting up an unreasonable standard - considering the state of cartography in the 19th century and earlier historical maps are often less reliable than a good textual description, I'd contend that it's impossible to define an area "exactly" using historical maps at all but if you have a description of where the boundaries are supposed to be they can often be easily drawn on a modern map. In this case determining whether the correct area is shaded isn't all that tricky, China's concessions were done by province and there are plenty of maps out there that show the provinces of China, I agree that more research is needed to make sure we have the right list of provinces, but that's just a matter of taking the time to do it. Whether you show zones of influence at all is really a different question which I don't have a strong opinion about. I'd be reluctant to change this one since it's so widely used on non-English wikis, but I'd support having two different versions of the map out there, one with ZOI and one without, though if you take out China and Siam you should take out the area in India as well - and then article editors can debate which to use. For that matter I'd support you doing a new labeled map like you've done for some of the other empires as well . Kmusser (talk) 15:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there - I don't mean one has to use historical maps. There are plenty of modern day books on empires and we should show what modern day historians show in their maps. If you are willing to support a labelled map, then great - I'll set about making one. FYI - if you are in favour of this style of map for the empire articles, your input on this matter at Talk:Portuguese Empire would be useful. I have been having trouble with User:EuroHistoryTeacher removing File:The Portuguese Empire.png. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrickt16:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we had some debate about this when I took British Empire to a FA review. Personally I'm not a fan of those animated GIF maps. They are either too fast and distracting, or too slow and boring to watch. I also think they look very amateurish. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrickt16:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've been thinking for a while that it might be interesting to have an article comparing the Major Airlines Hubs of the World where they offer direct flights. It would be great to have some maps to go with them. I was thinking New York (With EWR, JFK & LGA), and London (LHR, LGW, STN, LTN & LCY) to start with. If this is something that sounds at all interesting, let me know, and I'll put together destinations lists. My Talk page is the best way to get in touch with me. Braditude (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit was successful ! I improved it. But the GL use embeded template, so you need to purged the cache to see your edits. Yug(talk)04:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your archivage ! I some times feel we are just 2 on this map project~ I'm happy to know that we will soon open the Map lab, and make the place more fun and lively :] Yug(talk)19:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, an interesting news... the idea of a new convention seems borning on fr-map lab, directly derivated from wiki-de location maps conventions, and aiming to ease statistical display, possibly generated by script. It's an SVG maps, as Location maps, but each province/state have its own specific path-polygone, easy to colorate, and the SVG code clearly identify/name this path (ex: id="Florida"). A bot may then create a full set of harmonious US-State locator maps ;). Interesting ! Yug(talk)12:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Kmusser. The linked article on the Boundary Waters Canoe Area has a map which is in .gif format and not up to the standard of your work. Would you be willing to replace it? I think showing Superior National Forest (in which the BWCA is located) as well as Voyageurs National Park (which is continguous with the forest) is a good idea. I'm not so sure about the highways. (There is a map in the Voyageurs article but the scale is such as to make it illegible.) Thanks. Kablammo (talk) 01:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
With a little effort I found the source of the map.[2] More detail of the forest at the linked page. As you can see the Interstate shields are garish and the contrast between the forest and the BWCA itself is poor. Kablammo (talk) 01:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice work. My only question is whether the arrow from the BWCA legend to the BWCA itself should split to go to the discrete BWCA section west of Ely also. Thanks for your efforts; this map is much better than the old one. Kablammo (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Looking again, it is clear enough, as the colors of the legend and park are the same. Kablammo (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Destinations from ORD
Hey. I noticed that ORD needs the following destinations to be removed:
bda, ngo, tpe, khi, isb, lhe, hyd, dgo, nas, fpo, geg, mxp, vie, oak
I mainly just checked int'l destinations so there's the possibility that more domestic destinations should be deleted as well. Oh, and off the bat, DME and LIR should be added. I don't know if there are any other destinations to be added since I didn't check. Deus Caritas Est (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please update the destination map of YUL that you made?
New Destinations
Houston (IAH)
Fort Myers (RSW)
Image copyright problem with File:US Election04-08shift.svg
Thanks for uploading File:US Election04-08shift.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
The Smithsonian American Art Museum will be holding a Wikipedia Loves Art! meetup on Friday, February 27 from 5-7 pm in the Kogod Courtyard. This is a photography event involving Wikipedians, along with Flickr users and others, to generate content for Wikipedia. Come share your experiences, meet the other teams, and take some photos! While RSVPing isn't necessary drop Jeff Gates an email if you're planning on attending so he can get a head count: gatesj (at) si.edu. There also is a signup list here, along with detailed information. The museum is conveniently located across from the Gallery Place-Chinatown metro station.
DC 6th Meetup (March 7)
The DC 6th meetup will take place on March 7th at Pizzeria Uno's at Union Station, one level up from the main floor. The meetup will start at 5pm, and people usually stick around there for several hours. You can RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 6.
I am looking for a cartographer interested in making maps for a series of short Wikipedia articles I am writing. Could you be interested? I want every artificial whitewater on the global competition circuit to have its own Wikipedia article. I have written several, the only complete ones are Dickerson Whitewater Course and Ocoee Whitewater Center. I have started Water Sports Centre Čunovo, Tacen Whitewater Course, and Parc Olímpic del Segre. Dickerson is the only course I have seen in person (and paddled). I drew that map from my own measurements. I am trying to get permission to upload satellite photos of several other courses, but in many cases the satellite photos are not satisfactory. They could be used to draw course maps, however. I will attend the above meeting. Will you be there? Thank you. HowardMorland (talk) 05:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done as you requested, I tested it just now and it will run after the image workshop archive job from now on. Note that a link to the new archive at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop/Archive/Apr 2009 still needs to be placed somewhere on the main map workshop page. If you decide to change your mind about the selected lengths of time or anything else let me know.--Dycedargж04:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Kmusser, the bot closes the map requests too fast. Map creation is far slower than image creation (WP:GL/I), I guess the time should be 3 to 4 time longer on the map workshop. The French Map lab work without time limit. But, some request stay there months, and are eventually not satisfied. Anyway, the current English Map workshop archive system is far too fast, a slower archiving is need. Can you chance this ? Yug(talk)15:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, User:Dycedarg set up the archiving bot at my request and said the settings could be whatever we want them to be. What do you think would be good? Monthly instead of weekly? Kmusser (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How about this: pages will be marked stale after 30 days, and stale sections will be archived after 30 days, bringing the total time to 60 days as opposed to 21. And how about resolved sections, are those archiving too fast as well or is 3 days fine?--Dycedargж17:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I've implemented 30 and 30 for the stale and stale archive times, you can let me know if you want the resolved archive time changed.--Dycedargж01:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to follow up on your suggestion to create clickable maps, (per your suggestion in the Map Lab forum) but not sure where to start. I downloaded GIMP, and I've started through the documentation, but I gather GIMP is pixel oriented, event though it can handle SVG. Would I be better off in Inkscape? Can Inkscape take the output of a Template, or do I have to start over specifying the coordinates?Sphilbrick (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you need to make any changes to the map as it's all done through coding on the template. Take a look at the stuff in Category:Dynamic map templates and see if you can copy the code syntax of one that you like. You will need GIMP or Inkscape for looking up the coordinates of where you want your dots, either should be fine for that. Kmusser (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind making a map of the Aliso Creek watershed (in California) as this article is going through a peer review and it had been recommended that you make a map? Thanks, themaeetalk23:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The 7th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, June 6th, starting at 5 p.m. The event will be at Bertucci's, near George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom metro station. It will follow the Apps for Democracy open source event at GWU. For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 7. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.)
Delivered by TheHelpfulBot at 19:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC) to report errors, please leave a note here. [reply]
Cano Caciquiare
Kmusser:
Loved your map on the Caciquiare river! Im an architect interested in design and Territorial Ordering Plans. Im beginning a TOP for the protection of the Amazon Jungle.
My question is: Is there a possible connection between the Parana and Amazon basins that would allow an inland South American travel from Buenos Aires to Delta Amacuro ( the mouths of the Orinoco)?
A jesuit priest supposedly travelled in the 1500s by river from Paraguay to the mouth of the Orinoco.
My blog is: www.metrobm.blogspot.com
Greetings
Metrobm (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea, just from looking at a map, I don't think they are linked hydrologically, but looks like there are several places where a portage from one basin to the other wouldn't have been hard. Though crossing from the Parana's headwaters would lead to the Araguaia or Tocantins which would lead to the Amazon delta rather than the Orinoco. If you took the Parana to the Paraguay river to the Pantanal region - it's headwaters are very close to both the Tapajos (via Juruena or Teles Peres) and the Madeira (via the Guapore), the Madeira-Guapore would probably by easier to navigate in terms of the number of waterfalls you'd need to get past. Kmusser (talk) 02:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've only recently learned a bit about you and your maps which are excellent -- as all the awards I saw moments ago attest to. Still, I personally want to say, "THANK YOU" for your contributions. I greatly enjoy cartography, among many other things, and I appreciate the high quality of your contributions to me, orthers that come to a wiki area, and the world that you help better -- certainly my world!
I'm not very good with the SVG maps, I'd try contacting NordNordWest on the German wiki who is the one that's been making those. I can do a list for Burma, I probably won't have the detail I'm getting with Brazil, I lucked out with Brazil's DoT maps being online, but I should be able to at least list the major ones. Kmusser (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Burma I'll get to as soon as I finish Brazil, I'm going on vacation in a couple of days so it probably won't be till the end of the month. Bangladesh I don't think I could do much better than what's already there, the entire country is a delta so the rivers don't have an orderly tributary structure to trace, most of them are distributaries and side channels and flow to and from multiple rivers. Kmusser (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, eventually, my day job has been keeping me too busy to do much mapping lately, but when I get a chance I'll make one. Kmusser (talk) 20:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tributaries of the South Fork were too small to show up in my data, but I did make a new and improved Eel River map. Kmusser (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Volunteer opportunity in Bethesda, Thursday, July 16
The Wikimedia Foundation will be conducting an all-day Academy at the National Institutes of Health, in Bethesda, Maryland, on Thursday, July 16. The team that will be teaching at the Academy, a mix of paid staff and volunteers, is looking for four more volunteers to be teaching assistants, providing one-to-one assistance in workshops whenever a workshop participant has a problem following the instructional directions. (We currently have two editors signed up as teaching assistants, and are looking for a total of six.)
The NIH editing workshops are only for two hours, but volunteers are asked to meet the Wikimedia Foundation team at the hotel in Bethesda at about 7:15 a.m. (time to be finalized shortly) and to stay for the entire day, which ends at 4:30 p.m. Lunch will be provided. (The full schedule can be found here.)
The team is not necessarily looking for expert editors (though they are welcome), just people who can help novices who might get stuck when trying to do some basic things. If you've been an editor for at least 3 months, and have done at least 500 edits, you probably qualify.
If you're interested, please send John Broughton an email. If you might be interested, but would like further information, please post a note on his user talk page, so that he can respond there, and others can see what was asked.
Hey there. Just wanted to say thanks for the suggestion to run the image through Inkscape. It worked like a charm, and I managed to get this shiny new map of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline uploaded.
Great job on your map showing the overlapping definitions of Los Angeles, placed on the Greater Los Angeles Area page. My coworkers and I, who are mappers ourselves, were just recently discussing the need for such a map, but we hadn't yet gotten beyond a rough sketch. It looks great! Thanks! EmergentProperty (talk) 02:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly done, I still need to do some clean up in dealing with disambiguation links, a few more might pop up as I seperate cases where I accidently used the same link for different rivers. I'm on vacation though so won't completely finish until I get back next week. You're welcome to make similar lists, I had a request further up on this page for Burma which I haven't started on yet. It would also be useful to expand the tons of Brazilian river stubs we now have that barely have any info. Kmusser (talk) 16:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm from the Portuguese-language Wikipedia and I would like to know if you can provide me with the files for me to translate the Mahajanapadas map (File:Ancient_india.png) to Portuguese.
It is currently being used in the Portuguese-language article about Mahajanapadas (pt:Mahajanapadas).
My pleasure, I only just found out about the place... I just hope my amateurishness doesn't show too much in the pictures I'm making. TastyCakes (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the catch, will have it fixed shortly. 11:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
St. Johns River map
Caption goes hereCaption goes here
Hi, Kmusser. We interacted on the talk page of St. Johns River about the issue of sources stating the north-flowing is rare in North America which you and Maxim refuted. I still have some reservations, in that I think it should be clarified...or something...but I don't have the sources that do that unfortunately.
It's not on that issue I'm contacting you, however. Over a disagreement about permissions for an image of the river and the basins that are managed by the St. Johns River Water Management District, a map was removed from the article. Since a significant portion of the article addresses the basins of the river, I feel pretty strongly that the article should contain an image that reflects the boundaries of these basins. The image that was in the article and the best source is here, on page 4. Are you able to construct a map similar to that that could be used in the article?
Jobs are stupid. Ok. Anyways, it's at GA right now, which may take a month or so. I'd like to send it on to FAC following that. So...whenever. I appreciate it. --Moni3 (talk) 19:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think it's pimpin and awesome. It would look this size in the article, however, and it's hard to read at this size. Any suggestions? I defer to others' knowledge of digital art. --Moni3 (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, uploaded a PNG version as well to see if that would help, but it doesn't much. I think I may just have too many labels on there, if I removed some I could enlarge what's left. Do away with the counties names maybe? I'll experiment some more next week. Kmusser (talk) 01:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I went through and messed with the colors a bit and increased the font sizes. The SVG still doesn't look very good, but I think the PNG version could go into the article, especially if you push the thumbnail size a little, I think it's pretty nice at 300 px (we used 300 on the now featured Columbia River article). Kmusser (talk) 17:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That looks much better! May I make a final request, that perhaps the numbers indicating the St. Johns River Water Management District watersheds be made a bit more prominent, either by making them a stronger color (red, green) or larger and bolder? Thanks! (Oh, and Levi is Levy County...) --Moni3 (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It should warm your heart to know that the 3 million people who live in these basins don't really pay attention to the river. Until it's gone, or so mucked up that it's unusable... --Moni3 (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, the Manifold and Shape files are both software specific file formats, I can open the Shape files. Taking a look at the contents they are the region boundaries - if you look at the Physiographic Map PDF those are the red and blue boundary lines marked on there and named in the legend (but not any of the background into or the red dots). Does look like a ton of other info on that site, so good to have. Kmusser (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, maybe not so useful after all, seems to be missing projection information, so while I can open it I can't overlay it with other data. Kmusser (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Holy crap man, that's outstanding. How do you do that? And can you give me a link to the NHD (specifically that data or map you based this on)? upstateNYer06:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will fix that on Monday - source for the NHD is http://nhd.usgs.gov/, I have GIS, so was viewing the data directly, in theory you can see the same data using their online viewer (listed under data - if you get it to work, I'm mapping the high resolution NHD flowline data), but my computer has trouble with it. Beginning and ending points of streams can also be confirmed via GNIS at http://geonames.usgs.gov/domestic/ which I use as a check. Kmusser (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I could only find so much information from those sites. In your search, did you find any info on the size of the drainage basin and the length of the creek? My current sources are not fully correct. upstateNYer19:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing on the drainage basin, the boundary I drew on the map is a rough approximation. I could calculate a length using GIS, but that might count as OR. Would be useful as a check to see if other sources are in the right ballpark though. Kmusser (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, the NHD actually includes a length column, so these numbers can be sourced directly to NHD, I didn't have to calculate anything: Poesten Kill = 44.4 km; Quacken Kill = 25.6 km; Bonesteel Creek = 8.7 km; Sweet Milk Creek = 7.6 km; Newfoundland Creek = 5.8 km and that's all the streams in the watershed that had a name according to NHD. There is an unnamed tributary upstream from Bonesteel and also on the right that comes in at a respectable 8.8 km, might be worth adding if you find a name for it in another source (clearly visible but unnamed on the topo map as well). Kmusser (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, I asked the USGS folk for the appropriate citation for NHD and they answered with:
U.S. Geological Survey, 2009, National Hydrography Dataset:
U.S. Geological Survey dataset available at http://nhd.usgs.gov
OR
United States Geological Survey, National Hydrography Dataset:
Available from http://nhd.usgs.gov/data.html
Planning Discussions Now Finished Regarding DC Meetup #9
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
Planning — for the most part, anyway — is now finished (see here) for DC Meetup #9.
But (there's always a but) the Penn Line one is a bit screwey, as there's a long, unmarked line the entire length of the template representing the Split of the Brunswick and Camden lines, when there should only be a short stub. And, as an appearance thing, WUS should probably be centered under the Penn Line, um, line instead if the divergant routes.
Yeah, I haven't worked with those kind of templates very much and ran out of time - I'm headed out of town for a few days, will tinker with it some more when I get back. Kmusser (talk) 03:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Karl, I have noticed an inconsistency in the name of the Selenge river tributary: Egiin River is shown on the Selengerivermap.png as Eg. In the English-language literature it is called Ongin, which makes identification even more confusing, but the Egiin is apparently a modern native spelling. I do not mind correcting it if you give me the original png with object legends. I would also slightly tint the territories of Mongolia and Russia for better perception. And I would love to take advantage of your offer to use your maps as basemap. Regards, Barefact (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Egiin and Ongin are not the same river. The Geonet names server http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/index.html places the Ongin in central Mongolia, to the south of the Selenge river basin, which it is not a part of. Geonet labels the Egiin as 'Egiyn Gol' which would probably be more correct, but I try to match my labels to the wikipedia article names if possible. Kmusser (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if you'd be able to produce a map similar to File:Poestenkillmap.png to replace File:Brunswick, New York Map.svg. I'd like to see any major water features, hamlets/settlements, and roadways (specifically, New York State Routes 2, 7, 40, 142, 278, and 351 - all the NY Routes in the town) visible and identified if at all possible. Since File:RensselaerCounty Brunswick.svg is already in the article, I don't believe you'll need an inset to show the relative location, unless you feel otherwise. Think that's possible? I'll take the best you can offer either way. Use your judgement. :) ❄ upstateNYer ❄ 06:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the most detailed data I have is the township boundary - I could potentially add the Poesten Kill, but my roads info isn't as detailed as what's already on there, so I'm not sure that would be an improvement. Kmusser (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No need for SVG. Any chance you can get the Quacken Kill in there also (this being a local map, and all), along with labels on the Poesten Kill and Quacken Kill? Otherwise, it looks great, and I thank you very much for taking the time! ❄ upstateNYer ❄ 01:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Kmusser. Problem with helping people is that people will always ask for help...
I wrote several articles for the Everglades, including the main one.
I don't know how well you know the geography of the Everglades, but the map at the top of the article is lacking. My admittedly poor graphic skills cannot fix this. To do the region justice, the following items should be shown:
I can do that, I was even thinking of doing one back when I was doing the Florida rivers but never got around to it, and I think I already have most of the data I'd need. I'll do a new one rather than modify the existing one, I think it's kind of nice to have the satellite image uncluttered by a bunch of labels, but the article does need a more general map to actually locate stuff - will zoom in a bit more than the existing one. Kmusser (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
