User talk:Kitsap2010

Big Scandia River moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Big Scandia River. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Can not find any evidence this even exists. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is Kitsap2010. I live right next to the river, in Scandia, Washington-and it's real name is actually Big Scandia Creek. The reason why I called this a **river** is because it influences our culture greatly, and is a major influence to Scandia, Washington's past. I just feel like the word **creek** makes her seem insignificant and useless, because it is one of the big and raging rivers on the peninsula. Just to inform 'ya. Thanks for notifying me,
Kitsap2010 Kitsap2010 (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and some pointers

Hi @Kitsap2010. I see you are relatively new to the project and focused on geographical features and municipalities in Kitsap County. (I have family connections to North Kitsap and have spent a great deal of time there, so I am very familiar with these places, by the way.) I appreciate the desire to flesh out the encyclopedic coverage of the county. However, please be sure to add reliable sources for the specific claims you make. Otherwise the statements are liable to being removed. For example:

Also, please be sure not to engage in WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Above, for instance, you say that you used the name Big Scandia River instead of "Big Scandia Creek", even though the source supports "Creek". Wikipedia can't be a repository for our own ideas; everything needs to be based on reliable sources. If you have a question, feel free to ask at WP:TEAHOUSE, where volunteers are there to help you understand Wikipedia's policies.

Finally, please do not do this, ever. Wikipedia is not for WP:MADEUP content and that kind of thing will be swiftly deleted. (If you persist in doing things like that, you'll be blocked from editing, so please just focus on what's real and verifiable.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I'm also from North Kitsap myself. Thank you for letting me know. Kitsap2010 (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Republic of Scandia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Stop icon

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Republic-of-scandia-flag.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: unblock|reason=Your reason here .  — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Republic of Scandia, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pearson, Washington moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pearson, Washington. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:59, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kitsap2010 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because I did absoulutely nothing wrong. I was copying text from the Molossia page (to make a new page for MY micronation) which is named the Republic of Scandia. I stated multiple times that I am the prime minister of the Republic of Scandia, and that the page was created by the official government of the micronation itself-me. Do you really think only a week after our declaration of independence there's going to be oh so-"reliable" sources that I can use? No. Do I want to share my name? No. I want to keep things private incase something actually happens, because of online shenanigans that people are usually up to, they could hack my account or ruin my life by impersonating me with my own name. Please understand this, and I am sorry in advance. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not abuse your TPA again

Anymore edits like [[1]] and I will ask a admin to revoke your TPA.DACartman (talk) 07:59, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i hope you know that this is my page :) Kitsap2010 (talk) 22:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One thing you cannot remove (that you did remove) is a declined unblock while you are still blocked. see WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK. It can now be deleted, since you are no longer blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oh yeah but you can't remove declined unblock requests while blocked :) DACartman (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified claims

Please do not add unverified claims to Wikipedia articles as you did here. Every claim should have a reliable source. The WP:TEAHOUSE is a great place to go if you are new. I am trying to WP:ASSUMEGOODFAITH, even after your hoax creations and block, in your intentions here since you are a new user. If you want to expand coverage of these small communities and geographic features in Kitsap County, you'll need to bring reliable sources to support the claims. Merry Christmas. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"unverified" oh really? i live in scandia myself, do i really have to prove it to you when you can cleary see the existence of the creek on google earth and fishermap? you can see farms from sattelite view, and i dont have to prove or give evidence to it, at least for the farms that are obviously scattered across scandia. your just too focused on poulsbo, also merry christmas :) Kitsap2010
Please read WP:V: In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people are able to check that information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. You live in Scandia, I’ve been to Scandia (proof), but neither of our personal experiences can be used as the basis for statements of fact on Wikipedia. Reliable sources are needed. Then read WP:GOOGLEMAPS. Online maps can be used to source basic information, like coordinates or street names, but the way you’re using them requires individual interpretation of map data and so isn’t useful for verification purposes. Do you want to make a difference here? Then start reading and asking questions. Editors here are generally happy to help new editors learn. But comments like this, calling another editor “pathetic” and making an unfounded statement that an editor is improperly focused on a particular locale (what in my edits makes you think I’m overly focused on Poulsbo?) are going to wear out good will. You’ve already been blocked once. Making additional insults will result in an indefinite block. Good luck. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
alright, is there any sources where i can find reliable info about scandia? tell me if you find one. thanks Kitsap2010 (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's your responsibility. See Wikipedia:PROVEIT. You can search the web and your local library for sources, read them, and then use them for references to edits you make. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i already have multiple times in the past month. i've found nothing but retailor sites and just a bunch of information about a pathetic city in minnesota who stole scandia's name. Kitsap2010 (talk) 20:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]