|
User talk:Kitchen Knife/Archive 2
It is my belief the Mhytle is one of the most dangerous types of user on WikiPedia. Someone with an agenda who denies it. There are various types of POV warrior and he is amongst the worst. He is a persistent vandal Wikipedia would do well to remove him completely.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
I believe he has answered that question at Talk:Flag Institute. I see that the two of you disagree on this matter, and that's all well and good - get more people in with an WP:RFC and discuss it at that page. That does not make him a POV warrior nor editing with an agenda, just that he and you hold different opinions. WormTT · (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Removed talk page access.I have removed your talk page access because you are abusing it to make accusations against others instead of addressing the reason for your block and requesting unblock. If you wish to appeal the block, you can send an email to unblock-en-l RE: E-mailPlease refrain from making false accusations because that doesn't help you achieve anything. --Bmusician 00:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:DutchSceenShot.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:DutchSceenShot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Isochronous's interwikisSorry, you're wrong. Isochronous, cs:Isochronie and de:Isochronie are desambiguation pages, but es:Isocrona, eo:Izokroneco, it:Isocronismo and ru:Изохронность колебаний are not. I removed the incorrect interwikis. Regards, --Metrónomo (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC) May be of interest! Martinevans123 (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Waterspaces?See here. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aintree Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC) You have been reported to WP:AN/I for disruptive behavior. Please desist from further editing of the conflicted articles until this is resolved by a non-interested third party, thank you.Camelbinky (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Higher National DiplomaHi, Thanks for correcting my oversight on the typo correction, appreciate it. :) Audit Guy (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Altering talk page discussionsHi, four times now (23:25, 25 June 2014, 12:03, 27 June 2014, 23:26, 27 June 2014, 23:54, 27 June 2014) you have altered discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains in such a way as to break the layout of subsequent threads. In the first and third, you altered
Kichen Knife, what's with those last two edits to the same project talk page, where you first delete someone's post at the end of a thread and then multiple subsequent threads, and then insert a string of gibberish? What's going on? Yngvadottir (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Gambier TerraceThank you for reversing Editiationist's alteration. Editationist is a pest, systematically reversing other my edits as well (see "Canning, Liverpool"). In the case of Canning, his aim seems to be to make the area seem as grandiose and expensive as possible, so perhaps he is an estate agent. In some cases his aim is unfathomable - why delete a warning that a referenced website is no longer maintained, for example? I don't know much about how Wiki works, can anything be done about such vexatious editors? Tdls (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Free-turbine turboshaftFix it then. Don't just write an un-necessary article which would be better covered in Turboshaft. Wikipedia may be a free to edit encyclopedia, but it still demands common sense.--Petebutt (talk) 09:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 21Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time Crashers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keith Allen and Chris Ramsey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Hi, Time CrashersJust dropping this note as a courtesy FYI: I have added some STUB tags and some talkpage comments on the article that you created for Time Crashers. I think this sounds like an interesting show, reminiscent of The 1900 House, and I wish there was a way to watch it outside the UK. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 17:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC) Novelist spellingThanks for the correction but I don't understand your edit summary of "No it isn't. There was a hourse were it was spelt with a double l, but tat is it." Hourse?? Thanks, Dismas|(talk) 22:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC) Category:Parks and commons in Sefton has been nominated for discussion Category:Parks and commons in Sefton, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 22 July
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 23Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Francis Mott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redhill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 30Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Merseyrail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 12 September
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Kitchen Knife. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Including traditional/historic counties as a point of reference.Hello Kitchen Knife, Please advise why my edits were reverted? They were most certainly not vandalism! There is nothing wrong whatsoever in stating that a place is in one or straddles two or more traditional counties. The fact that they are not (and in some places never) used for administrative purposes but remain as geographical points of reference especially as Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP announced traditional counties can be used and should be promoted. The edits I made only added this info and it still clearly stated new metropolitan areas were now used for local government, which is totally separate from the traditional and historic counties. Can you please reinstate my edits? Andrew Donaldson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DonaldsonAC (talk • contribs) 21:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC) Propaganda? Vandalism? Stating facts actually, I wrote it last night in work, no idea what you are referring to, you might be happy to see misinformation perpetuated while the heritage of the country is meddled with. Eric Pickles spoke about this last year so how come you lot so vehemently opposed to any mention of the traditional counties? You are nothing but little Nazis who think you are the be all and end all, well you will see. You are a snotty cunt who can't handle facts. It's well known how Wikipedia is hardly gospel fact, and now I see why, when the WikiStasi stifle actual facts being added. I will desist you, cretin! LØL March 2017
 Your recent editing history at Zircon (missile) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)  The article Netkous-viaduct has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Kitchen Knife. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Gstnlnk A tag has been placed on Template:Gstnlnk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>). If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Useddenim (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC) The article Scally (slang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Kitchen Knife. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Please see my proposal to speedily rename a category
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Common Gateway Interface revertHi Kitchen Knife, Re your revert of my revert of your edit
E.g., one that conforms to the Linux Foundation's Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, which states that "There must be no subdirectories in /usr/bin." Referring to
There are various reasons that might happen. What error message do you get?
That's odd. When I try, I get
Norwich revertsHello I noticed you just reverted a couple of edits I made on Norwich. I made a much needed edit in the form of the so called largest city after London section mainly rest I'm not so bothered about. You are contradicting the established fact that Birmingham is the second largest city in England after london followed by Manchester and Leeds. Norwich isnt the second largest city. It's not established other than through a book when Birmingham is recognized as the second largest city by the UK Government. So I'm reverting your edit on that part. RailwayJG (talk) 22:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:PerseyMig-logo.jpg Thanks for uploading File:PerseyMig-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Category:European Computers has been nominated for renamingCategory:European Computers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Category:German computers has been nominated for splittingCategory:German computers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC) |
