User talk:Kiril Simeonovski/Archive 4

Your GA nomination of 42nd Chess Olympiad

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 42nd Chess Olympiad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will be available to work upon your comments in the reviewing process. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 42nd Chess Olympiad

The article 42nd Chess Olympiad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:42nd Chess Olympiad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Intervention in the SDSM article

Hi. The user: Mastersource is adding misleading information to the page of Social Democratic Union of Macedonia which is obvious right-wing propaganda. Could you please help me fix it as they wouldn't step down? Thank you. Macedonicus (talk) 10:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Macedonicus: Thanks for contacting me. I have paid careful attention on the whole incident and it seems that you should have contacted me before entering into verbal or edit war with the user. Disruptive editing across articles on topics in Macedonian politics is nothing new, as some users have been deliberately coming to illustrate their point on the English Wikipedia since the outbreak of the political crisis. Similar incidents have occurred, at least, in the articles on VMRO-DPMNE, Kumanovo clashes, 2015 Macedonian protests and 2016 Macedonian protests, which prompted reactions by the users working on improving their quality. We have always tried to resolve such incidents in a kind manner on the discussion pages of the articles in question but sometimes it was not possible to get over with the disruptive editing and the help was requested from administrators (please see WP:AN).
For now, I have reverted the information added by the user and explained my opinion on the discussion page based on my experience in handling similar edit wars in the aforementioned articles. However, be aware that my comment is not written in stone and may be overturned by other users so that the content be re-added. It is also impossible to censor the user from adding the information at any price if decently high quality of citation is attained. Once there is an established reason for removing the content on the discussion page, its re-adding without proper improvement can be safely removed from the article.
My friendly advice is to always remain calm and kind with the other users, refrain from using overly abrasive words, and ask for help from more experienced editors if needed. Take in mind that users from other countries, who cannot recognise the sensitivity of the topic as we do in our country, may notice your reaction and overtake sanctions against your behaviour before even getting introduced with the substance of the problem (note that the movement pays considerable attention to harassment as a focal problem within the community). The sockpuppet investigation you filed is also not the right way to handle this problem. You can reach me at kiril.simeonovski@gmail.com if you need further help. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Wishing you a very happy holiday season and a fulfilling 2017. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I wish you happy holidays too. Best.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Speaks Your Language

Hello Kiril, thanks for your notice about WikiSYL; I shall ascertain whether I can be of assistance. --DivineMeaninglessness (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kiril Simeonovski. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos opening ceremony of 42nd Chess Olympiad

Hi Kiril. You can add all of this (http://en.president.az/articles/20926/images) photos to commons if you want. For example license - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ilham_Aliyev_met_with_Azerbaijani_athletes_competing_in_Baku_Chess_Olympiad.jpg .--Nicat49 (talk) 21:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicat49: Thank you very much. It's great to know that we have such a collection under free licence. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 43rd Chess Olympiad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

43rd Chess Olympiad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael Adams
Open event at the 43rd Chess Olympiad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael Adams

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kiril Simeonovski. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 43rd Chess Olympiad

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 43rd Chess Olympiad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 01:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 43rd Chess Olympiad

The article 43rd Chess Olympiad you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:43rd Chess Olympiad for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matt294069 -- Matt294069 (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 43rd Chess Olympiad

The article 43rd Chess Olympiad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:43rd Chess Olympiad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matt294069 -- Matt294069 (talk) 10:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Epstein moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Larry Epstein, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For fixing bias in ITN. Your !votes meant a lot. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 02:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the barnstar. I try to do my best. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly editor notification and question

Hello Kiril Simeonovski. I hope you don't mind, but on an unofficial Wikipedia twitter, (@WikiCurrentNews) [1], which is used to updated people about new news on the Portal:Current events, I used your username + edit summary as the "consensus" to remove the information about the Alba Party nomination to ITN. You can see the (tweet here). If you don't want to have your name on the tweet, please just let me know and I will be happy to remove it. Have a good day! Elijahandskip (talk) 03:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. It's fine. I have nothing against seeing my name on the tweet. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carlsen versus Nepomniachtchi, World Chess Championship 2021, Game 6 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlsen versus Nepomniachtchi, World Chess Championship 2021, Game 6 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlsen versus Nepomniachtchi, World Chess Championship 2021, Game 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MaxBrowne2 (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

Hello,

Just letting your know I've called in a Wikipedia:Third opinion on our dispute. Hopefully, this will resolve this. Thanks for your maturity in this dispute thus far. --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2022 Winter Olympics

On 22 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Winter Olympics, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Молба

Здраво Кирил, Те молам види ако некој може или има време да му се направи статијата на акад. Коцарев на оваа Вики.(Веке има еден драфт кои е одбиен[2]) позз,178.148.119.189 (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здраво, забележувам дека верзијата е прифатена и статијата е средена.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Благодарам! 178.148.119.189 (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gorbachev, Carter and Tereshkova

Three "living legends", no doubt. They have been and should be honoured. Carter, in particular, for cleaning up the Chalk River mess. But that's as true today, five years ago or next week as it will be when they die aged something. This idea that the appropriate time to remind others these people did notable things is right after they die seems silly, and even sillier when the blurb omits all the things in favour of simply adding a nationality, age and job description, like every RD's opening line does. Why not on their birthdays, or when they fall ill, or any other time they make news for something RD noms aren't expressly designed to cover?

To me (and many others), the death itself should be evaluated at death. Are there ramifications beside remembrance? A cause more unusual than the usual? Even official days of mourning or a state funeral are something. Without these details, Gorbachev, Carter and Tereshkova have nothing even a bot couldn't autoblurb about literally everyone here.

In the future, if you or anyone wants more support for a death blurb, include something even remotely unique and interesting, please. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@InedibleHulk: Thanks for reaching out regarding this. I'll have in mind it when nominating future death blurbs. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, poor Gorbachev, he was 91. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Request to Move discussion

Hi Kiril Simeonovski, knowing your interest in all things Macedonian, I invite you to participate in this Request to Move: Discussion GStojanov (talk) 18:34, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]