User talk:Kingturtle/Archive5

Sources

Everything on Wikipedia is supposed to be supported with reliable sources, partially to satisfy the verifiability requirement. The stub looks totally legit, so it's not as big a deal as when a word is suspected to be a neologism, hoax, etc., but I found the article while doing some new page patrolling, saw that it had no sources, and tagged it as such. Presumably, there's an economics textbook out there that could easily be put in as a source. --Icarus (Hi!) 05:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Idema

I know you worked on this article some about a year ago. I've added lots of information to it and I thought maybe you could head over there, and check it out. It had marks for neutrality, verfiability, and cleanup. I've made improvements in these areas, but I don't want to remove these labels until fresh eyes have seen the article. Thanks, Xpanzion 06:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Lee

You created the above page as a redirect to Blacklist I cannot see why, so have tagged as a speedy deletion candidate, Davidprior 14:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Mohammad Saleheen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 18:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Evelyn Hernandez

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Evelyn Hernandez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Srice13 20:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From User talk:Srice13:

I have no idea why the Evelyn Hernandez article is not encyclopedic. Her story was in the news, covered by CNN and Court TV. It is absurd to delete the article. Please tell me where to go to make my case. Kingturtle 00:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may make your case the article's talk page. It might be worth noting that the article does not provide a link to coverage of "Hernandez" at either CNN or CourtTV. The one Court TV reference to Hernandez was really a link to Laci Peterson article that mentioned Hernandez. A quick search at courttv.com does not turn up any articles about Hernandez in the context of Hernandez.Srice13 16:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CHICOTW GAonhold

Flag of Chicago Flag of Chicago
Barbara Elaine Russell Brown is the current Chicago COTW
In the past you have edited Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago. It was the CHICOTW in the recent past. It has been placed on Good article on hold status thanks in part to your efforts. See its GA review and help us raise it towards the good article and eventually featured article classification level. The article was given good article on hold status on February 2, 2007. It will be reevaluated in between 2 and 7 days from this date. Recall that during its tenure as CHICOTW we achieved the following Improvement. See our CHICOTW Improvement History.
Contributing editors: AKeen, L Glidewell, NatusRoma, TheQuandry*, TonyTheTiger.

TonyTheTiger 23:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reading list

Hi,

Back in 2003, you posted a request for candidates for a reading list at the high school where you were teaching U.S. History. I added my candidates to the list in April 2006. Apparently, you have moved to New York since then. Are you still teaching?

In any event, I'm curious what the net result of your request was. Did you build a list of "outside reading" on U.S. history? If so, could you share it with me? My Wikipedia e-mail is enabled so you can e-mail it to me if that is more convenient for you.

Thanks.

--Richard 20:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Heroin1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Heroin1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 19:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

XHTML compliance

While I'm here, I went ahead and fixed your talk page to be XHTML compliant. You can change it back if you really want, but using valid XHTML is a good practice and will set a good example for other users. —Remember the dot (t) 19:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WCG itself violates copyrights

Hi, just to let you know. -- Goldie (tell me) 19:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Zog2.jpe

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zog2.jpe, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 20:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lynndie-chair.jpe

Thanks for uploading Image:Lynndie-chair.jpe. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hbdragon88 05:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Petard (cartoonist)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Paul Petard (cartoonist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 13:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I tried to change the link on your page for Ralph Wiggum from "[|[Wiggum Family|Ralph Wiggum]]" to just "[|[Ralph Wiggum]]," but I guess you have to do that yourself. - Bagel7 05:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of compositions by Ludwig van Beethoven

Thought you might like to know: I submitted a Featured List Nomination for this list, of which you seem to be a major author. I did some tinkering around the edges (lead, references, section headers, etc.) first. Cheers! —Turangalila talk 00:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help for a registration

Hi Kingturtle. I'm a new user, "enroled" with the new user id Mau_db. Here is my request, but I did a mistake writing my e-mail address: the correct one is @email.it, not @mail.com. How can I do to correct that? I'm a contributor of it.wiki, my User page is this. If you want I'll write an e-mail from the right address or anythng else to verify my identity. The e-mail address is not the same of italian registration, if it is necessary I can write you that, so I can resolve the matter. If you want, you can write me in my it.wiki talk or to the right e-mail address, or in my Ip talk (but I've a mobile ip). Here I left the same message to User:Samir, he suggests me to contact a bureaucrat or trying to usurp the account. What can I exactly do? Thank you for all. --79.3.210.203 18:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Change of username

Hello, I'd like to request a change of username. I believe I have to ask a bureaucrat to do that for me. I believe you are a bureaucrat. Can you help me? [Actually, I wanted to delete my account, but I've been made aware that that is not possible. So, I am am taking the only other course of action I can think of.] Many thanks. --JohnO 10:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello there, my username is The Random Editor. I usually go by Random though. I created my username planning to never change it, until recently when I wanted to change my username to Random. I was checking the list of users, and noticed unfortunatly that Random had already been taken. I though about usurptions but he had one edit so that was out of the question. I left a message on his talk page requesting that he change his username if he was not really going to edit a lot. I recieved no reply. he has made one and only one edit. Is there anyway at all I could change my username to Random? --Random Say it here! 22:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Syntax

Hi, the correct syntax for a redirect page is :-

#REDIRECT [[Name of page to redirect to]]
e.g for your recent Snozzberry page the correct syntax is #REDIRECT [[Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory]]
not :REDIRECT[[Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory]]
Exxolon 21:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Maybe a longtime ago the : was ok. I'll try to remember. Kingturtle 21:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image of Barbarossa

Rocks! Way to go man– IttyBittyGrittyindaShteCiti 07:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

Oh, you're welcome.

Are you from that area, by any chance? A couple of fellows who are from that area have suggested that the English language convention that a person from Afghanistan can be called an "Afghan" is inappropriate. They have told me that this is really only appropriate for members of the Pashtun ethnic group. They have suggested we use "Afghanistani", similar to Pakistani.

Have you heard this idea before? What do you think of it?

Cheers! Geo Swan 01:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am from New York State. I just developed an interest in Afghanistan when the U.S. invaded. In regards to the Afghan/Afghanistani question, all the media sources I've found (CNN, CBC, BBC, etc.) use Afghan and Afghani. All the dictionaries I've looked in use Afghan and Afghani. I don't see Afghanistani as a legitimate replacement. But if arguments can be made, I can be swayed. Kingturtle 18:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

error

Operation Mountain Storm has nothing to do with Afghanistan, check it. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Khan

In answer to your question, no, I could not find any sources mentioning that his confession had been coerced out of him. Found a lot of things, though, that could be used as references in the article:

Hope this helps. wjmt 04:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you so much for voicing your support in my successful RfA. I'm humbled to have the community's trust. As I master the ways of the mop and bucket, please don't hesitate to message me for any advice or corrections. Cheers! (I'll be sure to live up to your "fine candidate" statement) Spellcast 23:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Kingturtle, and thank you for the message. I have contributed to Wikipedia since 2006 (May-July), mainly in the Wikipedia "en espaňol", and today I took the time to continue to add a few more of the links between en & es. Thanks again, and please let me know if I may be of service to you. Best regards. Tortillovsky 18:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 12:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfAs due to be closed

There are a couple of RfAs that could be closed if you have a moment - Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Acroterion & Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Random832. Cheers, WjBscribe 03:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And done. :) Kingturtle (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. By the way, Wikipedia:List of administrators is now updated by a Bot every day so you don't need to add new admins to it. WjBscribe 04:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your vote

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a vote of (53/0/1).

As a token of my appreciation, please accept this bowl of tzatziki.

I feel honored to be trusted by so many of you. Wikipedia is such a large community, that my acceptance in the face of such large numbers truly is humbling. I will use my new tools to continue the tasks for which you entrusted them to me.

Gratefully, EncycloPetey (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why this is displaying weird, by the way, but notice a strange melding of another message box here. --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template syntax

You know more than I do. :-D I just add cats to templates. I occasionally write one but they tend to be copies of existing template-like text that people never made into an actual template. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 04:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan's 2004 constition was forged

See User:Kingturtle/Afghanistan

People arguing against Afghani and Afghanistani

The users arguing against these two terms, user: Hurooz, user: Dilbar Jan, and have been confirmed as sockkpuppupets of banned user user: NisarKand. He was a Pashtun (Afghan) nationalist and was banned for making disgusting racist comments against Tajiks. These sockpuppets are both banned now. Also I suspect user: Naseer n nasrat is his sockpuppet and started this controversy, I will also a checkuser on him. -- Behnam (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may have been me who "started this controversy." I don't mean any harm or any offense, but as far as I've been able to tell, Afghanistani is not the right term in the English language. I am trying to understand why the term Afghan is incorrect. Kingturtle (talk) 13:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd weigh in here. We [or at least I] are [am] not saying Afghan is incorrect. I actually use Afghan and would not use Afghani or Afghanistani. But there's a source for Afghanistani, so don't we have to include it as well? I really don't think WP is supposed to be normative; if that's false, please direct me to the policy. The version which I want to see includes all three demonyms, with sources, and Afghan listed first. Carl.bunderson (talk) 06:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MLB map — thanks

Thank you. I did do that MLB stadiums map, but it wasn't all that much! I just adapted the existing NFL stadiums map, and added Canada to accomodate the Blue Jays. But I appreciate the compliment. (I just like doing maps. If I had the time I would add maps to every page that needed them.) — Michael J 20:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should use my map base and do the NBA and NHL arenas, since they require Canada, also. — Michael J 20:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to see a map that showed every single city that ever had a major league team. Kingturtle (talk) 21:20, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean for baseball only, or all of the so-called major sports (baseball, football, basketball, hockey)? Or separate ones for each sport? I can make you one if you like — I have all that information easily available — but I'm not sure where it would belong on Wikipedia. — Michael J 17:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you can do other sports too, but I was thinking of a map that showed every city that ever had a Major League Baseball team. I am sure I can find a place to put it on History of baseball in the United States. Kingturtle (talk) 19:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if that might be good as an animated map, showing the changes over time. — Michael J 02:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
perhaps, but a regular, stagnant map would be fine too. Kingturtle (talk) 04:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Could you close Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DO11.10 if you have a sec? Hopefully if will be the last time I have to bother any crat about this sort if thing... WjBscribe 21:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kingturtle (talk) 21:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Lets assume you have an account on Meta that is not used much! If it is you you will need to link the user page there back to here for any vote to count (if not there is an impostor & feel free to let me know that). Cheers --Herby talk thyme 14:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dannys Contest

Hi Kingturtle,

I could use some support on creating a disclaimer for Dannys contest. I understand you are also offended by it. Please see the talk page. Bensaccount (talk) 18:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voluntarian

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Voluntarian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Voluntarian. Mdbrownmsw 21:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom

Just wanted to let you know that I replied to your comment on the talk page. Rebecca 04:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World Series infobox

Another thing I thought of - it would be helpful if someone could figure out how to exclude the ALCS and NLCS lines for the pre-1969 Series; I don't quite have the knack for figuring out how to insert the "if" code that would do the trick. Obviously the same the thing applies to pre-1940s TV and pre-1920s radio networks and broadcasters. MisfitToys (talk) 22:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Also we have to figure out have to get the "‡ elected as a player" comments to show up. Such programming is a bit over my head right now. Kingturtle (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Bernie Ward

My bad on the Ward page, I didn't see your edit for some reason, and it contains the same info. Bluefield (talk) 02:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no problemo. Kingturtle 02:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Prison-chair.jpe

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Prison-chair.jpe. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for some assistance...

I'm hoping you can point me in the right direction. I have been tasked with creating and administering a relatively large intranet site using MediaWiki software. As we are developing this project, it is becoming apparent that we need some ideas on how to manage and administer our wiki. We chose MediaWiki as our software with the intention of modeling our site with the very familiar Wikipedia. I can really use some assistance understanding how Wikipedia is managed to put those lessons learned into our project. Do you know of someone who might be able to talk to me as I continue the development of our intranet site? Any advice you can offer would be most appreciated. Thanks.

Elexman (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Rich – December 11, 2007Elexman (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Really, really bad haikus from a new admin

Setting new lows in thank-you spam:


So do bureaucrats get thanked along with supporting editors after an RfA? ... or just tipped?[7][8]

Well, I appreciate your adminning me and I promise not to cause too much excitement in my first week.

Enjoy your haikus, --A. B. (talk) 12:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kingturtle

For the welcome note. I've been learning the ropes and I'm getting the hang of things. Your links are helpful, and it's great to have a little support for the newcomers. I'm looking forward to seeing how the Mitchell Report page ends up looking:-) Cheers! Csbarrett (talk) 23:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

userbox broken

In your userboxes you have

This user is a feminist.

which should be

This user is a feminist.

.

I was going to change it myself but your page is protected (Vandalism? If so, sorry you have to put up with that). BTW your talkpage actually frightened me a little at first blush (too much red). Cheers. —Cronholm144 17:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User rights log summaries

Hello, would you mind putting a link to the RFA in the summary, so it's easier to find if users wish to view it? Thanks. Redrocketboy 13:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Kingturtle (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. Redrocketboy 13:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image removal

Hi, Kingturtle, thought I'd mention that in removing an image as you did in Lou Gehrig, also means the associated transcluded Template:MLBBioRet needs to go as well, otherwise the article lead is broken. I've fixed it. Cheers, JGHowes talk - 18:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Earl Wilson

Hallo, I created the Earl Wilson (disambiguation) page as part of the Wikipedia:Suggestions for name disambiguation. I see you've moved it to Earl Wilson, and renamed the baseball player article to Robert Earl Wilson. I don't think that complies with WP:Name "Adding middle names, or their abbreviations, merely for disambiguation purposes (that is: if this format of the name is not the commonly used one to refer to this person) is not advised." - this must surely also apply to adding a first name not usually used. All the external links seem to refer to the name "Earl Wilson", so that is the name he is best known by. The links in the navbox template at the bottom of his page now lead to the dab page, the infobox disagrees with the article name... in short, I disagree with your changes and plan to revert them, but thought I would run this past you first. PamD (talk) 23:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me before you made the change. Please feel free to change it back. I personally prefer finding ways to get rid of the parenthesis, but I will make note of the policy and follow it. Kingturtle (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. Have moved the dab page back to Earl Wilson (disambiguation), and requested move of the Robert Earl Wilson page to Earl Wilson using the correct procedure (I hope!). There are masses of links to E..W.., which would otherwise lead to the dab page. PamD (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

for the welcome note. It is much appreciated! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonlit Knight (talk • contribs) 16:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clash question - THE ONLY BAND THAT MATTERS

"The Only Band That Matters" is credited to Epic Records' Director of A&R, Bruce Harris, but I didn't found a reliable source (currently is at The_Clash#_note-2). There is also an archived discussion at Talk:The_Clash/Archive_1#.22The_Only_Band_that_Matters.22 archive talk page. I know it was used by Clash's American fan during their first tour in North America on 1979.

Revision history of The Clash Related to "The Only Band That Matters":

  • 06:30, 7 March 2007 by User:R._fiend added: "Their record company once dubbed them "The Only Band That Matters," a phrase which caught on with their fans, and has since become closely associated with them".
  • 15:17, 25 March 2007 by User:Iprudence added: "Their record company once dubbed them "The Only Band That Matters," a phrase which caught on with their fans, and has since become closely associated with them. Epic Records Director of A&R, Bruce Harris, came up with the phrase. He is credited with convincing the company to release The Clash in the USA. His wife, Marion(Bernstein) Harris, was the product manager.She is credited with convincing Joe Strummer to include lyrics in the sleeve."
  • [ 20:30, 6 April 2007] by User:Nazamo did the reference TAG.

—PJoe F. (talk • contribs) 18:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've seen you around on Clash articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Clash, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Clash on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.

—Pjoef (talk • contribs) 18:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Know Your Rights"... Listen to this / Run ... to join us!


Hello, thanks for the welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ospix (talk • contribs) 18:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Energy Control = User:Ron liebman

I figured I'd drop you a note since you left a welcome message for Energy Control (talk · contribs). That account is unquestionably a sockpuppet of the banned user Ron liebman (talk · contribs). Let me know if you'd like more information. Assistance in blocking his socks would be much appreciated. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BASEBALL

I joined. Next time you'd be better off asking on my talk page. But thanks for signing. Merry Christmas from Sasha 22:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Day Or Two Late, But...

Thanks for taking care of the extra reverts on PBS Kids Sprout. I can't tell if we've got a vandal on our hands there, or a kid, or an uninformed user, or just somebody with extraordinarily confusing phraseology....However, the fact that it keeps coming back and writing the same....whatever-that-is...is steadily leading me toward a conclusion...:) Anyway, thanks again. Gladys J Cortez 00:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PrimeHunter RfA

Thanks for the mop! We made some fun with prime number counts in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PrimeHunter. The last uncounted vote made it 71 supports (assuming you didn't deliberately reject a vote), a prime number as targeted. Sorry to sound petty but will you please update the count in the RfA and Wikipedia:Successful adminship candidacies#December 2007? The uncounted prime vote has already been commented.[9] PrimeHunter (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating Wikipedia:Successful adminship candidacies#December 2007 to 71. I have taken the liberty of updating [10] the Rfa page with an edit summary URL for your update. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For reverting the vandalism to my userpage! I greatly appreciate it. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 06:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rochester WIKI

Hi, Kingturtle, Please stop putting that ridiculous and uncited demographics about greeks in rochester on the wiki. it has no place being on the rochester wiki and i will report further abuses and get arbitration involved. stop self promoting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.25.80.2 (talk) 20:57, 27 69.25.80.2 (talk) 21:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A) This is not a Rochester WIKI. This is Wikipedia.
B) I am not Greek, and not self-promoting.
C) It was not me who put that information into the article. But I think it is useful information.
D) Let's work together to find the appropriate references.
E) I have done nothing wrong.
Signed, Kingturtle (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop posting that content, its uncited, its opinion, it is inappropriate for a factual web page about the city of rochester. Its an unfounded fact, its self promotion to list last names of unknown families who dont have WP pages. I didn't call it a RocWiki i called it a Rochester Wiki aka Rochester Wikipedia page but thanks. Stop posting that content on that page, its totally irresponsible of you. It doens't matter what your background, its not relevant information for the main rochester wiki page. 69.25.80.2 (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I do not want to find references for that content because I do not want to see it on the Rochester web page. Lengths were taken to remove famous rochesterians from the wikipage, therefore respect that move and do not post random rochestesterians interested in self promotion. Otherwise I belong on that page along with all of my family from the "historically significant" country of poland.69.25.80.2 (talk) 21:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't me who added that information to the article. I am not Greek. None of those family names are mine. I do not believe the information is opinion. I think the information adds to the demographical information of the article. I find the information interesting, and I will try to find sources for it. If you have information about how and why people emigrated from Poland to Rochester, that would be much appreciated. Kingturtle (talk) 21:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I encourage you to create a user page. Communication between users is much easier that way. Kingturtle (talk) 21:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Always nice to be appreciated! Aelfthrytha (talk) 21:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


yes but they will all die by a long terrible death,sooner then they think —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.105.19.126 (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shout out

Thanks again for all the assists on Benazir Bhutto, you made my user page, and my day! Edit Centric (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! This form of collaboration is exhilarating - and, in light of the awful people in this world capable of such violence, in this case it helps me to feel that people are also capable of good things. Keep up the good work! Kingturtle (talk) 04:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutto

I noticed on the Benazir Bhutto talk page you noted that this was similar to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in that it could lead to another world war. Do you really think this situation could? Who would be the major players in such a conflict in your view? Clinevol98 (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If civil war breaks out in Pakistan, then how will the U.S., India, Iran Israel and Russia react? Then how will the E.U. and China react? Scares the bleep out of me. Kingturtle (talk) 06:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
India would certainly feel threatened if a radical Kashmiri terrorist group gained control of the government. John Bolton, like him or dislike him, said his primary worry now would be Musharraf himself getting assassinated. There's already been 3 attempts on the guy's life during his "presidency" already. That would surely plunge the country into all-out chaos. By the way, being a libertarian socialist puts you in line with Noam Chomsky as well, so you do know that as a baseball fan you have fallen into the media's propaganda trap to keep you interested in things that are of no importance, correct? :) I'm just kidding...I'm no fan of Chomsky and that assertion is ridiculous anyway. I've fallen into it too :) Clinevol98 (talk) 06:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block question

I see you've blocked User talk:Harrybabbar, but you didn't block User talk:Sikh scholar despite his personal attack [11] I was curious why? From what I can tell, User:Harrybabbar was quoting back to User:Sikh scholar, not originating the threat. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 06:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Harrybabbar has been insulting anyone who corrects his POVs and vandalism. He purposly changes footnoted material and makes erroneous claims. The he goes on personal attacks of anyone who dares to try and show hi an academic perspective. He is abusive and has also threatened me as well.
Gorkhali (talk) 06:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not questioning the block of User:Harrybabbar as much as I'm questioning the lack of block for User:Sikh scholar who seems to warrant it with this [12]. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 06:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sikh scholar is a great Sikh Wikipedian. Harrybabbar insulted his religion, his family and his personal honour. In Sikhism this is highly offensive and people in India would find harrybabbar's perosnal attack highly offensive. If he harrybabber did a personal attack on me like that I would probably react in the same way. Harrybabber need to be permenately blocked for vandalism and personal attack on editors. If he does vandalism again block him permenately.--Sikh historian (talk) 09:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The edit history does not seem to match this interpretation. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 09:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because you are not a Sikh you don't have the religious cultural knowledge of the highly offensive religious cultural insult he said to Sikh scholar
"do not refer yourself as Khalsa and insult such a pure word of our community" = To say this to a baptized Khalsa Sikh is the equivalent of saying his mother is a prostitute.--Sikh historian (talk) 09:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kingturtle, someone has blocked Sikh scholar please unblock Sikh scholar one can understand his emotional outburst after the highly offensive religious insult he was subjected to. Lets not lose an expert Sikh Wikipedian over a vandal, only Wikipedia will suffer long term to lose a long time expert Wikipedian such as Sikh Scholar. Please do justice unblock him.--Sikh historian (talk) 10:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked Harrybabbar for making 20 spams in a row that were rude, provocative and counter to the energy necessary for the Wikipedia project. I did not blocked Sikh scholar because I had been online for 16 hours and I needed to go to bed. I see that Stephen has blocked Sikh scholar, which is a move I support. Kingturtle (talk) 13:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank You

For the welcome! I have been sticking my toe in the editing waters of Wikipedia and having a blast...thanks for noticing :)Legotech (talk) 18:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]