User talk:Kierant/Archive3
Barnstar!No worries Kieran - great edits and love reading them. You get a bit wordy at times ha ha but yeah - great inputs. Ive been editing 1 article constantly as well http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbat_%28band%29 - it almost feels like its "yours" Doesnt it? Very addictive but i absolutley love Wiki! All the best. Cameron Ukbn2 19:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC) I've been slowly working on this page over time, and it's reached the point where I think it meets the criteria of a Good Article, although with two copyrighted fair use images and only 13k of content, it's well short of being FA. The biggest trouble with expanding the article is that the car was only released 12 months ago, so I'm still waiting on a lot of info to become available (e.g. production/sales figures). I didn't want to throw it open to the whole motley AutoProject community, some of whom may be compelled to "improve" the article by replacing metric with imperial measurements, adding badly laid out galleries of the rear of the car, reams of technical information in tabular or bulleted format, and expounding at length on the North American market perspective. Instead, I thought I'd just test the water by canvassing the opinions of some random auto editors who don't seem obsessed with making WP a Buyers' Guide. Anyway, you think it's worth taking Mitsubishi i through the WP:GA nomination process? This question has been copy/pasted to User talk:Kierant, User talk:Interiot, User talk:SteveBaker and User talk:BrendelSignature. --DeLarge 15:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Why arent you correcting this??User:Nareklm is using the same site for "source" , yet he purposely removed my same source (same site armenainhighland.com images) with "no source" so you can remove it. Please check this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tigranmetscoin.jpg ,this is the same site armenainhighland.com source. Yet he removed my images from the "same site" "same source" Ararat_arev The source I also had put in "File History" please check at the bottom of the images Here are my images I uploaded from same site as Nareklm uploaded Tigranmetscoin.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nkar3.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hurrian-AncientArmenian.jpg 75.4.211.151 19:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
New England Quarter articleHi Kieran, Hope you are well. I have finished the first draft of the "New England Quarter" article as referred to on the Brighton and Hove project page. With your in-depth knowledge of Brighton, could you take a look and let me know of/correct any inaccuracies. Also, have I used the correct method to cite websites? (I'm still very much a beginner on Wikipedia's citation policies!) Also, if you can think of any other appropriate categories or interwiki links, please go ahead; I had to submit it in a bit of a rush at lunchtime. Cheers, Matt. Hassocks5489 15:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Marine GateHi Kieran, Before I go adding a pic I took the other week, is it reasonable to state that the Marine Gate flats are within the area generally considered as Kemptown? I am inclined to think that they are, but it is a bit marginal, I suppose... Cheers, Hassocks5489 20:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Expansion of WP:BAH - your opinion, please.I have had the idea of expanding and renaming WikiProject Brighton to become WikiProject Sussex - this would not exclude people with a particular interest in, say, Chichester, Arundel, Worthing, Midhurst, Pulborough, Billingshurst, Horsham, Crawley, East Grinstead, Haywards Heath, Lewes, Eastbourne, Hastings, Rye, Winchelsea, etc. - all places worthy of a WikiProject - and I'm not sure that having WP:BAH as a sub-project of WP:Sussex would work. I feel that we are being too exclusive - we could attract new members this way. What do you think? - Vox Humana 8' 17:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kieran, User:Kevin Murray has called the page a "rejected proposal". I think he's wrong, but the page might need to be more than just examples. I've started a draft at User:Joeldl/Varieties of English Draft. Let me know what you think. Joeldl 14:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Hi Kierant/Archive3, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output. If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :) This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 01:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Church of St. Peter, BrightonHi Kieran; I have replied at my talk page to yours. Hassocks5489 11:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC) ArbuthnotHi, I've posted the info you requested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander George Arbuthnot (British army officer). Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 17:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Did You Know? suggestionHi Kieran; after coming across your new Aid Convoy article when looking for something else, I nominated a fact for the "Did You Know?" section on the front page. Could you check the wording I have used to make sure it makes sense in the context of the article - see here for my "hook". Hassocks5489 12:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep it up! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC) StockareeYes, this is true. Elderly residents of Stockbridge in Edinburgh really do call it Stockaree. I know this because I have been a resident of Stockbridge for some 17 years (although I am not elderly). Sadly, many of the elderly residents of "Stockaree" have popped off now. Stockbridge has a younger, fast-changing population. So the nick-name may soon be lost. That's life! Kind regardsAvril.rennie 17:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Lovely (micronation)what you playing at? most of the stuff i and others have put is legit and you've deleted it, are you even a memeber of the proboard site? do you know who anyone is? before you delete summat check the facts out, and stop reverting all the edits, lovely has changed and this needs putting out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompey Gaz (talk • contribs) 23:50, 16 June 2007
cheers keiran but really is it worth putting anything if its just gunna get deleted or reverted by you? i don't see how writing about the present lovely is my opinion, its whats happening to lovely, if you wanna go by the "official" lovely then you best delete the article because the idea/the people/the humor its all dead
I still don't get it, all i see is if it might offend someone it gets gone. but if you look at the LS boards and type tagg its all there. Anyhow am sorry for being a breast about this and for the work i've given you just alot of people are miffed at how this works. take it easy, Gaz Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex Please have a look at and join the above! --Vox Humana 8' 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Hillman Avenger Pop CultureI see you have deleted the entire Popular Culture section of Hillman Avenger. There is a mention of WikiProjectAutomobiles but I have to confess to not being able to find it (not to say it's not there, I just don't know how to find it). I wonder if there is some way we could comply with the rules and keep at least some of the "popular culture" items in there, maybe under another heading. It seems a pity to lose this information forever. Regards, Colin99 08:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete the additional LDV comments???If something is in the public domain it's not copyvio - discussion of business. All the material is in the public domain. Why did you undo the comments?? Do you work for LDV, their agency or GAZ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.199.59 (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
|