User talk:Keysstep

The lead to Vandalism more than adequately covers what is depectied by the picture. To state otherwise may be seen as WP:WEASEL.Traditional unionist (talk) 15:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any other explination for what happened to it?Traditional unionist (talk) 11:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Keysstep! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BigDunc^Talk 17:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Re. Edward Carson Mediation

I do appologise Keysstep, I haven't been too busy to asnwer you, I merely missed the comment. I've got to be honest here - it does look like a silly edit war - it's about a very lame thing. The best advice I can give to you is to seek a third opinion, where a neutral editor looks over the dispute and makes a neutral comment about which way the dispute should go. You've also got the option of starting an article RfC on the dispute, and give a wider audience a chance to look over it. Failing all that, I'd suggest going to the mediation cabal and beginning informal mediation, but do try the third opinion, followed by RfC first. Ryan Postlethwaite 15:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]