|
User talk:Kethrus/Archive/2014/November
JadoonIt was not an accidental revert on Jadoon. When looking into it, I discovered that it fitted in an earlier pattern of POV-pushing and sock puppetry. The Banner talk 13:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC) Escravos GTLMark Smedley (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC) MarkSmedley Hello Kethrus. Re Escravos GTL article, I tried to give the source to the footnote 4 as Energy Intelligence, which is a publisher of news about oil and energy. However it appears there is no article on Wikipedia about Energy Intelligence. I probably don't feel competent to set one up at this stage. I amended the Escravos GTL article, as the plant is now complete, and the cost is at least $10 billion. Until my edit, the article said it was nearing completion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Smedley (talk • contribs) 21:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Clue: No, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Carlisle and Simon Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
BlankingIf a user blanks a page they have created, it's G7 not A3. Yes, there is no content, but the blanking is taken as a request for the deletion that they can't do themselves. Of course, if there is any content input by others, G7 is out of the picture. Minor typo correction, adding of categories or tagging doesn't count, and nor does replacement of vandal or author removed text - and nor does removal of content that appears to be justified (spam, blp vio, or similar). Edits by IPs cause a problem, unless they are obviously the author (e.g. created page while signed in, then made 15 edits from an IP). Complicated? Yes. Not my fault... Peridon (talk) 13:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
how can I get a page published on wikipediaI had created that page about MetaOption that has been now deleted because apparantly I did not comply with the set guidelines. However, I did not have any intention to deliberately do so. Could you please convey to me how can I get an article about a company like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfire_Solutions published on wikipedia. I have sent a sandbox post for review; how soon can I expect a revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.226.28.142 (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
TARFirst of all, User:Ryulong decided to make these massive changes to the TAR pages without anyone's consent. This is not the first time Ryulong has done something incredibly frustrating on the TAR pages, and I see people arguing with him all the time and him just ignoring people. Second, this is a massive undertaking to translate the 'Leg' sections into large unbroken paragraphs of English. User:ApprenticeFan's grasp on the English language is not the best. What we have on the pages right now is perfectly fine English, but AF's edits are turning it into something messy and incredibly unprofessional. If these changes are to be made, I should think that someone with a firm grasp on the English language should handle them. Perhaps Ryulong should do it himself. Think about it, this is basically writing an English essay. Someone already left a message on ApprenticeFan's talk page, but he just ignored them. 184.70.8.70 (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The IP's accusations against me are unfounded but he is right about ApprenticeFan's edits. He is not very fluent in English and I told him last week not to go on a massive undertaking like this on his own because of his low fluency. I've restored the season 24 page to its original status. If the Io editor has issues with the formatting,he can bring it up on the season 25 page where it can be discussed.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
New MessageDude, I got a message from you on wikipedia that you wanted to talk to me or something? I don't know how else should I talk to you, so I thought this might be the way. shoot me an email at accgrd@yahoo.com --Unsigned by 80.187.96.200TALK.
some day somebody may look on this for history, but if you insist then just tell me how to delete it and I will.Michael.klewinski (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
School districtsGovernmental units such as school districts are normally notable, & would always at least be regarded as making enough of an indication of significance to pass speedy; but I deleted the article you had marked for A7 because it was a copyvio--which is of course a much more serious problem. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Page Deletion? (TheFlyStop.com)This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (The fly fishing industry is a great part of our outdoor culture. Do to its slow adaption of the Internet or the very antithesis that being online has with nature. Most of the major manufacturres and retailers dont have any entrys on wikipedia. Winston Rods, Reisa, Patagonia, Sims, The Fly Stop, Sage(farbanks enterprises), Scott Fly Rods, Loon are all huge multimillion dollar operations that are very important to the sport and yet most have nothing. In general the fly fishing content is lacking on the site and I would like to add many new pages to help resolve and provide accurate interesting information so people know where to start Msumvp (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Notability factorHi, you just reviewed the page I've created and said you don't see a difference between the deleted and new versions. The previous version was deleted because of lack of notability, this time I added the part about parent company, which is the oldest telecommunications company in Canada, and added 2 reliable references (with more details), Cellcom is a pretty large telecommunications distributor in Montreal, and it's a pretty old one too. I believe, if anyone would want to learn more about the history of telecommunications in Canada, they would want to read that page as well. As I'm not an expert wiki writer (working towards becoming one), I'd really appreciate if you could give me a tip on where I'm going wrong, maybe I can fix it by editing. I've read the how-to wiki materials, and thought the history and association to Bell makes it notable enough. Would really appreciate the help, thanks! Poster11 (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC) Aradial Technologies is a company that provides one of the top AAA on the market and also Billing and Policy Control. I think Wifi Pedia viewer should know that. As well I agree it is good for our commercial to be hear. Our competitors are all appearing in similar fashion on the Wifi. See: Aptilo Networks, Bridgewater Systems, Juniper, Amdocs and others. Feel free to mark it as a commercial company like the others. But please do not remove the page, unless you will be fair and remove also the competitors! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oe2k (talk • contribs) 15:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Somesh Tripathi talkback You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Somesh Tripathi (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Somesh Tripathi (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Two reasons Cameron Hepburn is notableHis work has been referenced in two recent news articles (Nov. 2, 3, 2014): http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/441272/why-gdp-is-useless-in-gauging-a-country-wealth and http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-11-02/what-s-wealth-if-you-can-t-count-it He's Director, Economics of Sustainability, The Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School: http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/people/550 ^This is the UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD (one of the best universities in the world). — Preceding unsigned comment added by AWDeconomicseditor (talk • contribs) 00:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Revert to Lesser AntillesI Did my research before I added those things and they were very true from all my researcher, and I am sure all the articles were credible, I do not believe i did anything non constructive as I was adding valid information. --71.43.107.50 (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Sir, Please have a look on Rajput article, I noticed that user Rajput334 recently removed some content from Rajput without explaining, infact messing it..Please block him. Thanks Sir.John811jd (talk) 03:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Rollback Hi Kethrus. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC) |
