User talk:KJS77/Archive1

Welcome!


Hello, KJS77/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 01:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Wedlock (band)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wedlock (band). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hey there..i know i created a previous page, but on further research found the music project and recreated the page using that template and added more verifiable information. Wedlock is a licensed band, currently touring, with releases available on iTunes, Amazon.com, Rhapsody Music, and material available at Borders and Barnes & Noble. What exactly is it that you guys keep deleting them for. Paul Allgood is also a published fiction author. What needs to happen to make this page stick???StacieVan 04:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What about the bands association with the recording of the recent album with John Morand at Sound of Music Studios in Richmond. That just doesnt count?StacieVan 04:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

12 January 2008

Fact is not "personal analysis" as you suggested. The article is mostly biased in it's current form.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.42.206.105&redirect=no —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.206.105 (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

Hey, dude -- I know all about Wikipedia, I just forgot to log in today.. The "removing POV" in the edit summary didn't tip you off? ;) 24.185.243.220 05:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patty

Good catch. BullzeyeComplaint Dept./Contribs) 05:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Anstee

Hi! Can you recheck the Margaret Anstee page. I believe it now conforms; I had been adding the links when the edit conflict began.

Yours, Jill Teed 22:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DB tag on the 76ers

When there is a possbike misspelling of an existant article, but written as the actual article, it's better to redirect to the proper spelling (which is what I did). Just a note telling you I have remove your tag. Evilclown93 20:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

answers.com

I noticed your comments at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_George_James_Arbuthnot. I wanted to let you know that answers.com copies its information from Wikipedia. It's not a copyright violation if you find something at answers that is the same as Wikipedia. The information was at wikipedia first. --JayHenry 03:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robo67

There are many entries for graduates of the school so why is this one deemed inappropriate?

Here Luke Kirby (actor) is an example of a entry similar to Alicia's that has been deemed appropriate. Why the double standard? --Robo67 21:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?

I never vandalised a wiki artical. If i did, please make the diff link. Dacheatcode 19:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, because the same thing happened to me. 0_o

Jean-Claude Duvalier

(I assume this is what you were referencing.) I fixed the citations and fixed the links for them. In the reverted version you went back to there are now 9 reference and only 7 references listed. This is obviously wrong. My contributions today were not vandalism.


Message

Hello, I did not make any edits to Ray Chares. I think that message was some sort of a mistake. 172.167.66.160 04:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, maybe someboday with my IP made the edit, but I thought it was rather rude to say "either you or somebody with your IP made the edit". I had already told you that I did not make that edit, and I do not think you shoul have implied that I might be lying. 172.167.66.160 05:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xylitol Robots

Sir,

Kudos for your vigilance on the Xylitol article. I was trying to demonstrate to my girlfriend why Wikipedia is not an infallible resource; you have made the argument somewhat less convincing.

(Let the record state that I would have removed the vandalism myself if you hadn't gotten to it first...)

T. Stepleton (CMU Robotics phd student---greetings from Squirrel Hill!)

Explain your self

Just how could showing how a POV editor who has lied that he wasnt a member of a group he was promoting, among many other thing, Vandalism on a artical discussion page? were else can such things be talked about as it is deeply impacting an artical?

It is the Ebionite artical BTW

Hey man im new at this and have no idead where to put this but u canerase it after u see it anyways but how did i vandilise that page???

Vandalism notice

I have noticed that you posted several warnings on a Talk page of this user. I feel obliged to inform you that the user in question vandalised article about the Unforgivable Curses in Harry Potter series. The evidence for my report is to be found on the user's Contributions list and in the history of the page. Appropriate action for blocking this IP should be taken. ILorbb | Talk 07:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page semi-protected

I protected your userpage for 24 hrs to stop the IP vandalism. Please let me know here if you want me to unprotect.--Chaser - T 05:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Luna Halo

Noticed your making an afd on Wedlock (band) (hope I did things fine) and was wondering if this would qualify for one too: Luna Halo. Not sure, since it has plenty of google hits. -WarthogDemon 05:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks. :) -WarthogDemon 06:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Constitutes Your Final Warning - Er . . . Your Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You've beat me to the punch way too many times tonight. Good work!|} -WarthogDemon 03:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dance Dance Evolution and the Anon IP

Yes, I know, I shoud assume good faith, but the user is clearly not acting in good faith - thus the last warning. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, the DDE article is a repost of material originally posted from Uncyclopedia, see here. I don't fully know my way around copyright rules regarding the exchange of information between Uncyclo and Wiki, but is it possible that such rules may require you to remove the DDE material you posted to BJAODN? Just wondering. Uncyclopedia should've been the first place I looked to see if the article was reposted material. TheLetterM 03:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For always being on the ball with vandal-fighting, and for being a consistent, hard-working, and honest contributor. Also, the reporting at AIV is always on the money! Jmlk17 06:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for reverting this edit to my userpage. Much appreciated. By the way, out of interest, are you a boy or a girl?--Vox Humana 8' 03:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a guy, I guess I should put that on my userpage. KJS77 05:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Handel

Hey, I saw this article has been vandalized, but I'm not sure how to fix it. Thought I'd let you know. Wingnutmax 00:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

that doesn't count as vandalism...

Hi, I appreciate the efforts to stop vandalism, but I was deleting the messages on my own page. They were both automatic messages relating to images I had uploaded, both of which I took care of. So I thought I could just delete them. Is that not ok? Ezradf 01:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KJS

what can i help you with? please welcome me. thank you. --Themirage (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oy, yeah! Nice job!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
A lot of your edits are reverting vandalism, nice job! Soxred93 has a boring sig 05:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

You're an effective vandal-fighter, and know the difference between a good-faith edit and vandalism. Would you like the rollback feature to help you revert vandalism better? Acalamari 02:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I know you use Twinkle. :) It's just that I can change your user rights from (none) to (rollbacker) which will give you the MediaWiki rollback, and it can be used alongside Twinkle. At any rate though, keep up your good anti-vandalism work. Acalamari 22:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The best thing about rollback is that, while it can be given out easily, it can be taken away quickly too. Acalamari 22:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandal watching

Thanks for that, it was the first time my homepage has been vandalised and you where on the ball. just so you know, she/he was blocked indefinatlyCoffeepusher (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi KJS77!
We thank you for uploading Image:RoGBanner.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been properly labeled. KJS77Talk 21:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revolution of Gaming

Is "I did it for the lulz" an acceptable response? Also, I'd hardly call one thread (gore filled as it may have been) spam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.58.0 (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reversion

Please be more careful. This was a good faith comment to the user and should not have been reverted. No big problems, but just to let you know. Pedro :  Chat  19:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Reversion of Keepers page

Greetings, I noticed your reversion of Keepers page when someone placed some band review links on it. I wasn't sure if you knew that Keeper asked for reviews of this band so he could review A speedy deletion he carried out.[1] Just FYI.--Cube lurker (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a history of vandalism and acted on it. Sorry for any trouble. KJS77 Join the Revolution 19:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blah Blah Blah

Hi KJS77..Robert Wolf at UBS has destroyed tremendous shareholder value and participated in illegal activities of insider trading. He was arrogant enough to establish his own Wiki page. I assure you everything I have and will write is the truth....any one that goes over UBS public docs can figure it all out..don't let him get away with these crimes UnionBS —Preceding unsigned comment added by UnionBS (talk • contribs) 21:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Put your comments at the bottom of a page with a header or I'll do just what I did to yours. Oh, and don't spam me with your random accusations unless you have proof. KJS77 Join the Revolution 02:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Quad relationships

Hey man, I just started the article. Could you let me finish it before you or anyone else decides to delete it. What the hell is Wikipedia coming to, I've been an editor since 2005 and never have I seen so much deletions then in the last year. Lord Balin (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I only nominated it for deletion because I wasn't sure about it. If others decide that it should be kept then I won't argue. I'm not infallible with these things. KJS77 Join the Revolution 19:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:UnrealSpiritX

Users are allowed to remove warnings (or anything else they want) from their Talk page. They can't remove it from other Talk pages. Corvus cornixtalk 22:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. well that's something that I think should be changed. That way they could get a million warnings and nobody would know. KJS77 Join the Revolution 00:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I Herby award you this barnstar for beating me at tagging this page for deletion

Alexnia (If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 20:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi, you made this reversion. Please remember that rollback is only for use in vandalism and not any other case, especially "good faith" edits. It doesn't bother me, but I know of admins who search for just such items. Thanks! :-) fr33kman t - c 22:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was cleaned up at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Assuming_Good_Faith. KJS77 Join the Revolution 01:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Good faith edits

Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I've replaced that warning on the user's talkpage with a test1 template instead of the default huggle one. SMC (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I still use Twinkle, I like to be able to choose which template I use. KJS77 Join the Revolution 00:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, Huggle lets you choose, but the default is for regular vandalism. I used to use Lupin's AV tool until it broke, since then I've been using Huggle. SMC (talk) 00:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMAGES

I did not know it. I am brand new to editing Wikipedia pages and thoughr ir was a disgrace there is no picture of Howard Ashman. THanks for your help. Chuck NE (talk) 04:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UAA reports

Hi KJS77, please could you take note of the comments Wisdom89 (talk · contribs) has left on your reports. Thank you. Caulde 11:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 2005 WAC Men's Basketball Tournament

A tag has been placed on 2005 WAC Men's Basketball Tournament requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Skitzo (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um... you might have posted to the wrong person... Skitzo tagged it and Anthony Appleyard downed it... - J Greb (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At a very rough look? The entire set of pages are eligible for deletion. The only difference between the '05 and the rest are the navboxes and the logos. Beyond that, they are all only a graphic of the final bracket state. It's something that should go through AfD though. - J Greb (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I think this is cleaned up, the PROD was taken off. KJS77 01:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad revert

KJS77, you need to review your revert of my recent edit to Cupcake, in which I restore material blanked by a variety of vandal IPs, and which you've chosen to delete again. I clearly note in the edit summary that I'm reverting back to an earlier version, before the spate of vandalism. 87.112.22.179 (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, apologies, you were reverting to that edit. My bad. 87.112.22.179 (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added at top of page, moved here

..It's true! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.218.77.211 (talk) 04:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, saying that someone "sucks" is considered vandalism. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Zuckerberg&diff=next&oldid=277938342) KJS77 04:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes Table

Go here and you'll see a table with the list of episodes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8_episodes 70.24.233.37 (talk) 09:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what this has to do with me. The only thing I did on that page was revert someone adding an incorrect link. KJS77 20:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage

Thnx for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 17:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, KJS77. You have new messages at WhiteHandofSauramon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

whats the deal yall

Huh what —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.144.141 (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You made an edit that I considered inappropriate, including announcing a death without a reference and personal opinions. KJS77 05:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, KJS77. You have new messages at SoSaysChappy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:Vandalism?

Hi KJS77, thanks for letting me know about the error. I have restored the edit and removed the warnings from the user's talk page. - Fastily (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top tip re. "autoconfirmed"

Just a tip for you - it's possible for a user to check if they are autoconfirmed or not by looking in Preferences; If they are, "Member of groups:" says "Autoconfirmed users".

In reference to the helpme some time ago, in User_talk:Thenachoman/Archive1.

Cheers,  Chzz  ►  01:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tomoyo.14

Hi KJS77. I've replaced the {{db-nocontext}} template with {{db-band}}. Wrong templates and warnings may be confusing for new users. --Vejvančický (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for informing me about the bot error ^_^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leaflord (talk • contribs) 14:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]