User talk:Jwebbatx

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jwebbatx. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Area 51 (1995 video game), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 20:09, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is all well and good but the simple fact is the previous entry was inaccurate and had numerous omissions. My updates are 100% accurate and are more complete. In fact, I could've added a lot more insightful information and another 5-6 historical photos but I chose to keep my edits to a minimum.

Also, you're COI remark doesn't hold water because you reverted my revisions before I told you that I was part of the team and helped create the game. I'm not sure what else to provide you to convince you that there's no COI here. Just do the research yourself and you'll find all of the changes I made are empirical facts.

I've made absolutely no effort to embellish anything in any way. Did you even read my edits? I have no interest in making changes other than providing accurate information on Wikipedia. I've simply filled in some holes.

Furthermore, you're making the "suggested guidelines" more important than the actual fundamental goal of Wikipedia. Again, if you're so concerned that my information has been somehow unduly influenced or in some way reveals a conflict of interest, then do your own research and make the (same) changes yourself. Otherwise, please stop reverting my edits. It makes zero sense for you to keep reverting my accurate and informative additions to a less accurate and less informative entry. How are you helping Wikipedia by doing that?

Your actions here are undermining the mission of wikipedia. Please stop. Jwebbatx (talk) 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]