User talk:Justinsane15/Archive 1

Archive 1

Super Heavyweight (MMA)

Why do you delete my table? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.195.205 (talk) 21:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

How is KOTC not top tier? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.195.205 (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Are you really comparing King of the Cage to UFC, Strikeforce, DREAM, etc. (Justinsane15 (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC))

Strikeforce: Los Angeles

The poster is up for this event, you can find it at: http://strikeforce.com/news/2010/04/28/%E2%80%9Cruthless%E2%80%99%E2%80%99-robbie-lawler-kj-noons-and-bobby-lashley-will-be-featured-at-strikeforce-event-wednesday-june-16-at-nokia-theatre-l-a-live/ Trunks8719 (talk) 23:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Strikeforce: Fedor vs Werdum

i suck at editing wiki, sorry. i had the source in there but it didnt come out right on the reference list http://www.mmafighting.com/2010/06/22/fedor-vs-werdum-card-complete-with-addition-of-four-preliminary/ Delinquent1904 (talk) 23:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


no doubt, thats actually what i did, but i must not of done it right still cause it ended up adding 4 of the same source in the reference list Delinquent1904 (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

ShoMMA

Thanks for keeping up the good fight against the guy intent on putting ShoMMA results in boxes. Udar55 (talk) 13:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation of ShoMMA

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to ShoMMA was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 23:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The Request for mediation concerning ShoMMA, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 00:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

Why did you revert my edit?

Why did you revert my edit on the MMA weight class champions. By removing WEC? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost563 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Why have you reverted my weight class page contributions?

These meet all of the standards for inclusion. They are properly sourced, written from a neutral point of view, and add to the information contained on and available through the page. Please explain.(Gravity 76 (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC))

Can you please give me some guidelines or suggestions for how I could better frame the information I provided? As I indicated before, the material is a legitimate contribution which enriches the page. It is factual, neutral, and does not duplicate any other information on the page. I would be happy to rephrase any portions of the writing to better adhere to these standards, but I do not believe that the information itself (as opposed to the form of its presentation) warrants deletion. Should it be in a different section, or drafted in a different manner? I look forward to hearing from you.(Gravity 76 (talk) 00:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC))

Thanks for your message Justinsane15. I've gone through the standards you linked me to and will do my best to adhere to them. Please let me know if you have any more thoughts; I may try again with the weight class contributions in the near future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gravity 76 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Waachiim Spiritwolf

Hi, i edit Waachiim Spiritwolf article, and add his record, you can add location of events mountaineer1976

Hi! There is also an article for Waachiim spirit wolf, who seems to be the same person as Waachiim Spiritwolf. Would you get together with the principal author of the other article, User:Wwefantyler4, to determine which article will be merged into which? Thanks. JimCubb (talk) 23:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

UFC 130

Hello, in the interest of not getting blocked over WP:3RR, WP:WAR, or WP:CIVIL, you may want to get some more opinions at WT:MMA. I'll add my opinion if you start a topic there. —LOL T/C 11:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

revisions

you keep changing pages that do not need to be. I see them made up nicely and you take them back a step. mainly MMA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.74.61 (talk) 08:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bellator 42

The article Bellator 42 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL - Article about an event to happen in the future & WP:ADVERT - As this article is nothing more then an advertisement for that event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enfcer (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

ShoMMA edits

Hi. I noticed you've been changing the Satoshi Ishii fight coming up on the ShoMMA site from Light Heavyweight to Heavyweight.... I left a message on the talk page of that article saying that I was able to confirm from Strikeforce's own website that this fight will be contested at 205 lbs, which is the Light Heavyweight division for Strikeforce. I am unsure why you are changing it back to Heavyweight. Can you give me a source for why it should be a heavyweight fight? If I don't hear back in 24 hours, I will be changing it back to Light Heavyweight. Thanks. Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 18:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

My apologies. I'm still new to this and forgot to change the reference. I will make sure to do so in the future and will also check to make sure it's done on that page now. Thanks again for getting back to me. Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 17:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

DREAM Bantamweight GP

No problem about the changes as I understand the chaos usually involved with Japanese MMA promotions and their titles. MMAJunkie is now referring to it as DREAM.17, so maybe it should be changed to that for consistency? http://mmajunkie.com/news/23307/dream-17-matchups-set-for-2011-japan-bantamweight-grand-prix-opening-round.mma Udar55 (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

MOS:CONSISTENCY

I see that you cited MOS:CONSISTENCY for this edit, but that section reads, "formatting choices should be consistent within a Wikipedia article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia as a whole" (emphasis added). No other heading in that article has the word "Televised", so clearly MOS:CONSISTENCY doesn't help you. In addition, being consistent and complying with MoS is far better than being consistent and violating MoS. —LOL T/C 20:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

I believe the problem with what you cited here is that no guideline was actually established regarding headings for UFC events; somebody just started an article that violated MoS, and the same bad format was being continuously copypasted to the next event. This is why the capitalization of "Card" is so inconsistent; it's only lowercase where a MoS-savvy editor cared enough to correct it. At any rate, since you wouldn't object to having all UFC events comply with the MoS, I'll do just that. Thanks. —LOL T/C 20:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Score Fighting Series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Score Fighting Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Score Fighting Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 04:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ProElite: Big Guns

The article ProElite: Big Guns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#DIR, WP:NOT#NEWS - Wikipedia is not a directory of minor sporting events. No reliable sources anyway.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bellator 55 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bellator 55 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellator 55 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:17, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ultimate Chaos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultimate Chaos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Chaos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Strikeforce 40, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HP Pavilion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of UFC 140 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UFC 140 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 140 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (edits) 08:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Strawweight (MMA)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Strawweight (MMA) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MattParker 119 (talk) 18:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of MFC 32 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MFC 32 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MFC 32 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (edits) 22:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in Konfrontacja Sztuk Walki events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rodney Wallace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hello. I see you made a few changes in UFC 151 and UFC 148.

  • was considered [...] - The Silva/Sonnen second bout is considered by many analysts as the most highly anticipated fight in the history of the sport.
  • [[Category:Scheduled mixed martial arts events]] - UFC 151 was in fact scheduled by the organisation, so it became the first officially announced UFC event to be cancelled.

Thanks for your edits. Happy Editing!

LlamaAl (talk) 01:10 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WEC 6

The article WEC 6 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no significant coverage in reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coin Operation (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Archive 1