|
User talk:Justinm1978/Archive 2
What part of this edit were you reverting in the name of NPOV? Also, the fact that a white student was the general portrayer is absolutely relevant to the article, as that is a main point of the Chief debate. Tool2Die4 (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Alpha Phi AlphaI was looking at this history of Alpha Phi Alpha's talk page and ran across this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-06-29_Infobox_Fraternity. In which you were involved. I did a whole lot of history research and used strong references that could be cited. The individuals involved so far that have demonstrated a lot of issues were Miranda, CCson, and Robotam. They accussed me of being a sockpuppet the first day I edited. I passed the checkuser that was done on me. Now they are building a case against me for suspected sockpuppet. They have also reverted a number of my edits. All of my sources can be edited and seen; while a number of the sources that were previously used were cited but could only be viewed if you had the book. I was wondering if you could work with me on an mediation or RFC. Thank you. RobertOgleFan (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Please feel free to comment hereWikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-04-22 Alpha Phi Alpha
HelloI had a few questions about Vigil Honor as well as a few other things. I was wondering if you could email me. Thank you. Hadsomefun (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I emailed you. thank you. Hadsomefun (talk) 18:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Request for CommentA request for comment has been filed on your behavior. Please make your comments known there. Regards. miranda 13:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Reverting on Delta Sigma ThetaI kindly suggest you stop reverting on Delta Sigma Theta. The IP has already broken 3RR, and apparently you have too. There's a thread on ANI if you would like to discuss. miranda 21:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
BlockedI've blocked you for breaking the three revert rule. You weren't warned, but given that you warned the IP, then broke the 3RR yourself, you clearly understood what the rule was. The previous three reverts are; [2], [3], [4]. Ryan Postlethwaite 21:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 Justinm1978 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This block is a bit arbitrary, as returning page content to be in-line with consensus on the Template talk:Infobox_Fraternity#Results of Mediation should not be a violation of 3RR. I would like a different admin than the one who blocked me to review this. Decline reason: The block is correct. Reverting to what you think is the consensus version is not among the exceptions allowed under WP:3RR. — Sandstein 21:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|I stated my reason for reverting [[Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#Content Dispute on Delta Sigma Theta|on the ANI page for this "content dispute"]], which explained how this editor was going against the template standard. That is not edit warring, nor is it violation of [[WP:3RR]]. This block is not justified, as there is no content dispute when the issue has been settled and there is a standard definition in place.}}
My turn on the DST monitoring, I guess.I'll try to keep an eye out.Naraht (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Please read my comment. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC) re: Omega Phi Gamma DiscussionI agree. Thanks for all of your help and the constructive edits that you have made to the article. Victor8698 (talk) 03:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC) AnonI was thinking the same thing. Badagnani (talk) 02:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Removal of referenced statement from Toyota Prius articleHi Justinm1978, I assume that you made this edit by mistake, judging by the associated summary comment ("This information is suspect, provide a reference"). If you look again, you will see that I had added a more specific reference for the statement, which you just removed, along with the statement. Perhaps you could undo your own edit, adding an appropriate summary. Incidentally, why did you think that the information was "suspect"? For your information, here are the eight cars, with their official UK "combined" fuel consumption and references.
Best regards, -- de Facto (talk). 15:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Reverting other people's editsInstead of blindly reverting people's edits, please look at the edit history and AGF, because the IP did make some constructive edits. miranda 16:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Polite requestHi Justinm1978, I wondered if you were planning to withdraw the false accusation you made at Talk:Toyota Prius#Deletion of CNW Research, that my 'only contributions to this [the Prius] article are to insert "studies" (used loosely) that push one particular point-of-view ...' It is evidently untrue, anyone can check the edit history to verify that, and cannot be allowed to stand. -- de Facto (talk). 22:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
University of Illinois external linksIn light of your reversion, I've opened a new section in the [[[edit]Talk:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign|article's Talk page]]. Please contribute! --ElKevbo (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Apo-crest.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Alpha Phi Alpha EditsHi, I wasn't ignoring you--just giving you the chance to show the newbie that you were not simply jumping on his case. cheers -RoBoTamice 19:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Suburban ExpressI think our conflict in this article is accidental. While I was trying to "fix" it's orphan status and remove the tag, you nominated it for deletion, and I inadvertantly removed your tag as well. I have NO connection with this company and I am a great distance from your city. My goal was to improve the article and I will not enter into a discussion as to whether it should be deleted or not - I don't care. If it is a valid article it should remain linked to the articles for those universities it serves. This would mean that "orphaned" would not be an argument for deletion and the quality of the article would have to stand up for itself. I can understand your frustration, because you thought it was deliberate interference with your very proper tagging. Sorry about that. -FairFare (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Phi Beta Kappa SocietyHello, Justinm1978. I've seen the Mediation Cabal case requested for Phi Beta Kappa Society here, and I'm glad to take the case. It appears that you have engaged in discussion about the issue, and I have listed you as a party. I have reviewed the relevant discussions and am looking forward to working towards an ultimate resolution. Regards, Jd027 (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Gamma BetaHi, I was wondering if you could help me out on my article and getting it unprotected. I've created a user page, and believe it meets wiki fraternity requirements. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hawee/Gamma_Beta Please help me out and let me know what i need to do or what is wrong. [[[User:Hawee|Hawee]] (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)] WikiProject Scouting electionsYou are receiving this notice as an active member of WikiProject Scouting. To change your status as a member, please edit Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Members. Rlevse is retiring as our lead coordinator; see Stepping down as ScoutingWikiProject Lead Coordinator. Election for a new coordinator will be held after the new year. If you are interested in nominating yourself or another editor, please add the name to Project coordinator election. Yours in Scouting Chris BatyI restored the prod on that article, since you didn't say any reason in the edit summary or on the talk page as to why you disagreed or how the article's subject meets any kind of notability guidelines, nor did you offer any way to improve the article, which is requested when removing a prod. I have also added a proposal to merge the contents of the article into the NaNoWriMo article since I believe that is the best way to handle it. Not even wrong. Have a read of this:
Do you have a problem with this? WP:AFD. --Calton | Talk 03:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC) A word of advice: Do not go against Calton, he has JzG in his pocket and can do pretty much whatever he wants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.50.238 (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Red LinksI noticed that you eliminated all the organizations without wikilinks from Cultural interest fraternities and sororities. Couldn´t you just unlink them? Is this a list of organizations in wikipedia or a comprehensive list of cultural organizations? Can I add back the organizations without wikilinks just for informational purposes? --Coquidragon (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Is http://apqgss.tripod.com/Related.html , the only source for the Alpha Phi Omega connection?Naraht (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Im the founder of Phi Rho Eta Fraternity, Inc., just wondering where you getting this information from!! If you want to know anything about our fraternity feel free to contact be at mrandolph@phirhoeta.org. And your right your not 100% right!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etaman (talk • contribs) 19:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Parkland president.While the Alpha Phi Omega alumni database is an acceptable reference, there are lots of other places that are better. Any idea if there is anything on either the chapter or even better school website indicating this?Naraht (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC) I'll see if the chapter can get that updated Justinm1978 (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Justinm1978. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2021
--evrik (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021
--evrik (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: October 2021
--evrik (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2022
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC) WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2022
|
){kind=link}