This is an archive of past discussions with User:JuneGloom07. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello June, your name was suggested to me by User:HJ_Mitchell, whom I ran across in an edit-history of a troubled page. Thanks to solid editing by User:Racconish, the page has survived AfD... but it still needs some assistance.
My job was to try and contact the owners of the designer-slash-clothing firm, who edit from various anon addresses, and suffer from a case of WP:NOCLUE ... they are too busy selling tuxedos, silk ties, cufflinks, and USD$900-each duffel bags for lugging around one's expensive tennis raquet, it seems, and have never read *any* of wikipedia's five bazillion policies, in the . Unfortunately, I failed in my job, and have not managed to locate anybody as yet.
Thus, the page is somewhat unfinished. So... ummm... I notice you have an Art History banner on your userpage! Might that interest extend to design menswear, with color-oriented shirts, dazzling cufflinks, and such? :-) Truth: they do have very artistic hand-made cufflinks. None that have been installed as an exhibit in the Louvre, as yet, but still.
Or if not yourself, do you know someone who might be interested? The article in question is Duchamp (clothing), retail stores located in London. Thanks for improving wikipedia. Feel free to ping my talkpage if you reply, and I don't respond promptly. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Not only do I have an Art History banner on my page, I also happen to have a Fashion WikiProject banner too. I'm interested in improving the article, but the only problem is time. I'm working on a couple of projects at the moment that I really hope to finish before I go away to Ireland on Saturday. The internet over there isn't great (no broadband where I'm going), so I won't be doing any major editing for a while. If the article needs action straight away, then it might be worth dropping a note on Fashion WikiProject talk page and see if anyone there can help. - JuneGloomTalk23:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Well then, most excellent. :-) Time is standing still on the article at the moment -- so that part is no problem. It was AfD'd as of October 19th, rescued by User:Racconish, and then kept on October 25th. Since then, nothing. There has been no contact with the owners of the store; they got discouraged and left, from what I can tell. This has happened many times before, over the past five years.
Currently, my goal is to find an editing-partner-in-crime for Racconish, who has some knowledge of the industry, and can help finish up the article Right This Second. ... oh... huh... that policy does not mean what I think it means! ;-) There is no hurry on the content. But if you could, please put the article, and the article-talkpage, into your watchlist.
There are two purposes here, to help Racconish manage the article, and to get the elusive COI folks to visit the talkpage. At some point, usually every six months or so, the owners/employees of the store will try to add in their press-release material again. At least *one* person there learned how to use a personal-talkpage, back in summer 2013... but they don't have time to read our five bazillion RULZ, so I'd like a chance to give them the five-minute-version instead, if they'll just hold still. Should somebody with seeming-COI difficulties show up, can you ping my talkpage, or post a note on the WP:RETENTION talkpage so one of the other folks can try and talk the Duchamp folks down from the WP:BITE ledge, as it were.
As for the content, if you have some time for editing-efforts, there are some as-yet-unused sources on the talkpage that Racconish and myself rustled up, that could use inclusion into the article. I'm happy to do some of that work myself, if you can be the stern reviewer that separates the Reliable Sources from the unreliable ones, and corrects my lack-of-industry-know-how gaffes, and such. Thanks much, please ping my talkpage if you like. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries Episode listing changes
Hi! I haven't been part of Wikipedia for YEARS so forgive that I can't log in as I don't even remember my email or anything from way back when lol but just a heads up. I changed the Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries Episode listing article back to a previous version because the order of that article apparently was screwed up a few edits ago. Sadly that's all I remember how to do, change back to previous versions or I would have helped fixed whatever else was wrong. Just a heads up so someone can perhaps see what the article is missing now. All I did was return it to the latest version that had the right order so the Reference section went back to the end of the page because, as of the very last edit, it was smack in the middle of the page. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.210.68 (talk) 00:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for catching that and for letting me know. The only issue with the previous version (the one before that pesky IP came along) is that it contained some copyrighted episode summaries. I've removed the summaries for now, so they can be rewritten. - JuneGloomTalk01:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Daniel Robinson
I don't know if this counts; but he first appeared in 1992 in ep 1730 as an uncredited baby in a video Charlene made for Madge. Conquistador2k6 12:48 2 December 2013 (UTC)
If he was uncredited and he only appeared in video footage, I think it would be okay to say his first appearance is in 2014. It will be his first physical appearance at least. If we can find a reliable source, we could always say that he's been mentioned on-screen and appeared briefly in video footage in 1992. - JuneGloomTalk13:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
One of the news outlets might do their research and mention it. The story has attracted a fair bit of attention, even the BBC and The Daily Telegraph reported on it. - JuneGloomTalk01:45, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
By the way I know the image says it's for writing about writers, but when I added it from the "wikilove" tab, it said it was for people who write a lot of articles! So I hope that's not confusing! :-) –anemoneprojectors– 16:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I finally got a chance to get on wiki and I looked over your nom and approved it. Sorry for the delay. Thingg⊕⊗19:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Ah, my bad. Sorry for the mistake - but as that's the case, shouldn't the Port Douglas section read "loss of her job," instead of career? Techhead7890 (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
On 12 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Drew Cam, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that parts of The Drew Carey Show episode "Drew Cam" were broadcast simultaneously on the television and the Internet, a first for a primetime show? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drew Cam. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hey. For Ruth Archer? - Don't want to make your any job harder. lol I was randomly looking a bit more and found tiny characterisation from a script writer - [1] and wondered if this book source is of any use - [2].Rainthe 121:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
You won't make it harder at all. Thanks for that link and I got that book for Christmas, so I'll go and dig it out. Yay! - JuneGloomTalk21:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Cinematography
Congratulations on your first Holby City article. Mo Effanga is a great article to read! You should be proud of all the hard work you (always) put in! Rainthe 100:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Ha. :p I find some of the medical jargon a welcome change to write about than your usual soapy fictional character.Rainthe 101:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Charlie Cotton (2014)
I think for safety's sake, you should refer to him as Charlie Jr. Just my opinion
On 23 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mo Effanga, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that NHS Blood and Transplant stated several people had asked to be removed from the UK organ donor register as a result of a storyline involving Holby City character Mo Effanga? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mo Effanga. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
A free image of the cast member from Full Monty is not essentially similar to this unfree image of courtroom striptease. Enough sources discuss it, and... free text doesn't make the image replaceable... does it? --George Ho (talk) 22:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I didn't remove the reference, I moved it down. I expanded on the sentence you added to the lead in the body of the article (if that makes sense). - JuneGloomTalk01:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that, I should have looked more closely. I am just wondering if your paragraph might warrant its own section rather than being attached to Series 2? Just a thought. Melbourne3163 (talk) 02:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
That's okay. It could have it's own sub-section actually. I think I saw some more info relating to the situation elsewhere, so it can be expanded upon. - JuneGloomTalk02:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:JuneGloom07. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Yes, I've seen that article. That's why I commented out the departure info in the cast list and the Bianca Scott article. I suspect she is leaving, but nothing has been confirmed yet. - JuneGloomTalk18:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Just a quick one. I know this issue has come up a few times, normally by an unregistered user changing it, but I was just wondering about the surname issue with Callum, Sonya and Lauren. Whilst I agree that they should match their article names, shouldn't there article names be changed to reflect the show's titles, as Callum and Sonya are Rebecchi and Lauren is Turner? I would appreciate your thoughts. Adamiow (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
On 4 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Drew Live, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first live episode of the American sitcom The Drew Carey Show was performed three times, once for each of three different time zones? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drew Live. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hey - thought I'd give you this to ce and add in where you think best. :)
Lisa Anthony from BIG! magazine reported that Rick would arrive in Ramsay Street following expulsion from his former school. But Benito ruins Rick's hopes of finding a job and enrolls him at Erinsborough High. Anthony added that "the scene is set for battles with Mrs Burke".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Anthony|first=Lisa|title=G'Day Rick Alessi (Dan Falzon)|journal=BIG!|date=5-18 May 1993|issue=18|pages=6|publisher=[[EMAP]]}}</ref>
We seem to be on the same wavelength lately on editing Neighbours articles - we did good. While I do not like much of the US TV or UK music acts you edit - I noticed that yo edited GRL, I love that song so will help out with that in the future.Rainthe 102:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I can't really promise anything (especially because I'm rubbish at reviewing stuff), but I'll try and look at the list at some point. - JuneGloomTalk23:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Nebraska, Philomena
Hi. Hope you're well. I was wondering if you would consider removing North Carolina nominations and Screenwriters' Choice Awards from Nebraska's accolades page for non-notability as they don't yet have a separate page on wiki as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and based on this discussion [[3]]. Screenwriters' Choice Awards are based on votes of users of a screenwriting program which could again question its notability.
For Philomena's accolade page, Screenwriters' Choice Award as well. Cowlibob (talk) 10:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Dog and Pony Show you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruby2010 -- Ruby2010 (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
I know this probably wasn't isn't the place to ask this, but how did you do the family tree for the Ramsey family? I know you used GenoPro, but what kind of Paint did you use? Arjoccolenty (talk) 20:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
This is the right place. :) I haven't used it in a while, but from what I remember GenoPro has everything you need and doesn't require Paint. If you want to add coloured lines, then GenePro has them already. - JuneGloomTalk20:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
On 26 May 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2014 Cannes Film Festival, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
No problem. Redirects are made for almost every character featured in a list. However, I suspect Pam Coker might not be notable enough for her own article just yet. It might be worth expanding her list entry first. - JuneGloomTalk18:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Re: Peter
Unfortunately not, he was essentially a plot device for Nicola Charles' exit. Other than his romance with her and the generally lead up to the wedding, there's nothing really that sticks out to me as him being his own character. Conquistador2k6 20:28 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I was just wondering whether it was worth adding storylines to his list entry. I think I might leave them out, since the development info I have covers everything. - JuneGloomTalk19:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Sure, I'll get cracking ASAP. Conquistador2k6 00:51 28 May 2014 (UTC)
I think she's a pretty good actress, so I'm sure she'll do fine on The Bold and the Beautiful. Her Neighbours character got super annoying in the last couple of years that she was around, but I don't think that was Ashleigh's fault. I'll have to watch her debut for sure and see how she does. - JuneGloomTalk16:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm definitely looking forward to seeing how they do; I always love when B&B usher in brand new talent. I hope this will allow for Jessica Forrester to return, too! livelikemusicmy talk page!01:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
I have no idea what's going on in the show, but I checked out Ashleigh/Ivy's first appearance and quite enjoyed it. Ivy's definitely a different character to Kate Ramsay that's for sure! I want to stick with it for a few more episodes to see how she goes. - JuneGloomTalk21:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
She's portraying the never-before-heard of or seen niece of the Forrester family patriarch, Eric Forrester. She's coming to the series as the new jewelry design for Hope For the Future (HFTF), a fashion line by Hope Logan. She is replacing Quinn Fuller, who got fired following her scheme to have Ridge Forrester travel to Abu Dhabi to stop the wedding of Bill Spencer and Brooke Logan. Other story lines, not directly affecting Ivy, are: Oliver Jones may be using Ivy's cousin Aly Forrester as a means of him staying with Forrester Creations, and [one of the] show's many love triangles of Hope, Liam and Wyatt; and it is rumoured that Ivy may end up as Wyatt's new love interest. livelikemusicmy talk page!22:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for signing up to the first Portsmouth meetup last Sunday, even though it was a shame you didn't make it in the end.
I'm now turning my attention to organising the second meetup. An end of August date seemed to get support from those there, and so I've provisionally scheduled it for Sunday the 31st, avoiding the bank holiday weekend the week before. It was suggested that people might like a visit to a museum in the morning before the pub in the afternoon. I suggest that the Portsmouth 2 talk page on Meta is the best place to organise it, so when you have time please feel free to head on over there and share your thoughts. Please also invite anyone in the area you know or think would like to get involved with organising or attending the museum visit and/or pub. Chris McKenna (WMUK) (talk) 12:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
So sorry, I completely missed this. I'm also sorry for missing the meetup, what I had to cancel for was not worth it believe me. The end of the month sounds good to me, as does the visit to a museum. - JuneGloomTalk01:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Have you checked out her reference links for unrelated and spammed links or links that don't match with the claim information? I clicked on the four links in her reference section and got ads. Please take a look. Thanks.
On 14 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eddi McKee, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that actress Sarah-Jane Potts filmed her own audition for the role of Eddi McKee in Holby City, after she was approached by the show's casting director? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eddi McKee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Will do. I wonder if there is an interesting story behind Jason Crewes's brief tenure? It seems odd that Nick was a regular character for only a month. - JuneGloomTalk18:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't really understand why you reverted my edit to remove Katya Kinski. She may not have been mentioned in the source, but she is still the full sister of Zeke and Rachel, and therefore a full cousin of Nate. I would assume she was omitted from the article as Zeke and Rachel were on the show for longer and are therefore better known.
KP-TheSpectre (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
You and I both know he's related to Katya, but someone not familiar with the show might question why she's mentioned in his section, but not in any of the sources out there. It could be seen as original research. As new sources become available, she might be mentioned. - JuneGloomTalk00:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
@KP-TheSpectre: After speaking with another editor, I've gone and added Katya back. But, if someone asks for a source, I think you should be the one to provide it as you originally added her. - JuneGloomTalk15:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I have noticed that Gill has been editing the Kate Ramsay article today and she said that Kate is returning to the show. I have removed her comments. I hope Gill doesn't do it again. Anyway I thought I will let you know what Gill did today.
Hi. I've had to edit your comment to remove User:Gillyh's real name, as it could be seen as a violation of WP:OUTING (don't worry, you're new and we all make mistakes). Thank you for undoing her edits, usually I catch them straight away, but today has been busy. Her IP has now been blocked by an admin for six months. - JuneGloomTalk18:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Ugly Heart
On 8 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ugly Heart, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the music video accompanying "Ugly Heart" was seen by 2.5million viewers in less than a week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ugly Heart. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Episode 523 (Neighbours) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W06:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Why isn't Rebel Wilson's birth date allowed on her page?
Her birth date can only be added to the article if it's back up by a reliable source. Unfortunately, at the moment, it seems that one cannot be found and there are also conflicting dates. There is a discussion on the talk page that you may want to take a look at. - JuneGloomTalk02:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Month names
Hiya, Thanks for reverting [4] - I was supposed to have done the exact opposite & added full month names, Obviously I hadn't checked properly so thank you :),
Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk)16:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Oh right! I thought it was really odd and wondered if it was a new thing that was being rolled out, but I couldn't find anything. If there are months that need to be filled out, please do come back and sort them. Sometimes I don't notice them. - JuneGloomTalk02:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
You received a Wikipedia email about Wikipedia Library access to WP:FindMyPast about 3 weeks ago. We currently don't have record of your response on the Google form. Please make sure to follow the instructions in that email for obtaining access,Sadads (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Storylines
Hello there. I have become concerned about some recent edits and the amount of IP attention to updating storylines. But for a long time I have actually considered such sections as not only a hindrance but kinda redundant. When I write a new article there is such a temptation to repeat notable plot. Articles are not meant to sound repetitive are they. So I leave info out. But then I thought to myself, articles are only meant to contain notable information.. so why do I even bother writing storyline sections out. I am the first to preach about articles containing only important information yet I just kept on including a section I barely agreed with because it was deemed acceptable by the community. I cannot do it anymore, call me silly, stupid or down right dreaming - but do you think I should take such a discussion to one of the boards? I need an honest opinion, so if you think I am being insane then please tell me off.Rainthe 100:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey. I've been wondering the same thing actually. I feel like I spend half my time condensing storylines, as some of the sections are getting quite big and fancrufty. I recently went through Liam Spencer's article and removed 8900+ characters of prose from the storylines section (and it still needs work). I think some editors prioritise storylines over out-of-universe development info. If anything, that's the least important section of an article and certainly doesn't show notability. There's also the problem with repetition as you mentioned. I think some articles, especially the older and more complex characters, would definitely benefit from getting rid of the storylines and concentrating on the development side of things. There's more scope to explain and analyse storylines in the development sections. Some of the recent Holby City articles that we created cover all the notable aspects of the characters and there's barely a storylines section in sight. You're definitely not silly or insane, I think you raise an important point that needs further discussion. - JuneGloomTalk01:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I have given it more though since your reply and I am actually going to start a discussion at the Wikiproject to see what everyone else thinks. I agree about the Holby City articles, a great example of not even needing to bother with a storyline section. The W&L articles did not seem incomplete with the absence of the section either. We just might be onto something good here. Perhaps there is still time to be called insane though. As you say, most casual editors who land on here and dedicate their time to over cluttering the storyline section. Ouch.Rainthe 111:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi: First, thanks for reviewing my submission. It appears that you are passing the submission. My question is, why did you use the {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} prefix to your comment, rather than {{subst:DYKtick}}? The former is typically for entries that are perceived as good to go, but based upon assumption of good faith. An example of the use of this would be for an entry in which the links to reliable sources are not hyperlinked in an article. I ask because use of the AGF tick can delay a nomination, but the AGF isn't qualified in your review. Please respond at your convenience. NorthAmerica100003:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
@Northamerica1000: Hi. I've always used {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} when the hook is sourced by an offline reference per WP:DYKR. Since I don't have the book, I AGF. I don't think there will be a delay in getting it on the main page, but I'll go back and mention the source is offline in my review, so it's clear. - JuneGloomTalk15:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Here's the source that's used in the article (which also verifies the hook), from Google Books, but it's an online source that I can plainly read, and it's also hyperlinked in the article: [5]. I'm not worried about it, but perhaps it's not viewable for you. NorthAmerica100016:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey! I'm still watching and I'm definitely enjoying it. I like how there's a cliffhanger at the end of almost every episode, always makes me want to tune in again. Not all the soaps do that, so it's great. I'm really liking Ivy (way more than Ashleigh's Neighbours character) and her potential romance with Liam. I added some casting and reception info, and condensed the storylines, but it needs more development stuff. What are your thoughts about the show right now? - JuneGloomTalk01:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, if there's one thing B&B is good about, it's their cliffhangers at the end of each episode. I can't compare to Ivy to Ashleigh's character on Neighbours, but I've been enjoying her vibe so far; she's giving me the new Steffy Forrester vibe, but much more in a humbling way; I do enjoy her pairing with Liam, too! You did a fantastic job at re-doing his character page. It's already ten times better than it was before! I'm loving the show; I usually go off of it for 3-6 months at the time, but within the past two years, it's really been a riveting soap! livelikemusicmy talk page!02:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
No she's not but I am. You don't have to be an administrator to warn users. I have looked at your edits and I agree with June. You are making unsubstantiated claims about a living person amongst others. Please stop or you will end up being blocked 5 albert square (talk) 06:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Sorry I hadn't seen that and assumed Sharon and Jackie were Sheila's daughters, I apologise but it also says Sheila's husband was called Reg and not Frank? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozzykins97 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Sheila did say her husband was called Reg during one of her early episodes, but when she began appearing more often and her background was mentioned, her husband's name was changed to Frank. The website writer just made a mistake (it's not the first time). - JuneGloomTalk01:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Could it be possible she had 2 husbands? ( at different times obviously )
I think it would have been mentioned on-screen by now. It's just a simple name change, it happens all the time. Nate was originally going to be called Hunter. - JuneGloomTalk15:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Nell
Hey June,
Can i have your advice for Nell's status as a character on Neighbours. She has now been added to the opening credits and in the past that generally means a character is a main on the show. However, other users (AusSoap) seem to think otherwise. I would appreciate your opinion on this one. Cheers. B.Davis2003 (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
When a character is added to the opening credits, it does not automatically mean they are a regular. Neighbours have jumped the gun before on that front, which is why we usually go by the closing credits which get updated quicker and more accurately. On the other hand, young children have almost always been considered regular characters. See Jamie Clarke, Charlie Hoyland, Hannah Martin, etc. Nell's kinda tricky. Personally, I don't really mind where she goes. - JuneGloomTalk03:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
In fact I resent the accusations, since I only undid four edits yesterday because you added the wrong parameter to some infoboxes. I haven't touched any of your other edits for weeks. - JuneGloomTalk15:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
It is unfair to accuse editors following Wikipedia's rules of bullying. Please try and stick to editing rather than thinking it is personal with other editors - who in this case are simply tidying articles and keeping them stable.Rainthe 123:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to say, I totally agree with everything you said in your comments regarding the edits on the Tom Nash article.
Personally speaking, I think the BTTB website is the most authoritative 'Home And Away' website on the internet. However, that's neither here nor there because you're right, it's just a fansite.
The only reason I decided to reference the changes I made to that article is because on November 17, I made 8 changes to 8 different 'Home And Away'-related articles and some user decided to revert all 8 articles back to their previous versions.
If it was down to me, I wouldn't have made any references......after all, nobody referenced the material when the original information was added (the incorrect information that I corrected).
So at the risk of it being reverted again, I decided to reference it.
That some user was me. I have undone your edits once again. IMDB can be edited by anyone it is not a reliable source. BTTB is a fansite. We all worked really hard on Home and Away articles a couple of years ago and the aim was to clean them up. I am not doing it to be mean. If you find a reliable source I would be thankful that you corrected a mistake. But you have to understand that you could be anyone trying to mislead readers. You could tweak IMDB and use it as a source. I am not saying you are, but it has happened in the past - which is why it is best to avoid using it. But like I said, I would actually be happy to be proved wrong aslong the article is accurate.Rainthe 101:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charlene Robinson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 17:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Hiya, as you are quite good at creating pages and adding pictures to them (and I'm not!) I was wondering whether you would update some/ most of the characters Wikipedia pages from Ali Spencer onwards as they still don't have their own page. I still can't figure out how to create one and I don't understand the help page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.112.212 (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the compliment. I'm not an avid watcher of Emmerdale at the moment, and I don't know if any of the characters particularly appeal to me enough to create an article for them. I'll have a look and a think about it though. In the meantime, the Wikipedia:Article wizard might be of some use to you. - JuneGloomTalk23:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted my extensive edit to the List of Miranda episodes page yesterday. I changed the series overview table at the top of the page as per WP:TVOVERVIEW. You will see this new format on most pages regarding the episodes in a television series. I also changed the colour scheme as the current one appears "dull" and unattractive. My edit was not in the wrong and I'd appreciate it if you could change it back as I seem unable to do so. Thanks.
You removed sourced content without an explanation. Since there was no edit summary, the edit could easily have been seen as vandalism. In fact you added some unsourced content with the average viewing figures. Could you please provide reliable sources for those, please? The previous colours were also chosen as they were neutral and better for readers with eyesight problems (see WP:ACCESS). - JuneGloom07Talk23:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
livelikemusicmy talk page! is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:JuneGloom07. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
.JPG)
_2014.jpg){kind=link}