User talk:Jumpy542

January 2022

Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hudepohl Brewing Company, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 17:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Goodwill Industries have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Benjamin112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2021–22 NFL playoffs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Benjamin112 ☎ 16:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Take Me Home, Country Roads. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monday's Broncos-Seahawks game needs its own Wikipedia page. Jumpy542 (talk) 02:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Template:Buffalo Bills. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The butt fumble has its own article, why doesn't the butt punt? Jumpy542 (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Let's Go Blue—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dartez Jacobs (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Only one source added since previous decline, it is from a foundation website, not a reliable source like a newspaper.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jumpy542! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panorama Middle School (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Pudding

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Royal Pudding, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited or poorly cited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation. A Twitter account belonging to an unknown individual that does not mention the information in question is not a reliable source.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of NFL nicknames, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wide Right II (Buffalo Bills) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still does not appear to pass WP:NSPORTSEVENT. The information in this draft would be best merged to a section of Bills–Chiefs rivalry.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hey man im josh (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs

Biographies cannot be promoted side by side. You also haven't been adding the nomination credits. SL93 (talk) 22:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware. Jumpy542 (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aware of what? You have done the above just recently. SL93 (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok Jumpy542 (talk) 23:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest getting a mentor for building preps at the DYK talk page if you are actually serious about it. Otherwise, please stop. SL93 (talk) 23:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
where do i go? Jumpy542 (talk) 23:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you found it. Sorry if I sounded rude. I was just frustrated about fixing the problems. I hope that you can figure out the right way to build preps because we could use the help. SL93 (talk) 23:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! About your question at WT:DYK, I think you could use a bit more experience before starting to build preps. It takes a good understanding of both DYK and Wikipedia policies, so I would advise making a couple of thousands of edits at least before starting to build them. It would be especially helpful if you submitted some DYK nominations or reviews in that time, to help you understand the process better. Once you've gained that experience, though, we'd love to have you! Best wishes, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jumpy542, did you even read this? And why are you promoting hooks as your first DYK contributions? Stop. SL93 (talk) 00:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jumpy542, you have been asked to stop promoting DYK hooks to prep. You are ignoring your fellow editors who you have asked to mentor you. Your actions are thus disruptive. I need to point out that continued disruption will be met with a block. Did I make this clear enough?
You are getting very closed to receiving a block. Schwede66 23:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Schwede66 Maybe Jumpy542 should receive a block - please see the bottom of this revision. SL93 (talk) 02:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sorry. Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 02:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like you're just here to mess around with DYK and AFC. SL93 (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
no i am not Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 02:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why would you post DYK credits, Jumpy542? Schwede66 02:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i'm learning, i'm new to this. Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 02:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you editing someone else's user page? SL93 (talk) 02:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
those didn't have links. Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 02:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not your user page. Stop. SL93 (talk) 02:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 03:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,395 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Pittsburgh Steelers (talk) Add sources
219 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C 2002 NFL season (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start EMD FP10 (talk) Add sources
1,151 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Seattle Seahawks (talk) Add sources
66 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Barcalounger (talk) Add sources
4,508 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA 4 (talk) Add sources
463 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Texas A&M Aggies football (talk) Cleanup
108 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mill Hill School (talk) Cleanup
77 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Music of Ohio (talk) Cleanup
755 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (talk) Expand
222 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Henry IV, Part 2 (talk) Expand
45 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C History of the Baltimore Ravens (talk) Expand
870 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Sports in the United States (talk) Unencyclopaedic
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C WXDU (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,737 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA San Francisco 49ers (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Monarchy in Saskatchewan (talk) Merge
141 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Halfback (American football) (talk) Merge
94 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Yellow-eyed penguin (talk) Merge
494 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Ross Chastain (talk) Wikify
38 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B History of the Denver Broncos (talk) Wikify
287 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Winnipeg Jets (1972–1996) (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start The Grass Company (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bahman Amiri Moghaddam (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub American Lindy Hop Championships (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Lakewood Gulch (talk) Stub
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Scott Morrow (ice hockey, born 2002) (talk) Stub
67 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Computer Love (Kraftwerk song) (talk) Stub
128 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mark Kastelic (talk) Stub
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Steele Chambers (talk) Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 2024 Montana Senate election (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Ruby has been accepted

Jeffrey Ruby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amelogen (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cambalachero was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No changes since last decline
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cambalachero (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox4 (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lubok instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 22:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceadach O'Neill has been accepted

Ceadach O'Neill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bradley Ibrahim has been accepted

Bradley Ibrahim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martha Conway has been accepted

Martha Conway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 75th Street (DuPage County) (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antomius Wise (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohio State Award (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie Miley (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rio Kyerematen (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free enterprise (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Free enterprise instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Galanopoulos (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This will need WP:TNT and a complete re-write in neutral tone.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lion's Den Fight Club (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 16:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting previously declined drafts that you have never worked on

I would like to know why you are submitting drafts that you have never worked on, and which are virtually unchanged since their previous decline. I find this behavior suspicious, as it is behavior sometimes engaged in by spammers looking to bolster their apparently legitimate activity. I ask that you not do this. BD2412 T 17:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no response to this request for an explanation, I will be submitting this issue to the Administrator's noticeboard shortly. BD2412 T 13:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thijs Boogaard (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adamtt9 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Non-notable tennis player who doesn't yet meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Very likely a case of WP:TOOSOON as Boogaard hasn't yet had any notable results on the professional tour.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Adamtt9 (talk) 12:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest Bot

Jumpy542 (talk) 21:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
418 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Original Six (talk) Add sources
831 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Candidates in the 2024 United Kingdom general election (talk) Add sources
98 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Colfax Avenue (talk) Add sources
157 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B History of swimming (talk) Add sources
1,133 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Jacksonville Jaguars (talk) Add sources
109 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Texas A&M University Corps of Cadets (talk) Add sources
487 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mattéo Guendouzi (talk) Cleanup
947 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Metonymy (talk) Cleanup
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Oregon State University Marching Band (talk) Cleanup
2,247 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Kansas City Chiefs (talk) Expand
157 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Evergreen, Colorado (talk) Expand
3,984 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Costco (talk) Expand
966 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Graffiti (talk) Unencyclopaedic
123 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ready to Go (Republica song) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C WCBN-FM (talk) Unencyclopaedic
155,295 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (talk) Merge
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C B69 (New York City bus) (talk) Merge
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Power system reliability (talk) Merge
214 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Sport in Australia (talk) Wikify
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rick Telander (talk) Wikify
285 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: FA History of Burger King (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Brihaspati Kund (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start AtlantaIX (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bhandakhapar (talk) Orphan
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start San Antonio Dragons (talk) Stub
195 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Ken Lawson (talk) Stub
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Purdue University in Indianapolis (talk) Stub
73 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Isaac Price (talk) Stub
138 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Angus and Perthshire Glens (UK Parliament constituency) (talk) Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 2001 Denver Broncos season (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Draft articles on Ice hockey

A tag has been placed on Category:Draft articles on Ice hockey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Keating IV draft.

Hey Jumpy, I just noticed that you submitted my draft. I was wondering why? I know it looks kind of complete, but I actually still had a little bit of work to do on it. 50.37.85.65 (talk) 09:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked this editor why they are submitting drafts they have previously done no work on, and they have not responded. It is getting close to time to take measures to prevent this from recurring. BD2412 T 13:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 14:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Is it possible for the draft to be unsubmitted again? I had the draft unsubmitted once before and I hope it can be done again. My draft was declined before and I would not like it to be declined again and potentially deleted and lose months of work. Thank you. 50.37.85.65 (talk) 15:35, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IDK Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 16:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was asking BD2412. Ill ask on his talk page. Also stop submitting drafts that you don't have permission to submit. My draft could potentially be deleted at this moment. 50.37.85.65 (talk) 00:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BD2412 Jumpy542 is still at it with Draft:Alice LaPlante. In the DYK section of this talk page, I noted that Jumpy542 is also causing issues by promoting DYK hooks when they shouldn't be, giving a false DYK notification on my talk page, and editing someone's user page. SL93 (talk) 02:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding drafts to AfC category

Hi, can I ask why you're adding unsubmitted drafts to the 'AfC pending submissions by age/0 days ago' category manually? I've just undone two such edits, at Draft:Independent Monitor and Draft:Joseph Hallman. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Hallman (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NyanThousand was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Joseph Hallman instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Additionally, editor appears to have a COI with Joseph Hallman (similar name and all). If needed, please follow COI guidelines
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NyanThousand (talk) 16:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jumpy542

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BD2412 T 03:16, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing future is at stake in that discussion. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 16:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're going to have to do better than "ok"--in general. Drmies (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see this for a fuller explanation of your block. If you wish to return to the fold, you will have to address these points I made, and the points made by BD2415 and SL93. Drmies (talk) 23:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Max Hechtman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Max Hechtman. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice LaPlante has been accepted

Alice LaPlante, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Hechtman (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Declined as per discussion with author, in order to give author time to make further improvements before resubmission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jumpy542 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Had Enough time to contemplate Jumpy542 #goflamesgo 22:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great, please tell us what it is that you have contemplated. 331dot (talk) 22:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfie Harrison (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
doesn't meet WP:NATH.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poppa's House (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wait until it's released. I can't see any sign of WP:SIGCOV.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Independent Monitor (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladislav Gradinari (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't meet WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryan Carrington (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from https://thesundevils.com/staff-directory/bryan-carrington/4001, https://thesundevils.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/bryan-carrington/5165, https://thesundevils.com/news/2022/12/9/sun-devil-football-tasks-bryan-carrington-to-lead-corners.aspx. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Demt1298 (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]