This is an archive of past discussions with User:Juhachi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Ayu_Tsukimiya, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here13:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
I am currently trying to make the article D.Gray-man into a FA. Of course due to my poor English I requested a copy-edit from the guild. However, I wonder if you could point out somethings about the article. The article currently has a peer review here. Anyway, regards and good luck.Tintor2 (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Itaru Hinoue caricature.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music of Rewrite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 8-Bit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Jun Maeda caricature.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello. I make a new page for the movie,but now the page is nominee for the deleation. I try to improve anything that i can,but i think there is still something that still not to be add on the page. Can you please check to the page whether my edit is enough or still must be improve? Thanks,and sorry for my bad english Msonnyandrean (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Juhachi, Just to let us know that there are error article paragraphs for Higurashi When They Cry franchise for the game and anime television series. Please, can you help me rectify the words without mistakes? Rectify 54 (talk) 18:59 , 30 March 2017 (UTC)
On 10 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maon Kurosaki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that prior to her major debut, singer Maon Kurosaki posed as a gravure model for the cover of a novel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maon Kurosaki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maon Kurosaki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harmonia (visual novel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 11:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Are you planning on taking this to GTC soon? I am the only one that can close the nomination anyway. GamerPro6423:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Anly
On 15 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anly, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Japanese singer-songwriter Anly began playing songs by ear on her guitar when she was in third grade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anly. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Anly), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Air anime-movie comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
On 28 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harmonia (visual novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Japanese visual novelHarmonia was first released in English to see how the game would be received worldwide before its release in Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harmonia (visual novel). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Harmonia (visual novel)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi Juhachi, I noticed this promotion today. There is an unresolved issue regarding the availability of the sources for those articles, and it would be better not to promote any until it's resolved. I don't know what your rules are about undoing promotions or whether you consider it too late. I'll leave that up to you. The discussion is here (also see that talk page), although it has petered out because the nominator has stopped responding. Best wishes, SarahSV(talk)03:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
@SlimVirgin: The way I see it, even if the FAC for CMLL World Lightweight Championship failed, that article will still be a GA, and thus would not effect the criteria of the FTC. The fact is that there were three supports and no opposes in the FTC, and seeing as how it started back in February and the only long discussion it had ended back in March, there didn't appear to be anything in the FTC itself to prevent its promotion. Obviously, if CMLL World Lightweight Championship lost its FAC and then was taken to GAR and lost it's GA certification, then there would be a retention period of three months to give editors a chance to bring it back to at least a GA before the topic was taken to WP:FTRC.--十八05:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. It's unfortunate timing, because I was literally minutes away from emailing either you or the other coordinator to ask you to wait, when I saw the promotion appear on my watchlist. The sourcing issues affect more than just one article. Anyway, I'll leave it there for now. SarahSV(talk)05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaori Yamagata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
July
FTC
Hey there. Just wondering, if you get a chance, can you close at least one of the older nominations on the board? GamerPro6404:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Re "Wrong Japanese episode titles"
I just happened to be catching up on some WP:A&M discussion and found this topic of yours in the archives, which seems very similar to a situation I encountered myself - however you got a username whereas all I got was a bunch of dynamic IPs. I don't know if it is still ongoing; I don't edit here that often these days and only encountered the problem as I happened to find those made-up episode titles being copied from here onto ANN, but if it is I thought you might find these additional examples useful. Shiroi Hane (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi! So I found a featured article (Planets beyond Neptune) under the scope of Wikipedia:Featured topics/Solar System that isn't included in the featured topic. Also, Planet Nine is a good article that would also fall within the scope of the featured topic. How would I go about getting one or both of these articles added to the featured topic? Thanks, Ks0stm(T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 05:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't really understand why they weren't added back then; do you think they would stand a reasonable chance of being added this time? That is, do you think that they still suffer from whatever caused them to not be added back then? Ks0stm(T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 21:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
@Ks0stm: There's probably just as much chance they'll pass as fail. The topic is meant to be an overview of the solar system, so even though there are other relevant articles that could be in the topic, the scope is limited to just be a general overview of the solar system. Because trans-Neptunian objects are already largely in the topic with the inclusion of Kuiper belt, Scattered disc, Oort cloud and Dwarf planet, there might not be much of a rationale to include Planets beyond Neptune (or Planet Nine since it hasn't officially been discovered yet).--十八22:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
And on your part, I respectfully ask you to please refrain from pronouncing baseless accusations against me before checking the circumstances a bit more closely. Recently I've had my share of that elsewhere already, and I've had enough of that.DanielC46 (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Just wanted to explain why I changed that "snail" back to "maimai". It seems Yoimonogatari will have an episode actually called "Mayoi Snail" (hahaha, thanks Nisio). I thought it might be better to point that out, at least in the Japanese volume list (the English release picked "snail", so that's that). Not a hill I'd die on though, it certainly is a minute detail.
Also, are you still against the idea of using headers (or colors, or anything else) to separate the various "seasons"? The series is getting pretty long, and I think it would be a nice addition and easier to understand than the now rather lengthy and slightly cumbersome explanation over in the general Monogatari series article... 213.86.124.2 (talk) 09:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I think using snail there makes the most sense since "maimai" doesn't mean anything in English, and the original title as given shows the reader that the first instance of "snail" is derived from マイマイ and the second is derived from スネイル. As for the headers or some kind of split between the "seasons", show me an RS that splits them in that fashion, which could then be used the reference those splits on the main article and justify those splits on the novel list.--十八10:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I guess the ad in the final pages of one of the latest novels would do that, but I imagine that's copyrighted material? What would Wikipedia's stance be in this case? 213.86.124.2 (talk) 14:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
That would be considered a primary source. A reliable, third-party source would be much more preferable since it could be independently verified.--十八18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Hello, I think that a full translation in English is useful because the people who watch Madoka Magica can understand the meaning of the title. Answer please. If I don’t have an answer, I can’t know why you removed my modification. And if I don’t know why you removed my modification, I will undo your modification.
P.S. : I am not English, so I am sorry for the spelling mistakes, for the mistakes in the placement of words and/or any other mistake. And I don’t wan’t to look alike wicked. Cordially.
@11 Tom: Because on top of it being original research (and the fact that that quora cite isn't a reliable source), any parsing of the series' title has no bearing on the series itself, or indeed, any bearing on the article itself. Not to mention that the lead is meant to be a summary of the whole article, so you can't put anything in the lead that isn't already in the rest of the article. Lastly, this is a good article, so any additions to the article need to be weighed against the good article criteria for inclusion.--十八20:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Quora isn’t reliable ? But why ? Because it is a forum ? I will not change the article « Puella Magi Madoka Magica ». 11 Tom (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
@11 Tom: No, they aren't, because of the placement of the words. "Burning eyes of Shana" would be equivalent to "Shana no Shakugan", because you could switch "Burning eyes of Shana" around to be "Shana's burning eyes" in that example. This is not how the series' title is rendered, Shakugan no Shana, where "Shakugan" is an adjective that describes who Shana is based on her appearance, namely, that her eyes burn red. To put it another way, say it was "One-Eyed Shana" because she wore an eyepatch. You wouldn't switch it around to say "one eye of Shana" or "Shana's one eye" since that wouldn't make any sense.--十八20:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I must say that English is not my native language. But for the meaning, they aren't synonyms? Here, « -eyed » isn’t a verb, isn’t it ? I think that it is a noun. I hope that I don't be mistaken. Can you explain me the meaning of « burning-eyed », please? I will thank you much.
Hey there, could you take a look at the article right now? I've expanded it and nominated it for a GAN, but I think it might still need some improvement when it comes to wordings and the like. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew15:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
I restored the dead links by fixing them and re-added the character plot information. Rather than going WP:BABY here lets work together to trim down the excess plot details. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Episode Summaries
Hi. Episode summaries are all essentially original research, based on the events within the episode, so I don't think the criticism in List of Kino's Journey episodes is fair. Summaries can also contain other information such as: guest appearances, and references to other characters/stories/movies/plays where appropriate. eg Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1) and many Simpsons episodes. The "Colosseum" episode contains substantial plot and dialogue form the earlier 2-part episode which I think is appropriate to include. Do you have an alternative solution? Ozflashman (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
@Ozflashman: I would really question the validity of adding in such content, especially references to other media, which is little more than trivia and would need a reference anyway. And other stuff existing isn't exactly an appropriate argument. The reason why episode summary plots don't need references is because the episode itself is the reference, but that's only in regard to the story itself. In this case, the new Kino anime is being produced by a completely different staff from the first series, and since both are adapting material from the source novels, of course there's going to be overlap. That doesn't mean that it was "remade" persay, but that the same story from the novels was readapted by another studio. I don't believe it's appropriate to put material like that in an episode summary, as it is really skirting original research since you yourself are comparing events from one series with another, despite the fact the only thing the two series have in common is that they're based on the same source material and are otherwise completely different. By that same token, this is the same reason why you don't (or shouldn't) see stuff like "This episode adapted chapter X from the manga." in episode summaries from anime based on manga, since there's nothing to independently verify that other than the original research of someone making that claim. Even {{Episode list}} and {{Japanese episode list}} say "A short 100–200 word plot summary of the episode" should be used for that field; it says nothing about extraneous, out-of-universe information.--十八08:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I take your point, especially that they use the same source material and will leave it as is. If you have an opportunity, check out the earlier episodes, you'll find that as well as plot and dialogue, the graphic and character designs are the same. Ozflashman (talk)
@Ozflashman: Similar, but not the same. As I said, the staff from both series are different; character design was done by 2 people before (Shigeyuki Suga for the 2003 series and first film, and Yoshiaki Itou for the second film) whereas it's done by Ryoko Amisaki for the 2017 series, although they're all based on Kouhaku Kuroboshi's designs.--十八19:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tokimeki Only Love logo.png
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Tokimeki Only Love logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
I only added the Yahoo Japan site to the article. Do you of other Japanese review sites that might be considered reliable? Due to my lack of knowledge with Japanese I don't understand when they are reviews. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talk • contribs) 05:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)17:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Juhachi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Juhachi. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Alex Shih (talk) 03:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello Juhachi, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Randou2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Rina3.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Yuna2.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)02:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
